CIA: Trey Gowdy Altered Documents To Frame Hillary Clinton

[daws101]

so when the CIA said the documents were changed and sent the actual documents to Cummings and Gowdy again its now a smear tactic... riiiiiiiight Gowdy gets caught altering a document and now its a smear tactic ... why is it when your republicans get caught it's a smear tactic ... after all it was the CIA that went to Rep. commings not Rep, comming going top the CIA for the information

If Gowdy is guilty, indict him. If Hillary is guilty indict her. If Cummings is guilty, indict him.

No one is above the law. But simply hurling partisan talking points does not prove guilt. It proves nothing.

But simply hurling partisan talking points does not prove guilt. It proves nothing

THAT'S ALL you and right wingers have DONE from day one.... I can SHOW your near hundred posts of PARTISAN talking points you got from your right wing media propagandists slamming Hillary.... you are one big fat hypocrite.

Hillary's lies have been well documented, even by the left wing media. But you fools don't care---------you just looooooooooove her, she can do no wrong, she is a liberal female so the laws and rules don't apply to her.

All you do on this message board is post dem/lib talking points and lies. You are nothing but a parrot with no ability to think for yourself. How do you manage to dress yourself?

Not the think for yourself ploy again!
This coming from a member of a party that has one live brain cell .

"ah aint no ways tarred" "it was caused by a video" "we landed under sniper fire" "Chelsea was jogging around the WTC on 9/11" " I always try to tell the truth".

From your standard bearer-------------and you dare to challenge anyone's brain cells?

My standard bearer ?
Like I said one live brain cell.

 

[daws101]

Did Powell destroy evidence? No he did not.

False equivalence.

No moron, that is my whole point.

Too bad it's not the reality.

Now your stupidity is just boring me. Dismissed.

The brain dead are easily bored.

 

[Redfish]

It's being investigated by the FBI. If they haven't made a determination yet, how can the CIA? Hillary has all her emails sent to her private server, how is it possible none were classified? And why did she delete most of them?

you've been told many times and you keep coming back with the same questions thats been answered...

as for the 127 Emails in question by Gowdy who claim that Sidney Blumenthal's emails were classified in nature in the benghazi hearings... these were the ones that Gowdy claim the CIA had said was classified ... as you can see the CIA went back and looked at these 127 emails of Sidney Blumenthal that Gowdy claimed were classified turn out not to declassified ..I realize you have a COMPREHENSION PROBLEM YOU"VE SHOWN IT IN THE PAST.... these were the Emails that Gowdy brought to the benghazi hearings, not the ones you may think have been deleted... as for these deleted emails ...you speak of if you ever paid attention you would have know that the FBI had recovered all of her erased emails in question ... as she said, they were personal and had nothing to do with the government ... which the FBI has already said they were personal in nature ... so pay attention and stop with your lying ...

You keep deflecting. The investigation hasn't concluded and she did receive classified emails on her personal unsecure server. You don't like the facts so you want to dismiss them instead of adopting some measure of integrity, we get it.

We get you. Innocent until proved guilty is fundamental to the character and culture of America and Americans. In you own words, "The investigation hasn't concluded" and yet you have pronounced guilt. Do not ever wrap yourself in the American Flag, or consider yourself a Christian (if you do).

The question as to if, and when and why some e-mails were classified can become exculpatory. In any event, no allegation that the use of her personal server has caused damage to our nation. Something even the lying haters on the right have not been able to produce.

it makes no difference when the emails were "marked" classified. Classified data does not have to be marked in order to be classified. The content makes it classified, not the markings.

False ! The filling system is the SOS office and all others it is required to classify all correspondence .
But since all emails must be printed and filled the "stamping is done in order of arrival not importance.

wrong. I held top secret and SAP clearances for years. I know the rules, laws, and punishments for breaking them.

Classified data can be in your head. If you write it down its your responsibility to properly mark and protect it from disclosure.

As usual, you know nothing about the subject and are just parroting the lies fed to you by the Clinton campaign.

If I did what she did, I would be typing this from a jail cell.

 

[Redfish]

If Gowdy is guilty, indict him. If Hillary is guilty indict her. If Cummings is guilty, indict him.

No one is above the law. But simply hurling partisan talking points does not prove guilt. It proves nothing.

But simply hurling partisan talking points does not prove guilt. It proves nothing

THAT'S ALL you and right wingers have DONE from day one.... I can SHOW your near hundred posts of PARTISAN talking points you got from your right wing media propagandists slamming Hillary.... you are one big fat hypocrite.

Hillary's lies have been well documented, even by the left wing media. But you fools don't care---------you just looooooooooove her, she can do no wrong, she is a liberal female so the laws and rules don't apply to her.

All you do on this message board is post dem/lib talking points and lies. You are nothing but a parrot with no ability to think for yourself. How do you manage to dress yourself?

Not the think for yourself ploy again!
This coming from a member of a party that has one live brain cell .

"ah aint no ways tarred" "it was caused by a video" "we landed under sniper fire" "Chelsea was jogging around the WTC on 9/11" " I always try to tell the truth".

From your standard bearer-------------and you dare to challenge anyone's brain cells?

My standard bearer ?
Like I said one live brain cell.

are you not a hildebeast supporter? you certainly sound like one.

 

[daws101]

you've been told many times and you keep coming back with the same questions thats been answered...

as for the 127 Emails in question by Gowdy who claim that Sidney Blumenthal's emails were classified in nature in the benghazi hearings... these were the ones that Gowdy claim the CIA had said was classified ... as you can see the CIA went back and looked at these 127 emails of Sidney Blumenthal that Gowdy claimed were classified turn out not to declassified ..I realize you have a COMPREHENSION PROBLEM YOU"VE SHOWN IT IN THE PAST.... these were the Emails that Gowdy brought to the benghazi hearings, not the ones you may think have been deleted... as for these deleted emails ...you speak of if you ever paid attention you would have know that the FBI had recovered all of her erased emails in question ... as she said, they were personal and had nothing to do with the government ... which the FBI has already said they were personal in nature ... so pay attention and stop with your lying ...

You keep deflecting. The investigation hasn't concluded and she did receive classified emails on her personal unsecure server. You don't like the facts so you want to dismiss them instead of adopting some measure of integrity, we get it.

We get you. Innocent until proved guilty is fundamental to the character and culture of America and Americans. In you own words, "The investigation hasn't concluded" and yet you have pronounced guilt. Do not ever wrap yourself in the American Flag, or consider yourself a Christian (if you do).

The question as to if, and when and why some e-mails were classified can become exculpatory. In any event, no allegation that the use of her personal server has caused damage to our nation. Something even the lying haters on the right have not been able to produce.

it makes no difference when the emails were "marked" classified. Classified data does not have to be marked in order to be classified. The content makes it classified, not the markings.

False ! The filling system is the SOS office and all others it is required to classify all correspondence .
But since all emails must be printed and filled the "stamping is done in order of arrival not importance.

wrong. I held top secret and SAP clearances for years. I know the rules, laws, and punishments for breaking them.

Classified data can be in your head. If you write it down its your responsibility to properly mark and protect it from disclosure.

As usual, you know nothing about the subject and are just parroting the lies fed to you by the Clinton campaign.

If I did what she did, I would be typing this from a jail cell.

Of course you would be dear..
You vastly over estimate your own importance.

 

[daws101]

THAT'S ALL you and right wingers have DONE from day one.... I can SHOW your near hundred posts of PARTISAN talking points you got from your right wing media propagandists slamming Hillary.... you are one big fat hypocrite.

Hillary's lies have been well documented, even by the left wing media. But you fools don't care---------you just looooooooooove her, she can do no wrong, she is a liberal female so the laws and rules don't apply to her.

All you do on this message board is post dem/lib talking points and lies. You are nothing but a parrot with no ability to think for yourself. How do you manage to dress yourself?

Not the think for yourself ploy again!
This coming from a member of a party that has one live brain cell .

"ah aint no ways tarred" "it was caused by a video" "we landed under sniper fire" "Chelsea was jogging around the WTC on 9/11" " I always try to tell the truth".

From your standard bearer-------------and you dare to challenge anyone's brain cells?

My standard bearer ?
Like I said one live brain cell.

are you not a hildebeast supporter? you certainly sound like one.

Gee for an eyes only security guy you're extremely stupid and make bias false assumptions a lot.
Fail.

 

[hjmick]

CIA: Trey Gowdy Altered Documents To Frame Hillary Clinton

and it keeps getting better over benghazi read it a weep repub-lie tards

“Despite claims that the Committee would be run with integrity, Republicans have engaged in a series of selective leaks of inaccurate and incomplete information in an effort to attack Secretary Clinton with unsubstantiated or previously debunked allegations,” the Democrats wrote.

On October 7, 2015, Gowdy sent a response to ranking minority member Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD), stating that he was “disheartened at the nature and tone of Monday’s letter from your Democrat colleagues and you.”

In the letter, Gowdy referred extensively to Sidney Blumenthal, a long-time confidante and adviser to the Clintons, who served as assistant and senior adviser to Bill Clinton from August 1997 until January 2001.

In addition to Sidney Blumenthal’s business interests, Secretary Clinton also apparently received classified information from Blumenthal- information she should have known was classified at the time she received it. In one email, Blumenthal writes “Tyler spoke to a colleague currently at CIA, who told him the agency had been dependent for intelligence from [redacted due to sources and methods].”1 This information, the name of a human source, is some of the most protected information in our intelligence community, the release of which could jeopardize not only national security but also human lives. Armed with that information, Secretary Clinton forwarded the email to a colleague–debunking her claim that she never sent any classified information from her private email address.1 There may be other instances as well where Secretary Clinton passed on classified information she received from Sidney Blumenthal. [emphasis added]



However, as Newsweek reported on Sunday, the CIA informed the House Select Committee on Benghazi on Saturday that Gowdy’s claims were false:

Indeed, according to committee correspondence reviewed by Newsweek, the CIA did tell the panel on Saturday that it had reviewed 127 emails between Clinton and her close friend and outside adviser, Sidney Blumenthal, and none of it was deemed classified.

“The CIA reviewed the material in question and informed State that it required no redactions,” the agency informed Susan Sachsman Grooms, staff director and general counsel for the panel’s Democrats, on October 17.

On Sunday, Cummings sent a letter to Gowdy to correct the public record in light of the fact that the CIA had debunked Chairman Gowdy’s accusations.

Cummings began, writing that: “On October 7, 2015, you sent me a 13-page letter making a grave new accusation against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Specifically, you accused her of compromising national security and endangering lives,” adding that, “The problem with your accusation—as with so many others during this investigation—is that you failed to check your facts before you made it, and the CIA has now informed the Select Committee that you were wrong. I believe your accusations were irresponsible, and I believe you owe the Secretary an immediate apology.”




Cummings went on to accuse Gowdy of making the false claims against Clinton in an attempt to diffuse controversy surround Republican Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s admission that the purpose of the Benghazi hearings was to discredit Clinton.

It appears that your letter was rushed out to the press to counter the public firestorm caused by Republican Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s stark admission that Republicans are using millions of taxpayer dollars to damage Secretary Clinton’s bid for president. However, your letter only provided further evidence of this fact.

Speaking directly to Gowdy’s accusations against Clinton, Cummings wrote:

In your letter on October 7, 2015, you stated that Secretary Clinton received an email from Sidney Blumenthal on March 18, 2011, that included the name of someone who purportedly provided information to the CIA. You asserted that this information was classified, arguing that Secretary Clinton “received classified information from Blumenthal—information she should have known was classified at the time she received it.” You then alleged:

Armed with that information, Secretary Clinton forwarded that email to a colleague—debunking her claim that she never sent any classified information from her private email address.

In your letter, you went to great lengths to highlight the gravity of your accusation, stating:

This information, the name of a human source, is some of the most protected information in our intelligence community, the release of which could jeopardize not only national security but human lives.

Cummings then dropped the bomb – accusing Gowdy of altering documents in an effort to frame Clinton:

To further inflate your claim, you placed your own redactions over the name of the individual with the words, “redacted due to sources and methods.” To be clear, these redactions were not made, and these words were not added, by any agency of the federal government responsible for enforcing classification guidelines.

Cummings continued, emphasizing the fact that the CIA had thoroughly debunked Gowdy’s false claims against Clinton:

Contrary to your claims, the CIA yesterday informed both the Republican and Democratic staffs of the Select Committee that they do not consider the information you highlighted in your letter to be classified. Specifically, the CIA confirmed that “the State Department consulted with the CIA on this production, the CIA reviewed these documents, and the CIA made no redactions to protect classified information.”

Unfortunately, you sent your letter on October 7 without checking first with the CIA. Now that we have done so, we have learned that your accusations were incorrect.

Cummings concluded his letter, writing that Gowdy’s actions have “brought discredit” on the Benghazi investigation and has “undermine[d] the integrity” of the committee and the House of Representatives itself:

Unfortunately, the standard operating procedure of this Select Committee has become to put out information publicly that is inaccurate and out of context in order to attack Secretary Clinton for political reasons. These repeated actions bring discredit on this investigation and undermine the integrity of the Select Committee and the House of Representatives.

Plagiarist. Thief.


You should be banned for plagiarizing the work of others.


Nice, real nice loser.

I never claimed this as my work ... I clearly said, and it keeps getting better over benghazi, read it a weep repub-lie tards ... where do you see me saying this is my work??? you should be banned for being ignorant ... I guess you can't stand that the article puts repub-lie-tards like you in their place as being liars...

You did not link the original source material. By omission you claim it as your own. So, unless you are Samuel Ward, you have plagiarized the work. Thief.

As for ignorance, yours is on full display, especially when you call me a Republican, for I am not. As for Republicans being liars, no more so than Democrats. If you do not believe this, then you are being willfully ignorant... which really is no surprise...

 

[Rambunctious]

Obama is telling Joe to get ready...heard it this morning on MSNBC so what is going on? They said Biden is chomping at the bit to get in the race. What does Obummer know that we and Clinton don't know? hhhmmmmm?

 

[basquebromance]

SPEAKER GOWDY IS AN AMERICAN HERO.

 

[daws101]

SPEAKER GOWDY IS AN AMERICAN HERO.

using that logic so is Scott Shepard.

 

[Iceweasel]

It's being investigated by the FBI. If they haven't made a determination yet, how can the CIA? Hillary has all her emails sent to her private server, how is it possible none were classified? And why did she delete most of them?

you've been told many times and you keep coming back with the same questions thats been answered...

as for the 127 Emails in question by Gowdy who claim that Sidney Blumenthal's emails were classified in nature in the benghazi hearings... these were the ones that Gowdy claim the CIA had said was classified ... as you can see the CIA went back and looked at these 127 emails of Sidney Blumenthal that Gowdy claimed were classified turn out not to declassified ..I realize you have a COMPREHENSION PROBLEM YOU"VE SHOWN IT IN THE PAST.... these were the Emails that Gowdy brought to the benghazi hearings, not the ones you may think have been deleted... as for these deleted emails ...you speak of if you ever paid attention you would have know that the FBI had recovered all of her erased emails in question ... as she said, they were personal and had nothing to do with the government ... which the FBI has already said they were personal in nature ... so pay attention and stop with your lying ...

You keep deflecting. The investigation hasn't concluded and she did receive classified emails on her personal unsecure server. You don't like the facts so you want to dismiss them instead of adopting some measure of integrity, we get it.

We get you. Innocent until proved guilty is fundamental to the character and culture of America and Americans. In you own words, "The investigation hasn't concluded" and yet you have pronounced guilt. Do not ever wrap yourself in the American Flag, or consider yourself a Christian (if you do).

The question as to if, and when and why some e-mails were classified can become exculpatory. In any event, no allegation that the use of her personal server has caused damage to our nation. Something even the lying haters on the right have not been able to produce.

Unlike yourself I can use my head. All the emails went to her personal server. Some emails she received as Sec of State were classified, that isn't in dispute. It's part of the job. But the dots are too far apart for you, we get it.

LOL

 

[daws101]

It's being investigated by the FBI. If they haven't made a determination yet, how can the CIA? Hillary has all her emails sent to her private server, how is it possible none were classified? And why did she delete most of them?

you've been told many times and you keep coming back with the same questions thats been answered...

as for the 127 Emails in question by Gowdy who claim that Sidney Blumenthal's emails were classified in nature in the benghazi hearings... these were the ones that Gowdy claim the CIA had said was classified ... as you can see the CIA went back and looked at these 127 emails of Sidney Blumenthal that Gowdy claimed were classified turn out not to declassified ..I realize you have a COMPREHENSION PROBLEM YOU"VE SHOWN IT IN THE PAST.... these were the Emails that Gowdy brought to the benghazi hearings, not the ones you may think have been deleted... as for these deleted emails ...you speak of if you ever paid attention you would have know that the FBI had recovered all of her erased emails in question ... as she said, they were personal and had nothing to do with the government ... which the FBI has already said they were personal in nature ... so pay attention and stop with your lying ...

You keep deflecting. The investigation hasn't concluded and she did receive classified emails on her personal unsecure server. You don't like the facts so you want to dismiss them instead of adopting some measure of integrity, we get it.

We get you. Innocent until proved guilty is fundamental to the character and culture of America and Americans. In you own words, "The investigation hasn't concluded" and yet you have pronounced guilt. Do not ever wrap yourself in the American Flag, or consider yourself a Christian (if you do).

The question as to if, and when and why some e-mails were classified can become exculpatory. In any event, no allegation that the use of her personal server has caused damage to our nation. Something even the lying haters on the right have not been able to produce.

Unlike yourself I can use my head. All the emails went to her personal server. Some emails she received as Sec of State were classified, that isn't in dispute. It's part of the job. But the dots are too far apart for you, we get it.

LOL

False!

 

[Redfish]

You keep deflecting. The investigation hasn't concluded and she did receive classified emails on her personal unsecure server. You don't like the facts so you want to dismiss them instead of adopting some measure of integrity, we get it.

We get you. Innocent until proved guilty is fundamental to the character and culture of America and Americans. In you own words, "The investigation hasn't concluded" and yet you have pronounced guilt. Do not ever wrap yourself in the American Flag, or consider yourself a Christian (if you do).

The question as to if, and when and why some e-mails were classified can become exculpatory. In any event, no allegation that the use of her personal server has caused damage to our nation. Something even the lying haters on the right have not been able to produce.

it makes no difference when the emails were "marked" classified. Classified data does not have to be marked in order to be classified. The content makes it classified, not the markings.

False ! The filling system is the SOS office and all others it is required to classify all correspondence .
But since all emails must be printed and filled the "stamping is done in order of arrival not importance.

wrong. I held top secret and SAP clearances for years. I know the rules, laws, and punishments for breaking them.

Classified data can be in your head. If you write it down its your responsibility to properly mark and protect it from disclosure.

As usual, you know nothing about the subject and are just parroting the lies fed to you by the Clinton campaign.

If I did what she did, I would be typing this from a jail cell.

Of course you would be dear..
You vastly over estimate your own importance.

nope, just telling it like it is.

 

[Redfish]

Hillary's lies have been well documented, even by the left wing media. But you fools don't care---------you just looooooooooove her, she can do no wrong, she is a liberal female so the laws and rules don't apply to her.

All you do on this message board is post dem/lib talking points and lies. You are nothing but a parrot with no ability to think for yourself. How do you manage to dress yourself?

Not the think for yourself ploy again!
This coming from a member of a party that has one live brain cell .

"ah aint no ways tarred" "it was caused by a video" "we landed under sniper fire" "Chelsea was jogging around the WTC on 9/11" " I always try to tell the truth".

From your standard bearer-------------and you dare to challenge anyone's brain cells?

My standard bearer ?
Like I said one live brain cell.

are you not a hildebeast supporter? you certainly sound like one.

Gee for an eyes only security guy you're extremely stupid and make bias false assumptions a lot.
Fail.

are you a Hillary supporter? yes or no

 

[Redfish]

Obama is telling Joe to get ready...heard it this morning on MSNBC so what is going on? They said Biden is chomping at the bit to get in the race. What does Obummer know that we and Clinton don't know? hhhmmmmm?

what you forget is that the obamas and the Clintons hate each other. Obama would like nothing better than to destroy them, and vice versa.

As soon as the polls swing against Hillary, you can count on Obama turning the DOJ loose on her.

 

[Redfish]

It's being investigated by the FBI. If they haven't made a determination yet, how can the CIA? Hillary has all her emails sent to her private server, how is it possible none were classified? And why did she delete most of them?

you've been told many times and you keep coming back with the same questions thats been answered...

as for the 127 Emails in question by Gowdy who claim that Sidney Blumenthal's emails were classified in nature in the benghazi hearings... these were the ones that Gowdy claim the CIA had said was classified ... as you can see the CIA went back and looked at these 127 emails of Sidney Blumenthal that Gowdy claimed were classified turn out not to declassified ..I realize you have a COMPREHENSION PROBLEM YOU"VE SHOWN IT IN THE PAST.... these were the Emails that Gowdy brought to the benghazi hearings, not the ones you may think have been deleted... as for these deleted emails ...you speak of if you ever paid attention you would have know that the FBI had recovered all of her erased emails in question ... as she said, they were personal and had nothing to do with the government ... which the FBI has already said they were personal in nature ... so pay attention and stop with your lying ...

You keep deflecting. The investigation hasn't concluded and she did receive classified emails on her personal unsecure server. You don't like the facts so you want to dismiss them instead of adopting some measure of integrity, we get it.

We get you. Innocent until proved guilty is fundamental to the character and culture of America and Americans. In you own words, "The investigation hasn't concluded" and yet you have pronounced guilt. Do not ever wrap yourself in the American Flag, or consider yourself a Christian (if you do).

The question as to if, and when and why some e-mails were classified can become exculpatory. In any event, no allegation that the use of her personal server has caused damage to our nation. Something even the lying haters on the right have not been able to produce.

Unlike yourself I can use my head. All the emails went to her personal server. Some emails she received as Sec of State were classified, that isn't in dispute. It's part of the job. But the dots are too far apart for you, we get it.

LOL

False!

nothing in his post is false. deal with the truth, it will set you free.

 

[daws101]

We get you. Innocent until proved guilty is fundamental to the character and culture of America and Americans. In you own words, "The investigation hasn't concluded" and yet you have pronounced guilt. Do not ever wrap yourself in the American Flag, or consider yourself a Christian (if you do).

The question as to if, and when and why some e-mails were classified can become exculpatory. In any event, no allegation that the use of her personal server has caused damage to our nation. Something even the lying haters on the right have not been able to produce.

it makes no difference when the emails were "marked" classified. Classified data does not have to be marked in order to be classified. The content makes it classified, not the markings.

False ! The filling system is the SOS office and all others it is required to classify all correspondence .
But since all emails must be printed and filled the "stamping is done in order of arrival not importance.

wrong. I held top secret and SAP clearances for years. I know the rules, laws, and punishments for breaking them.

Classified data can be in your head. If you write it down its your responsibility to properly mark and protect it from disclosure.

As usual, you know nothing about the subject and are just parroting the lies fed to you by the Clinton campaign.

If I did what she did, I would be typing this from a jail cell.

Of course you would be dear..
You vastly over estimate your own importance.

nope, just telling it like it is.

Bullshit you are giving a opinion based on your vastly over estimated self importance.
The two are mutually exclusive.

 

[daws101]

Not the think for yourself ploy again!
This coming from a member of a party that has one live brain cell .

"ah aint no ways tarred" "it was caused by a video" "we landed under sniper fire" "Chelsea was jogging around the WTC on 9/11" " I always try to tell the truth".

From your standard bearer-------------and you dare to challenge anyone's brain cells?

My standard bearer ?
Like I said one live brain cell.

are you not a hildebeast supporter? you certainly sound like one.

Gee for an eyes only security guy you're extremely stupid and make bias false assumptions a lot.
Fail.

are you a Hillary supporter? yes or no

You have already convicted yourself that I am.

 

[daws101]

you've been told many times and you keep coming back with the same questions thats been answered...

as for the 127 Emails in question by Gowdy who claim that Sidney Blumenthal's emails were classified in nature in the benghazi hearings... these were the ones that Gowdy claim the CIA had said was classified ... as you can see the CIA went back and looked at these 127 emails of Sidney Blumenthal that Gowdy claimed were classified turn out not to declassified ..I realize you have a COMPREHENSION PROBLEM YOU"VE SHOWN IT IN THE PAST.... these were the Emails that Gowdy brought to the benghazi hearings, not the ones you may think have been deleted... as for these deleted emails ...you speak of if you ever paid attention you would have know that the FBI had recovered all of her erased emails in question ... as she said, they were personal and had nothing to do with the government ... which the FBI has already said they were personal in nature ... so pay attention and stop with your lying ...

You keep deflecting. The investigation hasn't concluded and she did receive classified emails on her personal unsecure server. You don't like the facts so you want to dismiss them instead of adopting some measure of integrity, we get it.

We get you. Innocent until proved guilty is fundamental to the character and culture of America and Americans. In you own words, "The investigation hasn't concluded" and yet you have pronounced guilt. Do not ever wrap yourself in the American Flag, or consider yourself a Christian (if you do).

The question as to if, and when and why some e-mails were classified can become exculpatory. In any event, no allegation that the use of her personal server has caused damage to our nation. Something even the lying haters on the right have not been able to produce.

Unlike yourself I can use my head. All the emails went to her personal server. Some emails she received as Sec of State were classified, that isn't in dispute. It's part of the job. But the dots are too far apart for you, we get it.

LOL

False!

nothing in his post is false. deal with the truth, it will set you free.

Also bullshit.

 

[Redfish]

You keep deflecting. The investigation hasn't concluded and she did receive classified emails on her personal unsecure server. You don't like the facts so you want to dismiss them instead of adopting some measure of integrity, we get it.

We get you. Innocent until proved guilty is fundamental to the character and culture of America and Americans. In you own words, "The investigation hasn't concluded" and yet you have pronounced guilt. Do not ever wrap yourself in the American Flag, or consider yourself a Christian (if you do).

The question as to if, and when and why some e-mails were classified can become exculpatory. In any event, no allegation that the use of her personal server has caused damage to our nation. Something even the lying haters on the right have not been able to produce.

Unlike yourself I can use my head. All the emails went to her personal server. Some emails she received as Sec of State were classified, that isn't in dispute. It's part of the job. But the dots are too far apart for you, we get it.

LOL

False!

nothing in his post is false. deal with the truth, it will set you free.

Also bullshit.

wrong again, dude or dudette. the bullshit here is all coming from you.