Wicked Jester
Libsmackin'chef
This one post has fully deemed any further posts by you as completely null and void.YOU just did pea brain...
And...I'LL address "the other stupidity you wrote about nukes landing inside the US"
Right wing Anti American SCUM...
February 27, 2009
What is it about conservatives and their attitudes about attacks on U.S. cities?
A few years ago, TV preacher Pat Robertson said he welcomed a nuclear attack on the State Department, telling a national television audience, "Maybe we need a very small nuke thrown off on Foggy Bottom to shake things up." A couple of years later, Bill O'Reilly welcomed a terrorist attack on San Francisco. The Fox News personality told al Qaeda, "You want to blow up the Coit Tower? Go ahead."
And yesterday, the Bush administration's former U.N. ambassador, John Bolton, generated wild applause joking about a nuclear attack on Chicago.
"The fact is on foreign policy I don't think President Obama thinks it's a priority," Bolton said. "He said during the campaign he thought Iran was a 'tiny' threat. Tiny, tiny depending on how many nuclear weapons they are ultimately able to deliver on target. It's, uh, it's tiny compared to the Soviet Union, but is the loss of one American city -- pick one at random, Chicago -- is that a tiny threat?"
Jonathan Stein noted, "Bolton wasn't the only one who thought this was funny. The room erupted in laughter and applause.
LOL...the Washington Monthly??? Seroiusly? Are you really going show this as your only proof that only right wingers are the only ones who have ever flirted with a nuke on America? Now help me with that last part. Don't see the joke here. I see Bolton making a pretty strong point over the seriousness of the threat that Iran poses. Would Obama consider an attack on Chicago a tiny threat? No. Point made.
Yes, I absolutely contend only right wing pea brains HOPE for an American city to be nuked...
It has to do with the right wing mental illness...the NEED to punish...
Former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld said the American people lack "the maturity to recognize the seriousness of the threats." What's to be done? According to Rumsfeld, "The correction for that, I suppose, is [another] attack."
Newt Gingrich recently said:
"the better they've done at making sure there isn't an attack, the easier it is to say, 'Well, there never was going to be an attack anyway.' And it's almost like they should every once in a while have allowed an attack to get through just to remind us."
The head of the Arkansas Republican party said:
"At the end of the day, I believe fully the president is doing the right thing, and I think all we need is some attacks on American soil like we had on [Sept. 11, 2001]" so people appreciate Bush.
Philadelphia Daily News columnist Stu Bykofsky openly called for "another 9/11" that "would help America" restore a "community of outrage and national resolve".
GOP memo touts new terror attack as way to reverse party's decline
Credibility now zero.
You're not very bright, but you are fun to laugh at!