Climate Change Deniers Are Immoral

[The Sage of Main Street]

Forgive me if I've forgotten the details but recently I watched a program on Science Channel. It was all about a relationship between the overall temperature of a planet and that of it's atmosphere and solar radiation. There were other factors involved. I encourage you to reference the material. Nonetheless, the point was that the warming or cooling of a planet was largely dependent upon these factors. The science I believe was accurate at least as far as it goes. So that much is true. It is also true that human activity has increased the overall temperature of the planet. How anyone with any sense at all can deny this is inconceivable. Just put yourselves and a bunch of people in a room without heat and see how warm it gets. Simple but nevertheless a demonstration. As far as morality goes. Belief or non belief in such a thing is without moral context.

Spitting in the Ocean

It's more like putting ants on the floor of a huge room and seeing how much the temperature changes.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

The Climate change deniers of today will be responsible for the suffering of everyone's children tomorrow.

Showing once again that the AGW movement is religious and not scientific. Morality is the realm of the religious nutters dude. Science concerns itself with facts, and the AGW has precious little of those, which is why they resort to pathetic emotional appeals. Just sayin....

You pose an apt example of amorality. The scientific process itself is obviously unrelated to any moral principles.......the application of that science has everything to do with morality.

Wrong. The scientific method was developed over centuries to deal with religious fruitcakes like you, who chose "faith" over what they were actually seeing right in front of them. I live in a cause and effect world. You don't.

Vindictive Nerd Misfits

But you deny the cause and effect findings of psychological science that would explain why people become delusional escapist authoritarian GreenHeads.

 

[westwall]

The Climate change deniers of today will be responsible for the suffering of everyone's children tomorrow.

Showing once again that the AGW movement is religious and not scientific. Morality is the realm of the religious nutters dude. Science concerns itself with facts, and the AGW has precious little of those, which is why they resort to pathetic emotional appeals. Just sayin....

You pose an apt example of amorality. The scientific process itself is obviously unrelated to any moral principles.......the application of that science has everything to do with morality.

Wrong. The scientific method was developed over centuries to deal with religious fruitcakes like you, who chose "faith" over what they were actually seeing right in front of them. I live in a cause and effect world. You don't.

Vindictive Nerd Misfits

But you deny the cause and effect findings of psychological science that would explain why people become delusional escapist authoritarian GreenHeads.

Psychology is a "soft science" so their conclusions are OPINIONS. Not facts. Learn the difference.

 

[SSDD]

The Climate change deniers of today will be responsible for the suffering of everyone's children tomorrow.

Is it more moral to demand observed, measured, quantified, empirical evidence for a thing and remain skeptical till such time as the evidence is produced...or to simply accept a claim based primarily on one's political leanings...and cause untold harm to world and personal economies?

Feel free to remain skeptical while the wold burns.

Do you really think the earth is going to burn? Have you been that thoroughly duped? Do you have any idea what the average temperature on earth has ben across its history?....or what the average atmospheric CO2 concentrations have been?

 

[SSDD]

It is also true that human activity has increased the overall temperature of the planet.

Got the first bit of observed, measured, quantified, empirical evidence to support that claim?.....didn't think so.

 

[irosie91]

The Climate change deniers of today will be responsible for the suffering of everyone's children tomorrow.

Is it more moral to demand observed, measured, quantified, empirical evidence for a thing and remain skeptical till such time as the evidence is produced...or to simply accept a claim based primarily on one's political leanings...and cause untold harm to world and personal economies?

Feel free to remain skeptical while the wold burns.

Do you really think the earth is going to burn? Have you been that thoroughly duped? Do you have any idea what the average temperature on earth has ben across its history?....or what the average atmospheric CO2 concentrations have been?

I think that the issue is REALLY that even minor changes in
climate and concentrations of this or that gas will have MAJOR
impacts on the DELICATE balance of nature------not that the planet is going to turn into a ball of fire

 

[SSDD]

The Climate change deniers of today will be responsible for the suffering of everyone's children tomorrow.

Is it more moral to demand observed, measured, quantified, empirical evidence for a thing and remain skeptical till such time as the evidence is produced...or to simply accept a claim based primarily on one's political leanings...and cause untold harm to world and personal economies?

Feel free to remain skeptical while the wold burns.

Do you really think the earth is going to burn? Have you been that thoroughly duped? Do you have any idea what the average temperature on earth has ben across its history?....or what the average atmospheric CO2 concentrations have been?

I think that the issue is REALLY that even minor changes in
climate and concentrations of this or that gas will have MAJOR
impacts on the DELICATE balance of nature------not that the planet is going to turn into a ball of fire

You think nature is in some "DELICATE" balance? Really? Look around. The temperature range on this planet today...at measured stations range from 112.3F at Makka, Saudi Arabia to -92.2F at Vostok, Antarctica. That is a spread of 204.5 degrees F in one day...today!!!...That hardly suggests a balance of any sort...much less a delicate balance.

Again...what do you think the average global temperature has been on earth since it developed an atmosphere? And do you have the first bit of observed, measured, quantified, empirical evidence that man's CO2 emissions are altering the global temperature?

 

[SSDD]

The Climate change deniers of today will be responsible for the suffering of everyone's children tomorrow.

Is it more moral to demand observed, measured, quantified, empirical evidence for a thing and remain skeptical till such time as the evidence is produced...or to simply accept a claim based primarily on one's political leanings...and cause untold harm to world and personal economies?

Feel free to remain skeptical while the wold burns.

Do you really think the earth is going to burn? Have you been that thoroughly duped? Do you have any idea what the average temperature on earth has ben across its history?....or what the average atmospheric CO2 concentrations have been?

I think that the issue is REALLY that even minor changes in
climate and concentrations of this or that gas will have MAJOR
impacts on the DELICATE balance of nature------not that the planet is going to turn into a ball of fire

You think nature is in some "DELICATE" balance? Really? Look around. The temperature range on this planet today...at measured stations range from 112.3F at Makka, Saudi Arabia to -92.2F at Vostok, Antarctica. That is a spread of 204.5 degrees F in one day...today!!!...That hardly suggests a balance of any sort...much less a delicate balance. Nature is chaos....not a delicate balancing act.

Again...what do you think the average global temperature has been on earth since it developed an atmosphere? And do you have the first bit of observed, measured, quantified, empirical evidence that man's CO2 emissions are altering the global temperature?

.

 

[Crick]

As you've been told repeatedly before, if you'd like some empirical evidence that man's CO2 emissions are the primary cause of the observed warming, simply go to www.ipcc.ch and look for "The Physical Science Basis".

Your repeated claim that there is no such evidence is ignorant and puerile.

 

[PredFan]

Garbage.

What IS immoral is the global warming scam that is being pushed upon the world.

More hogwash from the duped fools.

As if you have any idea about the content of the video......or even able to comprehend it.

I didn't even watch it, I just told you gloBULL warming is complete BS, sheeple

And yet temperatures and oceans keep rising anyway.......despite your dim witted theories.

It's the sun stupid!

 

[PredFan]

Here is a glimpse into the future for everyone, courtesy of me, PredFan:

The ice caps have not changed from their normal, the polar bears are not gone, the seas have not risen, and the temperature is pretty much the same as now. Basically because global warming/climate change/climate disruption did not occur.

The governments and governing bodies say: "It's because of our efforts starting back in the early century."

Even though it was a scam all along, that is how they will spin it when nothing happens.

There are no reputable or honest climate change deniers.....they don't exist.

Irrelevant at best, a lie at worst.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

The Climate change deniers of today will be responsible for the suffering of everyone's children tomorrow.

Really dude, do you expect anybody to watch a video over 100 minutes long before commenting on your post? I'll watch your video as soon as you read thru all these links, maybe-

Friends of Science | The Myths and Facts of Global Warming
Top Ten Reasons Climate Change is a Hoax | Global Climate Scam
31,000 scientists say "no convincing evidence". — OSS Foundation
'Global warming the greatest scam in history' claims founder of Weather Channel
Yes, ‘global warming’ is a hoax and here’s the proof
http://www.globalresearch.ca/copenh...n-facts-and-ten-myths-on-climate-change/16467
Three Facts Prove Climate Alarm Is a Scam

 

[jc456]

Here is a glimpse into the future for everyone, courtesy of me, PredFan:

The ice caps have not changed from their normal, the polar bears are not gone, the seas have not risen, and the temperature is pretty much the same as now. Basically because global warming/climate change/climate disruption did not occur.

The governments and governing bodies say: "It's because of our efforts starting back in the early century."

Even though it was a scam all along, that is how they will spin it when nothing happens.

There are no reputable or honest climate change deniers.....they don't exist.

I know of no one that doesn't believe climate changes. Your statement means absolutely nothing.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

The Climate change deniers of today will be responsible for the suffering of everyone's children tomorrow.

Showing once again that the AGW movement is religious and not scientific. Morality is the realm of the religious nutters dude. Science concerns itself with facts, and the AGW has precious little of those, which is why they resort to pathetic emotional appeals. Just sayin....

You pose an apt example of amorality. The scientific process itself is obviously unrelated to any moral principles.......the application of that science has everything to do with morality.

Wrong. The scientific method was developed over centuries to deal with religious fruitcakes like you, who chose "faith" over what they were actually seeing right in front of them. I live in a cause and effect world. You don't.

Vindictive Nerd Misfits

But you deny the cause and effect findings of psychological science that would explain why people become delusional escapist authoritarian GreenHeads.

Psychology is a "soft science" so their conclusions are OPINIONS. Not facts. Learn the difference.

Not Ready for Prime Time

Climatology is a descriptive science. It's for nerds who weren't smart enough to get jobs in the productive sciences. In other words, the carbon-checkers the Greenies look up to are minor leaguers.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

The Climate change deniers of today will be responsible for the suffering of everyone's children tomorrow.

Is it more moral to demand observed, measured, quantified, empirical evidence for a thing and remain skeptical till such time as the evidence is produced...or to simply accept a claim based primarily on one's political leanings...and cause untold harm to world and personal economies?

Feel free to remain skeptical while the wold burns.

Do you really think the earth is going to burn? Have you been that thoroughly duped? Do you have any idea what the average temperature on earth has ben across its history?....or what the average atmospheric CO2 concentrations have been?

The Climate change deniers of today will be responsible for the suffering of everyone's children tomorrow.

Is it more moral to demand observed, measured, quantified, empirical evidence for a thing and remain skeptical till such time as the evidence is produced...or to simply accept a claim based primarily on one's political leanings...and cause untold harm to world and personal economies?

Feel free to remain skeptical while the wold burns.

Do you really think the earth is going to burn? Have you been that thoroughly duped? Do you have any idea what the average temperature on earth has ben across its history?....or what the average atmospheric CO2 concentrations have been?

I think that the issue is REALLY that even minor changes in
climate and concentrations of this or that gas will have MAJOR
impacts on the DELICATE balance of nature------not that the planet is going to turn into a ball of fire

You think nature is in some "DELICATE" balance? Really? Look around. The temperature range on this planet today...at measured stations range from 112.3F at Makka, Saudi Arabia to -92.2F at Vostok, Antarctica. That is a spread of 204.5 degrees F in one day...today!!!...That hardly suggests a balance of any sort...much less a delicate balance.

Again...what do you think the average global temperature has been on earth since it developed an atmosphere? And do you have the first bit of observed, measured, quantified, empirical evidence that man's CO2 emissions are altering the global temperature?

Nothing in Nature Is Where It Belongs Unless Man Put It There

The balance of nature is not in man's favor. And it is nothing to worship; it is not Nature, like mindless primitives and immature Greenies think of it. By definition, nature is not supernatural.

It is our duty to transform it or we won't survive. The mutant degenerates who believe in Gaia preach the opposite: by not submitting to Nature, we are bringing on our own destruction. To this secular theocracy, productive science is the Original Sin.

 

[Crick]

Perfect example of shortsighted, self-centered, anti-social ignorance.

Your initial problem is assuming something fundamental separates homo sapiens from the rest of "nature". You go downhill from there.

 

[SSDD]

As you've been told repeatedly before, if you'd like some empirical evidence that man's CO2 emissions are the primary cause of the observed warming, simply go to www.ipcc.ch and look for "The Physical Science Basis".

Your repeated claim that there is no such evidence is ignorant and puerile.

Sorry guy...we have already been through the facts that you can't find the first bit pf observed, measured, quantified, empirical evidence there. A chart showing the absorptive qualities of radiative gasses is not evidence of anything other than that they absorb IR...there is also an emission chart which shows that they emit and don't retain any energy at all...and you don't have the first experiment that demonstrates that absorption and emission equals heating....what you have is assumptions.

Your claim that there is such evidence is prima facia proof that you are easily fooled.

 

[Crick]

I haven't the faintest desire to try to satisfy your insane, nonsensical understandings of basic science. There's really no point in discussing science with you. You're way beyond incompetent.

 

[SSDD]

I haven't the faintest desire to try to satisfy your insane, nonsensical understandings of basic science. There's really no point in discussing science with you. You're way beyond incompetent.

And you haven't the faintest chance of actually finding any observed, measured, quantified, empirical evidence supporting the A in AGW....what you posted was not even close, but it did show how easily you were fooled.

So once again, begin your cycle of lies claiming that you have provided such evidence....you only have one gear....and it is stuck on stupid.

 

[Crick]

Except you are the liar here. Anyone can go to IPCC.ch and see the evidence for themselves. As they do so, more and more of them will become aware of the quality of your information.