Discussion in 'Politics' started by Wolfstrike, Oct 2, 2017.
Or a 20 mm Gau-8
You don't have to recind it, just add "and for this purpose"
New 2nd amendment
A well-regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free state, and for this purpose the right of the People to bear arms shall not be infringed
That way the interpretation of the second clause has to rely on the first clause. And not be interpreted to stand on its own, as an individual right. But instead to be based on a collective need.
Wow. If I had serious mental problems that would really be an issue
wouldn't it? I mean, Dems have created countless laws that prevent
me being identified as having such problems from the general public.
Now your response might have been a response to the other gentleman,
but the result is still the same. You libs need to understand that you
cannot continue to talk out of both sides of your mouth and be considered
credible by the majority of the electorate in the individual states.
It's never ending with you guys.
"We want to keep weapons out of the hands of the mentally ill." (That's
what you preach today). Tomorrow you preach..."We must protect
the identity of the mentally ill from the American public, or they will
discriminate against the mentally ill."
"We MUST pass Federal Gun Laws...today!" Tomorrow you preach...
"States and/or cities Do Not have to follow Federal Immigration Laws
and the Government cannot impose sanctions on those that refuse
to follow Fed law."
You asswipes don't know if you're coming or going.
Separate names with a comma.