- Jan 19, 2010
- 67,956
- 62,354
- 3,605
You have to have someone bring it up to a judge... and the GOP are afraid.....If the act is illegal then the order that requires it is also illegal or, in this case, unconstitutional.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You have to have someone bring it up to a judge... and the GOP are afraid.....If the act is illegal then the order that requires it is also illegal or, in this case, unconstitutional.
First of all I haven't seen any threats I've only heard the DOJ whine about them... well we all know they lie....Irrelevant. They still don’t get to send terroristic threats to teachers and school boards.
This is becoming one of the right.
It’s super nuts but the conservative court is not afraid to whip out major rules doctrine to go against Democratic agenda and ignore it when it would be used against the Republican agenda.That's nuts bucko....
You can always claim to have not seen any threats if you keep your head up your ass.First of all I haven't seen any threats I've only heard the DOJ whine about them... well we all know they lie....
Elections have consequences.... the courts are one of them....It’s super nuts but the conservative court is not afraid to whip out major rules doctrine to go against Democratic agenda and ignore it when it would be used against the Republican agenda.
So there is one?..... come on man... Trump got hundreds a week....You can always claim to have not seen any threats if you keep your head up your ass.
But that doesn’t really change reality.
School boards get death threats over race, gender, mask policies
Local school officials across the United States are being inundated with threats of violence and other hostile messages from anonymous harassers nationwide, fueled by rage over culture-war issues.www.reuters.com
actually they will hold up if the Court is all liberals or mostly liberals..I disagree very strongly... this SCOTUS makes every call with the constitution... they do not make up law like liberals do... that's now we got Roe V Wade... with liberal judicial activism... and that's why it was undone... laws must be made with the constitution behind them or they won't hold up....
True but theoretically down the road a sensible court will undo it... just like Roe v Wade....actually they will hold up if the Court is all liberals or mostly liberals..
TRUMP is Greatest President for that reason alone... his Justice nominees!
but look how many people had to die b4 Roe was overturned!True but theoretically down the road a sensible court will undo it... just like Roe v Wade....
I know.....but look how many people had to die b4 Roe was overturned!
My God.. some 63 million or more..
all those people with all their God given talents.. their unique personalities and gifts... never to be known by anyone.. It is really sad.. an epic tragedy
I’m aware. Just don’t pretend like conservatives are the ones fighting to defend the constitution. The conservative courts are doing a great job tearing it to shreds.Elections have consequences.... the courts are one of them....
Read the article. Otherwise you’ll look like a moron.So there is one?..... come on man... Trump got hundreds a week....
Well they aren't fighting to eliminate the constitution like many dems and libs are....I’m aware. Just don’t pretend like conservatives are the ones fighting to defend the constitution. The conservative courts are doing a great job tearing it to shreds.
I actually do not believe anything from Reuters or the DOJ or any sad school board on the losing end....Read the article. Otherwise you’ll look like a moron.
“Reuters found 220 examples of such intimidation in a sampling of districts.”
Dumb hyperbole aside, they are content with destroying our civil rights and letting the authoritarian police state take hold.Well they aren't fighting to eliminate the constitution like many dems and libs are....
You mean like Row vs Wade? Or Rickard vs. Filburn?Major rules doctrine doesn’t show up in the constitution.
The court invented rules that don’t exist to be able to use at will to enforce their partisan political agenda.
Pathetic.I actually do not believe anything from Reuters or the DOJ or any sad school board on the losing end....
IF you are a person who will never admit to defeat, and Trump is. And you want to run for office, What a cleaver why to do it. Throw as much dirt as possible (and they all do it) on your opponent. Then say the only way you could lose is if you were cheated. Then lie your ass off about everything, incite those who wanted you to win by non stop flame throwing. Then after trying Everything thing you could ever have though of, in and out of court, ninjas turtles & all that crazy stuff. Refuse to leave the White House in the usual civilized manor we have become accustomed too. Keep the crazy going even after almost two years of a new president. Then if your not sure you can get reelected ask your supporters to somehow reinstate you with out having to be elected!!!! Just Wow.I wonder if anyone remembers that the FBI was investigating Hillary just a couple of weeks before the election, and the doubt thrown on her about her e-mails is what could have very well cost her the election? And even now, almost a decade later, nothing has come from that investigation no matter how much conservatives and Trump supporters wish it would have. That actually happened to Clinton, but all we have from Trump and his supporters is speculation and hearsay.
Not only that, but I wonder if anyone else remembers Trump telling everyone who would listed BEFORE the 2016 election, that if Hillary won, it would be because the election was "rigged"?
News article from the wayback machine........................
Trump says he may not accept result if Clinton wins, in reversal from debate
GOP nominee also spoke at length with the New York Times about the marital infidelities of former president Bill Clinton, insisting ‘Hillary was an enabler’www.theguardian.com