Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The claims of potential benefits, allegedly provided by medically unnecessary, non-therapeutic circumcision, lack any real support from medical science. United States medical literature, as compared with the medical literature of other nations, is highly biased in favor of male circumcision. The word potential means to exist in possibility but not in actuality. The scientific literature that supports such potential benefits is written mostly by doctors who were reared in circumcising cultures.
one of the first ways in which tyrannical and anti-semetic regimes isolated and made jews alien was to outlaw circumcision. they would then use the fact that someone was circumcised as a way of identifying and outing jews who were singled out for persecution.
Are you a physician? What qualification do you have that is more legitimate than the CDC?
Fuck off, idiot. You are not interesting, you are boring and insipid.
Are you a physician? How many times do I have to ask?
Did YOU read the links I provided for you?
Are you a physician? How many times do I have to ask?
Did YOU read the links I provided for you?
I don't have to be a doctor to decipher scientific study vs cultural acceptance.
Are you a physician? How many times do I have to ask?
Did YOU read the links I provided for you?
I don't have to be a doctor to decipher scientific study vs cultural acceptance.
Is that a yes or a no? Why so evasive?
Circumcision ruling condemned by Germany's Muslim and Jewish leaders | World news | guardian.co.uk
Jewish and Muslim leaders were united on Wednesday in their condemnation of a German court's decision to in effect outlaw the circumcision of boys after a judge deemed that the religious practice amounted to bodily harm.
Representatives of the two religious communities called the ruling insensitive and discriminatory, saying it was an attack on centuries of religious tradition.
A judge at a Cologne court said that the circumcision of minors went against a child's interests because it led to a physical alteration of the body, and because people other than the child were determining its religious affiliation.
<more>
Well awesome job Germany! Now if only we could outlaw it in America.
can't outlaw it in the U.S. that would be unconstitutional oppression of a religious group.
Circumcision is unneccesary. Its a violation of the rights of the child to choose.
Additionally, it protects the head of the cock and allows it to keep its sensitivty well later into life. The forskin also provides more friction for both the male and female during love making meaning the male needs to thrust less and not as hard in order to please both him and her.
By removing the foreskin, we are taking away an intregal part of lovemaking thus relegating our males to a less satisfying sex life.
Imagine as much as we like it now, if we had ALL our parts that made it better for both us and our partners.
And lastly, its the ultimate violation of our children. We modify their bodies without their consent. Its a vile and disgusting practice.
I say BAN it now!
US law says the child doesn't have the right o choose himself until age 12
The AMA advises against circumcision.
That's like, a lot of doctors.
I don't have to be a doctor to decipher scientific study vs cultural acceptance.
Is that a yes or a no? Why so evasive?
The AMA advises against circumcision.
Well awesome job Germany! Now if only we could outlaw it in America.
can't outlaw it in the U.S. that would be unconstitutional oppression of a religious group.
Circumcision is unneccesary. Its a violation of the rights of the child to choose.
Additionally, it protects the head of the cock and allows it to keep its sensitivty well later into life. The forskin also provides more friction for both the male and female during love making meaning the male needs to thrust less and not as hard in order to please both him and her.
By removing the foreskin, we are taking away an intregal part of lovemaking thus relegating our males to a less satisfying sex life.
Imagine as much as we like it now, if we had ALL our parts that made it better for both us and our partners.
And lastly, its the ultimate violation of our children. We modify their bodies without their consent. Its a vile and disgusting practice.
I say BAN it now!
US law says the child doesn't have the right o choose himself until age 12
If you believe in a right to life, you must also believe in a rightr to not be mutlilated.
The AMA advises against circumcision.
That's like, a lot of doctors.
Failure to recommend something is not the same as advising against it.
The AMA sees many future benefits in circumcision. They also see a risk in getting it done... a risk made higher by diseased cock-sucking Jews endangering infants.
I also notice that the AMA is disproportionally influenced by Jews. It would be most unexpected for Jews to recommend circumcision, like if Afros were lining up to call Trayvon a thug for assaulting Zimmerman. Or, like if Jews were lining up to call Trayvon a thug for assaulting Zimmerman.
You're a fucking idiot. Fuck off.
Circumcision ruling condemned by Germany's Muslim and Jewish leaders | World news | guardian.co.uk
Jewish and Muslim leaders were united on Wednesday in their condemnation of a German court's decision to in effect outlaw the circumcision of boys after a judge deemed that the religious practice amounted to bodily harm.
Representatives of the two religious communities called the ruling insensitive and discriminatory, saying it was an attack on centuries of religious tradition.
A judge at a Cologne court said that the circumcision of minors went against a child's interests because it led to a physical alteration of the body, and because people other than the child were determining its religious affiliation.
<more>