Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Me? I actually agree with amso, you idiot.You are the one who supposedly worked 39 years in the energy industry and knows very little about it, yeah? Nope, although you think it was a nuke, you are wrong.If we want factual rational commentary from you, we'll ask for it.No rolling horizontal shock wave, primarily verticle. Natural gas perhaps or an LP tanker in port. Very hot fireball with short life. A whole sack full of gas of some sort, my guess.
So you don't think it was a nuke? Nah, you did. The force is not with you this night, either.Me? I actually agree with amso, you idiot.You are the one who supposedly worked 39 years in the energy industry and knows very little about it, yeah? Nope, although you think it was a nuke, you are wrong.If we want factual rational commentary from you, we'll ask for it.No rolling horizontal shock wave, primarily verticle. Natural gas perhaps or an LP tanker in port. Very hot fireball with short life. A whole sack full of gas of some sort, my guess.
i remember that one, and another one that looked like a nuke. I think it was an explosion at a fertilizer plant. almost looked like an atom bomb, shook up and broke windows in homes miles away.A tanker or an ammunition ship in the port of Houston, I think, during WWII.wasnt it in Texas, i think it was the 40's when they had a similar blast that shook the state?
can you imagine if that event happened in the center of a major texas town of about 100,000?i remember that one, and another one that looked like a nuke. I think it was an explosion at a fertilizer plant. almost looked like an atom bomb, shook up and broke windows in homes miles away.A tanker or an ammunition ship in the port of Houston, I think, during WWII.wasnt it in Texas, i think it was the 40's when they had a similar blast that shook the state?
Fertilizer (ammonium nitrate). Texas City, 1947
can you imagine if that event happened in the center of a major texas town of about 100,000?i remember that one, and another one that looked like a nuke. I think it was an explosion at a fertilizer plant. almost looked like an atom bomb, shook up and broke windows in homes miles away.A tanker or an ammunition ship in the port of Houston, I think, during WWII.wasnt it in Texas, i think it was the 40's when they had a similar blast that shook the state?
Fertilizer (ammonium nitrate). Texas City, 1947
Some poor country somewhere would be doomed..An explosion of this magnitude (God forbid) in the U.S. would be subject to media speculation under the 1st Amendment and wild international and domestic coverage.. Useful pop-culture educated idiots assume that China (and the former USSR) will be honest because they adhere to the same 1st Amendment (or any other part of the Bill of Rights) . The point is that China controls propaganda and what we hear may or may not be close to the truth depending on the political agenda.
You know they make small ones, right?A "nuke" that only kills 50+ people. Shootspeeders is such a tard.
Safety last. You need to make more money for the oligarchs, and make it quicklyI just saw the video, too early to figure out what happened, but then again China is always trying to push out their products as fast as possible to meet demands, maybe to the extent where safety is not their number one issue when running major industries, where in the USA, we have "Safety First" maybe in China its "Profits First, Then Safety".
Yeah, Obama the ankle grabber is going to nuke China. That's like Jake voting for a Republican
Nobody said obama did this, you fool. He's just a tool of the real power. THINK
You are an idiot.
The board notes that all you have is namecalling. Thanks for admitting i'm right.
You know they make small ones, right?A "nuke" that only kills 50+ people. Shootspeeders is such a tard.
Are you really this dense? Bombs have a blast radius that kills everyone inside of it, whether that be 50, 100, or 1000. Put 1 man in the middle of a desert and drop a 100 kiloton MIRV on him and the death toll will only be one. Jeeze, I feel like I'm talking to a complete idiot here.You know they make small ones, right?A "nuke" that only kills 50+ people. Shootspeeders is such a tard.
That kill 50 people?
You know they make small ones, right?A "nuke" that only kills 50+ people. Shootspeeders is such a tard.
Put 1 man in the middle of a desert and drop a 100 kiloton MIRV on him and the death toll will only be one.
Jeeze, I feel like I'm talking to a complete idiot here.
A warehouse storing chemicals and fuel exploded and caught fire in the eastern Chinese city of Jingjiang on Friday, the local government and media reports said, but the blaze was under control with no casualties. The blast recalled huge explosions caused by improper storage of chemicals in the northern city of Tianjin last August, when at least 165 people were killed and fears were raised of toxic contamination.
Blaze triggers huge blast at port in Jingjiang
The latest accident was at the premises of a company called Jiangsu Deqiao Storage, which is authorised to keep hazardous chemicals, reports said. The Jingjiang government said on its verified microblog that the fire was “under control” with no deaths or injuries. One photo posted online showed dark clouds of smoke with the fire still burning amid what appeared to be storage tanks.
The Jingjiang government statement said activity near the site had returned to “normal”. Industrial accidents are common in China where safety standards are often lax. But the massive blast in Tianjin sparked widespread anger over a perceived lack of transparency by officials about its causes and environmental impact.
Explosion rips through Chinese chemical warehouse | Fox News
A warehouse storing chemicals and fuel exploded and caught fire in the eastern Chinese city of Jingjiang on Friday, the local government and media reports said, but the blaze was under control with no casualties. The blast recalled huge explosions caused by improper storage of chemicals in the northern city of Tianjin last August, when at least 165 people were killed and fears were raised of toxic contamination. The latest accident was at the premises of a company called Jiangsu Deqiao Storage, which is authorised to keep hazardous chemicals, reports said.
A massive explosion has occurred in China at a warehouse.
The Jingjiang government said on its verified microblog that the fire was “under control” with no deaths or injuries. One photo posted online showed dark clouds of smoke with the fire still burning amid what appeared to be storage tanks.
The Jingjiang government statement said activity near the site had returned to “normal”. Industrial accidents are common in China where safety standards are often lax. But the massive blast in Tianjin sparked widespread anger over a perceived lack of transparency by officials about its causes and environmental impact.
Chemical warehouse explodes in China
