David Brooks: Mitt Romney Is 'The Least Popular Candidate In History'

Lakhota

Diamond Member
Jul 14, 2011
159,117
74,937
2,330
Native America
By Chris Gentilviso

After a rocky week that saw plenty of conservatives break away from Mitt Romney, New York Times columnist David Brooks summed up the state of affairs on Sunday.

Brooks was one of several panelists on NBC's "Meet The Press" roundtable, which dove into some data surrounding Romney's popularity.

"Look at his high unfavorable ratings," host David Gregory said. "At 50%. The highest of any candidate running in recent memory. This is an image problem that his philosophical statements in this speech in May to fundraisers only exacerbates."

Brooks did not mince words, calling Romney "the least popular candidate in history."

"He has to look at what the president's weakness is," Brooks said. "He's never gonna win a popularity contest."

Brooks added that Romney "does not have the passion for the stuff he’s talking about."

"He’s a problem solver," Brooks said. "I think he’s a non-ideological person running in an extremely ideological age, and he’s faking it."

More: David Brooks: Mitt Romney Is 'The Least Popular Candidate In History' (VIDEO)
 
This is vital. I'm sure the media will discuss this endlessly.

Fucking nazi racist, Lahkota.

Wow, the Stepford wingnut queen really sounds bitter.


Nice, another NYtimes hit piece...SHOCKER


Lakhota, do you even know how politics works in this country? It must be tough comming from the reservation? or are you an Indian the way Elizabeth Warren and 90% of Americans are?
 
You know, there's quite a few Republicans who are expressing buyer's remorse over selecting Mittens as their candidate. You won't hear much of it on FAUX Nooze, but you will hear a LOT of it on right wing radio.

When your own party says bad things about you and you're their candidate, you definitely have problems.
 
This is vital. I'm sure the media will discuss this endlessly.

Fucking nazi racist, Lahkota.

Wow, the Stepford wingnut queen really sounds bitter.


Nice, another NYtimes hit piece...SHOCKER


Lakhota, do you even know how politics works in this country? It must be tough comming from the reservation? or are you an Indian the way Elizabeth Warren and 90% of Americans are?

You nailed it.
 
You know, there's quite a few Republicans who are expressing buyer's remorse over selecting Mittens as their candidate. You won't hear much of it on FAUX Nooze, but you will hear a LOT of it on right wing radio.

When your own party says bad things about you and you're their candidate, you definitely have problems.

Of course you will never mention all the folks with buyers remorse about Maobama. There are a butt load of them, and they all say bad shit about your dear leader.
 
You know, there's quite a few Republicans who are expressing buyer's remorse over selecting Mittens as their candidate. You won't hear much of it on FAUX Nooze, but you will hear a LOT of it on right wing radio.

When your own party says bad things about you and you're their candidate, you definitely have problems.

Maybe they should have stuck with Cain, he said he would be leading right now :lmao:
 
By Chris Gentilviso

After a rocky week that saw plenty of conservatives break away from Mitt Romney, New York Times columnist David Brooks summed up the state of affairs on Sunday.

Brooks was one of several panelists on NBC's "Meet The Press" roundtable, which dove into some data surrounding Romney's popularity.

"Look at his high unfavorable ratings," host David Gregory said. "At 50%. The highest of any candidate running in recent memory. This is an image problem that his philosophical statements in this speech in May to fundraisers only exacerbates."

Brooks did not mince words, calling Romney "the least popular candidate in history."

"He has to look at what the president's weakness is," Brooks said. "He's never gonna win a popularity contest."

Brooks added that Romney "does not have the passion for the stuff he’s talking about."

"He’s a problem solver," Brooks said. "I think he’s a non-ideological person running in an extremely ideological age, and he’s faking it."

More: David Brooks: Mitt Romney Is 'The Least Popular Candidate In History' (VIDEO)


Huff :poop: again? :lol:
 
By Chris Gentilviso

After a rocky week that saw plenty of conservatives break away from Mitt Romney, New York Times columnist David Brooks summed up the state of affairs on Sunday.

Brooks was one of several panelists on NBC's "Meet The Press" roundtable, which dove into some data surrounding Romney's popularity.

"Look at his high unfavorable ratings," host David Gregory said. "At 50%. The highest of any candidate running in recent memory. This is an image problem that his philosophical statements in this speech in May to fundraisers only exacerbates."

Brooks did not mince words, calling Romney "the least popular candidate in history."

"He has to look at what the president's weakness is," Brooks said. "He's never gonna win a popularity contest."

Brooks added that Romney "does not have the passion for the stuff he’s talking about."

"He’s a problem solver," Brooks said. "I think he’s a non-ideological person running in an extremely ideological age, and he’s faking it."

More: David Brooks: Mitt Romney Is 'The Least Popular Candidate In History' (VIDEO)


Huff :poop: again? :lol:

It's more accurate than Glenn Beck or Breitbart TV.
 
NaziCon wingnuts just don't like facts.

c3EEY.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top