Corporate welfare in action ....

No, in the real word. No other way to see cash payments to a company.
no, just cause you can post on a message board doesn't mean anything you write is accurate. I posted the language in the bill. the company is providing collateral, not the government paying cash. again, just cause you have the ability to post, doesn't change the fact of what is actually happening.
The wording is very clear, they will receive cash payments. Are you dishonest or really stupid? Both probably?
after they deposit 10 billion and employ 13,000. It's a refund. like buying a bottle of pop and getting money back when you bring back the empty bottle. Or recycling aluminum, you get the aluminum and turn it in for a refund. it's really simple bubba.

They would have to pay taxes to call it a refund. They won't be doing that.
they are paying, up front. 10 billion dollars worth with the investment of hiring 13,000 employees. It's called an investment, they are gambling the people of WI will produce for them the billions they invested. I get it, you don't understand investments. you're a fking libturd, what else would I expect.

You don't understand a refund. You see Foxconn would have to pay WI 10 billion for it to be a refund. They aren't paying WI anything, they are just getting a welfare payout. Cute try though. BTW, you think 3 billion for 13,000 jobs is a good deal? You must not value tax dollars.
 
capitalism.jpg
 
no that isn't what they're doing at all. read the bill idiot.

Again because you are really slow:

Under the bill, the company would have 15 years to access the maximum $2.85 billion in cash payments tied to meeting the investment and hiring numbers. They can also receive $150 million in sales tax exemptions on construction equipment.
again, you can't read: "The bill approved on a bipartisan 64-31 vote would make $2.85 billion available to Foxconn Technology in cash payments if it invests $10 billion and hires 13,000 workers. The Senate approved the proposal Tuesday."

i can't stand people misleading the public like you. shame on you
The right wing doesn't have a problem with corporate welfare, only welfare for Individuals.

So it would seem.

Why not invest in better welfare schemes, and insist the People, have to engage in better morals for it.

THIS is exactly why I'm opposed to welfare, corporate or otherwise. THIS is exactly what lurks behind every welfare scheme: a lever to control people. Fuck that.
no different than a job, company owns my time.

Only if you agree to sell it to them. Taxes are forced - it's essentially money that's stolen from us. And then that jackasses like you want to see government demanding that we jump through hoops to get it back.

This really all goes back to something you said earlier - that you think the government is there to provide us with jobs. That's socialism, something I'm hoping we can still avoid.
 
The competitive wage is below a livable wage making the competitive wage be too low.

Define: Exact worth.

Employees that are degreed for certification (example: Engineer) generally make more because the employer must have them to operate, otherwise no.

I never wrote 'where and how they live.' I wrote livable wage.

Is exact worth a bit much for you? What part is difficult for you to comprehend?

My entire life I was paid my exact worth. That's why I have either been an independent contractor or business owner the past 45 years. I wanted to be in control of how much I am paid. For that, I took a huge risk and assumed personal responsibility if I failed. I succeeded beyond my own expectations.

Generally, those who hire engineers are themselves, engineers. So again they know the exact value of an engineer to their business. If they're good enough, they may be offered a place in the firm as a partner.

Define: Livable Wage without it referring to where and how they live.
 
The WI tax payers giving $3 billion to a foreign company is a good deal? You must be a communist.
no that isn't what they're doing at all. read the bill idiot.

Again because you are really slow:

Under the bill, the company would have 15 years to access the maximum $2.85 billion in cash payments tied to meeting the investment and hiring numbers. They can also receive $150 million in sales tax exemptions on construction equipment.
again, you can't read: "The bill approved on a bipartisan 64-31 vote would make $2.85 billion available to Foxconn Technology in cash payments if it invests $10 billion and hires 13,000 workers. The Senate approved the proposal Tuesday."

i can't stand people misleading the public like you. shame on you
The right wing doesn't have a problem with corporate welfare, only welfare for Individuals.

Why not invest in better welfare schemes, and insist the People, have to engage in better morals for it.
again, no such thing as corporate whatever you call it. giving out money for nothing is welfare.
redistribution of wealth is what it is; socialism does it, capitalism doesn't. any questions.
 
Again because you are really slow:

Under the bill, the company would have 15 years to access the maximum $2.85 billion in cash payments tied to meeting the investment and hiring numbers. They can also receive $150 million in sales tax exemptions on construction equipment.
again, you can't read: "The bill approved on a bipartisan 64-31 vote would make $2.85 billion available to Foxconn Technology in cash payments if it invests $10 billion and hires 13,000 workers. The Senate approved the proposal Tuesday."

i can't stand people misleading the public like you. shame on you
The right wing doesn't have a problem with corporate welfare, only welfare for Individuals.

Why not invest in better welfare schemes, and insist the People, have to engage in better morals for it.
again, no such thing as corporate whatever you call it. giving out money for nothing is welfare.
redistribution of income is socialist, not capitalist. The right wing Only complains when income is redistributed to the poor.
redistribution happens everyday around the nation, for goods purchased. And most americans work for the money they use to redistribute. only the poor feel they can sit on their ass and get paid.
By the public sector. It makes all the difference in the world, except to the right wing.
 
Contract carriers.

Amazon To Roll Out A Fleet Of Branded Trailer Trucks
Leena Rao
Dec 04, 2015
ReCode reported on Friday, comes days after the company revealed how its new drones will be able to deliver packages to shoppers in 30 minutes.

Instead of using the trucks for delivery to customers, Amazon (AMZN, +0.35%) said that trailers will be used to move packages between Amazon fulfillment centers. Currently, Amazon partners with trucking companies, and will continue to work with these businesses to manage the branded trucks.

[...]

Amazon To Roll Out A Fleet Of Branded Trailer Trucks
 
The WI tax payers giving $3 billion to a foreign company is a good deal? You must be a communist.
no that isn't what they're doing at all. read the bill idiot.

Again because you are really slow:

Under the bill, the company would have 15 years to access the maximum $2.85 billion in cash payments tied to meeting the investment and hiring numbers. They can also receive $150 million in sales tax exemptions on construction equipment.
again, you can't read: "The bill approved on a bipartisan 64-31 vote would make $2.85 billion available to Foxconn Technology in cash payments if it invests $10 billion and hires 13,000 workers. The Senate approved the proposal Tuesday."

i can't stand people misleading the public like you. shame on you
The right wing doesn't have a problem with corporate welfare, only welfare for Individuals.

So it would seem.

Why not invest in better welfare schemes, and insist the People, have to engage in better morals for it.

THIS is exactly why I'm opposed to welfare, corporate or otherwise. THIS is exactly what lurks behind every welfare scheme: a lever to control people. Fuck that.
Religion is a form of control.
 

I assume you are against corporate welfare then? Cause it certainly isn't capitalism.

I think the problem is that some of them only know one argument.
No, the problem is that any argument will do against capitalism.
You make it seem like it is either, or; socialists know we should try to merely use Capitalism, for all of its worth in modern economic times.
 

I assume you are against corporate welfare then? Cause it certainly isn't capitalism.
What it being discussed isn't corporate welfare.

I have been discussing corporate welfare. For example the Foxconn deal:


Under the bill, the company would have 15 years to access the maximum $2.85 billion in cash payments tied to meeting the investment and hiring numbers. They can also receive $150 million in sales tax exemptions on construction equipment.
 

I assume you are against corporate welfare then? Cause it certainly isn't capitalism.
What it being discussed isn't corporate welfare.

I have been discussing corporate welfare. For example the Foxconn deal:


Under the bill, the company would have 15 years to access the maximum $2.85 billion in cash payments tied to meeting the investment and hiring numbers. They can also receive $150 million in sales tax exemptions on construction equipment.

Are you a citizen living in Wisconsin?
 

I assume you are against corporate welfare then? Cause it certainly isn't capitalism.
What it being discussed isn't corporate welfare.

I have been discussing corporate welfare. For example the Foxconn deal:


Under the bill, the company would have 15 years to access the maximum $2.85 billion in cash payments tied to meeting the investment and hiring numbers. They can also receive $150 million in sales tax exemptions on construction equipment.

Are you a citizen living in Wisconsin?

Don't see how that matters. Cash payments from the government to a business is clearly corp welfare and against free market capitalism.
 
Don't see how that matters. Cash payments from the government to a business is clearly corp welfare and against free market capitalism.

It matters because if you are not a citizen of Wisconsin, this whole issue is none of your business. It is solely the business Wisconsinites.
 
Don't see how that matters. Cash payments from the government to a business is clearly corp welfare and against free market capitalism.

It matters because if you are not a citizen of Wisconsin, this whole issue is none of your business. It is solely the business Wisconsinites.

Sure I am then.

It is an example of corporate welfare regardless. Cash payments from gov to business. Cute none of your business argument though.
 

Forum List

Back
Top