Contraception is a lifestyle choice? But Viagra is for a "medical condition"?

Ya, brought to you by the good people who invented Restless Leg Syndrome. Male erection is psychological more than physical. Hence arrousal, if absent will be the cause. Wanna avoid erection problems, practice every day.

Except they don't prescribe viagra for ED that's not physical. I am sorry you can't get it up because the highschool couch scared you.

tapatalk post
 
Birth control "treats" the "medical conditions" of ovulation and pregnancy resulting from sexual intercourse.

Last time I checked, those are things that the female body is SUPPOSED to do, not ailments to be corrected.
For an older man to not be able to get an erection, that is also how the body is designed to work. It is a natural progression of aging. Therefore, older men wanting viagra so they can get erections is a lifestyle choice, not natural, not a medical condition.

Bullshit. God you women are presumptuous sometimes. Men as they get older don't care much for sex but they still get it up. Please peddle your sexist stereotypes elsewhere

tapatalk post


It's not a sexist stereotype, it is true. And if they could usually get it up Viagra and Cialis would go out of business. Many elderly men have prescriptions for such drugs. And many elderly/ middle aged men still care about having sex.
You are an idiot.


Sent from my iPhone using Rat in Ernie's anus's tears.
 
Ya, brought to you by the good people who invented Restless Leg Syndrome. Male erection is psychological more than physical. Hence arrousal, if absent will be the cause. Wanna avoid erection problems, practice every day.

Except they don't prescribe viagra for ED that's not physical. I am sorry you can't get it up because the highschool couch scared you.

tapatalk post


You wouldn't know either way.


Sent from my iPhone using Rat in Ernie's anus's tears.
 
Bullshit. God you women are presumptuous sometimes. Men as they get older don't care much for sex but they still get it up. Please peddle your sexist stereotypes elsewhere

tapatalk post

He's right. As men get older, the harder it is for them to get a hard on. All part of aging. Therefore, taking viagra to get it up is messing with the natural function of the body.

So shove that.

What the fuck would you know

tapatalk post


A lot more than you obviously.


Sent from my iPhone using Rat in Ernie's anus's tears.
 
Ed is a actual physical problem. Birth control is not unless it is for regulating the body. The pill can be used this way and see no problem with insurance paying for a actual health problem...but just wanting to fuck without getting pregnant is not a health problem

tapatalk post


A physical problem that only effects your sex life.


Sent from my iPhone using Rat in Ernie's anus's tears.
 
Ovarian cysts and whatnot aside, it doesn't matter if it is a "lifestyle choice"

We are all better off if poor people without self-control have the means to not have unwanted pregnancies. I think we can all agree to that.
 
Viagra is a drug that is used to treat pulmonary hypertension and heart disease. Alleviating erectile dysfunction is a side effect. That's why there are so many warnings that come with prescriptions of Viagra when it is used by men that do not have other health risks.

Poor people who cannot control themselves should pay for their own birth control, OR, the state may provide a permanent form of birth control. An implant or surgery.
 
Ovarian cysts and whatnot aside, it doesn't matter if it is a "lifestyle choice"

We are all better off if poor people without self-control have the means to not have unwanted pregnancies. I think we can all agree to that.

"Ovarian cysts and whatnot..." ?????????????? As usual, ignorance is more valued by some people than actually educating themselves.

Agree? We can agree that children are very expensive.

We can also agree that people, men and women, have the right to decide when they wish to conceive.
 
Is the original poster so incredibly stupid that he cannot understand the difference between a drug that compensates for a physical infirmity and one that (if successful) prevents a natural and healthy physical phenomenon (ovulation) from occurring in a healthy female?

Say it isn't so!

The discussion is about HEALTH INSURANCE! Health insurance is intended to indemnify the policy holder from the medical costs associated with treating and curing physical problems.

Ovulation is not a physical problem. It is what happens WHEN THINGS WORK PROPERLY! Asking for insurance to cover the cost of preventing one's body from functioning normally is pretty fucking perverse.

Should insurance cover anti-perspirants? Should it cover Bean-o? Should it cover haircuts? All of these are costs that we incur to overcome the normal and natural functioning of our bodies.

Stupid.

Stupid.

Stupid.
 
A doctor should know women can use birth control for other reasons other than to prevent pregnancy.
Viagra is for a medical condition, and unless it is for a child, it used to have sex and only to have sex, a lifestyle choice.


Sent from my iPhone using Rat in Ernie's anus's tears.
a doctor knows women do not use "birth control" for other reasons than birth control.

because what they use for "other reasons" is not "birth control" :D

but an idiot leftard has no idea what hormones are in the "pill" and which of those, albeit in totally different combinations and doses, are used for "different reasons".

which is not surprising, since leftards are ignorant beyond imaginable.


Of course I know what is in birth control, most women do. You are beyond ignorant when it comes to what birth control can be used for.
You think a doctor would be more knowledgable.
Many doctors prescribe it for hormonal imbalances and to regulate periods, which is exactly what my doctor did before I ever had sex.
Please don't pretend to know anything about the subject. And you really shouldn't pretend to be a doctor anymore. No one believes you.



Sent from my iPhone using Rat in Ernie's anus's tears.

are you stoned again, idiot?

you supposedly dispense the medications in the pharmacy, so you supposedly know that the same medication can be in different formulations - and birth control combinations of the hormones approved by FDA for birth control are being prescribed for birth control only.
The ones used to treat endometriosis, for example, are different formulations - if some idiot prescribes "the pill" for endometriosis - the insurance won't pay for it, because it is a different medication which FDA approved for the use in such situation, although an active component in both might be the same hormone.

one does not use corticosteroid cream to treat Steven's Johnson's syndrome - although the chemical compound used to treat it is the same corticosteroid.

even if you are exemplary stupid, you at least should know that medication exists in a variety of forms if you dispense them in the pharmacy :rolleyes:

or are you just cleaning the toilets in the pharmacy?
 
a doctor knows women do not use "birth control" for other reasons than birth control.

because what they use for "other reasons" is not "birth control" :D

but an idiot leftard has no idea what hormones are in the "pill" and which of those, albeit in totally different combinations and doses, are used for "different reasons".

which is not surprising, since leftards are ignorant beyond imaginable.


Of course I know what is in birth control, most women do. You are beyond ignorant when it comes to what birth control can be used for.
You think a doctor would be more knowledgable.
Many doctors prescribe it for hormonal imbalances and to regulate periods, which is exactly what my doctor did before I ever had sex.
Please don't pretend to know anything about the subject. And you really shouldn't pretend to be a doctor anymore. No one believes you.



Sent from my iPhone using Rat in Ernie's anus's tears.

it can be used for insurance and peace of mind of a parent

"the pill" is not used for anything else except contraception. Estrogen and progesterone are.
 
BC pills can be prescribed for reasons other than birth control, and in those cases they are covered under most insurance policies, as they should be.

When used to prevent conception, however, the woman or the couple (as the case may be) SHOULD PAY FOR IT THEMSELVES!
 
75957_10151973667891275_185423525_n.jpg




But, as has been noted, its really no one's business. It is and should be between the woman and her doctor.

Keep ignorant rw's out of our private lives.




.
 
Is the original poster so incredibly stupid that he cannot understand the difference between a drug that compensates for a physical infirmity and one that (if successful) prevents a natural and healthy physical phenomenon (ovulation) from occurring in a healthy female?

I take it you believe that its perfectly healthy for a female to bleed so heavily each month she collapses from blood loss, is in so much pain that she takes multiple sick days per month, and is unable to even enjoy sex because the pain is so great? That is what some women experience when they have their periods. Birth control HELPS and you want to take it away because you assume that any woman who needs it is a whore.
 
BC pills can be prescribed for reasons other than birth control, and in those cases they are covered under most insurance policies, as they should be.

When used to prevent conception, however, the woman or the couple (as the case may be) SHOULD PAY FOR IT THEMSELVES!

How do you prove whether the birth control is for actual birth control?

And if women have to pay for their own birth control, men can pay for their erection pills.
 
BC pills can be prescribed for reasons other than birth control, and in those cases they are covered under most insurance policies, as they should be.

When used to prevent conception, however, the woman or the couple (as the case may be) SHOULD PAY FOR IT THEMSELVES!

How do you prove whether the birth control is for actual birth control?

And if women have to pay for their own birth control, men can pay for their erection pills.

That works for me. It's a choice. They can both pay.
 
Right wingers whine constantly about poor women having children. And then refuse to help them in any way from having the very children right wingers are whining about.
 
Confused? That laughter isn't confusion. It's laughter directed at you.

Birth control pills may also be prescribed to reduce menstrual cramps or prevent anemia.

Birth Control Pills (Oral Contraceptives) Index by MedicineNet.com

We call those "medical conditions".

Birth control "treats" the "medical conditions" of ovulation and pregnancy resulting from sexual intercourse.

Last time I checked, those are things that the female body is SUPPOSED to do, not ailments to be corrected.
For an older man to not be able to get an erection, that is also how the body is designed to work. It is a natural progression of aging. Therefore, older men wanting viagra so they can get erections is a lifestyle choice, not natural, not a medical condition.

No, the fact that the body can be expected to break down as it gets older doesn't mean it's "supposed" to, or that the aforementioned breakdown constitutes "normal functioning". Therefore, Viagra to correct blood circulation issues is as much a treatment of a medical condition as medications to combat the ravages of Alzheimer's and glaucoma would be.

It's sorta funny how leftists, when vociferously defending their right to fuck like rabid, amoral weasels, invariably reveal just how Puritanical, judgemental, and derogatory their view of sex actually is.
 

Forum List

Back
Top