As more information comes I'm betting this kid is let go or found not guilty if he goes to trial. Any competent lawyer will argue he legitimately feared for his life and panicked. It's going to be Ferguson and Baltimore all over again from the Left.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Did you say something?You can choose to hear or ignore whatever you like. But rhetorical faggotry gets called out whether you "hear" or not.
As more information comes I'm betting this kid is let go or found not guilty if he goes to trial. Any competent lawyer will argue he legitimately feared for his life and panicked. It's going to be Ferguson and Baltimore all over again from the Left.
Yes. every time I feel a bump on the left rear of my car, I end up running over people and killing as many as I can.
I'd like see see a mob assault you, and when you flee to your car, the mob attacks your car with baseball bats. I'd like to see how you'd react, if you would handle it as well as you claim you would.
Did you say something?You can choose to hear or ignore whatever you like. But rhetorical faggotry gets called out whether you "hear" or not.
My eyes are getting old so I might be wrong, but for some reason my head told me it looks like the windshield is shattered before he hits that white mustang.
Who knows, I presume the police will figure it out as they're probably compiling all the video and stuff - even the stuff the media won't put out (like before the accident and such.)
As more information comes I'm betting this kid is let go or found not guilty if he goes to trial. Any competent lawyer will argue he legitimately feared for his life and panicked. It's going to be Ferguson and Baltimore all over again from the Left.
Did you say something?You can choose to hear or ignore whatever you like. But rhetorical faggotry gets called out whether you "hear" or not.
If you think that a single person losing control of their car is equivalent to what happened in 9-11, then you are a fucking moron.New report "Al Qaeda terrorists just wrong place wrong time. 9/11 plan appears to be to fly all passengers to Disney World as a symbol of unity before unruly plane mob hit them in head and they panicked and diverted to twin towers".
Welcome to my ignore list.
Apparently the OP uses "Ignore" as a safe space against those who call out his idiocy. Like this thread.
What a wimp.
THIS JUST IN
"Quck Draw" McGraw was trying to high-five the protestor at the rally, and he slipped! Yeah that's the ticket!
--- also he was misquoted afterwards. What he meant to say was "next time we might have to kiss him". It was a typo!
You have a right to speak, but do you think you have a right to be HEARD?
You can choose to hear or ignore whatever you like. But rhetorical faggotry gets called out whether you "hear" or not.
As more information comes I'm betting this kid is let go or found not guilty if he goes to trial. Any competent lawyer will argue he legitimately feared for his life and panicked. It's going to be Ferguson and Baltimore all over again from the Left.
Yep. This is going to be another Zimmerman style lynching attempt, though, so it will be on for a while; the state pols aren't going to let such a media circus get away from them, and they all have compliant judges in their pockets to keep it going as long as the TV crews keep showing up. Given how little cred the media has, we have to assume it's no more legit than the Zimmerman witch hunt was at this point.
My eyes are getting old so I might be wrong, but for some reason my head told me it looks like the windshield is shattered before he hits that white mustang.
Who knows, I presume the police will figure it out as they're probably compiling all the video and stuff - even the stuff the media won't put out (like before the accident and such.)
I could be wrong, too, but I thought that shattered windshield was suspiciously person-sized, and he may have hit a pedestrian right before he hit the white car.
That's nice, only he didn't flee to his car. He drove his car into the crowd.
It's possible. Hard to tell the way "shatterproof" glass spreads the shock. But clearly he sets up, accelerates (which is in no way necessary for "defense" if you're already inside a steel car), crashes into the car and pedestrian, suspiciously without the air bags going off, and then puts it in reverse and tears back up the road. And reportedly was watching and "casing" the street before he did it.
It's possible. Hard to tell the way "shatterproof" glass spreads the shock. But clearly he sets up, accelerates (which is in no way necessary for "defense" if you're already inside a steel car), crashes into the car and pedestrian, suspiciously without the air bags going off, and then puts it in reverse and tears back up the road. And reportedly was watching and "casing" the street before he did it.
Yea, Pogo, 'cause if a mob has been attacking you, even after you get into your car, the last thing you'd do is speed off in your car. It's no wonder we call them "libtards."
If this boy wanted to hurt someone, he would have rammed the libtards, not another car. But, maybe your bigotry gives you incite I don't have. Do you think this boy disconnected his air bags in planning to ram another car and possibly give himself whiplash?
It's possible. Hard to tell the way "shatterproof" glass spreads the shock. But clearly he sets up, accelerates (which is in no way necessary for "defense" if you're already inside a steel car), crashes into the car and pedestrian, suspiciously without the air bags going off, and then puts it in reverse and tears back up the road. And reportedly was watching and "casing" the street before he did it.
Yea, Pogo, 'cause if a mob has been attacking you, even after you get into your car, the last thing you'd do is speed off in your car. It's no wonder we call them "libtards."
If this boy wanted to hurt someone, he would have rammed the libtards, not another car. But, maybe your bigotry gives you incite I don't have. Do you think this boy disconnected his air bags in planning to ram another car and possibly give himself whiplash?
3 dead and at least 33 injured. He did want to hurt someone.
It's possible. Hard to tell the way "shatterproof" glass spreads the shock. But clearly he sets up, accelerates (which is in no way necessary for "defense" if you're already inside a steel car), crashes into the car and pedestrian, suspiciously without the air bags going off, and then puts it in reverse and tears back up the road. And reportedly was watching and "casing" the street before he did it.
Yea, Pogo, 'cause if a mob has been attacking you, even after you get into your car, the last thing you'd do is speed off in your car. It's no wonder we call them "libtards."
If this boy wanted to hurt someone, he would have rammed the libtards, not another car. But, maybe your bigotry gives you incite I don't have. Do you think this boy disconnected his air bags in planning to ram another car and possibly give himself whiplash?
My eyes are getting old so I might be wrong, but for some reason my head told me it looks like the windshield is shattered before he hits that white mustang.
Who knows, I presume the police will figure it out as they're probably compiling all the video and stuff - even the stuff the media won't put out (like before the accident and such.)
I could be wrong, too, but I thought that shattered windshield was suspiciously person-sized, and he may have hit a pedestrian right before he hit the white car.
It's possible. Hard to tell the way "shatterproof" glass spreads the shock. But clearly he sets up, accelerates (which is in no way necessary for "defense" if you're already inside a steel car), crashes into the car and pedestrian, suspiciously without the air bags going off, and then puts it in reverse and tears back up the road. And reportedly was watching and "casing" the street before he did it.
Yea, Pogo, 'cause if a mob has been attacking you, even after you get into your car, the last thing you'd do is speed off in your car. It's no wonder we call them "libtards."
If this boy wanted to hurt someone, he would have rammed the libtards, not another car. But, maybe your bigotry gives you incite I don't have. Do you think this boy disconnected his air bags in planning to ram another car and possibly give himself whiplash?
3 dead and at least 33 injured. He did want to hurt someone.
1 dead, 19 injured in the car thing. The other two dead are police officers who died in an unrelated helicopter crash. The rest of the injured are throughout the protest.
It is extremely unlikely he will get a fair trial.That's what I kinda saw. Could be wrong, but I hope he gets a fair trial.I know this will not even penetrate into the minds of our SJWs who just wanna have ANY reason at all to hate some random white guy, but it seems that the driver was hit with a bat and that might have panicked him.
It might be that the driver in Charlottesville was panicked into losing control of his car, and did not intentionally run his car into the crowd.
VIDEO: Protesters Attacked Charlottesville Driver's Car With Baseball Bat
He will get Zimmermanned.
It's possible. Hard to tell the way "shatterproof" glass spreads the shock. But clearly he sets up, accelerates (which is in no way necessary for "defense" if you're already inside a steel car), crashes into the car and pedestrian, suspiciously without the air bags going off, and then puts it in reverse and tears back up the road. And reportedly was watching and "casing" the street before he did it.
Yea, Pogo, 'cause if a mob has been attacking you, even after you get into your car, the last thing you'd do is speed off in your car. It's no wonder we call them "libtards."
If this boy wanted to hurt someone, he would have rammed the libtards, not another car. But, maybe your bigotry gives you incite I don't have. Do you think this boy disconnected his air bags in planning to ram another car and possibly give himself whiplash?
That's exactly what I think, minus the whiplash. After all ramming your car into a crowded street doesn't exactly indicate the brightest bulb in the light tower does it.
Disabling the air bags means he knew before doing it he was going to deliberately plow into something. And that's premeditation. Which blows the ridiculous theory of the OP into the tiny shards of hapless apologism that it is.
Trust me, the prosecution will be all over that if he tries to plead "panic".
Then of course there's leaving the scene. Ain't no way around that.
There's also this, as long as we're required to play Captain Obvious ---
A "mob" can't "attack you" if you aren't even in their vicinity until you ram your car into them.