Corporate welfare in action ....

[Brain357]

Are you a communist that you want the government picking which companies are going to do well? Clearly you are not a free market capitalist.

That post made absolutely no sense, but you're the source so I understand

It seems you don't know what a free market capitalist is. Not surprising.

guess you don't

Corporate welfare violates the separation of business and state that is an important aspect of capitalism. It violates the principles of a free market by giving an uneven playing field, restraining certain industries through regulation or giving favored corporations a competitive advantage through subsidies. In short, corporate welfare is counterproductive to both capitalism and the free market.

Corporate Welfare Is Neither Free Market nor Capitalism - Personal Money Store

again, you're in error. Any company can move where ever they want, the government has no hands on where they set headquarters or satellite offices. wow

Then there is no point in making offers if it isn't effecting where the business goes, waste of taxpayer money.

 

[jc456]

Good thing companies don't

See if you can start a company and have 3 bil thrown at you.

Under the bill, the company would have 15 years to access the maximum $2.85 billion in cash payments tied to meeting the investment and hiring numbers. They can also receive $150 million in sales tax exemptions on construction equipment.

Wisconsin Legislature approves $3 billion incentive for Foxconn

like Illinois/ Chicago is going after Amazon for 50K jobs? those mean old politicians trying to bring jobs to their constituents rather than having them dependent on them. you're really not a very bright light.

So government is dictating where business goes and picking winners and losers. That is against capitalism and free market. And really bad use of tax dollars, anti conservative. But you support that?

how do you figure that? government has an offer, the business accepts or declines the offer. you're in error.

Accepting the offer is dictating where the business goes. Quite simple and obvious really. Not sure why you don't get it. Or
if you believe they are not dictating where the business goes, it is a complete waste of taxpayer money.

how do you figure, isn't it the company's choice where they wish to do business? again, you're in error hugely.

 

[jc456]

That post made absolutely no sense, but you're the source so I understand

It seems you don't know what a free market capitalist is. Not surprising.

guess you don't

Corporate welfare violates the separation of business and state that is an important aspect of capitalism. It violates the principles of a free market by giving an uneven playing field, restraining certain industries through regulation or giving favored corporations a competitive advantage through subsidies. In short, corporate welfare is counterproductive to both capitalism and the free market.

Corporate Welfare Is Neither Free Market nor Capitalism - Personal Money Store

again, you're in error. Any company can move where ever they want, the government has no hands on where they set headquarters or satellite offices. wow

Then there is no point in making offers if it isn't effecting where the business goes, waste of taxpayer money.

doesn't cost tax payers a dime.

 

[Brain357]

See if you can start a company and have 3 bil thrown at you.

Under the bill, the company would have 15 years to access the maximum $2.85 billion in cash payments tied to meeting the investment and hiring numbers. They can also receive $150 million in sales tax exemptions on construction equipment.

Wisconsin Legislature approves $3 billion incentive for Foxconn

like Illinois/ Chicago is going after Amazon for 50K jobs? those mean old politicians trying to bring jobs to their constituents rather than having them dependent on them. you're really not a very bright light.

So government is dictating where business goes and picking winners and losers. That is against capitalism and free market. And really bad use of tax dollars, anti conservative. But you support that?

how do you figure that? government has an offer, the business accepts or declines the offer. you're in error.

Accepting the offer is dictating where the business goes. Quite simple and obvious really. Not sure why you don't get it. Or
if you believe they are not dictating where the business goes, it is a complete waste of taxpayer money.

how do you figure, isn't it the company's choice where they wish to do business? again, you're in error hugely.

Their decision is being effected by government, not free market.

 

[Brain357]

It seems you don't know what a free market capitalist is. Not surprising.

guess you don't

Corporate welfare violates the separation of business and state that is an important aspect of capitalism. It violates the principles of a free market by giving an uneven playing field, restraining certain industries through regulation or giving favored corporations a competitive advantage through subsidies. In short, corporate welfare is counterproductive to both capitalism and the free market.

Corporate Welfare Is Neither Free Market nor Capitalism - Personal Money Store

again, you're in error. Any company can move where ever they want, the government has no hands on where they set headquarters or satellite offices. wow

Then there is no point in making offers if it isn't effecting where the business goes, waste of taxpayer money.

doesn't cost tax payers a dime.

Again since you are really slow:
Under the bill, the company would have 15 years to access the maximum $2.85 billion in cash payments tied to meeting the investment and hiring numbers. They can also receive $150 million in sales tax exemptions on construction equipment.

 

[jc456]

like Illinois/ Chicago is going after Amazon for 50K jobs? those mean old politicians trying to bring jobs to their constituents rather than having them dependent on them. you're really not a very bright light.

So government is dictating where business goes and picking winners and losers. That is against capitalism and free market. And really bad use of tax dollars, anti conservative. But you support that?

how do you figure that? government has an offer, the business accepts or declines the offer. you're in error.

Accepting the offer is dictating where the business goes. Quite simple and obvious really. Not sure why you don't get it. Or
if you believe they are not dictating where the business goes, it is a complete waste of taxpayer money.

how do you figure, isn't it the company's choice where they wish to do business? again, you're in error hugely.

Their decision is being effected by government, not free market.

no it isn't, you're wrong. someone needs to sell a product cheaper, it has to be made cheaper which means expenses and all overhead costs must be cut back. location may influence that in every way.

 

[jc456]

guess you don't

Corporate welfare violates the separation of business and state that is an important aspect of capitalism. It violates the principles of a free market by giving an uneven playing field, restraining certain industries through regulation or giving favored corporations a competitive advantage through subsidies. In short, corporate welfare is counterproductive to both capitalism and the free market.

Corporate Welfare Is Neither Free Market nor Capitalism - Personal Money Store

again, you're in error. Any company can move where ever they want, the government has no hands on where they set headquarters or satellite offices. wow

Then there is no point in making offers if it isn't effecting where the business goes, waste of taxpayer money.

doesn't cost tax payers a dime.

Again since you are really slow:
Under the bill, the company would have 15 years to access the maximum $2.85 billion in cash payments tied to meeting the investment and hiring numbers. They can also receive $150 million in sales tax exemptions on construction equipment.

under what bill?

 

[Brain357]

So government is dictating where business goes and picking winners and losers. That is against capitalism and free market. And really bad use of tax dollars, anti conservative. But you support that?

how do you figure that? government has an offer, the business accepts or declines the offer. you're in error.

Accepting the offer is dictating where the business goes. Quite simple and obvious really. Not sure why you don't get it. Or
if you believe they are not dictating where the business goes, it is a complete waste of taxpayer money.

how do you figure, isn't it the company's choice where they wish to do business? again, you're in error hugely.

Their decision is being effected by government, not free market.

no it isn't, you're wrong. someone needs to sell a product cheaper, it has to be made cheaper which means expenses and all overhead costs must be cut back. location may influence that in every way.

If it isn't, then tax payer money is being wasted. Not the governments job to fund private business.

 

[Brain357]

Corporate welfare violates the separation of business and state that is an important aspect of capitalism. It violates the principles of a free market by giving an uneven playing field, restraining certain industries through regulation or giving favored corporations a competitive advantage through subsidies. In short, corporate welfare is counterproductive to both capitalism and the free market.

Corporate Welfare Is Neither Free Market nor Capitalism - Personal Money Store

again, you're in error. Any company can move where ever they want, the government has no hands on where they set headquarters or satellite offices. wow

Then there is no point in making offers if it isn't effecting where the business goes, waste of taxpayer money.

doesn't cost tax payers a dime.

Again since you are really slow:
Under the bill, the company would have 15 years to access the maximum $2.85 billion in cash payments tied to meeting the investment and hiring numbers. They can also receive $150 million in sales tax exemptions on construction equipment.

under what bill?

Foxconn. I've posted the link many times. How slow are you?

 

[Brain357]

Corporate welfare violates the separation of business and state that is an important aspect of capitalism. It violates the principles of a free market by giving an uneven playing field, restraining certain industries through regulation or giving favored corporations a competitive advantage through subsidies. In short, corporate welfare is counterproductive to both capitalism and the free market.

Corporate Welfare Is Neither Free Market nor Capitalism - Personal Money Store

again, you're in error. Any company can move where ever they want, the government has no hands on where they set headquarters or satellite offices. wow

Then there is no point in making offers if it isn't effecting where the business goes, waste of taxpayer money.

doesn't cost tax payers a dime.

Again since you are really slow:
Under the bill, the company would have 15 years to access the maximum $2.85 billion in cash payments tied to meeting the investment and hiring numbers. They can also receive $150 million in sales tax exemptions on construction equipment.

under what bill?

Wisconsin Legislature approves $3 billion incentive for Foxconn

 

[jc456]

how do you figure that? government has an offer, the business accepts or declines the offer. you're in error.

Accepting the offer is dictating where the business goes. Quite simple and obvious really. Not sure why you don't get it. Or
if you believe they are not dictating where the business goes, it is a complete waste of taxpayer money.

how do you figure, isn't it the company's choice where they wish to do business? again, you're in error hugely.

Their decision is being effected by government, not free market.

no it isn't, you're wrong. someone needs to sell a product cheaper, it has to be made cheaper which means expenses and all overhead costs must be cut back. location may influence that in every way.

If it isn't, then tax payer money is being wasted. Not the governments job to fund private business.

the government isn't in your scenarios, they did in Solyndra case and unacceptable.

 

[jc456]

again, you're in error. Any company can move where ever they want, the government has no hands on where they set headquarters or satellite offices. wow

Then there is no point in making offers if it isn't effecting where the business goes, waste of taxpayer money.

doesn't cost tax payers a dime.

Again since you are really slow:
Under the bill, the company would have 15 years to access the maximum $2.85 billion in cash payments tied to meeting the investment and hiring numbers. They can also receive $150 million in sales tax exemptions on construction equipment.

under what bill?

Wisconsin Legislature approves $3 billion incentive for Foxconn

incentive is not a payment of anything. too funny

 

[Brain357]

Then there is no point in making offers if it isn't effecting where the business goes, waste of taxpayer money.

doesn't cost tax payers a dime.

Again since you are really slow:
Under the bill, the company would have 15 years to access the maximum $2.85 billion in cash payments tied to meeting the investment and hiring numbers. They can also receive $150 million in sales tax exemptions on construction equipment.

under what bill?

Wisconsin Legislature approves $3 billion incentive for Foxconn

incentive is not a payment of anything. too funny

You don't read very well.

Under the bill, the company would have 15 years to access the maximum $2.85 billion in cash payments tied to meeting the investment and hiring numbers. They can also receive $150 million in sales tax exemptions on construction equipment.

 

[Brain357]

Accepting the offer is dictating where the business goes. Quite simple and obvious really. Not sure why you don't get it. Or
if you believe they are not dictating where the business goes, it is a complete waste of taxpayer money.

how do you figure, isn't it the company's choice where they wish to do business? again, you're in error hugely.

Their decision is being effected by government, not free market.

no it isn't, you're wrong. someone needs to sell a product cheaper, it has to be made cheaper which means expenses and all overhead costs must be cut back. location may influence that in every way.

If it isn't, then tax payer money is being wasted. Not the governments job to fund private business.

the government isn't in your scenarios, they did in Solyndra case and unacceptable.

Foxconn is worse than solyndra. You really don't make any sense.

 

[jc456]

how do you figure, isn't it the company's choice where they wish to do business? again, you're in error hugely.

Their decision is being effected by government, not free market.

no it isn't, you're wrong. someone needs to sell a product cheaper, it has to be made cheaper which means expenses and all overhead costs must be cut back. location may influence that in every way.

If it isn't, then tax payer money is being wasted. Not the governments job to fund private business.

the government isn't in your scenarios, they did in Solyndra case and unacceptable.

Foxconn is worse than solyndra. You really don't make any sense.

how do you figure? Solyndra didn't agree to any guaranteed money like Foxconn is in this bill. Foxconn had to invest 10 billion and 13000 jobs to get a 3 billion incentive. what did Solyndra put up as collateral? again, looks like a great deal for Wisconsin, gets deadheads suckers working.

 

[Brain357]

Their decision is being effected by government, not free market.

no it isn't, you're wrong. someone needs to sell a product cheaper, it has to be made cheaper which means expenses and all overhead costs must be cut back. location may influence that in every way.

If it isn't, then tax payer money is being wasted. Not the governments job to fund private business.

the government isn't in your scenarios, they did in Solyndra case and unacceptable.

Foxconn is worse than solyndra. You really don't make any sense.

how do you figure? Solyndra didn't agree to any guaranteed money like Foxconn is in this bill. Foxconn had to invest 10 billion and 13000 jobs to get a 3 billion incentive. what did Solyndra put up as collateral? again, looks like a great deal for Wisconsin, gets deadheads suckers working.

The WI tax payers giving $3 billion to a foreign company is a good deal? You must be a communist.

 

[Brain357]

Their decision is being effected by government, not free market.

no it isn't, you're wrong. someone needs to sell a product cheaper, it has to be made cheaper which means expenses and all overhead costs must be cut back. location may influence that in every way.

If it isn't, then tax payer money is being wasted. Not the governments job to fund private business.

the government isn't in your scenarios, they did in Solyndra case and unacceptable.

Foxconn is worse than solyndra. You really don't make any sense.

how do you figure? Solyndra didn't agree to any guaranteed money like Foxconn is in this bill. Foxconn had to invest 10 billion and 13000 jobs to get a 3 billion incentive. what did Solyndra put up as collateral? again, looks like a great deal for Wisconsin, gets deadheads suckers working.

Why do you think it is the role of government to pay for the expansion of foreign companies?

 

[jc456]

no it isn't, you're wrong. someone needs to sell a product cheaper, it has to be made cheaper which means expenses and all overhead costs must be cut back. location may influence that in every way.

If it isn't, then tax payer money is being wasted. Not the governments job to fund private business.

the government isn't in your scenarios, they did in Solyndra case and unacceptable.

Foxconn is worse than solyndra. You really don't make any sense.

how do you figure? Solyndra didn't agree to any guaranteed money like Foxconn is in this bill. Foxconn had to invest 10 billion and 13000 jobs to get a 3 billion incentive. what did Solyndra put up as collateral? again, looks like a great deal for Wisconsin, gets deadheads suckers working.

The WI tax payers giving $3 billion to a foreign company is a good deal? You must be a communist.

no that isn't what they're doing at all. read the bill idiot.

 

[jc456]

no it isn't, you're wrong. someone needs to sell a product cheaper, it has to be made cheaper which means expenses and all overhead costs must be cut back. location may influence that in every way.

If it isn't, then tax payer money is being wasted. Not the governments job to fund private business.

the government isn't in your scenarios, they did in Solyndra case and unacceptable.

Foxconn is worse than solyndra. You really don't make any sense.

how do you figure? Solyndra didn't agree to any guaranteed money like Foxconn is in this bill. Foxconn had to invest 10 billion and 13000 jobs to get a 3 billion incentive. what did Solyndra put up as collateral? again, looks like a great deal for Wisconsin, gets deadheads suckers working.

Why do you think it is the role of government to pay for the expansion of foreign companies?

it is the role of government to provide jobs for their citizens. sounds like that's what they're doing. thank you!!!!

 

[Brain357]

If it isn't, then tax payer money is being wasted. Not the governments job to fund private business.

the government isn't in your scenarios, they did in Solyndra case and unacceptable.

Foxconn is worse than solyndra. You really don't make any sense.

how do you figure? Solyndra didn't agree to any guaranteed money like Foxconn is in this bill. Foxconn had to invest 10 billion and 13000 jobs to get a 3 billion incentive. what did Solyndra put up as collateral? again, looks like a great deal for Wisconsin, gets deadheads suckers working.

The WI tax payers giving $3 billion to a foreign company is a good deal? You must be a communist.

no that isn't what they're doing at all. read the bill idiot.

Again because you are really slow:

Under the bill, the company would have 15 years to access the maximum $2.85 billion in cash payments tied to meeting the investment and hiring numbers. They can also receive $150 million in sales tax exemptions on construction equipment.