Could we put the lies about Biden to bed now?

[
Some want him to, but that's a pretty extreme step.

What do you think would happen if we ignored a subpoena?

Go ahead and issue a subpoena to me, let's find out.

You see Comrade, in order for a subpoena to have meaning, the issuer must have AUTHORITY over the target.

You are under the delusion that the Executive is an inferior branch and under the jurisdiction of the Legislative.

You are wrong. Adam Lying Schitt has zero authority to issue subpoenas to the executive in pursuit of his attempted coup. The COEQUAL executive is well within their rights to tell the Communist party - because this isn't even congress, it isn't even the house, it is ONLY the Communist party. The president has every right to tell the miscreants of the Stalinist democrats to go blow a goat.
 
Yes, he did actually. Did you not pay attention to the testimony? It's getting really annoying having to bring you up to speed on the matter all the while you keep calling me names.
Yes, you are right, he claimed the transcript was edited. However, no one else does, and his claim is absurd on its face. If the transcript was edited, then who did it? There are plenty of people responsible for the document who could confirm Vindman's claim, but Schiffferbrains couldn't produce any them.

No one else who was in on the call has testified before Congress. NSC and White House staffers edited the call.

It's rich that you are criticizing Schiff for failing to prove Vindman's claim with other witnesses when Trump is the one preventing any other witnesses from testifying. That's not a legitimate criticism, is it?
If Trump couldn't stop Vindman or Sondland from testifying, then how could he stop anyone else from testifying? If these people were forced to testify, do you actually imagine that they would say anything incriminating about Trump?

People have been instructed by Trump not to comply. That's a direct order from their superior. People can choose to ignore him at their own risk. Vindman and Sondland had to disobey Trump. This is a cute line, but it's not going to fly.

And?

Let's remind you, in case you are tempted to lie;

{
When he was asked by the Republican counsel, “To the best of your knowledge, do you know about any preconditions on the aid?” he responded, “No.”

“There were a lot of rumors swirling around as to why the aid had been held up, including they wanted a review, they wanted Europe to do more. There were all kinds of rumors,” he added.

He said he called the president on September 9, 2019, to find out what he wanted from Ukraine.

“He said: ‘I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo. I want Zelensky to do the right thing.’ And I said: ‘What does that mean?’ And he said: ‘I want him to do what he ran on.’ And that was the end of the conversation.”}

Transcript Reveals Gordon Sondland Never Knew of Any 'Quid Pro Quo'

Focusing too much on any one exchange misses the complete story. Don't let yourself have blinders.

Sondland revised his testimony. He admits to preconditions on a White House meeting. He "doesn't remember" about other exchanges but does not contest the recollections of other's discussions with him where the preconditions were made explicit.

The Sept 9th phone call, if it even happened which is a little in doubt, was after Trump was made aware of the whistleblower report and his ability to keep a cap on the story (which the White House was going through great lengths to do) was over. So I don't exactly find his statement exculpatory since he knew he was in deep shit by the time he decided to say "no quid pro quo". His actions speak louder than words.
 
[
Some want him to, but that's a pretty extreme step.

What do you think would happen if we ignored a subpoena?

Go ahead and issue a subpoena to me, let's find out.

You see Comrade, in order for a subpoena to have meaning, the issuer must have AUTHORITY over the target.

You are under the delusion that the Executive is an inferior branch and under the jurisdiction of the Legislative.

You are wrong. Adam Lying Schitt has zero authority to issue subpoenas to the executive in pursuit of his attempted coup. The COEQUAL executive is well within their rights to tell the Communist party - because this isn't even congress, it isn't even the house, it is ONLY the Communist party. The president has every right to tell the miscreants of the Stalinist democrats to go blow a goat.
Do you think Congress has oversight authority over the executive or not?
 
Schiff would be within his power to have the seargant at arms arrest them and hold them until they complied. He has chosen not to because that's a very extreme step.

What do you think would happen if you or me chose to ignore a subpoena?

Oh really Comrade? Try it. The President would be WELL within his rights in that case to send marines in to arrest the entire house for treason and making war on the United States Government.

You Stalinists live in a fantasy.
 
Schiff would be within his power to have the seargant at arms arrest them and hold them until they complied. He has chosen not to because that's a very extreme step.

What do you think would happen if you or me chose to ignore a subpoena?

Oh really Comrade? Try it. The President would be WELL within his rights in that case to send marines in to arrest the entire house for treason and making war on the United States Government.

You Stalinists live in a fantasy.
Not a fantasy. It’s literally how they used to do it back in the old days. No one sent marines to storm the capital in a coup attempt. Such an order would be clearly unconstitutional by the speech and debate clause.
 
Yes, you are right, he claimed the transcript was edited. However, no one else does, and his claim is absurd on its face. If the transcript was edited, then who did it? There are plenty of people responsible for the document who could confirm Vindman's claim, but Schiffferbrains couldn't produce any them.

No one else who was in on the call has testified before Congress. NSC and White House staffers edited the call.

It's rich that you are criticizing Schiff for failing to prove Vindman's claim with other witnesses when Trump is the one preventing any other witnesses from testifying. That's not a legitimate criticism, is it?
If Trump couldn't stop Vindman or Sondland from testifying, then how could he stop anyone else from testifying? If these people were forced to testify, do you actually imagine that they would say anything incriminating about Trump?

People have been instructed by Trump not to comply. That's a direct order from their superior. People can choose to ignore him at their own risk. Vindman and Sondland had to disobey Trump. This is a cute line, but it's not going to fly.

And?

Let's remind you, in case you are tempted to lie;

{
When he was asked by the Republican counsel, “To the best of your knowledge, do you know about any preconditions on the aid?” he responded, “No.”

“There were a lot of rumors swirling around as to why the aid had been held up, including they wanted a review, they wanted Europe to do more. There were all kinds of rumors,” he added.

He said he called the president on September 9, 2019, to find out what he wanted from Ukraine.

“He said: ‘I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo. I want Zelensky to do the right thing.’ And I said: ‘What does that mean?’ And he said: ‘I want him to do what he ran on.’ And that was the end of the conversation.”}

Transcript Reveals Gordon Sondland Never Knew of Any 'Quid Pro Quo'

Focusing too much on any one exchange misses the complete story. Don't let yourself have blinders.

Sondland revised his testimony. He admits to preconditions on a White House meeting. He "doesn't remember" about other exchanges but does not contest the recollections of other's discussions with him where the preconditions were made explicit.

The Sept 9th phone call, if it even happened which is a little in doubt, was after Trump was made aware of the whistleblower report and his ability to keep a cap on the story (which the White House was going through great lengths to do) was over. So I don't exactly find his statement exculpatory since he knew he was in deep shit by the time he decided to say "no quid pro quo". His actions speak louder than words.

:rofl:

This coup is a farce, based on rumors, innuendo, slander, and third hand claims. It was STARTED because the Stalinist party FAILED in the Russian Collusion Conspiracy Theory. The farce was PREDICATED on a a whistleblower named Eric Ciaramella who turns out to be CIA operative who was FIRED from the NSC by President Trump because the little fucker leaked classified information to the little Goebbels.

But it gets better. Turns out that Ciaramella is a good buddy of Quid Pro Joe Biden.

{
Eric Ciaramella, the alleged Ukraine whistleblower, was a guest of Vice President Joe Biden at a glitzy lunch in October 2016 to honor the prime minister of Italy.

Biden co-hosted the banquet with former Secretary of State John Kerry for then-Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi. Ciaramella, who is of Italian heritage, was among the U.S. officials who accepted an invitation. This week, the Washington Examiner reported that Ciaramella is now a deputy national intelligence officer for Russia and Eurasia on the National Intelligence Council, reporting to the director of national intelligence.}

Alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella was Biden guest at State Department banquet

Of course Ciaramella is a confidant of KGB John Brennan and hand picked by the old Stalinist pile of shit himself;

{Federal documents reveal that the whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella, previously worked in the Obama administration with former Vice President Joe Biden and former CIA Director John Brennan. RealClear reports that Ciaramella remained there into the Trump administration, and headed the Ukraine desk at the National Security Council, eventually transitioning into the West Wing, until June 2017.}

Anti-Trump 'Whistleblower' Worked With DNC Operatives, Joe Biden

AND Ciaramella was involved in the Ukraine tampering with the 2016 election with Alexandra Chalupa.

{
Alexandra Chalupa was apparently hired by the DNC going as far back as 2013. According to Politico, shortly after the election:

A daughter of Ukrainian immigrants who maintains strong ties to the Ukrainian-American diaspora and the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine, Chalupa, a lawyer by training, in 2014 was doing pro bono work for another client interested in the Ukrainian crisis and began researching Manafort’s role in Yanukovych’s rise, as well as his ties to the pro-Russian oligarchs who funded Yanukovych’s political party.”

According to Politico, Chalupa claimed that in October of 2015 she began investigating Trump’s ties to Russia. Why she began this investigation is completely unknown. The only thing of significance that had happened at this point was that Trump announced he was running for office. There was no apparent triggering event. Candidate Trump had very limited contact with Russia or Russia businessmen

...

And Ciaramella worked with a Democratic National Committee operative who dug up dirt on the Trump campaign during the 2016 election, inviting her into the White House for meetings, former White House colleagues said. The operative, Alexandra Chalupa, a Ukrainian-American who supported Hillary Clinton, led an effort to link the Republican campaign to the Russian government. “He knows her. He had her in the White House,” said one former co-worker, who requested anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter.

Documents confirm the DNC opposition researcher attended at least one White House meeting with Ciaramella in November 2015. She visited the White House with a number of Ukrainian officials lobbying the Obama administration for aid for Ukraine.}

HUGE! CIA "Whistleblower" Eric Ciaramella Worked with DNC Operative Alexandra Chalupa in Creation of Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax

No WONDER you Communists hid his name and the little Goebbels covered it up...
 
No one else who was in on the call has testified before Congress. NSC and White House staffers edited the call.

It's rich that you are criticizing Schiff for failing to prove Vindman's claim with other witnesses when Trump is the one preventing any other witnesses from testifying. That's not a legitimate criticism, is it?
If Trump couldn't stop Vindman or Sondland from testifying, then how could he stop anyone else from testifying? If these people were forced to testify, do you actually imagine that they would say anything incriminating about Trump?

People have been instructed by Trump not to comply. That's a direct order from their superior. People can choose to ignore him at their own risk. Vindman and Sondland had to disobey Trump. This is a cute line, but it's not going to fly.

And?

Let's remind you, in case you are tempted to lie;

{
When he was asked by the Republican counsel, “To the best of your knowledge, do you know about any preconditions on the aid?” he responded, “No.”

“There were a lot of rumors swirling around as to why the aid had been held up, including they wanted a review, they wanted Europe to do more. There were all kinds of rumors,” he added.

He said he called the president on September 9, 2019, to find out what he wanted from Ukraine.

“He said: ‘I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo. I want Zelensky to do the right thing.’ And I said: ‘What does that mean?’ And he said: ‘I want him to do what he ran on.’ And that was the end of the conversation.”}

Transcript Reveals Gordon Sondland Never Knew of Any 'Quid Pro Quo'

Focusing too much on any one exchange misses the complete story. Don't let yourself have blinders.

Sondland revised his testimony. He admits to preconditions on a White House meeting. He "doesn't remember" about other exchanges but does not contest the recollections of other's discussions with him where the preconditions were made explicit.

The Sept 9th phone call, if it even happened which is a little in doubt, was after Trump was made aware of the whistleblower report and his ability to keep a cap on the story (which the White House was going through great lengths to do) was over. So I don't exactly find his statement exculpatory since he knew he was in deep shit by the time he decided to say "no quid pro quo". His actions speak louder than words.

:rofl:

This coup is a farce, based on rumors, innuendo, slander, and third hand claims. It was STARTED because the Stalinist party FAILED in the Russian Collusion Conspiracy Theory. The farce was PREDICATED on a a whistleblower named Eric Ciaramella who turns out to be CIA operative who was FIRED from the NSC by President Trump because the little fucker leaked classified information to the little Goebbels.

But it gets better. Turns out that Ciaramella is a good buddy of Quid Pro Joe Biden.

{
Eric Ciaramella, the alleged Ukraine whistleblower, was a guest of Vice President Joe Biden at a glitzy lunch in October 2016 to honor the prime minister of Italy.

Biden co-hosted the banquet with former Secretary of State John Kerry for then-Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi. Ciaramella, who is of Italian heritage, was among the U.S. officials who accepted an invitation. This week, the Washington Examiner reported that Ciaramella is now a deputy national intelligence officer for Russia and Eurasia on the National Intelligence Council, reporting to the director of national intelligence.}

Alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella was Biden guest at State Department banquet

Of course Ciaramella is a confidant of KGB John Brennan and hand picked by the old Stalinist pile of shit himself;

{Federal documents reveal that the whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella, previously worked in the Obama administration with former Vice President Joe Biden and former CIA Director John Brennan. RealClear reports that Ciaramella remained there into the Trump administration, and headed the Ukraine desk at the National Security Council, eventually transitioning into the West Wing, until June 2017.}

Anti-Trump 'Whistleblower' Worked With DNC Operatives, Joe Biden

AND Ciaramella was involved in the Ukraine tampering with the 2016 election with Alexandra Chalupa.

{
Alexandra Chalupa was apparently hired by the DNC going as far back as 2013. According to Politico, shortly after the election:

A daughter of Ukrainian immigrants who maintains strong ties to the Ukrainian-American diaspora and the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine, Chalupa, a lawyer by training, in 2014 was doing pro bono work for another client interested in the Ukrainian crisis and began researching Manafort’s role in Yanukovych’s rise, as well as his ties to the pro-Russian oligarchs who funded Yanukovych’s political party.”

According to Politico, Chalupa claimed that in October of 2015 she began investigating Trump’s ties to Russia. Why she began this investigation is completely unknown. The only thing of significance that had happened at this point was that Trump announced he was running for office. There was no apparent triggering event. Candidate Trump had very limited contact with Russia or Russia businessmen

...

And Ciaramella worked with a Democratic National Committee operative who dug up dirt on the Trump campaign during the 2016 election, inviting her into the White House for meetings, former White House colleagues said. The operative, Alexandra Chalupa, a Ukrainian-American who supported Hillary Clinton, led an effort to link the Republican campaign to the Russian government. “He knows her. He had her in the White House,” said one former co-worker, who requested anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter.

Documents confirm the DNC opposition researcher attended at least one White House meeting with Ciaramella in November 2015. She visited the White House with a number of Ukrainian officials lobbying the Obama administration for aid for Ukraine.}

HUGE! CIA "Whistleblower" Eric Ciaramella Worked with DNC Operative Alexandra Chalupa in Creation of Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax

No WONDER you Communists hid his name and the little Goebbels covered it up...
Nice copy pasta but has nothing to do with the matter. Just a lot of obfuscation and distraction.

The facts are that Trump was pushing for an investigation into his political opponents. The fact is that Trump personally ordered a delay in foreign aid.

These facts alone raise reasonable suspicion.
 
Ukraine Ousts Viktor Shokin, Top Prosecutor, and Political Stability Hangs in the Balance

The United States and other Western nations had for months called for the ousting of Mr. Shokin, who was widely criticized for turning a blind eye to corrupt practices and for defending the interests of a venal and entrenched elite. He was one of several political figures in Kiev whom reformers and Western diplomats saw as a worrying indicator of a return to past corrupt practices, two years after a revolution that was supposed to put a stop to self-dealing by those in power.

As the problems festered, Kiev drew increasingly sharp criticism from Western diplomats and leaders. In a visit in December, Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. said corruption was eating Ukraine “like a cancer.” Christine Lagarde, the managing director of the International Monetary Fund, which props up Ukraine financially, said last month that progress was so slow in fighting corruption that “it’s hard to see how the I.M.F.-supported program can continue.”
Ukraine Ousts Viktor Shokin, Top Prosecutor, and Political Stability Hangs in the Balance
...................................................................................................................................................
Hunter Biden 'did not violate anything,' former Ukrainian prosecutor says
Hunter Biden 'did not violate anything,' former Ukrainian prosecutor says

A former Ukrainian prosecutor who investigated a gas company tied to Hunter Biden said Thursday that there was no evidence the former vice president's son engaged in illegal activity.

"From the perspective of Ukrainian legislation, he did not violate anything,” Yuriy Lutsenko told The Washington Post.
....................................................................................................................................................
Debunking 4 Viral Rumors About the Bidens and Ukraine

At the time of his board appointment, the younger Mr. Biden had just been discharged from the Navy Reserve for drug use. He had no apparent experience in Ukraine or natural gas. And while accepting the board position was legal, it reportedly raised some eyebrows in the Obama administration. The Burisma board position was lucrative: Mr. Biden received payments that reached up to $50,000 per month.

A year later, Viktor Shokin became Ukraine’s prosecutor general, a job similar to the attorney general in the United States. He vowed to keep investigating Burisma amid an international push to root out corruption in Ukraine.

But the investigation went dormant under Mr. Shokin. In the fall of 2015, Joe Biden joined the chorus of Western officials calling for Mr. Shokin’s ouster. The next March, Mr. Shokin was fired. A subsequent prosecutor cleared Mr. Zlochevsky.
Debunking 4 Viral Rumors About the Bidens and Ukraine
......................................................................................................................................
Is there any evidence Old Joe pushed to have Shokin removed because of his kid's involvement with Burisma? No. How could there be since Shokin was not investigating Burisma? A fact that contributed to Shokin's dismissal demanded by the EU and the IMF for NOT adequately investigating corruption in Ukraine.

All the facts in evidence point to Trump's demand that an announcement be made the Bidens were being investigated by Ukraine had nothing to do with a realistic expectation anything nefarious would be found. Rather, Ukraine's acquiescence to conduct an investigation was what Don wanted because he knew it was enough to smear Biden.

Trump's belief has been borne out. Even though no investigation was launched and no evidence of wrongdoing exists millions of gullible rubes have it in their easily manipulated heads Biden is guilty of something............based on unsubstantiated innuendo.

How it all makes sense to you ignorant fools is obvious...pull your heads from your asses and think straight once.
 
If Trump couldn't stop Vindman or Sondland from testifying, then how could he stop anyone else from testifying? If these people were forced to testify, do you actually imagine that they would say anything incriminating about Trump?

People have been instructed by Trump not to comply. That's a direct order from their superior. People can choose to ignore him at their own risk. Vindman and Sondland had to disobey Trump. This is a cute line, but it's not going to fly.

And?

Let's remind you, in case you are tempted to lie;

{
When he was asked by the Republican counsel, “To the best of your knowledge, do you know about any preconditions on the aid?” he responded, “No.”

“There were a lot of rumors swirling around as to why the aid had been held up, including they wanted a review, they wanted Europe to do more. There were all kinds of rumors,” he added.

He said he called the president on September 9, 2019, to find out what he wanted from Ukraine.

“He said: ‘I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo. I want Zelensky to do the right thing.’ And I said: ‘What does that mean?’ And he said: ‘I want him to do what he ran on.’ And that was the end of the conversation.”}

Transcript Reveals Gordon Sondland Never Knew of Any 'Quid Pro Quo'

Focusing too much on any one exchange misses the complete story. Don't let yourself have blinders.

Sondland revised his testimony. He admits to preconditions on a White House meeting. He "doesn't remember" about other exchanges but does not contest the recollections of other's discussions with him where the preconditions were made explicit.

The Sept 9th phone call, if it even happened which is a little in doubt, was after Trump was made aware of the whistleblower report and his ability to keep a cap on the story (which the White House was going through great lengths to do) was over. So I don't exactly find his statement exculpatory since he knew he was in deep shit by the time he decided to say "no quid pro quo". His actions speak louder than words.

:rofl:

This coup is a farce, based on rumors, innuendo, slander, and third hand claims. It was STARTED because the Stalinist party FAILED in the Russian Collusion Conspiracy Theory. The farce was PREDICATED on a a whistleblower named Eric Ciaramella who turns out to be CIA operative who was FIRED from the NSC by President Trump because the little fucker leaked classified information to the little Goebbels.

But it gets better. Turns out that Ciaramella is a good buddy of Quid Pro Joe Biden.

{
Eric Ciaramella, the alleged Ukraine whistleblower, was a guest of Vice President Joe Biden at a glitzy lunch in October 2016 to honor the prime minister of Italy.

Biden co-hosted the banquet with former Secretary of State John Kerry for then-Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi. Ciaramella, who is of Italian heritage, was among the U.S. officials who accepted an invitation. This week, the Washington Examiner reported that Ciaramella is now a deputy national intelligence officer for Russia and Eurasia on the National Intelligence Council, reporting to the director of national intelligence.}

Alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella was Biden guest at State Department banquet

Of course Ciaramella is a confidant of KGB John Brennan and hand picked by the old Stalinist pile of shit himself;

{Federal documents reveal that the whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella, previously worked in the Obama administration with former Vice President Joe Biden and former CIA Director John Brennan. RealClear reports that Ciaramella remained there into the Trump administration, and headed the Ukraine desk at the National Security Council, eventually transitioning into the West Wing, until June 2017.}

Anti-Trump 'Whistleblower' Worked With DNC Operatives, Joe Biden

AND Ciaramella was involved in the Ukraine tampering with the 2016 election with Alexandra Chalupa.

{
Alexandra Chalupa was apparently hired by the DNC going as far back as 2013. According to Politico, shortly after the election:

A daughter of Ukrainian immigrants who maintains strong ties to the Ukrainian-American diaspora and the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine, Chalupa, a lawyer by training, in 2014 was doing pro bono work for another client interested in the Ukrainian crisis and began researching Manafort’s role in Yanukovych’s rise, as well as his ties to the pro-Russian oligarchs who funded Yanukovych’s political party.”

According to Politico, Chalupa claimed that in October of 2015 she began investigating Trump’s ties to Russia. Why she began this investigation is completely unknown. The only thing of significance that had happened at this point was that Trump announced he was running for office. There was no apparent triggering event. Candidate Trump had very limited contact with Russia or Russia businessmen

...

And Ciaramella worked with a Democratic National Committee operative who dug up dirt on the Trump campaign during the 2016 election, inviting her into the White House for meetings, former White House colleagues said. The operative, Alexandra Chalupa, a Ukrainian-American who supported Hillary Clinton, led an effort to link the Republican campaign to the Russian government. “He knows her. He had her in the White House,” said one former co-worker, who requested anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter.

Documents confirm the DNC opposition researcher attended at least one White House meeting with Ciaramella in November 2015. She visited the White House with a number of Ukrainian officials lobbying the Obama administration for aid for Ukraine.}

HUGE! CIA "Whistleblower" Eric Ciaramella Worked with DNC Operative Alexandra Chalupa in Creation of Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax

No WONDER you Communists hid his name and the little Goebbels covered it up...
Nice copy pasta but has nothing to do with the matter. Just a lot of obfuscation and distraction.

The facts are that Trump was pushing for an investigation into his political opponents. The fact is that Trump personally ordered a delay in foreign aid.

These facts alone raise reasonable suspicion.


afb112919dAPR20191129054509.jpg



The entire farrago is to hide the fact that Biden sold the office of the vice-presidency to China and a Ukrainian gas company.
And there is proof...PROOF.....of exactly that.

Don't be a dunce your whole life...take a day off.
 
People have been instructed by Trump not to comply. That's a direct order from their superior. People can choose to ignore him at their own risk. Vindman and Sondland had to disobey Trump. This is a cute line, but it's not going to fly.

And?

Let's remind you, in case you are tempted to lie;

{
When he was asked by the Republican counsel, “To the best of your knowledge, do you know about any preconditions on the aid?” he responded, “No.”

“There were a lot of rumors swirling around as to why the aid had been held up, including they wanted a review, they wanted Europe to do more. There were all kinds of rumors,” he added.

He said he called the president on September 9, 2019, to find out what he wanted from Ukraine.

“He said: ‘I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo. I want Zelensky to do the right thing.’ And I said: ‘What does that mean?’ And he said: ‘I want him to do what he ran on.’ And that was the end of the conversation.”}

Transcript Reveals Gordon Sondland Never Knew of Any 'Quid Pro Quo'

Focusing too much on any one exchange misses the complete story. Don't let yourself have blinders.

Sondland revised his testimony. He admits to preconditions on a White House meeting. He "doesn't remember" about other exchanges but does not contest the recollections of other's discussions with him where the preconditions were made explicit.

The Sept 9th phone call, if it even happened which is a little in doubt, was after Trump was made aware of the whistleblower report and his ability to keep a cap on the story (which the White House was going through great lengths to do) was over. So I don't exactly find his statement exculpatory since he knew he was in deep shit by the time he decided to say "no quid pro quo". His actions speak louder than words.

:rofl:

This coup is a farce, based on rumors, innuendo, slander, and third hand claims. It was STARTED because the Stalinist party FAILED in the Russian Collusion Conspiracy Theory. The farce was PREDICATED on a a whistleblower named Eric Ciaramella who turns out to be CIA operative who was FIRED from the NSC by President Trump because the little fucker leaked classified information to the little Goebbels.

But it gets better. Turns out that Ciaramella is a good buddy of Quid Pro Joe Biden.

{
Eric Ciaramella, the alleged Ukraine whistleblower, was a guest of Vice President Joe Biden at a glitzy lunch in October 2016 to honor the prime minister of Italy.

Biden co-hosted the banquet with former Secretary of State John Kerry for then-Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi. Ciaramella, who is of Italian heritage, was among the U.S. officials who accepted an invitation. This week, the Washington Examiner reported that Ciaramella is now a deputy national intelligence officer for Russia and Eurasia on the National Intelligence Council, reporting to the director of national intelligence.}

Alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella was Biden guest at State Department banquet

Of course Ciaramella is a confidant of KGB John Brennan and hand picked by the old Stalinist pile of shit himself;

{Federal documents reveal that the whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella, previously worked in the Obama administration with former Vice President Joe Biden and former CIA Director John Brennan. RealClear reports that Ciaramella remained there into the Trump administration, and headed the Ukraine desk at the National Security Council, eventually transitioning into the West Wing, until June 2017.}

Anti-Trump 'Whistleblower' Worked With DNC Operatives, Joe Biden

AND Ciaramella was involved in the Ukraine tampering with the 2016 election with Alexandra Chalupa.

{
Alexandra Chalupa was apparently hired by the DNC going as far back as 2013. According to Politico, shortly after the election:

A daughter of Ukrainian immigrants who maintains strong ties to the Ukrainian-American diaspora and the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine, Chalupa, a lawyer by training, in 2014 was doing pro bono work for another client interested in the Ukrainian crisis and began researching Manafort’s role in Yanukovych’s rise, as well as his ties to the pro-Russian oligarchs who funded Yanukovych’s political party.”

According to Politico, Chalupa claimed that in October of 2015 she began investigating Trump’s ties to Russia. Why she began this investigation is completely unknown. The only thing of significance that had happened at this point was that Trump announced he was running for office. There was no apparent triggering event. Candidate Trump had very limited contact with Russia or Russia businessmen

...

And Ciaramella worked with a Democratic National Committee operative who dug up dirt on the Trump campaign during the 2016 election, inviting her into the White House for meetings, former White House colleagues said. The operative, Alexandra Chalupa, a Ukrainian-American who supported Hillary Clinton, led an effort to link the Republican campaign to the Russian government. “He knows her. He had her in the White House,” said one former co-worker, who requested anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter.

Documents confirm the DNC opposition researcher attended at least one White House meeting with Ciaramella in November 2015. She visited the White House with a number of Ukrainian officials lobbying the Obama administration for aid for Ukraine.}

HUGE! CIA "Whistleblower" Eric Ciaramella Worked with DNC Operative Alexandra Chalupa in Creation of Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax

No WONDER you Communists hid his name and the little Goebbels covered it up...
Nice copy pasta but has nothing to do with the matter. Just a lot of obfuscation and distraction.

The facts are that Trump was pushing for an investigation into his political opponents. The fact is that Trump personally ordered a delay in foreign aid.

These facts alone raise reasonable suspicion.


afb112919dAPR20191129054509.jpg



The entire farrago is to hide the fact that Biden sold the office of the vice-presidency to China and a Ukrainian gas company.
And there is proof...PROOF.....of exactly that.

Don't be a dunce your whole life...take a day off.

proof. PROOF!

no there isn’t. There’s zero evidence. No one has shown anything of the sort.
 
Do you think Congress has oversight authority over the executive or not?


Does Congress has oversight authority over the executive? Not in the way you Communist think. If you think it does, present the article or amendment that details it. The oversight of the executive is LIMITED to the approval of certain elements. For instance, the president appoints federal judges, but the Senate must confirm such appointments. The president appoints ambassadors, but the Senate must confirm them. The house has zero oversight authority - nor should it. The president MUST be free to act, he is not the servant of the house. Despite your abject ignorance, the executive is not an inferior branch but rather COEQUAL.

Since I'm feeling generous;

Constitution of the United States - We the People
 
Do you think Congress has oversight authority over the executive or not?


Does Congress has oversight authority over the executive? Not in the way you Communist think. If you think it does, present the article or amendment that details it. The oversight of the executive is LIMITED to the approval of certain elements. For instance, the president appoints federal judges, but the Senate must confirm such appointments. The president appoints ambassadors, but the Senate must confirm them. The house has zero oversight authority - nor should it. The president MUST be free to act, he is not the servant of the house. Despite your abject ignorance, the executive is not an inferior branch but rather COEQUAL.

Since I'm feeling generous;

Constitution of the United States - We the People

So you’re saying that Congress has the ability to impeach the president but not the ability to investigate the president?

Where the hell do people come up with this nonsense?
 
Not a fantasy. It’s literally how they used to do it back in the old days. No one sent marines to storm the capital in a coup attempt. Such an order would be clearly unconstitutional by the speech and debate clause.

REALLY?

Oh wow, so you can show the HOUSE arresting a member of the executive branch?

Let's see it.

iu
 
And?

Let's remind you, in case you are tempted to lie;

{
When he was asked by the Republican counsel, “To the best of your knowledge, do you know about any preconditions on the aid?” he responded, “No.”

“There were a lot of rumors swirling around as to why the aid had been held up, including they wanted a review, they wanted Europe to do more. There were all kinds of rumors,” he added.

He said he called the president on September 9, 2019, to find out what he wanted from Ukraine.

“He said: ‘I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo. I want Zelensky to do the right thing.’ And I said: ‘What does that mean?’ And he said: ‘I want him to do what he ran on.’ And that was the end of the conversation.”}

Transcript Reveals Gordon Sondland Never Knew of Any 'Quid Pro Quo'

Focusing too much on any one exchange misses the complete story. Don't let yourself have blinders.

Sondland revised his testimony. He admits to preconditions on a White House meeting. He "doesn't remember" about other exchanges but does not contest the recollections of other's discussions with him where the preconditions were made explicit.

The Sept 9th phone call, if it even happened which is a little in doubt, was after Trump was made aware of the whistleblower report and his ability to keep a cap on the story (which the White House was going through great lengths to do) was over. So I don't exactly find his statement exculpatory since he knew he was in deep shit by the time he decided to say "no quid pro quo". His actions speak louder than words.

:rofl:

This coup is a farce, based on rumors, innuendo, slander, and third hand claims. It was STARTED because the Stalinist party FAILED in the Russian Collusion Conspiracy Theory. The farce was PREDICATED on a a whistleblower named Eric Ciaramella who turns out to be CIA operative who was FIRED from the NSC by President Trump because the little fucker leaked classified information to the little Goebbels.

But it gets better. Turns out that Ciaramella is a good buddy of Quid Pro Joe Biden.

{
Eric Ciaramella, the alleged Ukraine whistleblower, was a guest of Vice President Joe Biden at a glitzy lunch in October 2016 to honor the prime minister of Italy.

Biden co-hosted the banquet with former Secretary of State John Kerry for then-Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi. Ciaramella, who is of Italian heritage, was among the U.S. officials who accepted an invitation. This week, the Washington Examiner reported that Ciaramella is now a deputy national intelligence officer for Russia and Eurasia on the National Intelligence Council, reporting to the director of national intelligence.}

Alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella was Biden guest at State Department banquet

Of course Ciaramella is a confidant of KGB John Brennan and hand picked by the old Stalinist pile of shit himself;

{Federal documents reveal that the whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella, previously worked in the Obama administration with former Vice President Joe Biden and former CIA Director John Brennan. RealClear reports that Ciaramella remained there into the Trump administration, and headed the Ukraine desk at the National Security Council, eventually transitioning into the West Wing, until June 2017.}

Anti-Trump 'Whistleblower' Worked With DNC Operatives, Joe Biden

AND Ciaramella was involved in the Ukraine tampering with the 2016 election with Alexandra Chalupa.

{
Alexandra Chalupa was apparently hired by the DNC going as far back as 2013. According to Politico, shortly after the election:

A daughter of Ukrainian immigrants who maintains strong ties to the Ukrainian-American diaspora and the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine, Chalupa, a lawyer by training, in 2014 was doing pro bono work for another client interested in the Ukrainian crisis and began researching Manafort’s role in Yanukovych’s rise, as well as his ties to the pro-Russian oligarchs who funded Yanukovych’s political party.”

According to Politico, Chalupa claimed that in October of 2015 she began investigating Trump’s ties to Russia. Why she began this investigation is completely unknown. The only thing of significance that had happened at this point was that Trump announced he was running for office. There was no apparent triggering event. Candidate Trump had very limited contact with Russia or Russia businessmen

...

And Ciaramella worked with a Democratic National Committee operative who dug up dirt on the Trump campaign during the 2016 election, inviting her into the White House for meetings, former White House colleagues said. The operative, Alexandra Chalupa, a Ukrainian-American who supported Hillary Clinton, led an effort to link the Republican campaign to the Russian government. “He knows her. He had her in the White House,” said one former co-worker, who requested anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter.

Documents confirm the DNC opposition researcher attended at least one White House meeting with Ciaramella in November 2015. She visited the White House with a number of Ukrainian officials lobbying the Obama administration for aid for Ukraine.}

HUGE! CIA "Whistleblower" Eric Ciaramella Worked with DNC Operative Alexandra Chalupa in Creation of Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax

No WONDER you Communists hid his name and the little Goebbels covered it up...
Nice copy pasta but has nothing to do with the matter. Just a lot of obfuscation and distraction.

The facts are that Trump was pushing for an investigation into his political opponents. The fact is that Trump personally ordered a delay in foreign aid.

These facts alone raise reasonable suspicion.


afb112919dAPR20191129054509.jpg



The entire farrago is to hide the fact that Biden sold the office of the vice-presidency to China and a Ukrainian gas company.
And there is proof...PROOF.....of exactly that.

Don't be a dunce your whole life...take a day off.

proof. PROOF!

no there isn’t. There’s zero evidence. No one has shown anything of the sort.

I've slapped you in the face with the evidence multiple times.

Who do you think you're fooling?
 
And?

Let's remind you, in case you are tempted to lie;

{
When he was asked by the Republican counsel, “To the best of your knowledge, do you know about any preconditions on the aid?” he responded, “No.”

“There were a lot of rumors swirling around as to why the aid had been held up, including they wanted a review, they wanted Europe to do more. There were all kinds of rumors,” he added.

He said he called the president on September 9, 2019, to find out what he wanted from Ukraine.

“He said: ‘I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo. I want Zelensky to do the right thing.’ And I said: ‘What does that mean?’ And he said: ‘I want him to do what he ran on.’ And that was the end of the conversation.”}

Transcript Reveals Gordon Sondland Never Knew of Any 'Quid Pro Quo'

Focusing too much on any one exchange misses the complete story. Don't let yourself have blinders.

Sondland revised his testimony. He admits to preconditions on a White House meeting. He "doesn't remember" about other exchanges but does not contest the recollections of other's discussions with him where the preconditions were made explicit.

The Sept 9th phone call, if it even happened which is a little in doubt, was after Trump was made aware of the whistleblower report and his ability to keep a cap on the story (which the White House was going through great lengths to do) was over. So I don't exactly find his statement exculpatory since he knew he was in deep shit by the time he decided to say "no quid pro quo". His actions speak louder than words.

:rofl:

This coup is a farce, based on rumors, innuendo, slander, and third hand claims. It was STARTED because the Stalinist party FAILED in the Russian Collusion Conspiracy Theory. The farce was PREDICATED on a a whistleblower named Eric Ciaramella who turns out to be CIA operative who was FIRED from the NSC by President Trump because the little fucker leaked classified information to the little Goebbels.

But it gets better. Turns out that Ciaramella is a good buddy of Quid Pro Joe Biden.

{
Eric Ciaramella, the alleged Ukraine whistleblower, was a guest of Vice President Joe Biden at a glitzy lunch in October 2016 to honor the prime minister of Italy.

Biden co-hosted the banquet with former Secretary of State John Kerry for then-Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi. Ciaramella, who is of Italian heritage, was among the U.S. officials who accepted an invitation. This week, the Washington Examiner reported that Ciaramella is now a deputy national intelligence officer for Russia and Eurasia on the National Intelligence Council, reporting to the director of national intelligence.}

Alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella was Biden guest at State Department banquet

Of course Ciaramella is a confidant of KGB John Brennan and hand picked by the old Stalinist pile of shit himself;

{Federal documents reveal that the whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella, previously worked in the Obama administration with former Vice President Joe Biden and former CIA Director John Brennan. RealClear reports that Ciaramella remained there into the Trump administration, and headed the Ukraine desk at the National Security Council, eventually transitioning into the West Wing, until June 2017.}

Anti-Trump 'Whistleblower' Worked With DNC Operatives, Joe Biden

AND Ciaramella was involved in the Ukraine tampering with the 2016 election with Alexandra Chalupa.

{
Alexandra Chalupa was apparently hired by the DNC going as far back as 2013. According to Politico, shortly after the election:

A daughter of Ukrainian immigrants who maintains strong ties to the Ukrainian-American diaspora and the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine, Chalupa, a lawyer by training, in 2014 was doing pro bono work for another client interested in the Ukrainian crisis and began researching Manafort’s role in Yanukovych’s rise, as well as his ties to the pro-Russian oligarchs who funded Yanukovych’s political party.”

According to Politico, Chalupa claimed that in October of 2015 she began investigating Trump’s ties to Russia. Why she began this investigation is completely unknown. The only thing of significance that had happened at this point was that Trump announced he was running for office. There was no apparent triggering event. Candidate Trump had very limited contact with Russia or Russia businessmen

...

And Ciaramella worked with a Democratic National Committee operative who dug up dirt on the Trump campaign during the 2016 election, inviting her into the White House for meetings, former White House colleagues said. The operative, Alexandra Chalupa, a Ukrainian-American who supported Hillary Clinton, led an effort to link the Republican campaign to the Russian government. “He knows her. He had her in the White House,” said one former co-worker, who requested anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter.

Documents confirm the DNC opposition researcher attended at least one White House meeting with Ciaramella in November 2015. She visited the White House with a number of Ukrainian officials lobbying the Obama administration for aid for Ukraine.}

HUGE! CIA "Whistleblower" Eric Ciaramella Worked with DNC Operative Alexandra Chalupa in Creation of Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax

No WONDER you Communists hid his name and the little Goebbels covered it up...
Nice copy pasta but has nothing to do with the matter. Just a lot of obfuscation and distraction.

The facts are that Trump was pushing for an investigation into his political opponents. The fact is that Trump personally ordered a delay in foreign aid.

These facts alone raise reasonable suspicion.


afb112919dAPR20191129054509.jpg



The entire farrago is to hide the fact that Biden sold the office of the vice-presidency to China and a Ukrainian gas company.
And there is proof...PROOF.....of exactly that.

Don't be a dunce your whole life...take a day off.

proof. PROOF!

no there isn’t. There’s zero evidence. No one has shown anything of the sort.



Let's check:





The bribe at 02:15


Biden sidesteps questions about corruption;






Hunter Biden....drug addict, reprobate, no experience in the gas industry...or in Ukraine...

...yet given $83 thousand a month for the sale of the office of the vice-presidency.


And....
Interesting that when Biden was VP, he and his son Hunter went to deal with China, and Hunter came away with $millions.....

But Trump is immune to the bribes.


"The troubling reason why Biden is so soft on China
In 2013, then-Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden flew aboard Air Force Two to China. Less than two weeks later, Hunter Biden’s firm inked a $1 billion private equity deal with a subsidiary of the Chinese government’s Bank of China. The deal was later expanded to $1.5 billion. In short, the Chinese government funded a business that it co-owned along with the son of a sitting vice president."
https://nypost.com/2019/05/11/the-troubling-reason-why-biden-is-so-soft-on-china/


Sounds a lot like the $145 million Putin gave the Clintons.


Research this:

https https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/01/us/politics/biden-son-ukraine.html://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=5&v=lH_sdTC7Anw






PROOF!!!!!


Brutal, huh? Sorry you didn’t run with scissors when you had the chance?
 
Not a fantasy. It’s literally how they used to do it back in the old days. No one sent marines to storm the capital in a coup attempt. Such an order would be clearly unconstitutional by the speech and debate clause.

REALLY?

Oh wow, so you can show the HOUSE arresting a member of the executive branch?

Let's see it.

iu
"Speech and debate clause"?!????

dumb-people1.jpg
 
Not a fantasy. It’s literally how they used to do it back in the old days. No one sent marines to storm the capital in a coup attempt. Such an order would be clearly unconstitutional by the speech and debate clause.

REALLY?

Oh wow, so you can show the HOUSE arresting a member of the executive branch?

Let's see it.

iu

The last arrest was like a century ago. There was a court case about it. Precedent is on my side.

McGrain v. Daugherty - Wikipedia
 
Focusing too much on any one exchange misses the complete story. Don't let yourself have blinders.

Sondland revised his testimony. He admits to preconditions on a White House meeting. He "doesn't remember" about other exchanges but does not contest the recollections of other's discussions with him where the preconditions were made explicit.

The Sept 9th phone call, if it even happened which is a little in doubt, was after Trump was made aware of the whistleblower report and his ability to keep a cap on the story (which the White House was going through great lengths to do) was over. So I don't exactly find his statement exculpatory since he knew he was in deep shit by the time he decided to say "no quid pro quo". His actions speak louder than words.

:rofl:

This coup is a farce, based on rumors, innuendo, slander, and third hand claims. It was STARTED because the Stalinist party FAILED in the Russian Collusion Conspiracy Theory. The farce was PREDICATED on a a whistleblower named Eric Ciaramella who turns out to be CIA operative who was FIRED from the NSC by President Trump because the little fucker leaked classified information to the little Goebbels.

But it gets better. Turns out that Ciaramella is a good buddy of Quid Pro Joe Biden.

{
Eric Ciaramella, the alleged Ukraine whistleblower, was a guest of Vice President Joe Biden at a glitzy lunch in October 2016 to honor the prime minister of Italy.

Biden co-hosted the banquet with former Secretary of State John Kerry for then-Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi. Ciaramella, who is of Italian heritage, was among the U.S. officials who accepted an invitation. This week, the Washington Examiner reported that Ciaramella is now a deputy national intelligence officer for Russia and Eurasia on the National Intelligence Council, reporting to the director of national intelligence.}

Alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella was Biden guest at State Department banquet

Of course Ciaramella is a confidant of KGB John Brennan and hand picked by the old Stalinist pile of shit himself;

{Federal documents reveal that the whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella, previously worked in the Obama administration with former Vice President Joe Biden and former CIA Director John Brennan. RealClear reports that Ciaramella remained there into the Trump administration, and headed the Ukraine desk at the National Security Council, eventually transitioning into the West Wing, until June 2017.}

Anti-Trump 'Whistleblower' Worked With DNC Operatives, Joe Biden

AND Ciaramella was involved in the Ukraine tampering with the 2016 election with Alexandra Chalupa.

{
Alexandra Chalupa was apparently hired by the DNC going as far back as 2013. According to Politico, shortly after the election:

A daughter of Ukrainian immigrants who maintains strong ties to the Ukrainian-American diaspora and the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine, Chalupa, a lawyer by training, in 2014 was doing pro bono work for another client interested in the Ukrainian crisis and began researching Manafort’s role in Yanukovych’s rise, as well as his ties to the pro-Russian oligarchs who funded Yanukovych’s political party.”

According to Politico, Chalupa claimed that in October of 2015 she began investigating Trump’s ties to Russia. Why she began this investigation is completely unknown. The only thing of significance that had happened at this point was that Trump announced he was running for office. There was no apparent triggering event. Candidate Trump had very limited contact with Russia or Russia businessmen

...

And Ciaramella worked with a Democratic National Committee operative who dug up dirt on the Trump campaign during the 2016 election, inviting her into the White House for meetings, former White House colleagues said. The operative, Alexandra Chalupa, a Ukrainian-American who supported Hillary Clinton, led an effort to link the Republican campaign to the Russian government. “He knows her. He had her in the White House,” said one former co-worker, who requested anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter.

Documents confirm the DNC opposition researcher attended at least one White House meeting with Ciaramella in November 2015. She visited the White House with a number of Ukrainian officials lobbying the Obama administration for aid for Ukraine.}

HUGE! CIA "Whistleblower" Eric Ciaramella Worked with DNC Operative Alexandra Chalupa in Creation of Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax

No WONDER you Communists hid his name and the little Goebbels covered it up...
Nice copy pasta but has nothing to do with the matter. Just a lot of obfuscation and distraction.

The facts are that Trump was pushing for an investigation into his political opponents. The fact is that Trump personally ordered a delay in foreign aid.

These facts alone raise reasonable suspicion.


afb112919dAPR20191129054509.jpg



The entire farrago is to hide the fact that Biden sold the office of the vice-presidency to China and a Ukrainian gas company.
And there is proof...PROOF.....of exactly that.

Don't be a dunce your whole life...take a day off.

proof. PROOF!

no there isn’t. There’s zero evidence. No one has shown anything of the sort.



Let's check:





The bribe at 02:15


Biden sidesteps questions about corruption;






Hunter Biden....drug addict, reprobate, no experience in the gas industry...or in Ukraine...

...yet given $83 thousand a month for the sale of the office of the vice-presidency.


And....
Interesting that when Biden was VP, he and his son Hunter went to deal with China, and Hunter came away with $millions.....

But Trump is immune to the bribes.


"The troubling reason why Biden is so soft on China
In 2013, then-Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden flew aboard Air Force Two to China. Less than two weeks later, Hunter Biden’s firm inked a $1 billion private equity deal with a subsidiary of the Chinese government’s Bank of China. The deal was later expanded to $1.5 billion. In short, the Chinese government funded a business that it co-owned along with the son of a sitting vice president."
https://nypost.com/2019/05/11/the-troubling-reason-why-biden-is-so-soft-on-china/


Sounds a lot like the $145 million Putin gave the Clintons.


Research this:

https https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/01/us/politics/biden-son-ukraine.html://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=5&v=lH_sdTC7Anw






PROOF!!!!!


Brutal, huh? Sorry you didn’t run with scissors when you had the chance?

Where is there proof that Biden was attempting to help his son by getting the prosecutor dismissed?
 
If Trump couldn't stop Vindman or Sondland from testifying, then how could he stop anyone else from testifying? If these people were forced to testify, do you actually imagine that they would say anything incriminating about Trump?

People have been instructed by Trump not to comply. That's a direct order from their superior. People can choose to ignore him at their own risk. Vindman and Sondland had to disobey Trump. This is a cute line, but it's not going to fly.

And?

Let's remind you, in case you are tempted to lie;

{
When he was asked by the Republican counsel, “To the best of your knowledge, do you know about any preconditions on the aid?” he responded, “No.”

“There were a lot of rumors swirling around as to why the aid had been held up, including they wanted a review, they wanted Europe to do more. There were all kinds of rumors,” he added.

He said he called the president on September 9, 2019, to find out what he wanted from Ukraine.

“He said: ‘I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo. I want Zelensky to do the right thing.’ And I said: ‘What does that mean?’ And he said: ‘I want him to do what he ran on.’ And that was the end of the conversation.”}

Transcript Reveals Gordon Sondland Never Knew of Any 'Quid Pro Quo'

Focusing too much on any one exchange misses the complete story. Don't let yourself have blinders.

Sondland revised his testimony. He admits to preconditions on a White House meeting. He "doesn't remember" about other exchanges but does not contest the recollections of other's discussions with him where the preconditions were made explicit.

The Sept 9th phone call, if it even happened which is a little in doubt, was after Trump was made aware of the whistleblower report and his ability to keep a cap on the story (which the White House was going through great lengths to do) was over. So I don't exactly find his statement exculpatory since he knew he was in deep shit by the time he decided to say "no quid pro quo". His actions speak louder than words.

:rofl:

This coup is a farce, based on rumors, innuendo, slander, and third hand claims. It was STARTED because the Stalinist party FAILED in the Russian Collusion Conspiracy Theory. The farce was PREDICATED on a a whistleblower named Eric Ciaramella who turns out to be CIA operative who was FIRED from the NSC by President Trump because the little fucker leaked classified information to the little Goebbels.

But it gets better. Turns out that Ciaramella is a good buddy of Quid Pro Joe Biden.

{
Eric Ciaramella, the alleged Ukraine whistleblower, was a guest of Vice President Joe Biden at a glitzy lunch in October 2016 to honor the prime minister of Italy.

Biden co-hosted the banquet with former Secretary of State John Kerry for then-Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi. Ciaramella, who is of Italian heritage, was among the U.S. officials who accepted an invitation. This week, the Washington Examiner reported that Ciaramella is now a deputy national intelligence officer for Russia and Eurasia on the National Intelligence Council, reporting to the director of national intelligence.}

Alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella was Biden guest at State Department banquet

Of course Ciaramella is a confidant of KGB John Brennan and hand picked by the old Stalinist pile of shit himself;

{Federal documents reveal that the whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella, previously worked in the Obama administration with former Vice President Joe Biden and former CIA Director John Brennan. RealClear reports that Ciaramella remained there into the Trump administration, and headed the Ukraine desk at the National Security Council, eventually transitioning into the West Wing, until June 2017.}

Anti-Trump 'Whistleblower' Worked With DNC Operatives, Joe Biden

AND Ciaramella was involved in the Ukraine tampering with the 2016 election with Alexandra Chalupa.

{
Alexandra Chalupa was apparently hired by the DNC going as far back as 2013. According to Politico, shortly after the election:

A daughter of Ukrainian immigrants who maintains strong ties to the Ukrainian-American diaspora and the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine, Chalupa, a lawyer by training, in 2014 was doing pro bono work for another client interested in the Ukrainian crisis and began researching Manafort’s role in Yanukovych’s rise, as well as his ties to the pro-Russian oligarchs who funded Yanukovych’s political party.”

According to Politico, Chalupa claimed that in October of 2015 she began investigating Trump’s ties to Russia. Why she began this investigation is completely unknown. The only thing of significance that had happened at this point was that Trump announced he was running for office. There was no apparent triggering event. Candidate Trump had very limited contact with Russia or Russia businessmen

...

And Ciaramella worked with a Democratic National Committee operative who dug up dirt on the Trump campaign during the 2016 election, inviting her into the White House for meetings, former White House colleagues said. The operative, Alexandra Chalupa, a Ukrainian-American who supported Hillary Clinton, led an effort to link the Republican campaign to the Russian government. “He knows her. He had her in the White House,” said one former co-worker, who requested anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter.

Documents confirm the DNC opposition researcher attended at least one White House meeting with Ciaramella in November 2015. She visited the White House with a number of Ukrainian officials lobbying the Obama administration for aid for Ukraine.}

HUGE! CIA "Whistleblower" Eric Ciaramella Worked with DNC Operative Alexandra Chalupa in Creation of Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax

No WONDER you Communists hid his name and the little Goebbels covered it up...
Nice copy pasta but has nothing to do with the matter. Just a lot of obfuscation and distraction.

The facts are that Trump was pushing for an investigation into his political opponents. The fact is that Trump personally ordered a delay in foreign aid.

These facts alone raise reasonable suspicion.

Facts destroy the Communist agenda, 100% of the time.

Look Comrade, you Communists hold the house and grossly abused your power to run the Soviet Star Chamber and the Stalinist Show Trial. But the Americans hold the Senate. If a lowly Logistics Scientist like me can put this together, trust me, the American Senators can.
 

Forum List

Back
Top