Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Do Catholics have a problem with insurance paying for drugs to treat male erectile dysfunction - like Viagra?
Probably not, because without an erection, you can't get a woman pregnant, and if you don't get the woman pregnant, you can't raise good little dogma drones, because to be effective, they have to be taught from birth so that THEY can raise good little dogma drones.
The Catholics need the believers. And.........I've also started to see commercials for the Catholic church encouraging members who left to "come back home".
Can't be..CG says the Catholics wouldn't stoop to tv advertising..you hafta be LYING!!!!!
Cuz she's little miss can't be wrong and you don't have a twat so you couldn't be even if you wanted to be.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGXdQ298jbc]Little Miss Can't Be Wrong Spin Doctors Lyrics - YouTube[/ame]
Please point out where in the first amendment it says that religious owned businesses can ignore the law?
It doesn't. It merely says that Congress can't prevent you from practicing your religion and it can't establish a state religion.
Nothing in this mandate keeps Catholics from believing the silly things they believe.
And when the Church starts expelling members for practicing birth control, then I'll take them seriously on this issue.
Plain and simple, it goes against the first amendment.
So all of you who don't seem to give a flying fuck about this one, should just shut up about all the BS you've been peddling about the Patriot Act and the TSA and God knows what else.
It's BS and it's no good for you.............
Yes I have already fired off letters to my congressman, both Senators, and the White House.......
Please point out where in the first amendment it says that religious owned businesses can ignore the law?
It doesn't. It merely says that Congress can't prevent you from practicing your religion and it can't establish a state religion.
Nothing in this mandate keeps Catholics from believing the silly things they believe.
And when the Church starts expelling members for practicing birth control, then I'll take them seriously on this issue.
Are you certain you are American?
Are you certain you are American?
yup. I am. Now are you going to keep avoiding the point, Sarge?
How does this rule interfer in the free practice of religion in any way?
It doesn't. It's a law that governs business contracts. Nothing more, nothing less.
I try so hard to be patient and understanding..................
It forces the church to provide a service that is against its teachings.
Is that easy enough to understand? It is so simple that I would bet I could get kids in HS to understand it..... Now please bend over grab hold of your ears and give a hard sudden pull. The popping sound you hear will be your head coming out of your ass.
Please point out where in the first amendment it says that religious owned businesses can ignore the law?
It doesn't. It merely says that Congress can't prevent you from practicing your religion and it can't establish a state religion.
Nothing in this mandate keeps Catholics from believing the silly things they believe.
And when the Church starts expelling members for practicing birth control, then I'll take them seriously on this issue.
Again....
Note that last part..... 'free exercise thereof. Congress does not have the right to define what 'free exercise thereof' means. They have no authority do define that. The 'free exercise thereof' includes a religion's right to run charities, schools, hospitals - because they are part of our religion.Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
You might be too stupid to understand it.... but others are not.
That's the most ignorant thing I've seen in this whole debate.
The Catholic church gets to claim that Notre Dame football games are 'religion' and therefore the lady hired to work a concession stand can be denied birth control in her health plan,
contrary to US law.
lolol
It does, however, say that Congress shall make no law that respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. That makes the law unconstitutional, and means everyone, even atheists, can ignore it. Your problem is you are thinking like an idiot, and you think we want the law to apply to everyone but us. We actually want it gone.
Get your head out of your ass and start actually discussing the issues and you might have a chance of actually learning something.
Probably not, because without an erection, you can't get a woman pregnant, and if you don't get the woman pregnant, you can't raise good little dogma drones, because to be effective, they have to be taught from birth so that THEY can raise good little dogma drones.
The Catholics need the believers. And.........I've also started to see commercials for the Catholic church encouraging members who left to "come back home".
Can't be..CG says the Catholics wouldn't stoop to tv advertising..you hafta be LYING!!!!!
Cuz she's little miss can't be wrong and you don't have a twat so you couldn't be even if you wanted to be.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGXdQ298jbc]Little Miss Can't Be Wrong Spin Doctors Lyrics - YouTube[/ame]
Really? Then what are these?
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WujKBJc_yMg]Catholic Church - Commercial (TV Spot) - YouTube[/ame]
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gt85NgsBjEY]Catholics Come Home Georgia Testimonial - Darren H. - YouTube[/ame]
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EeRMhNYg_rE]Catholics Come Home Georgia Testimonials - YouTube[/ame]
It does, however, say that Congress shall make no law that respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. That makes the law unconstitutional, and means everyone, even atheists, can ignore it. Your problem is you are thinking like an idiot, and you think we want the law to apply to everyone but us. We actually want it gone.
Get your head out of your ass and start actually discussing the issues and you might have a chance of actually learning something.
Again, you can't disobey the law because you morally object to it.
Otherwise, we could all refuse to pay our taxes on the notion that we object to War, Capital Punishment or whatever the government is doing that we could find a religious objection to.
yup. I am. Now are you going to keep avoiding the point, Sarge?
How does this rule interfer in the free practice of religion in any way?
It doesn't. It's a law that governs business contracts. Nothing more, nothing less.
I try so hard to be patient and understanding..................
It forces the church to provide a service that is against its teachings.
Is that easy enough to understand? It is so simple that I would bet I could get kids in HS to understand it..... Now please bend over grab hold of your ears and give a hard sudden pull. The popping sound you hear will be your head coming out of your ass.
Well, Kids in High School wouldn't know it's a lie.
They are not being forced to provide services. They are providing health coverage that complies with the law. An insurance company provides the services. A doctor peforms them. Nothing here keeps them from practicing their religion.
By your logic, every Catholic in the Armed forces should have been able to apply for a Contientious Objector Discharge because the Pope declared the Iraq War immoral. Otherwise, you are interferring with their religion.
By your logic, we could all stop paying our taxes for the same reason.
Religious objections do not override compliance with the law. Sorry, they don't.
I try so hard to be patient and understanding..................
It forces the church to provide a service that is against its teachings.
Is that easy enough to understand? It is so simple that I would bet I could get kids in HS to understand it..... Now please bend over grab hold of your ears and give a hard sudden pull. The popping sound you hear will be your head coming out of your ass.
Well, Kids in High School wouldn't know it's a lie.
They are not being forced to provide services. They are providing health coverage that complies with the law. An insurance company provides the services. A doctor peforms them. Nothing here keeps them from practicing their religion.
By your logic, every Catholic in the Armed forces should have been able to apply for a Contientious Objector Discharge because the Pope declared the Iraq War immoral. Otherwise, you are interferring with their religion.
By your logic, we could all stop paying our taxes for the same reason.
Religious objections do not override compliance with the law. Sorry, they don't.
Guess what? You're stupid.........
Note that last part..... 'free exercise thereof. Congress does not have the right to define what 'free exercise thereof' means. They have no authority do define that. The 'free exercise thereof' includes a religion's right to run charities, schools, hospitals - because they are part of our religion.
You might be too stupid to understand it.... but others are not.
Let me try this again.
You are definitely dumber than I thought. You just passed rdean on the scale and are approaching merril, which is a position you do not want to be in.
- It is not a law.
- Civil disobedience is enshrined in our legal system.
- That means that we can disobey we law because we are morally opposed to it.
- If you look as far back as the 1960s you will see that disobedience to a law that people were morally opposed to resulted in the law being overturned.
Well, Kids in High School wouldn't know it's a lie.
They are not being forced to provide services. They are providing health coverage that complies with the law. An insurance company provides the services. A doctor peforms them. Nothing here keeps them from practicing their religion.
By your logic, every Catholic in the Armed forces should have been able to apply for a Contientious Objector Discharge because the Pope declared the Iraq War immoral. Otherwise, you are interferring with their religion.
By your logic, we could all stop paying our taxes for the same reason.
Religious objections do not override compliance with the law. Sorry, they don't.
Guess what? You're stupid.........
This has nothing to do with the war, or the pedophiles in any church. It has to do with basic first amendment rights. But you are too stupid to understand that. Either that or your hatred for the church blinds you.
And no I am not catholic.....
Any American can apply for conscientious objector status. But why bother? Simply do not volunteer, there is no draft.........
Let me try this again.
You are definitely dumber than I thought. You just passed rdean on the scale and are approaching merril, which is a position you do not want to be in.
- It is not a law.
- Civil disobedience is enshrined in our legal system.
- That means that we can disobey we law because we are morally opposed to it.
- If you look as far back as the 1960s you will see that disobedience to a law that people were morally opposed to resulted in the law being overturned.
Uh, it is a law. It's called the Affordable Health Care Act.
Civil disobeience might be part of the legal system, but you give up that right the minute your church takes money from the government as a contractor.
The Chuch's own membership isn't going to back them on this one, guy. The Bishops will be leading a parade where no one will follow.
I honestly wished these bishops showed this much outrage when little boys were being molested by priests.
Any American can apply for conscientious objector status. But why bother? Simply do not volunteer, there is no draft.........
I was specifically referring to the guy who is already in, who maybe signed up after 9/11, and then the Iraq war broke out and his Man in a Dress said it was an immoral war.
Why isn't he immediately entitled to a discharge from his contract?
What's your logic there, Sarge?
Any American can apply for conscientious objector status. But why bother? Simply do not volunteer, there is no draft.........
I was specifically referring to the guy who is already in, who maybe signed up after 9/11, and then the Iraq war broke out and his Man in a Dress said it was an immoral war.
Why isn't he immediately entitled to a discharge from his contract?
What's your logic there, Sarge?
