Daily Caller supports Hillary, Warren- End of TP?

[francoHFW]

http://news.google.com/news/url?sr=...D&bvm=section&did=-1991771368176215541&ssid=h

No evidence they actually differ that much, or that Hillary (or Obama) have sold out to Wall St.....like the Fox etc, corporate news theme. ANYTHING for controversy and ratings.

And a secret for ignorant dupes...

 

[Mac1958]

http://news.google.com/news/url?sr=1&ct2=us/0_0_s_1_1_a&sa=t&usg=AFQjCNGrnidROsXmx69yvXwEvunvYeUXJA&cid=52778684080704&url=http://dailycaller.com/2014/12/15/clinton-and-warren-facts-not-labels/&ei=YBqPVMDwGc-tgQe02YHwCw&sig2=r2ti_h8xWoLP1lCqZROGIQ&rt=HOMEPAGE&vm=STANDARD&bvm=section&did=-1991771368176215541&ssid=h

No evidence they actually differ that much, or that Hillary (or Obama) have sold out to Wall St.....like the Fox etc, corporate news theme. ANYTHING for controversy and ratings.

And a secret for ignorant dupes...

The piece was written by Lanny Davis, not "The Daily Caller".

You do know who Lanny Davis is, right?

I can't tell, your post doesn't make much sense.

.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

http://news.google.com/news/url?sr=1&ct2=us/0_0_s_1_1_a&sa=t&usg=AFQjCNGrnidROsXmx69yvXwEvunvYeUXJA&cid=52778684080704&url=http://dailycaller.com/2014/12/15/clinton-and-warren-facts-not-labels/&ei=YBqPVMDwGc-tgQe02YHwCw&sig2=r2ti_h8xWoLP1lCqZROGIQ&rt=HOMEPAGE&vm=STANDARD&bvm=section&did=-1991771368176215541&ssid=h

No evidence they actually differ that much, or that Hillary (or Obama) have sold out to Wall St.....like the Fox etc, corporate news theme. ANYTHING for controversy and ratings.

And a secret for ignorant dupes...

The piece was written by Lanny Davis, not "The Daily Caller".

You do know who Lanny Davis is, right?

I can't tell, your post doesn't make much sense.

.

Franco strikes again.

 

[francoHFW]

Much like the "Washington Post opinions" etc you dupes are always posting, by obsure RW hacks. Kudos to the caller for posting an opposing view for once. END OF TP?

That's the secret I referred to, of course I knew. DUH.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

You should stop smoking paint chips, Franco.

 

[francoHFW]

Idiot. lol

 

[francoHFW]

From link...

As a supporter of Hillary Clinton for president if she runs, I don’t mind the efforts of some Democrats to urge Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) to change her mind and run for president. I admire Warren, especially her recent effort to strip the “cromnibus” budget bill of a rollback of Dodd-Frank. On the other hand, she is now being described in the Senate by some Republicans as the “Ted Cruz of the Democratic Party.” A major progressive Democratic House member who supported Barack Obama in 2008 expressed the same concern over the weekend on a liberal-oriented cable network. Unfair, and not good.

The fact is, Hillary Clinton, Elizabeth Warren and most Democrats are more united on the basic issues than I can recall in a long time. They have all focused on the plight of the squeezed middle class and working families stuck in wage stagnation, their children burdened by substantial student loan debts while the income disparity between the super wealthy and the rest of America grows every year with no end in sight.

Unfortunately, many in the media seem bent on creating bogus substantial differences among them, using empty labels as pejoratives, devoid of facts. For example, a recent Bloomberg news article recently reported that pro-Warren Democrats are concerned about Clinton’s “pro-business economic policies and a roster of Wall Street donors.” But what facts support these labels?

Like Warren, Clinton supported the creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. As a U.S. senator, Clinton opposed extending tax cuts to those earning over $250,000 a year. She supports Obamacare, increasing the minimum wage and the president’s strict regulations to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and the planetary threat of global warming. “Pro-business economic policies”?

Of course, in her two successful campaigns for the U.S. Senate from New York, and in her 2008 presidential campaign, Clinton accepted donations from those who work on Wall Street. So did President Obama in 2008 as well as 2012. But what policies did either support, influenced by such donations? None are cited — none exist.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Nobody cares what a former Clinton sycophant thinks about Clinton and Warren, Franco.

 

[francoHFW]

Not in bizarro world, chump. Any actual argument about the media "controversy" between Hillary and Warren, who has said many times she's not interested in running?

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Why would I care about whether or not two sociopaths decide to run for president?