Citizen Grand Jury Indicts Obama

[elvis]

Greetings to All:

Barack Obama continues to be assaulted from every direction concerning his eligibility to be president of these United States.

Citizen grand jury indicts Obama

[FONT=&quot]BORN IN THE USA?[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Citizen grand jury indicts Obama[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Groups in 20 more states reviewing eligibility claims [/FONT]

[SIZE=-1]Posted: March 31, 2009
8:35 pm Eastern

[/SIZE] [FONT=Palatino, Times New Roman, Georgia, Times, serif]By Bob Unruh[/FONT]
[SIZE=-1] © 2009 WorldNetDaily [/SIZE]

Orly Taitz

President Obama has been named in dozens of civil lawsuits alleging he is not eligible to be president, with one man even filing a alleging the commander-in-chief is a fraud, and now a citizen grand jury in Georgia has indicted the sitting president.

The indictment delivered to state and federal prosecutors yesterday is one of the in the dispute over Obama's eligibility to be president under the U.S. Constitution's requirement that presidents be "natural born" citizens.

Orly Taitz, a California working on several of the civil actions, also announced she has filed another Quo Warranto case in the District of Columbia, where, she told WND, the statutes acknowledge that procedure.

The Quo Warranto claim essentially calls on Obama to explain by what authority he has assumed the power of the presidency (story continues).

Remember that Hawaii sealed Obama’s birth records (story) and that the evidence trail is leading to the conclusion that Obama was born in Kenya (story and story and story).

GL,

Terral

Were Rosie O'Donnell and charlie sheen on this jury? What about Alex Jones?

 

[Terral]

Hi Oxtoxi:

Orly Taitz

I feel a strange stirring in my loins...

We have an Obama Eligibility Update:

WorldNetDaily Exclusive

[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][SIZE=-1]BORN IN THE USA?[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Palatino, Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif][SIZE=+2]
Supremes asked to cooperate with FBI[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Palatino, Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif][SIZE=+1]Attorney investigating Obama's eligibility reports cyber attacks[/SIZE][/FONT]

[SIZE=-1]Posted: April 04, 2009
12:10 am Eastern

[/SIZE] [FONT=Palatino, Times New Roman, Georgia, Times, serif]By Bob Unruh[/FONT]
[SIZE=-1] © 2009 WorldNetDaily [/SIZE]

Orly Taitz

A lawyer investigating the eligibility of Barack Obama to be president under the U.S. Constitution's requirement that the office be occupied only by a "natural born" citizen is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to cooperate with an FBI investigation into alleged cyber crimes connected to her work.

In a letter addressed yesterday to Chief Justice John Roberts, the associate justices, the Secret Service and others, California lawyer Orly Taitz, who is working on a number of eligibility cases through the Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, wrote, "I hope that the Supreme Court will show proper cooperation in investigation of such crimes by the FBI and other agencies and I request a letter of cooperation to that extent."

Taitz is just one of many attorneys across the country whose clients are raising questions about Obama's eligibility.

WND has reported on dozens of legal challenges to Obama's status as a "natural born citizen." The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

Some of the lawsuits question whether he was actually born in Hawaii, as he insists. If he was born out of the country, Obama's American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the time (story continues).

We appear to have an Illegal Alien Foreign National squatting in the White House doing a job that real Americans appear unwilling or unable to do. Obama should have coughed up his real birth certificate a long time ago . . .

GL,

Terral

 

[random3434]

su ot gnoleb esab ruoy lla

 

[DiveCon]

su ot gnoleb esab ruoy lla

you left out one word

 

[Zoom-boing]

actually, all they verified was that they have seen the original birth certificate, they did not verify any of the contents. all obama has to do is provide a confirmed copy of the original and this goes away....

Makes one wonder why he doesn't do this and shut everyone up once and for all.

 

[DiveCon]

actually, all they verified was that they have seen the original birth certificate, they did not verify any of the contents. all obama has to do is provide a confirmed copy of the original and this goes away....

Makes one wonder why he doesn't do this and shut everyone up once and for all.

well, do you think the troofers would accept the results of a new 9/11 investigation when it came to the same conclusion we already know?
while it would be easy to end it by just doing what you said, there would still be those that wouldnt accept it
thus it would be a waste of time and money to do so now

 

[ItsFairmont]

Even if he were born outside of the USA (like John McCain, who was born in Panama), Obama's mother was from Kansas, bozos. She was an American, and that made him a natural born citizen by law.

You can be born anywhere you like and still be American. You don't have to actually be born on U.S. soil.

Goofs!

Maybe John McCain should be investigated for fraud because he ran for president but was born in Panama.

 

[elvis]

Even if he were born outside of the USA (like John McCain, who was born in Panama), Obama's mother was from Kansas, bozos. She was an American, and that made him a natural born citizen by law.

You can be born anywhere you like and still be American. You don't have to actually be born on U.S. soil.

Goofs!

Maybe John McCain should be investigated for fraud because he ran for president but was born in Panama.

McCain wasn't born in Panama, dipshit.

 

[DiveCon]

Even if he were born outside of the USA (like John McCain, who was born in Panama), Obama's mother was from Kansas, bozos. She was an American, and that made him a natural born citizen by law.

You can be born anywhere you like and still be American. You don't have to actually be born on U.S. soil.

Goofs!

Maybe John McCain should be investigated for fraud because he ran for president but was born in Panama.

McCain wasn't born in Panama, dipshit.

yes, he was
on a US Military base
with BOTH parents US Citizens

 

[DiveCon]

Even if he were born outside of the USA (like John McCain, who was born in Panama), Obama's mother was from Kansas, bozos. She was an American, and that made him a natural born citizen by law.

You can be born anywhere you like and still be American. You don't have to actually be born on U.S. soil.

Goofs!

Maybe John McCain should be investigated for fraud because he ran for president but was born in Panama.

having just one Citizen as a parent isnt always seen as being born a citizen

 

[WorldAHope]

Even if he were born outside of the USA (like John McCain, who was born in Panama), Obama's mother was from Kansas, bozos. She was an American, and that made him a natural born citizen by law.

You can be born anywhere you like and still be American. You don't have to actually be born on U.S. soil.

Goofs!

Maybe John McCain should be investigated for fraud because he ran for president but was born in Panama.

McCain wasn't born in Panama, dipshit.

JSM was birthed at US military hospital in the Canal Zone, which was a US protectorate or territory at the time. His daddy was in the Navy, later became Adm John McCain.

 

[WorldAHope]

Even if he were born outside of the USA (like John McCain, who was born in Panama), Obama's mother was from Kansas, bozos. She was an American, and that made him a natural born citizen by law.

You can be born anywhere you like and still be American. You don't have to actually be born on U.S. soil.

Goofs!

Maybe John McCain should be investigated for fraud because he ran for president but was born in Panama.

McCain wasn't born in Panama, dipshit.

JSM was birthed at US military hospital in the Canal Zone, which was a US protectorate or territory at the time. His daddy was in the Navy, later became Adm John McCain.

Orly Taitz is more than a little on the nutty side. Can't the birthers afford a lawyer who is serious, not half whacked without reputable legal credentials to present this case ?
Another person craving attention and seeking FAME. Joe the Plumber, meet Orly the Lawyer.

Turnabout: Is Obama Denialist Orly Taitz Really a Lawyer? Will She Be For Long?

Turnabout: Is Obama Denialist Orly Taitz Really a Lawyer? Will She Be For Long?
March 13th, 2009 · 46 Comments · Author - ACG, Politics

lthough Taitz is a member of the California Bar, she’s not listed as a member of the American Bar Association (check for yourself). Nor is her “law school” (William Howard Taft University) accredited by the ABA. Because Taft is a distance-learning school only, Taitz’s degree entitles her, at most, to practice in California, as her school candidly admits.

Rules of attorney discipline forbid the practice of law without a license - i.e., without sitting for and passing the bar exam, after graduating from an ABA-accredited school. Her correspondence degree is a limited exception, only useful in California. So, any action in which she appeared as counsel of record outside the state would constitute practicing law without a license, in violation of California disciplinary rules. Has “Dr.” Taitz violated this rule? Does her appearance before the Supreme Court, in filing documents for the frivolous, since-dismissed case Lightfoot v. Bowen, therefore subject her to discipline?

Even if Taitz legitimately filed her grade-school level motions before the Supreme Court, she may have violated a series of other disciplinary rules in the course of her conduct. The California Rules of Professional Conduct provide,

A member shall not seek, accept, or continue employment if the member knows or should know that the objective of such employment is:

(A) To bring an action, conduct a defense, assert a position in litigation, or take an appeal, without probable cause and for the purpose of harassing or maliciously injuring any person; or

(B) To present a claim or defense in litigation that is not warranted under existing law, unless it can be supported by a good faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of such existing law.4

The exception for “good faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of such existing law” is large as a matter of policy, and allows attorneys to creatively address real problems in the current state of the law. But at least one judge thinks that the Obama citizenship cases are more than creative - in his words, they’re the “frivolous” actions of “agents provacateurs,” constituting harassment, and potentially subjecting at least one Berg-led attorney to discipline. There’s no reason Taitz shouldn’t be similarly disciplined upon her next filing, under California’s mirror rule.

Further, Taitz’s “consent form,” posted on her site to solicit & induce ill-advised members of our military into suing the President, may constitute an unethical attorney solicitation. Under the California rules, attorney “communications” may not contain dramatization, or “confuse, deceive, or mislead the public.”5 Tricking enlisted men & women into frivolously suing the commander in chief at least flirts with that line. Smart lawyers don’t cut the disciplinary rules this close.

Now, I’m not a lawyer. Yet. So the above is amateur opinion, not professional theory. I know my limits. Taitz doesn’t. That’s just one of a few things that separates us.

 

[DiveCon]

McCain wasn't born in Panama, dipshit.

JSM was birthed at US military hospital in the Canal Zone, which was a US protectorate or territory at the time. His daddy was in the Navy, later became Adm John McCain.

Orly Taitz is more than a little on the nutty side. Can't the birthers afford a lawyer who is serious, not half whacked without reputable legal credentials to present this case ?
Another person craving attention and seeking FAME. Joe the Plumber, meet Orly the Lawyer.

Turnabout: Is Obama Denialist Orly Taitz Really a Lawyer? Will She Be For Long?

Turnabout: Is Obama Denialist Orly Taitz Really a Lawyer? Will She Be For Long?
March 13th, 2009 · 46 Comments · Author - ACG, Politics

lthough Taitz is a member of the California Bar, she’s not listed as a member of the American Bar Association (check for yourself). Nor is her “law school” (William Howard Taft University) accredited by the ABA. Because Taft is a distance-learning school only, Taitz’s degree entitles her, at most, to practice in California, as her school candidly admits.

Rules of attorney discipline forbid the practice of law without a license - i.e., without sitting for and passing the bar exam, after graduating from an ABA-accredited school. Her correspondence degree is a limited exception, only useful in California. So, any action in which she appeared as counsel of record outside the state would constitute practicing law without a license, in violation of California disciplinary rules. Has “Dr.” Taitz violated this rule? Does her appearance before the Supreme Court, in filing documents for the frivolous, since-dismissed case Lightfoot v. Bowen, therefore subject her to discipline?

Even if Taitz legitimately filed her grade-school level motions before the Supreme Court, she may have violated a series of other disciplinary rules in the course of her conduct. The California Rules of Professional Conduct provide,

A member shall not seek, accept, or continue employment if the member knows or should know that the objective of such employment is:

(A) To bring an action, conduct a defense, assert a position in litigation, or take an appeal, without probable cause and for the purpose of harassing or maliciously injuring any person; or

(B) To present a claim or defense in litigation that is not warranted under existing law, unless it can be supported by a good faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of such existing law.4

The exception for “good faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of such existing law” is large as a matter of policy, and allows attorneys to creatively address real problems in the current state of the law. But at least one judge thinks that the Obama citizenship cases are more than creative - in his words, they’re the “frivolous” actions of “agents provacateurs,” constituting harassment, and potentially subjecting at least one Berg-led attorney to discipline. There’s no reason Taitz shouldn’t be similarly disciplined upon her next filing, under California’s mirror rule.

Further, Taitz’s “consent form,” posted on her site to solicit & induce ill-advised members of our military into suing the President, may constitute an unethical attorney solicitation. Under the California rules, attorney “communications” may not contain dramatization, or “confuse, deceive, or mislead the public.”5 Tricking enlisted men & women into frivolously suing the commander in chief at least flirts with that line. Smart lawyers don’t cut the disciplinary rules this close.

Now, I’m not a lawyer. Yet. So the above is amateur opinion, not professional theory. I know my limits. Taitz doesn’t. That’s just one of a few things that separates us.

oh come on, that is lame as hell
who gives a rats ass if she ever went to law school


and before you jump to more stupid conclusions, i believe Obama was born in HI based on the State of HI issuing him a BC

 

[WorldAHope]

JSM was birthed at US military hospital in the Canal Zone, which was a US protectorate or territory at the time. His daddy was in the Navy, later became Adm John McCain.

Orly Taitz is more than a little on the nutty side. Can't the birthers afford a lawyer who is serious, not half whacked without reputable legal credentials to present this case ?
Another person craving attention and seeking FAME. Joe the Plumber, meet Orly the Lawyer.

Turnabout: Is Obama Denialist Orly Taitz Really a Lawyer? Will She Be For Long?

Turnabout: Is Obama Denialist Orly Taitz Really a Lawyer? Will She Be For Long?
March 13th, 2009 · 46 Comments · Author - ACG, Politics

lthough Taitz is a member of the California Bar, she’s not listed as a member of the American Bar Association (check for yourself). Nor is her “law school” (William Howard Taft University) accredited by the ABA. Because Taft is a distance-learning school only, Taitz’s degree entitles her, at most, to practice in California, as her school candidly admits.

Rules of attorney discipline forbid the practice of law without a license - i.e., without sitting for and passing the bar exam, after graduating from an ABA-accredited school. Her correspondence degree is a limited exception, only useful in California. So, any action in which she appeared as counsel of record outside the state would constitute practicing law without a license, in violation of California disciplinary rules. Has “Dr.” Taitz violated this rule? Does her appearance before the Supreme Court, in filing documents for the frivolous, since-dismissed case Lightfoot v. Bowen, therefore subject her to discipline?

Even if Taitz legitimately filed her grade-school level motions before the Supreme Court, she may have violated a series of other disciplinary rules in the course of her conduct. The California Rules of Professional Conduct provide,

A member shall not seek, accept, or continue employment if the member knows or should know that the objective of such employment is:

(A) To bring an action, conduct a defense, assert a position in litigation, or take an appeal, without probable cause and for the purpose of harassing or maliciously injuring any person; or

(B) To present a claim or defense in litigation that is not warranted under existing law, unless it can be supported by a good faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of such existing law.4

The exception for “good faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of such existing law” is large as a matter of policy, and allows attorneys to creatively address real problems in the current state of the law. But at least one judge thinks that the Obama citizenship cases are more than creative - in his words, they’re the “frivolous” actions of “agents provacateurs,” constituting harassment, and potentially subjecting at least one Berg-led attorney to discipline. There’s no reason Taitz shouldn’t be similarly disciplined upon her next filing, under California’s mirror rule.

Further, Taitz’s “consent form,” posted on her site to solicit & induce ill-advised members of our military into suing the President, may constitute an unethical attorney solicitation. Under the California rules, attorney “communications” may not contain dramatization, or “confuse, deceive, or mislead the public.”5 Tricking enlisted men & women into frivolously suing the commander in chief at least flirts with that line. Smart lawyers don’t cut the disciplinary rules this close.

Now, I’m not a lawyer. Yet. So the above is amateur opinion, not professional theory. I know my limits. Taitz doesn’t. That’s just one of a few things that separates us.

oh come on, that is lame as hell
who gives a rats ass if she ever went to law school


and before you jump to more stupid conclusions, i believe Obama was born in HI based on the State of HI issuing him a BC

She went to law school, that school's accreditation allows her to practise law only in Calif.
She is not listed as being a member of the Calif Bar. If she is practising law without passing the bar, she's gonna be calling on the birthers to post bail.
If she persists in pursuing and pushing or filing a case that a US District Court judge has dismissed and labelled as Frivolous and obvious Harassment, she will herself be liable for Contempt of Court.
Point is,
She's an obsessed stalker, a bulging eyed breathless talking fruit loop. A part time lawyer chasing fame and fortune and notoriety by pushing this corpse along.
And the WND birthers are looking up to her and chat her up as if she was a REAL lawyer, is the next Clarence Darrow.
Bizarro land.

 

[DiveCon]

Orly Taitz is more than a little on the nutty side. Can't the birthers afford a lawyer who is serious, not half whacked without reputable legal credentials to present this case ?
Another person craving attention and seeking FAME. Joe the Plumber, meet Orly the Lawyer.

Turnabout: Is Obama Denialist Orly Taitz Really a Lawyer? Will She Be For Long?

Turnabout: Is Obama Denialist Orly Taitz Really a Lawyer? Will She Be For Long?
March 13th, 2009 · 46 Comments · Author - ACG, Politics

lthough Taitz is a member of the California Bar, she’s not listed as a member of the American Bar Association (check for yourself). Nor is her “law school” (William Howard Taft University) accredited by the ABA. Because Taft is a distance-learning school only, Taitz’s degree entitles her, at most, to practice in California, as her school candidly admits.

Rules of attorney discipline forbid the practice of law without a license - i.e., without sitting for and passing the bar exam, after graduating from an ABA-accredited school. Her correspondence degree is a limited exception, only useful in California. So, any action in which she appeared as counsel of record outside the state would constitute practicing law without a license, in violation of California disciplinary rules. Has “Dr.” Taitz violated this rule? Does her appearance before the Supreme Court, in filing documents for the frivolous, since-dismissed case Lightfoot v. Bowen, therefore subject her to discipline?

Even if Taitz legitimately filed her grade-school level motions before the Supreme Court, she may have violated a series of other disciplinary rules in the course of her conduct. The California Rules of Professional Conduct provide,

A member shall not seek, accept, or continue employment if the member knows or should know that the objective of such employment is:

(A) To bring an action, conduct a defense, assert a position in litigation, or take an appeal, without probable cause and for the purpose of harassing or maliciously injuring any person; or

(B) To present a claim or defense in litigation that is not warranted under existing law, unless it can be supported by a good faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of such existing law.4

The exception for “good faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of such existing law” is large as a matter of policy, and allows attorneys to creatively address real problems in the current state of the law. But at least one judge thinks that the Obama citizenship cases are more than creative - in his words, they’re the “frivolous” actions of “agents provacateurs,” constituting harassment, and potentially subjecting at least one Berg-led attorney to discipline. There’s no reason Taitz shouldn’t be similarly disciplined upon her next filing, under California’s mirror rule.

Further, Taitz’s “consent form,” posted on her site to solicit & induce ill-advised members of our military into suing the President, may constitute an unethical attorney solicitation. Under the California rules, attorney “communications” may not contain dramatization, or “confuse, deceive, or mislead the public.”5 Tricking enlisted men & women into frivolously suing the commander in chief at least flirts with that line. Smart lawyers don’t cut the disciplinary rules this close.

Now, I’m not a lawyer. Yet. So the above is amateur opinion, not professional theory. I know my limits. Taitz doesn’t. That’s just one of a few things that separates us.

oh come on, that is lame as hell
who gives a rats ass if she ever went to law school


and before you jump to more stupid conclusions, i believe Obama was born in HI based on the State of HI issuing him a BC

She went to law school, that school's accreditation allows her to practise law only in Calif.
She is not listed as being a member of the Calif Bar. If she is practising law without passing the bar, she's gonna be calling on the birthers to post bail.
If she persists in pursuing and pushing or filing a case that a US District Court judge has dismissed and labelled as Frivolous and obvious Harassment, she will herself be liable for Contempt of Court.
Point is,
She's an obsessed stalker, a bulging eyed breathless talking fruit loop. A part time lawyer chasing fame and fortune and notoriety by pushing this corpse along.
And the WND birthers are looking up to her and chat her up as if she was a REAL lawyer, is the next Clarence Darrow.
Bizarro land.

who the fuck came up with the term "birthers" for the people that dont believe Obama's BC is valid?

LOL

just too damn funny

 

[LA RAM FAN]

If he wasnt a politician and an ordinary citizen,he would be behind bars for many years to come but that wont happen because sadly presidents can get away with anything.theres one different law for us citizens and one different one for politicians.

 

[SpidermanTuba]

The Quo Warranto claim essentially calls on Obama to explain by what authority he has assumed the power of the presidency

The answer to that is easy. On January 8th of this year, Congress met to tally up what is called the "Electoral College". Obama got a majority of the electoral votes cast, at 365 out of 538. Not a single Senator or Representative objected to the tally then, nor did a single Senator or Representative (from either party) question his eligibility at the time of the vote. Having thus been lawfully chosen as President, Obama's term began on January 20th.

 

[aka520]

Even if he were born outside of the USA (like John McCain, who was born in Panama), Obama's mother was from Kansas, bozos. She was an American, and that made him a natural born citizen by law.

You can be born anywhere you like and still be American. You don't have to actually be born on U.S. soil.

Goofs!

Maybe John McCain should be investigated for fraud because he ran for president but was born in Panama.

McCain wasn't born in Panama, dipshit.

JSM was birthed at US military hospital in the Canal Zone, which was a US protectorate or territory at the time. His daddy was in the Navy, later became Adm John McCain.

Children born to active military personnel abroad are granted immediate natural born US citizenship by the 14th Constitutional Amendment.
gb

 

[aka520]

Even if he were born outside of the USA (like John McCain, who was born in Panama), Obama's mother was from Kansas, bozos. She was an American, and that made him a natural born citizen by law.


The 14th Amendment does not apply to Obama, aka POS. He was born to an American minor mother and a foreign born father. If he was born in Kenya he is a citizen of Kenya. His grandmother on his father's side swears she personally witnessed his birth in Kenya along with a sister. A State of Hawaii official has stated there is a live birth certificate on file in Hawaii. However, the official conveniently failed to say where the live birth took place. Hawaiian law allows for a live birth to be recorded even if the birth takes place elsewhere.

Odd how Obama, aka POS abruptly left his campaign to return to Hawaii just in time to witness the demise of the one person who could expose the lie. His grandmother conveniently managed to die without revealing the truth. A pillow over the face could quickly snip that loose end for good. Somewhat of a stretch, but possible. After all, we are playing for the highest stakes possible. Furthermore, it did give Obama, aka POS the opportunity to cover any remaining loose ends.

Then there's the question about Obama, aka POS traveling to Pakistan in the 80's, using some sort of passport? Of what nationality was the passport? Surely not a US passport because he was never issued a US passport until one was rubber stamped when he was elected a Senator. Then there's the question of college entrance records? Did he register as a foreign exchange student to fraudulently receive student aid? Why hire the cadre of high priced lawyers with the sole purpose of making sure none of these questionable answers ever sees the light of day? Who is paying this army of lawyers?

All of these questions could be easily be resolved for $10 bucks, thereby releasing his Hawaiian birth certificate. Why does he not want this resolved? What is he hiding?

Would his removal from office result is the coming revolution predicted?
gb

 

[SpidermanTuba]

Even if he were born outside of the USA (like John McCain, who was born in Panama), Obama's mother was from Kansas, bozos. She was an American, and that made him a natural born citizen by law.


The 14th Amendment does not apply to Obama, aka POS. He was born to an American minor mother and a foreign born father. If he was born in Kenya he is a citizen of Kenya. His grandmother on his father's side swears she personally witnessed his birth in Kenya along with a sister. A State of Hawaii official has stated there is a live birth certificate on file in Hawaii. However, the official conveniently failed to say where the live birth took place. Hawaiian law allows for a live birth to be recorded even if the birth takes place elsewhere.

Odd how Obama, aka POS abruptly left his campaign to return to Hawaii just in time to witness the demise of the one person who could expose the lie. His grandmother conveniently managed to die without revealing the truth. A pillow over the face could quickly snip that loose end for good. Somewhat of a stretch, but possible. After all, we are playing for the highest stakes possible. Furthermore, it did give Obama, aka POS the opportunity to cover any remaining loose ends.

Then there's the question about Obama, aka POS traveling to Pakistan in the 80's, using some sort of passport? Of what nationality was the passport? Surely not a US passport because he was never issued a US passport until one was rubber stamped when he was elected a Senator. Then there's the question of college entrance records? Did he register as a foreign exchange student to fraudulently receive student aid? Why hire the cadre of high priced lawyers with the sole purpose of making sure none of these questionable answers ever sees the light of day? Who is paying this army of lawyers?

All of these questions could be easily be resolved for $10 bucks, thereby releasing his Hawaiian birth certificate. Why does he not want this resolved? What is he hiding?

Would his removal from office result is the coming revolution predicted?
gb

OMG now you're accusing Obama of offing his own grandmother. You truly are a moron.

Here is his birth certificate right here: