Cops Raid Women’s Restroom, Assault and Drag Lesbian Out Thinking She’s a Man

[Pop23]

My daughter called me in tears over this issue. She cancelled her speaking appearance for a convention at a hotel in NC to show her support for the LBGT community.

Why?

Does she want same sex marriage overturned?

She was upset over the inbred republicans trying to keep transgenders from using the restroom of their choice.

She doesn't understand that applying arbitrary laws against simalarily situated adults is what allowed same sex marriage bans?

She should study the court rulings in "Loving", Windsor" and "Obergfell", Cuz arbitrary application of the law could end Same Sex Marriage and bring back Jim Crow laws.

Why don't they teach Civics in school anymore.

Pity ain't it?

You've posted no evidence to support that claim, what you have posted is an opinion based on a willfully misrepresentation of those cases and laws.

You hate women and Gay Marriage?

 

[Asclepias]

My daughter called me in tears over this issue. She cancelled her speaking appearance for a convention at a hotel in NC to show her support for the LBGT community.

Why?

Does she want same sex marriage overturned?

She was upset over the inbred republicans trying to keep transgenders from using the restroom of their choice.

She doesn't understand that applying arbitrary laws against simalarily situated adults is what allowed same sex marriage bans?

She should study the court rulings in "Loving", Windsor" and "Obergfell", Cuz arbitrary application of the law could end Same Sex Marriage and bring back Jim Crow laws.

Why don't they teach Civics in school anymore.

Pity ain't it?

Actually she used Jim Crow laws as a basis for her reason to boycott NC. She compared it to the separation of Black and white. She is a lot smarter than most people and received a full ride academic scholarship so she actually pities people that dont understand things like this.

Then she understands that you can't allow just a certain sub group in, without allowing the entire group. That's how rights work.

Then, you can't exclude from showers and lockers as well, because equality is not limited by a doorway.

Oh well, what rights to privacy that the 99.97% must give up to make .03% of the population (that are already protected by hate crime laws) a tiny bit more accepted. That's even debateable

Actually you can. There is nothing to stop law makers from saying "with the exclusion of restrooms inside of unisex lockers". Obviously you dont know much about laws.

 

[daws101]

My daughter called me in tears over this issue. She cancelled her speaking appearance for a convention at a hotel in NC to show her support for the LBGT community.

Why?

Does she want same sex marriage overturned?

That was fucking un called for.

I know you want it.

You fight for arbitrary discrimination against simalarily situated citazens.

Just like you claim to know what you erroneously knew I didn't believe the subject of this thread was a setup!
That kind of knowing?
The law is not arbitrary and your claim of similarly situated people is misapplied.
Fail.

 

[daws101]

My daughter called me in tears over this issue. She cancelled her speaking appearance for a convention at a hotel in NC to show her support for the LBGT community.

Why?

Does she want same sex marriage overturned?

She was upset over the inbred republicans trying to keep transgenders from using the restroom of their choice.

She doesn't understand that applying arbitrary laws against simalarily situated adults is what allowed same sex marriage bans?

She should study the court rulings in "Loving", Windsor" and "Obergfell", Cuz arbitrary application of the law could end Same Sex Marriage and bring back Jim Crow laws.

Why don't they teach Civics in school anymore.

Pity ain't it?

You've posted no evidence to support that claim, what you have posted is an opinion based on a willfully misrepresentation of those cases and laws.

You hate women and Gay Marriage?

Asked and answered.
Next assumption. ..

 

[Pop23]

Why?

Does she want same sex marriage overturned?

She was upset over the inbred republicans trying to keep transgenders from using the restroom of their choice.

She doesn't understand that applying arbitrary laws against simalarily situated adults is what allowed same sex marriage bans?

She should study the court rulings in "Loving", Windsor" and "Obergfell", Cuz arbitrary application of the law could end Same Sex Marriage and bring back Jim Crow laws.

Why don't they teach Civics in school anymore.

Pity ain't it?

Actually she used Jim Crow laws as a basis for her reason to boycott NC. She compared it to the separation of Black and white. She is a lot smarter than most people and received a full ride academic scholarship so she actually pities people that dont understand things like this.

Then she understands that you can't allow just a certain sub group in, without allowing the entire group. That's how rights work.

Then, you can't exclude from showers and lockers as well, because equality is not limited by a doorway.

Oh well, what rights to privacy that the 99.97% must give up to make .03% of the population (that are already protected by hate crime laws) a tiny bit more accepted. That's even debateable

Actually you can. There is nothing to stop law makers from saying "with the exclusion of restrooms inside of unisex lockers".

They can say it, but done in an arbitrary fashion it can't stand.

Look at it this way

Blacks can use the restroom in the gym, but must use only the colored showers.

Go ahead, your logic will take us backwards 150 years

 

[daws101]

She was upset over the inbred republicans trying to keep transgenders from using the restroom of their choice.

She doesn't understand that applying arbitrary laws against simalarily situated adults is what allowed same sex marriage bans?

She should study the court rulings in "Loving", Windsor" and "Obergfell", Cuz arbitrary application of the law could end Same Sex Marriage and bring back Jim Crow laws.

Why don't they teach Civics in school anymore.

Pity ain't it?

Actually she used Jim Crow laws as a basis for her reason to boycott NC. She compared it to the separation of Black and white. She is a lot smarter than most people and received a full ride academic scholarship so she actually pities people that dont understand things like this.

Then she understands that you can't allow just a certain sub group in, without allowing the entire group. That's how rights work.

Then, you can't exclude from showers and lockers as well, because equality is not limited by a doorway.

Oh well, what rights to privacy that the 99.97% must give up to make .03% of the population (that are already protected by hate crime laws) a tiny bit more accepted. That's even debateable

Actually you can. There is nothing to stop law makers from saying "with the exclusion of restrooms inside of unisex lockers".

They can say it, but done in an arbitrary fashion it can't stand.

Look at it this way

Blacks can use the restroom in the gym, but must use only the colored showers.

Go ahead, your logic will take us backwards 150 years

False! it's the lack of logic that you are showing that will take us back to the bad old daze.

 

[Pop23]

Why?

Does she want same sex marriage overturned?

She was upset over the inbred republicans trying to keep transgenders from using the restroom of their choice.

She doesn't understand that applying arbitrary laws against simalarily situated adults is what allowed same sex marriage bans?

She should study the court rulings in "Loving", Windsor" and "Obergfell", Cuz arbitrary application of the law could end Same Sex Marriage and bring back Jim Crow laws.

Why don't they teach Civics in school anymore.

Pity ain't it?

You've posted no evidence to support that claim, what you have posted is an opinion based on a willfully misrepresentation of those cases and laws.

You hate women and Gay Marriage?

Asked and answered.
Next assumption. ..

Your butthurt is showing

Maybe next time wear big boy pants instead of that dress.

 

[Pop23]

She doesn't understand that applying arbitrary laws against simalarily situated adults is what allowed same sex marriage bans?

She should study the court rulings in "Loving", Windsor" and "Obergfell", Cuz arbitrary application of the law could end Same Sex Marriage and bring back Jim Crow laws.

Why don't they teach Civics in school anymore.

Pity ain't it?

Actually she used Jim Crow laws as a basis for her reason to boycott NC. She compared it to the separation of Black and white. She is a lot smarter than most people and received a full ride academic scholarship so she actually pities people that dont understand things like this.

Then she understands that you can't allow just a certain sub group in, without allowing the entire group. That's how rights work.

Then, you can't exclude from showers and lockers as well, because equality is not limited by a doorway.

Oh well, what rights to privacy that the 99.97% must give up to make .03% of the population (that are already protected by hate crime laws) a tiny bit more accepted. That's even debateable

Actually you can. There is nothing to stop law makers from saying "with the exclusion of restrooms inside of unisex lockers".

They can say it, but done in an arbitrary fashion it can't stand.

Look at it this way

Blacks can use the restroom in the gym, but must use only the colored showers.

Go ahead, your logic will take us backwards 150 years

False! it's the lack of logic that you are showing that will take us back to the bad old daze.

And the lack of logic is???????


Awaiting the next Dawsism

 

[Asclepias]

She was upset over the inbred republicans trying to keep transgenders from using the restroom of their choice.

She doesn't understand that applying arbitrary laws against simalarily situated adults is what allowed same sex marriage bans?

She should study the court rulings in "Loving", Windsor" and "Obergfell", Cuz arbitrary application of the law could end Same Sex Marriage and bring back Jim Crow laws.

Why don't they teach Civics in school anymore.

Pity ain't it?

Actually she used Jim Crow laws as a basis for her reason to boycott NC. She compared it to the separation of Black and white. She is a lot smarter than most people and received a full ride academic scholarship so she actually pities people that dont understand things like this.

Then she understands that you can't allow just a certain sub group in, without allowing the entire group. That's how rights work.

Then, you can't exclude from showers and lockers as well, because equality is not limited by a doorway.

Oh well, what rights to privacy that the 99.97% must give up to make .03% of the population (that are already protected by hate crime laws) a tiny bit more accepted. That's even debateable

Actually you can. There is nothing to stop law makers from saying "with the exclusion of restrooms inside of unisex lockers".

They can say it, but done in an arbitrary fashion it can't stand.

Look at it this way

Blacks can use the restroom in the gym, but must use only the colored showers.

Go ahead, your logic will take us backwards 150 years

Your logical fallacy didnt pass my test.

 

[daws101]

She was upset over the inbred republicans trying to keep transgenders from using the restroom of their choice.

She doesn't understand that applying arbitrary laws against simalarily situated adults is what allowed same sex marriage bans?

She should study the court rulings in "Loving", Windsor" and "Obergfell", Cuz arbitrary application of the law could end Same Sex Marriage and bring back Jim Crow laws.

Why don't they teach Civics in school anymore.

Pity ain't it?

You've posted no evidence to support that claim, what you have posted is an opinion based on a willfully misrepresentation of those cases and laws.

You hate women and Gay Marriage?

Asked and answered.
Next assumption. ..

Your butthurt is showing

Maybe next time wear big boy pants instead of that dress.

There's that cowardly need to talk shit when you are getting your ass handed to you constantly.

 

[Asclepias]

Actually she used Jim Crow laws as a basis for her reason to boycott NC. She compared it to the separation of Black and white. She is a lot smarter than most people and received a full ride academic scholarship so she actually pities people that dont understand things like this.

Then she understands that you can't allow just a certain sub group in, without allowing the entire group. That's how rights work.

Then, you can't exclude from showers and lockers as well, because equality is not limited by a doorway.

Oh well, what rights to privacy that the 99.97% must give up to make .03% of the population (that are already protected by hate crime laws) a tiny bit more accepted. That's even debateable

Actually you can. There is nothing to stop law makers from saying "with the exclusion of restrooms inside of unisex lockers".

They can say it, but done in an arbitrary fashion it can't stand.

Look at it this way

Blacks can use the restroom in the gym, but must use only the colored showers.

Go ahead, your logic will take us backwards 150 years

False! it's the lack of logic that you are showing that will take us back to the bad old daze.

And the lack of logic is???????


Awaiting the next Dawsism

The lack of common sense for starters.

 

[daws101]

Actually she used Jim Crow laws as a basis for her reason to boycott NC. She compared it to the separation of Black and white. She is a lot smarter than most people and received a full ride academic scholarship so she actually pities people that dont understand things like this.

Then she understands that you can't allow just a certain sub group in, without allowing the entire group. That's how rights work.

Then, you can't exclude from showers and lockers as well, because equality is not limited by a doorway.

Oh well, what rights to privacy that the 99.97% must give up to make .03% of the population (that are already protected by hate crime laws) a tiny bit more accepted. That's even debateable

Actually you can. There is nothing to stop law makers from saying "with the exclusion of restrooms inside of unisex lockers".

They can say it, but done in an arbitrary fashion it can't stand.

Look at it this way

Blacks can use the restroom in the gym, but must use only the colored showers.

Go ahead, your logic will take us backwards 150 years

False! it's the lack of logic that you are showing that will take us back to the bad old daze.

And the lack of logic is???????


Awaiting the next Dawsism

Everything You post on this subject is based on knee jerk penis phobia, sheer emotion, and rationalization.
Each one is diametrically opposed to logic and reason.

 

[Asclepias]

Then she understands that you can't allow just a certain sub group in, without allowing the entire group. That's how rights work.

Then, you can't exclude from showers and lockers as well, because equality is not limited by a doorway.

Oh well, what rights to privacy that the 99.97% must give up to make .03% of the population (that are already protected by hate crime laws) a tiny bit more accepted. That's even debateable

Actually you can. There is nothing to stop law makers from saying "with the exclusion of restrooms inside of unisex lockers".

They can say it, but done in an arbitrary fashion it can't stand.

Look at it this way

Blacks can use the restroom in the gym, but must use only the colored showers.

Go ahead, your logic will take us backwards 150 years

False! it's the lack of logic that you are showing that will take us back to the bad old daze.

And the lack of logic is???????


Awaiting the next Dawsism

Everything You post on this subject is based on knee jerk penis phobia, sheer emotion, and rationalization.
Each one is diametrically opposed to logic and reason.

What really makes me laugh is faulty logic regarding exclusions. I guess he think free speech means you can incite a riot.

 

[Pop23]

She doesn't understand that applying arbitrary laws against simalarily situated adults is what allowed same sex marriage bans?

She should study the court rulings in "Loving", Windsor" and "Obergfell", Cuz arbitrary application of the law could end Same Sex Marriage and bring back Jim Crow laws.

Why don't they teach Civics in school anymore.

Pity ain't it?

Actually she used Jim Crow laws as a basis for her reason to boycott NC. She compared it to the separation of Black and white. She is a lot smarter than most people and received a full ride academic scholarship so she actually pities people that dont understand things like this.

Then she understands that you can't allow just a certain sub group in, without allowing the entire group. That's how rights work.

Then, you can't exclude from showers and lockers as well, because equality is not limited by a doorway.

Oh well, what rights to privacy that the 99.97% must give up to make .03% of the population (that are already protected by hate crime laws) a tiny bit more accepted. That's even debateable

Actually you can. There is nothing to stop law makers from saying "with the exclusion of restrooms inside of unisex lockers".

They can say it, but done in an arbitrary fashion it can't stand.

Look at it this way

Blacks can use the restroom in the gym, but must use only the colored showers.

Go ahead, your logic will take us backwards 150 years

Your logical fallacy didnt pass my test.

Point it out, if you could you would.

The basis of all civil rights is that you can't arbitrarily discriminate against individuals that are similarly situated.

I support the concept, you don't.

That makes me the Progressive in this discussion and you and Daws the Regressives.

And you can't make that shit up folks.

 

[Pop23]

Then she understands that you can't allow just a certain sub group in, without allowing the entire group. That's how rights work.

Then, you can't exclude from showers and lockers as well, because equality is not limited by a doorway.

Oh well, what rights to privacy that the 99.97% must give up to make .03% of the population (that are already protected by hate crime laws) a tiny bit more accepted. That's even debateable

Actually you can. There is nothing to stop law makers from saying "with the exclusion of restrooms inside of unisex lockers".

They can say it, but done in an arbitrary fashion it can't stand.

Look at it this way

Blacks can use the restroom in the gym, but must use only the colored showers.

Go ahead, your logic will take us backwards 150 years

False! it's the lack of logic that you are showing that will take us back to the bad old daze.

And the lack of logic is???????


Awaiting the next Dawsism

The lack of common sense for starters.

Point it out, again, you can't.

 

[Pop23]

Then she understands that you can't allow just a certain sub group in, without allowing the entire group. That's how rights work.

Then, you can't exclude from showers and lockers as well, because equality is not limited by a doorway.

Oh well, what rights to privacy that the 99.97% must give up to make .03% of the population (that are already protected by hate crime laws) a tiny bit more accepted. That's even debateable

Actually you can. There is nothing to stop law makers from saying "with the exclusion of restrooms inside of unisex lockers".

They can say it, but done in an arbitrary fashion it can't stand.

Look at it this way

Blacks can use the restroom in the gym, but must use only the colored showers.

Go ahead, your logic will take us backwards 150 years

False! it's the lack of logic that you are showing that will take us back to the bad old daze.

And the lack of logic is???????


Awaiting the next Dawsism

Everything You post on this subject is based on knee jerk penis phobia, sheer emotion, and rationalization.
Each one is diametrically opposed to logic and reason.

Your emotional outburst is so Jim Crow like it's funny

 

[Pop23]

Actually you can. There is nothing to stop law makers from saying "with the exclusion of restrooms inside of unisex lockers".

They can say it, but done in an arbitrary fashion it can't stand.

Look at it this way

Blacks can use the restroom in the gym, but must use only the colored showers.

Go ahead, your logic will take us backwards 150 years

False! it's the lack of logic that you are showing that will take us back to the bad old daze.

And the lack of logic is???????


Awaiting the next Dawsism

Everything You post on this subject is based on knee jerk penis phobia, sheer emotion, and rationalization.
Each one is diametrically opposed to logic and reason.

What really makes me laugh is faulty logic regarding exclusions. I guess he think free speech means you can incite a riot.

Free speech is not a civil right

Take a civics class.

So a state can exclude simalarily situated individuals?

You learned nothing from the same sex marriage USSC ruling?

 

[Pop23]

She doesn't understand that applying arbitrary laws against simalarily situated adults is what allowed same sex marriage bans?

She should study the court rulings in "Loving", Windsor" and "Obergfell", Cuz arbitrary application of the law could end Same Sex Marriage and bring back Jim Crow laws.

Why don't they teach Civics in school anymore.

Pity ain't it?

You've posted no evidence to support that claim, what you have posted is an opinion based on a willfully misrepresentation of those cases and laws.

You hate women and Gay Marriage?

Asked and answered.
Next assumption. ..

Your butthurt is showing

Maybe next time wear big boy pants instead of that dress.

There's that cowardly need to talk shit when you are getting your ass handed to you constantly.

And you cowardly could not show the falicy?

 

[HappyJoy]

Round up the faggots, lesbos and trannys and throw them all from helicopters right over Main Street.

That's how we solve this problem.

Join ISIS at least they follow up.

 

[daws101]

Actually you can. There is nothing to stop law makers from saying "with the exclusion of restrooms inside of unisex lockers".

They can say it, but done in an arbitrary fashion it can't stand.

Look at it this way

Blacks can use the restroom in the gym, but must use only the colored showers.

Go ahead, your logic will take us backwards 150 years

False! it's the lack of logic that you are showing that will take us back to the bad old daze.

And the lack of logic is???????


Awaiting the next Dawsism

Everything You post on this subject is based on knee jerk penis phobia, sheer emotion, and rationalization.
Each one is diametrically opposed to logic and reason.

Your emotional outburst is so Jim Crow like it's funny

The only emotion you have and will ever have the ability to draw out of me is laughter from gut busting gawfaws to snickers.