Clear up confusion,America and full auto weapons

[meaner gene]

The joys of firing a 50 cal.

Or a 20 mm Gau-8

 

[meaner gene]

28th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States...

1. The second amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby rescinded

2. A well-regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the People to bear arms shall not be infringed, but shall be subject to Federal standards pertaining to the licensing of firearms buyers and sellers and owners and operators, the nature of permissible firearms and ammunition which may be owned or operated by private citizens, the registration of firearms, and the regulation of their use.

3. Congress shall have the power to enact appropriate law relevant to the facilitation and enforcement of these provisions.

You don't have to recind it, just add "and for this purpose"

New 2nd amendment

A well-regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free state, and for this purpose the right of the People to bear arms shall not be infringed

That way the interpretation of the second clause has to rely on the first clause. And not be interpreted to stand on its own, as an individual right. But instead to be based on a collective need.

 

[DJT for Life]

So, you say you need full auto weapons? Why?

Because, fuck you. That's why.

So you have no rational reason. Full auto weapons are designed for one purpose, and that is to throw a lot of rounds downrange to kill a lot of people. They are only useful in war, because they aren't very accurate.

Except for machine guns...American assault weapons are not set on full auto.
They fire in a three round burst. Waste of ammo and too much spray
on full auto.

They can quickly be adapted in a fire fight when heavily outnumbered
and they are defending a position, but when they assault they use the
3-round burst

I'll take a 3-round burst for now. Why wouldn't government give us that, especially if they are trying to limit magazine capacity?

Given the tenor of your posts, why should you even be allowed to have any kind of gun. You come across as someone with some major mental problems.

Wow. If I had serious mental problems that would really be an issue
wouldn't it? I mean, Dems have created countless laws that prevent
me being identified as having such problems from the general public.

Now your response might have been a response to the other gentleman,
but the result is still the same. You libs need to understand that you
cannot continue to talk out of both sides of your mouth and be considered
credible by the majority of the electorate in the individual states.

It's never ending with you guys.

"We want to keep weapons out of the hands of the mentally ill." (That's
what you preach today). Tomorrow you preach..."We must protect
the identity of the mentally ill from the American public, or they will
discriminate against the mentally ill."

OR

"We MUST pass Federal Gun Laws...today!" Tomorrow you preach...
"States and/or cities Do Not have to follow Federal Immigration Laws
and the Government cannot impose sanctions on those that refuse
to follow Fed law."

You asswipes don't know if you're coming or going.