Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would do something like that if a decent public course was nearby. There's a members-only course literally 2 miles from my house, through the neighborhood, but non-member guests pay $70 per round. Ridiculous.I pay 550 per year for unlimited golf at Rivers Edge.
Hey dumbass - this is CPAC, not a theme-specific conference. They could have held it in open-carry Arizona if they were true to their "conservative values".Brilliant. I want to have a conference in Chicago, dealing with the problems of Chicago gun crime. But Chicago doesn't allow concealed carry, so we've decided to hold the conference in Denver.Then why have it there?And local ordinances?Do you really think the GOP had a say in this. Go rent an auditorium and let me know if they ask you whether you want guns allowed or not.At CPAC today:
False. An organization can, and many times is forced to by the venue, buy event liability insurance.
Freedom isn't free, son.
Either you live by your principles or you don't.
If you want to excuse this as D.C. proximity convenience over supposedly closely and strongly held values, that's up to you.
The bottom line is the op is childish crap, period.
You wingnuts always have an excuse for why you are immune to the things you want everyone else to abide by.While inside, they will be railing against "gun-free zones".
I guess you're fucking clueless about secret service rules. I will tell you one thing, I can walk into my congressman's office while carrying a gun and no one says a word.
Only by site security, not attendees. And it's not about guns/no guns, it's about Constitutional rights.No hypocrisy, dumbass. Republicans don't have a problem keeping guns out of certain areas as long as those areas are secure. The difference with liberals is that they put the signs up but don't secure the area, thereby inviting disasters.
libs think theres no guns in there- they are that stupid.
At CPAC today:
Either you have a right to bear arms or you don't, correct?Actually, they are going to have a LOT of good guys to stop those bad guys with guns. Events like this have very heavy security.At CPAC today:
Oh lord, now they'll not have 'a good guy with a gun to stop the bad guy with a gun'. And as we know by conservative scientific lab work that is the ONLY thing that will stop a bad guy with a gun.
Tell us how that gun free zone works out for you cons.
Are you done lying yet? Oh, no you are not..
Irrelevant. They should all be able to have weapons.I'm pretty sure the security guards have weapons
This is what conservatives argue all the time. This is what Gun-Free Zones arguments are all about.
Nope. I have not seen a single conservative here argue that private property or private events should not be able to bar weapons on the premises.
It is interesting that you continued on bloviating your bullshit after it was already pointed out to you:
No hypocrisy, dumbass. Republicans don't have a problem keeping guns out of certain areas as long as those areas are secure. The difference with liberals is that they put the signs up but don't secure the area, thereby inviting disasters.
Where you blatantly failed.
What isn't a gun-free zone?It's exactly the point, because it isn't a gun free zone.
You wingnuts always have an excuse for why you are immune to the things you want everyone else to abide by.While inside, they will be railing against "gun-free zones".
I guess you're fucking clueless about secret service rules. I will tell you one thing, I can walk into my congressman's office while carrying a gun and no one says a word.
What isn't a gun-free zone?It's exactly the point, because it isn't a gun free zone.
No, you can't. That's because Republicans don't want to have to live with the laws they enforce upon the rest of us.You wingnuts always have an excuse for why you are immune to the things you want everyone else to abide by.While inside, they will be railing against "gun-free zones".
I guess you're fucking clueless about secret service rules. I will tell you one thing, I can walk into my congressman's office while carrying a gun and no one says a word.
Really, can you walk into your congressman's local office with a gun and no one care?
Read it again, retard.What isn't a gun-free zone?It's exactly the point, because it isn't a gun free zone.
No, it isnt. Ever hear of The Secret Service.
No, you can't. That's because Republicans don't want to have to live with the laws they enforce upon the rest of us.You wingnuts always have an excuse for why you are immune to the things you want everyone else to abide by.While inside, they will be railing against "gun-free zones".
I guess you're fucking clueless about secret service rules. I will tell you one thing, I can walk into my congressman's office while carrying a gun and no one says a word.
Really, can you walk into your congressman's local office with a gun and no one care?
Can't bring a gun into a Congressman's office but they say it's fine to bring one into a Kindergarten class.
What's the title of this thread again? HYPOCRITES!
But what does this have to do with CPAC banning guns at their annual shindig?
I see that conservatives here have no defense for this hypocrisy.
You can't bring a gun to a GOP candidate rally, either.
Because they usually are being dumb. Those same companies that bar weapons at their front door are not usually hiring armed security to take the place of citizens protecting themselves - the CPAC is. That difference has already been pointed out. I guess you missed that...Nope. I have not seen a single conservative here argue that private property or private events should not be able to bar weapons on the premises.
:
Really? I read all the time on here how stupid private company owners are for not allowing their employees to come to work carrying a gun. Just this week a couple gunners were going off on the lawn service company that had a mass shooting. You missed that eh?
What could the CPAC organizers have been concerned about that they didn't want just anybody to come in with a gun?
What was their concern? Why couldn't the organizers be convinced about how much safer everyone would be if everybody who wanted to could carry their gun into the event?
I bet the venue owners are democrats. Don't ya think?
You are loving an argument that no one here has made?Either you have a right to bear arms or you don't, correct?Actually, they are going to have a LOT of good guys to stop those bad guys with guns. Events like this have very heavy security.At CPAC today:
Oh lord, now they'll not have 'a good guy with a gun to stop the bad guy with a gun'. And as we know by conservative scientific lab work that is the ONLY thing that will stop a bad guy with a gun.
Tell us how that gun free zone works out for you cons.
Are you done lying yet? Oh, no you are not..
Irrelevant. They should all be able to have weapons.I'm pretty sure the security guards have weapons
This is what conservatives argue all the time. This is what Gun-Free Zones arguments are all about.
Nope. I have not seen a single conservative here argue that private property or private events should not be able to bar weapons on the premises.
It is interesting that you continued on bloviating your bullshit after it was already pointed out to you:
No hypocrisy, dumbass. Republicans don't have a problem keeping guns out of certain areas as long as those areas are secure. The difference with liberals is that they put the signs up but don't secure the area, thereby inviting disasters.
Where you blatantly failed.
CPAC wasn't forced to choose this event site, in this city.
I'm loving so-called "conservatives" arguing that guns aren't appropriate in a public venue.
You're so thick. It's unbelievable.Washington D.C. Concealed Carry Permit Information
People go to CPAC from all over the country, they're not allowed to bring their guns with them. That will change with a republican president.
I don't believe Bernie is a guest at CPAC this year.I see that conservatives here have no defense for this hypocrisy.
You can't bring a gun to a GOP candidate rally, either.
no defense?
let's talk about the Secret Service, the guys that are charged with protecting the President. They are also charged with protecting presidential candidates, even Comrade Bernie has a Secret Service detail.
SO, Secret Service rules for candidates supersedes the desire of some CPAC members to carry weapons.
But I do have to admit, very solid troll attempt on conservatives
8/10, will read again
You haven't even attempted to show that this was done by the venue and not by CPAC.This particular asinine rant of yours does not have anything to do with rights as it has been pointed out to you continuously that you do not have the right to carry a weapon on private property if the owner of that property chooses not to allow it.
I don't believe Bernie is a guest at CPAC this year.I see that conservatives here have no defense for this hypocrisy.
You can't bring a gun to a GOP candidate rally, either.
no defense?
let's talk about the Secret Service, the guys that are charged with protecting the President. They are also charged with protecting presidential candidates, even Comrade Bernie has a Secret Service detail.
SO, Secret Service rules for candidates supersedes the desire of some CPAC members to carry weapons.
But I do have to admit, very solid troll attempt on conservatives
8/10, will read again
Do the Cubans get SS protection yet? Kasich?
Why aren't conservatives arguing for SS to allow guns at these events? We're being told all the time by conservatives that a good guy with a gun is preferable to have around.
