D.C. Court rules warrantless stingray cell phone surveillance unconstitutional

MindWars

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2016
42,227
10,744
2,040
Law enforcement use of one tracking tool, the cell-site simulator, to track a suspect’s phone without a warrant violates the Constitution, the D.C. Court of Appeals said Thursday in a landmark ruling for privacy and Fourth Amendment rights as they pertain to policing tactics.
D.C. Court Rules Warrantless ‘Stingray’ Cell Phone Surveillance Unconstitutional
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Unconstitutional for them, but what about the rest of the dam country where they use sting ray all the time. You can bet they won't stop using their bs.
 
Law enforcement use of one tracking tool, the cell-site simulator, to track a suspect’s phone without a warrant violates the Constitution, the D.C. Court of Appeals said Thursday in a landmark ruling for privacy and Fourth Amendment rights as they pertain to policing tactics.
D.C. Court Rules Warrantless ‘Stingray’ Cell Phone Surveillance Unconstitutional
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Unconstitutional for them, but what about the rest of the dam country where they use sting ray all the time. You can bet they won't stop using their bs.

It takes a while for laws to change. Some states allow pot while others don't. Both will become the law across the land eventually, but it won't be quick.
 

Forum List

Back
Top