Citizen United being used to defend Disney over DeSantis attacks.

No. The governmental purpose here is to actually establish government on Disney land vs. it being its own little pedo fiefdom, k?
Such churlish mischaracterizations have no merit under law.

The authoritarian and his cronies retaliating against a private enterprise for exercising its constitutionally protected speech is the issue being litigated.

DeSantis's threats of potential penalties for Disney, including adding toll roads around its theme parks, new taxes on its hotels, and even building a prison nearby, is vindictive retaliation that is especially antithetical to conservatives' support of business.

As a consequence of his statist spite agenda, the suppressor of liberty is being manhandled by a mouse.
 
Tucker walked away a rich man and Fox News is tumbling in the ratings. Tucker got the last laugh.


1682945750038.jpeg


Actually Dominion got the last laugh.

(Well maybe not, the same type of suit brought by SmartMatic is still in the works.)

WW
 
View attachment 781239

Actually Dominion got the last laugh.

(Well maybe not, the same type of suit brought by SmartMatic is still in the works.)

WW
Yay! Cheer on the destruction of fair elections in America.

/sarcasm



They can't bury/deplatform everything.
 
Last edited:
Most of us want to protect our children from deviates and deviate behaviors in the name of decency and traditional values.

Then do not give Disney your money, but quit using the Govt to attack those you do not like
 
Liar. Prove that Desantis isn't acting on behalf of the majority of FL voters.

If he is does that make it right?

Would you support Ill going after Hobby Lobby just because a majority of voters wanted them to?

Is this really the country you want to live in, where the majority of voters can dictate who the Govt attacks next?
 
I would oppose changing to 5 outs in an inning, but I wouldn't grab my glove at only 3 outs. You don't have to like the rules to play by them.

Democrats ignore the rules / laws.

I don't expect you to admit it, but we both know, for example, Biden has ignored existing US imigration law.

If there was a chip inserted into the bodies of all politicians that would blow up if they ever violated existing laws, we both know there would be a lot of deceased politicians right now.
 
If he is does that make it right?
Would you support Ill going after Hobby Lobby just because a majority of voters wanted them to?
Is this really the country you want to live in, where the majority of voters can dictate who the Govt attacks next?
1. Yes it does. If church goers and parents are offended by deviate behaviors, than the government can stop the offensive behavior.


2. WTF does Hobby Lobby have to do with anything? If any company pushed offensive behaviors then the government should censor the offensive behavior. We don't want public nudity or public deviate sex acts, or sex with animals, or any other public deviate behaviors.

3. The government isn't attacking businesses. The government is attacking Donald Trump.
 
It's because the law didn't stand and Disney can legally answer back. If the law had stood, DeSantis could have legally shut them up.
We live in increasingly dangerous situation where the weaker control the stronger. There is a lot of cross ways of living involved also. So, you can have an individual firefighter in Reedy Creek who did nothing for 20 years promoted as a hero over someone who cleaned toilets in the Disney properties and protected tourists many times as needed who gets no word of an atta boy. Across the nation there are people weaker in employment of protecting citizens who wilt in real situations pushing genuflecting to them from other citizens who could clean their clock.
 
Such churlish mischaracterizations have no merit under law.

The authoritarian and his cronies retaliating against a private enterprise for exercising its constitutionally protected speech is the issue being litigated.

DeSantis's threats of potential penalties for Disney, including adding toll roads around its theme parks, new taxes on its hotels, and even building a prison nearby, is vindictive retaliation that is especially antithetical to conservatives' support of business.

As a consequence of his statist spite agenda, the suppressor of liberty is being manhandled by a mouse.

Manhandled? You keep using that word but I don't think you know what it means.
 
1. Yes it does. If church goers and parents are offended by deviate behaviors, than the government can stop the offensive behavior.

What happens when the Govt decides going to church is a deviate behavior? Will you be ok with the stopping it?

2. WTF does Hobby Lobby have to do with anything? If any company pushed offensive behaviors then the government should censor the offensive behavior. We don't want public nudity or public deviate sex acts, or sex with animals, or any other public deviate behaviors.

I just used them as an example. If the majority of the voters agree that Hobby Lobby is deviant by pushing their religion, would you be ok with the Govt attackign them based on the desires of the majority of the voters?

Disney does not support or encourage public nudity or public deviate sex acts, or sex with animals, so why are you ok with the Govt attacking them.

3. The government isn't attacking businesses. The government is attacking Donald Trump.

The Govt is attacking Disney, and you support it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top