Conservative view on the Russian thingy

Talk about an about face.

Pre-Trump, Putin was an ex-KGB swine, a lying, murderous thug who couldn't be trusted.

Not they're spinning for him.

Incredible.
.

That's a broad brush there Mac1958.

Tell us what is inaccurate.

Would you…please?

Who do you trust more, Nancy Pelosi or Vladamir Putin?

One of them wants to shred the Constitution and implement a Fascist dictatorship on America, the other is the leader of Russia
 
I know, I know, Putin is a psychopathic murdering dictator.

Blah, blah, blah. Aren't they all.

And everyone is all bunged up, including some conservatives, about Trump meeting with him and not condemning him? Naturally, Obama ignoring the genocide in Syria and then bombing the hell out of Libya while embracing abortion on demand is "A" OK , isn't it.

So US intelligence tells us that they think that the Russians hacked into the e-mails? So Dims, you mean the same US intelligence that told "W" that Iraq had WMD'S? So conservatives, you mean the same intelligence agencies that tried to go after Trump but let Hillary off the hook? Those same investigative agencies?

Additionally, the grand jury indicted 12 Russians this past week.

For some reason, Conservatives have rushed to the defense of these 12 Russians.

Did Mueller book his flight to Moscow yet?
 
Talk about an about face.

Pre-Trump, Putin was an ex-KGB swine, a lying, murderous thug who couldn't be trusted.

Not they're spinning for him.

Incredible.
.

That's a broad brush there Mac1958.

Tell us what is inaccurate.

Would you…please?

Who do you trust more, Nancy Pelosi or Vladamir Putin?

One of them wants to shred the Constitution and implement a Fascist dictatorship on America, the other is the leader of Russia

The leader of Russia who has employed the President to install a fascist dictatorship on America where he can pardon himself (and anyone else) for crimes.

You never told us who you trust more, an American congresswoman or the premier of Russia. We all know whom it is you do trust more…but we’re hoping you can summon your long lost manhood and say it out loud. Can you do that?
 
Talk about an about face.

Pre-Trump, Putin was an ex-KGB swine, a lying, murderous thug who couldn't be trusted.

Not they're spinning for him.

Incredible.
.

That's a broad brush there Mac1958.

Tell us what is inaccurate.

Would you…please?

Who do you trust more, Nancy Pelosi or Vladamir Putin?

One of them wants to shred the Constitution and implement a Fascist dictatorship on America, the other is the leader of Russia

The leader of Russia who has employed the President to install a fascist dictatorship on America where he can pardon himself (and anyone else) for crimes.

You never told us who you trust more, an American congresswoman or the premier of Russia. We all know whom it is you do trust more…but we’re hoping you can summon your long lost manhood and say it out loud. Can you do that?



"...the President to install a fascist dictatorship on America..."


If you ever get around to reading an actual book.....

414aX-0cJUL._SX330_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg




(Reading might make you appear a tiny bit less absurd.....)
 
I know, I know, Putin is a psychopathic murdering dictator.

Blah, blah, blah. Aren't they all.

And everyone is all bunged up, including some conservatives, about Trump meeting with him and not condemning him? Naturally, Obama ignoring the genocide in Syria and then bombing the hell out of Libya while embracing abortion on demand is "A" OK , isn't it.

So US intelligence tells us that they think that the Russians hacked into the e-mails? So Dims, you mean the same US intelligence that told "W" that Iraq had WMD'S? So conservatives, you mean the same intelligence agencies that tried to go after Trump but let Hillary off the hook? Those same investigative agencies?

Additionally, the grand jury indicted 12 Russians this past week.

For some reason, Conservatives have rushed to the defense of these 12 Russians.

The DOJ said no Americans were involved and it had no impact on our elections. :itsok:

For some reason, Conservatives have rushed to the defense of these 12 Russians. Its almost as if the Rooskies may have some information on the orange blob pervert.

Who's defending them?
We're laughing at Mewlers weak ass attempt to make his case relevant by indicting Russians that have zero chance of ever seeing the inside of a U.S. courtroom.

You guys. If not an overt defense, an overt attempt to smear the jury—made up of just ordinary Americans—and the prosecutor who submitted the charges for their approval or their rejection.

For some reason, you swear that Trump had nothing to do with Russia. Yet when some Russians get indicted…you guys go off half cocked in defense of Trump.

It is about wasting time.

There is no way the Russians will ever stand trial or be punished.

Mueller comes off as just trying to justify his job.
 
I know, I know, Putin is a psychopathic murdering dictator?

Blah, blah, blah. Aren't they all.

And everyone is all bunged up, including some conservatives, about Trump meeting with him and not condemning him? Naturally, Obama ignoring the genocide in Syria and then bombing the hell out of Libya killing God only knows how many while embracing abortion on demand ranging now in the hundreds of millions is "A" OK , isn't it.

So US intelligence tells us that they think that the Russians hacked into the e-mails? So Dims, you mean the same US intelligence that told "W" that Iraq had WMD'S? So conservatives, you mean the same intelligence agencies that tried to go after Trump but let Hillary off the hook? Those same investigative agencies?

LMAO!

Why won't the DNC give the FBI access to the servers so that they can prove it?

Then again, those servers are all probably lost like the servers that the IRS used to target conservatives or the servers that Hillary used to conduct her personal nefarious activity. Gosh darn it, what bad luck is that, eh?

My bad.



Before the Russian fake scandal, Wikileaks said that an insider leaked the emails because he was disgusted with what was going on. The DNC isn't going to risk anyone examining their server. If someone had hacked and they believed it was Russians or anyone on the right, they would have handed that server over for inspection immediately. As it is, they act like they have something to hide.
 
Additionally, the grand jury indicted 12 Russians this past week.

For some reason, Conservatives have rushed to the defense of these 12 Russians.

The DOJ said no Americans were involved and it had no impact on our elections. :itsok:

For some reason, Conservatives have rushed to the defense of these 12 Russians. Its almost as if the Rooskies may have some information on the orange blob pervert.

Who's defending them?
We're laughing at Mewlers weak ass attempt to make his case relevant by indicting Russians that have zero chance of ever seeing the inside of a U.S. courtroom.

You guys. If not an overt defense, an overt attempt to smear the jury—made up of just ordinary Americans—and the prosecutor who submitted the charges for their approval or their rejection.

For some reason, you swear that Trump had nothing to do with Russia. Yet when some Russians get indicted…you guys go off half cocked in defense of Trump.

It is about wasting time.

There is no way the Russians will ever stand trial or be punished.

Mueller comes off as just trying to justify his job.

Ahh…that is what you’re worried about. A special prosecutor wasting his time.
Anything else? LOL
 
I know, I know, Putin is a psychopathic murdering dictator?

Blah, blah, blah. Aren't they all.

And everyone is all bunged up, including some conservatives, about Trump meeting with him and not condemning him? Naturally, Obama ignoring the genocide in Syria and then bombing the hell out of Libya killing God only knows how many while embracing abortion on demand ranging now in the hundreds of millions is "A" OK , isn't it.

So US intelligence tells us that they think that the Russians hacked into the e-mails? So Dims, you mean the same US intelligence that told "W" that Iraq had WMD'S? So conservatives, you mean the same intelligence agencies that tried to go after Trump but let Hillary off the hook? Those same investigative agencies?

LMAO!

Why won't the DNC give the FBI access to the servers so that they can prove it?

Then again, those servers are all probably lost like the servers that the IRS used to target conservatives or the servers that Hillary used to conduct her personal nefarious activity. Gosh darn it, what bad luck is that, eh?

My bad.



Before the Russian fake scandal, Wikileaks said that an insider leaked the emails because he was disgusted with what was going on. The DNC isn't going to risk anyone examining their server. If someone had hacked and they believed it was Russians or anyone on the right, they would have handed that server over for inspection immediately. As it is, they act like they have something to hide.



. This summary from the Leftwing Slate:

”.... if the evidence that they’ve used to level major accusations at a foreign government comes not from agencies of the U.S. government or direct law enforcement investigations, but rather from private sector firms like CrowdStrike, then the “high confidence” of the government counts for very little. “
The FBI Relied on a Private Firm’s Investigation of the DNC Hack—Which Makes the Agency Harder to Trust
 
The DOJ said no Americans were involved and it had no impact on our elections. :itsok:

For some reason, Conservatives have rushed to the defense of these 12 Russians. Its almost as if the Rooskies may have some information on the orange blob pervert.

Who's defending them?
We're laughing at Mewlers weak ass attempt to make his case relevant by indicting Russians that have zero chance of ever seeing the inside of a U.S. courtroom.

You guys. If not an overt defense, an overt attempt to smear the jury—made up of just ordinary Americans—and the prosecutor who submitted the charges for their approval or their rejection.

For some reason, you swear that Trump had nothing to do with Russia. Yet when some Russians get indicted…you guys go off half cocked in defense of Trump.

It is about wasting time.

There is no way the Russians will ever stand trial or be punished.

Mueller comes off as just trying to justify his job.

Ahh…that is what you’re worried about. A special prosecutor wasting his time.
Anything else? LOL

I nor any Trump supporter is worried. I just explained why "we are taking the Russians side over Mueller's"
 

Forum List

Back
Top