Clotshot Producing the Wrong Proteins

You fail to point out the conclusion that
1702096419024.png
 
I worked on him doing CPR for about 15 minutes before paramedics arrived on scene and took over, working on him for another 40 minutes in the truck before calling it.
good that you jumped in W6

it's somewhat a workout too.....
~S~
 
One in four who had Pfizer Covid jabs experienced unintended immune response

So the mRNA shots are screwing up protein production in the body. Nothing to see here. Move on. It's totally safe and effective.
We are now in the Big Die Off and should see the Impure Ones rapidly RIPing .
Isn't this a secret cause for celebration ?
House prices , consumer goods prices will collapse as demand evaporates . Fewer idiots here etc etc

There is always a silver lining if you look hard .
 
"No adverse effects were created by the error, data show, "

Potentially though, what they learn from this could help the next time some virus appears that we haven't had before.
Only thing "they" learned is they can make $billions doing exactly what they did.
Why on earth would they do it differently?
Have you lived in América long?
 
Personally glad to be part of the vast majority, that has had the initial two jabs and a couple of updates with no ill effects, other than a slight fever, treated with Advil and gone overnight.
I have 15+ friends who are happily in heaven now because of the shots, and a handful of others still alive with a list of ailments caused by the shots.
 
There is no way a vaxxed can prove it worked for them lest they were tested everyday post-vax, even then they can't prove that their own immune system was not also contributing an antiviral response. There may not have been SARS2 that came close to a vaxxed, further confounding the illusion.

The N-1 methylpseudouridine question is problematic due to Musk's manipulation of scientists posting @ X. Ebright has been relegated to Musk's Wax Museum:

So we go back to 1981 for Ebright, because non-members of X cannot read what Ebright might currently have to say about this:

Ebright N-1

There are 3 Ebright references to analyze for pseudouridine:



 
They don't want to see it. You ain't gonna convince them they've been lied to. It ain't happening.
You don't tell the whole story, do you?

But in 2023, the Nobel Prize for Medicine went to the pair of scientists who had spent years working to fix the problem. It was done by taking one of the RNA bases, uridine, and swapping in a very similar synthetic alternative.

This breakthrough allowed scientists to create proteins in the body without the immune system attacking the jab.

It allows for quick and precise vaccines that are highly effective
 
But for Big Pharma's mRNA therapy to (mimic [italics]) what was already available, ivermectin, is the true pathology of Big Pharma. Ebright's (post #32) pseudouridimycin is a pseudouridine-containing antibiotic, and like ivermectin, it comes from Streptomyces.

There is a human syndrome connected with 1-methylpseudouridine:

Bowen-Conradi Syndrome
 
So there is a Hutterite connection with which to compare mRNA therapy reactions to the injection. What are the Hutterite stats for SARS2 infections and mRNA injections?

Pseudouridine was deemed "the fifth ribonucleotide" in 1951:

Bowen-Conradi syndrome is caused by Nep1(EMG1) mutations, and here we discover an arginine phenomenon (arginine has the highest isoelectric point of the amino acids) which we will file along with the arginines in the furin cleavage site of the SARS2 spike:

'....for four of the eight arginine residues strongly shifted or disappearing signals were observed upon addition of the RNA. These four arginines correspond to the four highly conserved arginines R54, R95, R98 and R102 that line a basic groove along the dimer interface in the vicinity of the bound SAH (S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine).'
 

Forum List

Back
Top