Climate Science -- Fifty Years of Getting Everything Right

[Billy_Bob]

The satellites and the climate both reject manmade global warming

A particularly demented and fraudulent denier cult myth that the bamboozled denier cult dimwits hold onto like grim death no matter how many times it is debunked.

You need to change your captions.. "Direct Surface Temperatures adjusted by modeling." But even the altered model shows that zero trend starting at 1995. Now with CO2 continuing to rise why has the warming STOPPED?

 

[Billy_Bob]

Endlessly reposting Spencer's faked graph doesn't make it any less fake.

For more real evidence of just how good global warming science has been, let's revisit Hansen's 1988 prediction.

Scenario B, the one closest to real emissions, predicts a +1.0C anomaly for 2015. And right now, we have a +1.0C anomaly. Hansen's forecast was nearly perfect, yet deniers constantly point to it as being totally wrong. Go fig.

You lies are duly noted.. All of the IPCC and Hansen predictions have failed..

 

[mamooth]

Yes, we get it. Deniers have a whole library of fudged graphs that they copy and paste whenever their religion is challenged. And nobody cares. All the real scientists know with certainty that deniers are just lying their asses off. Lying even louder on a message board won't change that.

As Hansen's near-perfect prediction from 1988 also demonstrates, global warming science has been getting everything right for 50 years now.

And after I pointed out deniers respond to Hansen's perfect prediction by declaring he was totally wrong, Kosh responded to Hansen's perfect prediction by declaring he was totally wrong. Kosh, thanks for proving my point about the irrationality of the hardcore deniers.

And as I pointed out in the other thread, the UAH temperature record fails because it doesn't do diurnal drift corrections correctly. Once that is fixed, the satellite record matches the surface record well. Spencer could fix that ... but he chooses not to. Make of that what you will.

 

[jc456]

Yes, we get it. Deniers have a whole library of fudged graphs that they copy and paste whenever their religion is challenged. And nobody cares. All the real scientists know with certainty that deniers are just lying their asses off. Lying even louder on a message board won't change that.

As Hansen's near-perfect prediction from 1988 also demonstrates, global warming science has been getting everything right for 50 years now.

And after I pointed out deniers respond to Hansen's perfect prediction by declaring he was totally wrong, Kosh responded to Hansen's perfect prediction by declaring he was totally wrong. Kosh, thanks for proving my point about the irrationality of the hardcore deniers.

And as I pointed out in the other thread, the UAH temperature record fails because it doesn't do diurnal drift corrections correctly. Once that is fixed, the satellite record matches the surface record well. Spencer could fix that ... but he chooses not to. Make of that what you will.

what is fudged? There's been others on here who've already stated the problem with the graphs you like. Artificial data. Yep data that is adjusted and then put in a spreadsheet to alter the temperature in an area. Yep, you admit that right?

Fifty years and no good model. That's for shit.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Yes, we get it. Deniers have a whole library of fudged graphs that they copy and paste whenever their religion is challenged. And nobody cares. All the real scientists know with certainty that deniers are just lying their asses off. Lying even louder on a message board won't change that.

As Hansen's near-perfect prediction from 1988 also demonstrates, global warming science has been getting everything right for 50 years now.

And after I pointed out deniers respond to Hansen's perfect prediction by declaring he was totally wrong, Kosh responded to Hansen's perfect prediction by declaring he was totally wrong. Kosh, thanks for proving my point about the irrationality of the hardcore deniers.

And as I pointed out in the other thread, the UAH temperature record fails because it doesn't do diurnal drift corrections correctly. Once that is fixed, the satellite record matches the surface record well. Spencer could fix that ... but he chooses not to. Make of that what you will.

what is fudged? There's been others on here who've already stated the problem with the graphs you like. Artificial data. Yep data that is adjusted and then put in a spreadsheet to alter the temperature in an area. Yep, you admit that right?

Fifty years and no good model. That's for shit.

Snagletooth couldn't get one thing right if it tried..

Empirical evidence shows the models all failed.. What ya gonna do when the first line of it's diatribe is always "Deniers". That is where it shows me it has no proof, just a lot of lies and deceptions followed by more denigration and ridicule... It has no facts.. It continually tries to prop up that failed fool Hansen over and over again.

It is a broken record, repeating itself over and over and over again endlessly..

 

[mamooth]

Kosh, reposting the same fudged graphs over and over won't make them any less fake. Again, here's the detailed debunking of your favorite big lie.

HotWhopper: How Roy Spencer and John Christy trick Anthony Watts and his deniers once again

Everyone should take Deniers as seriously as they'd take a Scientologist preaching about how mainstream medicine persecutes Scientologists by faking all the data. Such Denier or Scientologist cultists live in their own separate reality, one where only the cult can define what's true.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Kosh, reposting the same fudged graphs over and over won't make them any less fake. Again, here's the detailed debunking of your favorite big lie.

HotWhopper: How Roy Spencer and John Christy trick Anthony Watts and his deniers once again

Everyone should take Deniers as seriously as they'd take a Scientologist preaching about how mainstream medicine persecutes Scientologists by faking all the data. Such Denier or Scientologist cultists live in their own separate reality, one where only the cult can define what's true.

^ No warming since 1995

No "Wider and wider swings with an overall warming trend"

 

[Billy_Bob]

Kosh, reposting the same fudged graphs over and over won't make them any less fake. Again, here's the detailed debunking of your favorite big lie.

HotWhopper: How Roy Spencer and John Christy trick Anthony Watts and his deniers once again

Everyone should take Deniers as seriously as they'd take a Scientologist preaching about how mainstream medicine persecutes Scientologists by faking all the data. Such Denier or Scientologist cultists live in their own separate reality, one where only the cult can define what's true.

You cited HOTWHOOPER? Really? That Slandering Sou? Miriam is a left wing whore who publishes everything to do with left wing socialist power grab pseudoscience! She has zero credibility just like John Cooks SKS. Both are liars and propagandists proven by empirical evidence.

Now I know your getting desperate, your grasping boat anchors as you drowned.