Child Porn Proposal

[Father Time]

I hope I'm not overstepping my bounds by resurrecting this topic, but this issue is important to me, mainly because virtual child porn has artistic merit which according to the Miller Test is not porn.

I was very upset when Christopher Handley was arrested for possessing virtual child porn (lolicon).
The charge was actually selling it, but to justify a warrantless search and seizure to the media/press they said possession.

Now for the big news in Japan:
A new virtual child porn bill (amends an existing bill) was proposed and rejected, but a revision will be submitted later this fall.

Tokyo's 'Nonexistent Youth' Bill Rejected by Assembly - June 16 2010
by ANN staff member.

Sorry, I can't post URL's yet.

I'm not a mod but I wish you would've just posted a new topic on loli.

I kind of abandoned the idea I posted between then and now. I think it's flawed and won't work.

Although I still think loli should be legal.

 

[daveman]

I have a counter proposal:

Shoot pedos in the head.

So you advocate the death penalty for thought crime?

No. I advocate the death penalty for people who abuse children.

Scared? You should be.

 

[Father Time]

I have a counter proposal:

Shoot pedos in the head.

So you advocate the death penalty for thought crime?

No. I advocate the death penalty for people who abuse children.

Scared? You should be.

Then why did you say you wanted to criminalize being a pedo?

As it stands now you can be a pedo as long as you don't buy child porn or molest actual children.

 

[editec]

So I've been thinking of how we can try to fight the production of child porn more effectively and I came up with some ideas, and I wonder what you think.

All virtual child porn (drawings, sculptures, CGI images of kids getting screwed) should be legal as they harm no one and the evidence that they cause pedos to screw kids is very bad. If it's found that they made the images by first molesting a child than they should be arrested for molesting the child and not making an image.

Now anyway here's my bigger proposal (please read the entire thing before commenting).

The government should scour the internet for a week and find as much child porn as it can. It shall than prosecute the makers and consumers of said child porn but then it shall make all the images it finds public domain, legal to access and found in one convenient website (possibly with a .gov tag). All of the aforementioned images shall be tagged and if anyone is found with child porn that is not part of the public domain porn archives than they will be prosecuted, unless they can prove it was made before the one-week sweep. All makers of real child porn shall continue to be prosecuted.

Real child porn consists of images and video of kids being molested, as long as it's in demand kids will be molested for it at some rate. I'd love to go back in time and stop those kids from being molested but I can't and so we might as well use those images to lower demand. With this option the pedos into it have two options.
One. Search the internet for child porn created after the date in question and face the possibility of being persecuted.
2. Look at virtual child porn or go to the government's big stash of public domain kiddy porn and not face prosecution.

If they choose option number two they will not be feeding into the demand for videos of molested children and in theory the underground business of making such images and photos will videos and be easier to deal with.

So... any comments?

The government to date cannot control the content on the web.

So your idea, while interesting, isn't really possible.

 

[daveman]

Then why did you say you wanted to criminalize being a pedo?

As it stands now you can be a pedo as long as you don't buy child porn or molest actual children.

If you keep your vile, twisted, sick, inhuman shit in your head, that's fine. The second you act on it, you need to assume ambient temperature.