Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Banned
- #41
the people in this poll depend on cheating to get ahead
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Really?
I'm sure that the people working at companies like Staples, Toys R Us, Burger King, Burlington Coat Factory, etcetera, are all perfectly happy to be in that "narrow group".
Can you tell me that anything he has ever done has been primarily to create jobs? Of course not, his primary aim in business has always been to enrich himself, you want to apply that attitude to the presidency and expect beneficial results for the population at large? This guy would gauge his success by Wall Street and nothing else and it is glaringly obvious that their success does not trickle down nearly as much as republicans would like us to believe.
Half a loaf is better than none, which is what we've gotten from the BoiKing and his Chicago mobsters.
You beat on the wealthy because you have an irrational victimhood complex, and project it onto them.You're the one who is always beating on the wealthy, for no better reason that they're wealthy.Back to the wealth envy crap again I see, you are a lazy debater.
The lazy debater is the bigot, bigot.
I beat on the wealthy (mainly wall street banker types) because they are in charge and sucking the rest of us into horrible situations. You accuse me of irrational hatred but that could not be further from the truth, if these people insist on gathering that much power unto themselves and they fuck up they deserve to be spanked.
Jobs were a side effect of his primary aim of cashing in for himself.
Yeah no shit. Give us more of that side effect.
You beat on the wealthy because you have an irrational victimhood complex, and project it onto them.You're the one who is always beating on the wealthy, for no better reason that they're wealthy.
The lazy debater is the bigot, bigot.
I beat on the wealthy (mainly wall street banker types) because they are in charge and sucking the rest of us into horrible situations. You accuse me of irrational hatred but that could not be further from the truth, if these people insist on gathering that much power unto themselves and they fuck up they deserve to be spanked.
No better evidence of this exists that your completely irrational, ill-informed, bigoted and hateful posts, over the course of the last several days, if not from the date you landed here.
Like I said...Grow the hell up.
Jobs were a side effect of his primary aim of cashing in for himself.
Yeah no shit. Give us more of that side effect.
There was also the nasty side effect of liquidation and moving offshore, we have had plenty of that already. I am not sure it is possible to get a figure of net jobs created or saved by his activities but it is almost certainly in negative territory.
The companies Romney turned around don't think so.
Pretty narrow group there, any mention of the ones he simply liquidated without a second thought? A president must have some sort of concern for those working people who suffer by his decisions and I do not see that in him.
The companies Romney turned around don't think so.
Pretty narrow group there, any mention of the ones he simply liquidated without a second thought? A president must have some sort of concern for those working people who suffer by his decisions and I do not see that in him.
You mean like when Obama promised to bankrupt the coal industry? Or when his decision with GM killed thousands of factory and dealership jobs? Or when his jobs czar cut GE's US work force by half then rehired the Chinese workers?
Hack
Romney will go along with whatever the Fed tells him to do like every other president. He will appoint a bunch of G+S alumni to regulatory positions like every other president. He will know who rules the economy like every other, he is no cure for any of that shit.
Perhaps. Out of the two choices, Romney still has the most experience turning around financial situations.
I am going with the warts that give me the best opportunity to succeed by my hand and abilities.
I don't agree, he has experience in personally benefiting from bad situations but that is nothing like salvaging a situation for all involved.
Pretty narrow group there, any mention of the ones he simply liquidated without a second thought? A president must have some sort of concern for those working people who suffer by his decisions and I do not see that in him.
You mean like when Obama promised to bankrupt the coal industry? Or when his decision with GM killed thousands of factory and dealership jobs? Or when his jobs czar cut GE's US work force by half then rehired the Chinese workers?
Hack
Then by your logic Romney would be no better and probably worse.
Well no fucking duh they want mitt. he will help them to sell america overseas. If I made my money off of ripping off the american middle class and poor i would say good shit about mittens also. It does not make it so.
So according to the poll 75% of the people who do not manufacture or sell anything, but who make a lot of money off of shifting money around are saying that the guy who would allow them to raid financial institutions for profit like he did would improve the market by allowing them to crash companies for profit?
Well no fucking duh they want mitt. he will help them to sell america overseas. If I made my money off of ripping off the american middle class and poor i would say good shit about mittens also. It does not make it so.
So according to the poll 75% of the people who do not manufacture or sell anything, but who make a lot of money off of shifting money around are saying that the guy who would allow them to raid financial institutions for profit like he did would improve the market by allowing them to crash companies for profit?
Well no fucking duh they want mitt. he will help them to sell america overseas. If I made my money off of ripping off the american middle class and poor i would say good shit about mittens also. It does not make it so.
the same guys who gave us the mess were in
Well no fucking duh they want mitt. he will help them to sell america overseas. If I made my money off of ripping off the american middle class and poor i would say good shit about mittens also. It does not make it so.
The cost of the "global economy" drags down margins.
Business would prefer to keep it domestic.
Over regulation, punitive taxation and an unprepared, unmotivated work force drove as much opportunity overseas to meet demand and drive profit.
Pretty narrow group there, any mention of the ones he simply liquidated without a second thought? A president must have some sort of concern for those working people who suffer by his decisions and I do not see that in him.
You mean like when Obama promised to bankrupt the coal industry? Or when his decision with GM killed thousands of factory and dealership jobs? Or when his jobs czar cut GE's US work force by half then rehired the Chinese workers?
Hack
Then by your logic Romney would be no better and probably worse.
Well no fucking duh they want mitt. he will help them to sell america overseas. If I made my money off of ripping off the american middle class and poor i would say good shit about mittens also. It does not make it so.
The cost of the "global economy" drags down margins.
Business would prefer to keep it domestic.
Over regulation, punitive taxation and an unprepared, unmotivated work force drove as much opportunity overseas to meet demand and drive profit.
Americans prefer to be paid well and not live in a polluted shithole at the mercy of crooked banks and shady investors, weeeeeellllll excuse us.