CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 148,629
- 71,938
- 2,330
President of National Society of Climate Scientists
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ignore that man behind the curtain!!!! I am the great and powerful oz!! AGW is real!!! These e-mails reveal nothing!! NOTHING!!!!
oh no... much much bigger. Nixon was one nation. This is EVERY nation.Like I keep saying, it's Watergate all over again.
All we need now are Deep Throat and Rosemary Woods.
It is much more crude lol.How do they measure out 380 parts per million in the 5th grade experiment
So let me get this straight
The IPCC who utlizes and basis their conclusions from research done from organizations like the CRU want to try and say there is no smoking gun so their info still seems valid and continues to get funding.
WOW WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT THAT WOULD BE THEIR POSITION!
Nice job there Sherlock
INTERVIEW - Climate science untarnished by hacked emails - IPCC | Top News | Reuters
This is exactly what a lot of us have been saying. There is no smoking gun in the e-mails. The problem is the neos that want to deny globla warming don't understand what they are reading. WHO WOULDA THUNK?
I'm more honest than those working for the Hadley CRU and their associates, that's for sure.Fitz, nice! Did you receive a coloring book for Christmas! Well then, you are a qualified scientist then!
Nope. It's something I can prove beyond a reasonable doubt. It raises the probability an increased amount of similar gasses in the atmosphere has a similar result.
Could be wrong. Heck, reduce solar energy for the next decade and we could be praying for some greenhouse effect. Just I'm conservative and it seems safer not to ignore it.
So let me get this straight
The IPCC who utlizes and basis their conclusions from research done from organizations like the CRU want to try and say there is no smoking gun so their info still seems valid and continues to get funding.
WOW WHO WOULD HAVE THOUGHT THAT WOULD BE THEIR POSITION!
Nice job there Sherlock
No, the AP says there is nothing in the e-mails, and they have read them all, that proves fraud with global warming. Now, is the AP a group of socialist Democrats?
And what was the measured difference between a .03% concentration and a .04% concentration of CO2 in that experiment?Nope. It's something I can prove beyond a reasonable doubt. It raises the probability an increased amount of similar gasses in the atmosphere has a similar result.
Could be wrong. Heck, reduce solar energy for the next decade and we could be praying for some greenhouse effect. Just I'm conservative and it seems safer not to ignore it.
In your fifth grade experiment, this is a compelling level of education from which to cull your research, what percent of the original atmosphere was replaced with CO2?