This is really something I feel let down by today's gop over. If either party wants to fillibuster over the qualifications, or even ideology, of a nominee, esp a judicial nominee ... fillibuster away. Though the Bork confirmation hearings were a disaster for the dems, because the man was overly qualified, and he just didn't see a right to privacy. Reagan got elected, and it was his perogative, and even right (-:, to nominate people who shared his view of the constitution ... provided they were qualified by professional accomplishment. And the dems really energized the whole federalist thing, which btw I gotta say is intellectually bogus, imo.
But, this fight is simply about not wanting Obama to get ANY judge on the DC circuit, and for over 200 years thats NEVER been a reason to fillibuster. A potus has the constitutional power to get his nominees. It's Adivise and Consent, it's not you don't get no judges.
The Senate has not been as nuts as the House, but ... hell. The idiot grassley is right. Obama should pull the nomation, blow up fillibuster and nominate some radical. See how they like that. Forget Scalia. Appoint somebody from the damn William Kunstler Fund for Racial Justice. That'll shake things up.
But, this fight is simply about not wanting Obama to get ANY judge on the DC circuit, and for over 200 years thats NEVER been a reason to fillibuster. A potus has the constitutional power to get his nominees. It's Adivise and Consent, it's not you don't get no judges.
The Senate has not been as nuts as the House, but ... hell. The idiot grassley is right. Obama should pull the nomation, blow up fillibuster and nominate some radical. See how they like that. Forget Scalia. Appoint somebody from the damn William Kunstler Fund for Racial Justice. That'll shake things up.