Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I gave you the link. Besides, what difference does it make? Real testimony vs hearsay.......Time is not going to change that, unless, of course, you are heavily afflicted with TDS.......and you are.Miss Piggy??? Why Miss Piggy?
Does your little snippet
The Secret Service, meanwhile, has fully cooperated with the congressional Jan. 6 probe, according to Guglielmi. He added that Secret Service personnel appeared before the select panel without having to be subpoenaed.
Say when ( date(s) ) they cooperated with the congressional Jan 6 probe?
Do you know when they appeared?
Before or after CH testimony?
They already testified:
"The Secret Service, meanwhile, has fully cooperated with the congressional Jan. 6 probe, according to Guglielmi. He added that Secret Service personnel appeared before the select panel without having to be subpoenaed."
Settle down.I gave you the link. Besides, what difference does it make? Real testimony vs hearsay.......Time is not going to change that, unless, of course, you are heavily afflicted with TDS.......and you are.
Settle down.
It matters because how would they give testimony about what CH said, if they 'cooperated' before her testimony.
When they cooperated (previously) the "take me to the Capitol, I'm the fucking President" hadn't been mentioned yet by CH.
Yeah but, she claimed that lots of people knew. Also, if what she said were true, why didn't the SS say the same thing? You seem to be accusing the SS agents (who were actually there) of lying. Yet here you are with your TDS believing thrice removed hearsay.Settle down.
It matters because how would they give testimony about what CH said, if they 'cooperated' before her testimony.
When they cooperated (previously) the "take me to the Capitol, I'm the fucking President" hadn't been mentioned yet by CH.
Why would the SS freely offer that information.Interesting that it wasn't mentioned AT ALL by the Secret Service. Interesting to me, of course. You're too dumb to even wonder about that.
Why would the SS freely offer that information.
And the committee, at that point, didn't know what trump demanded, so how would they even know to ask about it.
SS......"Oh, BTW, trump wanted the SUV to be driven to the Capitol so he could join his KKKult in the violent protest"
Nice try.
Whose looking Dumb now >>>>>>> marvin martian yup.
To other SS agents, yes.You don't think any of the agents who were there would have mentioned that Trump tried to carjack them?
Why wouldn't they freely offer the information when they went before the committee voluntarily? Bottom line, as of now, there is 0 real evidence that the incident ever even happened.Why would the SS freely offer that information.
And the committee, at that point, didn't know what trump demanded, so how would they even know to ask about it.
SS......"Oh, BTW, trump wanted the SUV to be driven to the Capitol so he could join his KKKult in the violent protest"
Nice try.
Whose looking Dumb now >>>>>>> marvin martian yup.
This is the same bitter story that trump tells about people who are no longer loyal to trump
Trump breaks into his middle school age rant and just makes up stuff.
Childish Behavior and worse, you accept
Really? I think that is a lie. Prove it!Yes,
Kinzinger (that traitor) said the 'door is open' and these SS agent are welcome to come in a give their testimony under oath.
Are you sticking with the talking point that the SS agents wanted to testify by were denied by the panel?
Prove what?Really? I think that is a lie. Prove it!
Prove what?
www.salon.com
Did I confuse you when I wroteJ6 committee members say the agents who refuted Cassidy are welcome to come in and testify. Instead...they lawyer up. well, I guess going under oath is out of the question. But you keep up the MAGA lie. It is the trump
You lot should pace yourselves. You are apt to melt down totally in November of '24.No....the DOJ is investigating examples of witness tampering by associates of trump. The POS cannot just leave things alone
He is a dirty POS...who is stooping to Mafia techniques to try and shut witmesses up....remember....
It is often not the crime...It is the efforts to cover up. trump is determined to hang himself.
Anyone who went before that committee without legal counsel would be idiots. Have they REFUSED to testify?J6 committee members say the agents who refuted Cassidy are welcome to come in and testify. Instead...they lawyer up. well, I guess going under oath is out of the question. But you keep up the MAGA lie. It is the trump MO.
Secret Service agents disputing Hutchinson refuse to testify: panel
Anonymous news reports said Tony Ornato and Bobby Engel were willing to testify under oath. Now, not so much.
She has been definitively outed as a liar, as for you and your filthy ilk, your ending is upon you, we are getting rid of you evil fucking things, no safe harbor for any fascist democrat, you'd better get on your deviant knees and pray to your patron demon that it just ain't so, but it is! We will scrub the continent clean of your horrifying taint!
She was a courageous young lady to speak on TV to the country about the Capitol attack. Now she is being threatened by the trump cult.
You really aren't that bright. If the driver was willing to back up her story then they would have called on him to testify. Since they didn't...it's pretty obvious that wasn't happening.How would I do that?
It's like me asking you, "Prove that he didn't say it."
Do you want the driver to come forward and tell his story under oath?
Do you want him to come to the next hearing and testify under oath?
Would you believe the driver?
Or does it matter what he says that will determine if you believe him.
Lol, all you loons see is color.Not smart enough?
We don’t discriminate
Ok, when CH testified, nobody knew she was going to tell the story that Ornato (hearsay) told her.You really aren't that bright. If the driver was willing to back up her story then they would have called on him to testify. Since they didn't...it's pretty obvious that wasn't happening.
Oh, bullshit! That committee knew EXACTLY what her testimony was going to be! Kinzinger "invited" them? Did he do so with the subpoena power that the committee has used like a club against so many others? The answer to that would be NO! Why is that?Ok, when CH testified, nobody knew she was going to tell the story that Ornato (hearsay) told her.
How could they possible have had the driver testify if they didn't know that Hutchinson was going to tell that story.
Since then, June 28th, SS agents (through anonymous sources) have claimed that they were willing to testify, but to date, none have. Kinzinger has invited them, but they refused.
They erased text messages and have hired personal lawyers and are NOT cooperating with the J6 committee.
