Cap and Trade Tax Bill Online

Here we go the "Energy Bill" that has failed a few times. It keeps popping up because enviro-business is hell bent on getting it's global warming marketing package pushed through at all costs. I loved the part in the bill that keeps metioning green jobs but fails to mention that all the technologies that support this total lunacy are already being manufactured overseas and those so called green jobs will be created overseas as a result of this bill. Not only will it raise taxes on a wide scale, it will also punish industries in this nation and does NOTHING to eleminate this global warming which according to NASA the earth has seen an average rise in temp. around .4 degrees in the last 129 years. So I'm sure this will impact it considerably especially since China and India are building coal fired plants at a record pace. Whats even more crazy about this bill, other than the higher taxes ,lost jobs, and it's total lack of vision is the fact that this so called clean coal technology and other forms of so called CLEAN energy are more harmful to the environment than what we currently have now. Take clean coal, you will see a lot of big words like carbon sequestration and capture, well they propose turning all that nasty CO2 into liquid and pumping it into the ground. and these same people are complaing about nuclear waste? I don't recall 1700 deaths being caused by escaping spent nuclear fuel in this country, but it has happened in Africa with Co2. Look at Ethanol and the amount of corn it takes to make it or other plant based forms , well they all need to be grown, that takes land , lots of land, that takes water, and fertilizer to make it grow. Wind, well consider the fact it takes massive amounts to of land to produce little amounts of power, and take into consideration deforestation, the same is true for Solar. So environmentally friendly, green! more like fits in with the current marketing scheme. This bill needs to fail , and fail in a big way, because it will mean lost jobs, higher taxes. and just like the healthcare debate at a time we cannot afford any of them..

Carbon capture and storage - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a theoretical approach to mitigating the contribution of fossil fuel emissions to global warming, based on capturing carbon dioxide (CO2) from large point sources such as fossil fuel power plants. It can also be used to describe the scrubbing of CO2 from ambient air as a geoengineering technique. The carbon dioxide might then be permanently stored away from the atmosphere.

The term carbon dioxide capture and storage has also been used to describe biological techniques such as biochar burial, which use trees, plankton, etc. to capture CO2 from the air. However, it is more conventional to use the term carbon capture and storage to describe non-biological processes of capturing carbon dioxide from combustion at the source.
 
They'll read as much of this as they did the stim package.

Who knows Zoom we may even get another turtle tunnel out of the deal!

2892862791_1316c2b45f.jpg
 
Maybe they should start putting these bills into "cliff notes"---he.he.he.

Ah--the global warming bill aka (the cap & trade bill). I guess Nancy will be throwing the dice on this one, we can only hope that she will crap out!

This bill will add 2000-4000 in additional electricity costs to the average household--& in this economy!

To add--we are the only country in the world doing this:

So if Al Gore, Nancy Pelosi & Barack Obama can figure out a way to keep our air over the United States-, versus wandering off to other countries-then they may also be able to convince mother nature not to do a global melt around our shores?
 
Last edited:
Maybe they should start putting these bills into "cliff notes"---he.he.he.

Ah--the global warming bill aka (the cap & trade bill). I guess Nancy will be throwing the dice on this one, we can only hope that she will crap out!

This bill will add 2000-4000 in additional electricity costs to the average household--& in this economy!

To add--we are the only country in the world doing this:

So if Al Gore, Nancy Pelosi & Barack Obama can figure out a way to keep our air over the United States-, versus wandering off to other countries-then they may also be able to convince mother nature not to do a global melt around our shores?

Maybe they can come up with a way to astrodome the entire US. It would keep all of our clean air inside the US and the rest of the world's bad air out. Those cow farts will be a bugger though. :doubt:

Love the cliff notes idea - - - they'd at least get the gist of the thing and maybe prevent some 'oops, we didn't know that was in there' tripe.
 
I will say this, now theres a job project huh, building a dome to keep the clean air in so it wont escape and go over to some other country. I wonder though if this "cap and trade" bill pases that we will demand our air back from those countries that it floats over?
 
The oil-from-shale technology, which Raytheon says yields four or more barrels of oil for every barrel expended in the process, was sold in January to Schlumberger, an oilfield services provider based in Houston. Conventional methods typically yield half as much, Raytheon said.

The potential is huge. The largest known oil-shale deposits in the world are in the Green River Formation, which covers portions of Colorado, Utah and Wyoming, according to a 2005 RAND report. Estimates of the recoverable oil resources within the Green River Formation range from 500 billion barrels to 1.1 trillion barrels, according to the report.
Raytheon Tests Carbon Sequestration - Green Inc. Blog - NYTimes.com

Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar announces the withdrawal of a Bush administration proposal to issue more oil shale “research, development and demonstration” leases in the West, seeking more public input about this energy- and water-intensive fuel source before any decisions on further leasing are made.
Greater funding for conservation proposed:
The administration proposes budget for fiscal year 2010 calling for increased appropriations for the Land and Water Conservation Fund, national wildlife refuges, national parks, wildfire management, and other environmental programs that have suffered from chronic underfunding.
A conservation-minded President? A look at Obama’s first 100 days in office | The Wilderness Society

Okay so here we have another great decision, lets build more wind farms and solar farms that generate less power and take up more land and tax energy usage to fund it at the same time so companies that trade in Carbon credits, like say Al Gore's company will become very wealthy. Tell me again this is all for the environment?
 
That doesn't matter, the greens say it will be strip mined and 'damage' the evinronment.

Its been obvious for the some time the USA has considerable energy reserves within its borders, yet the political left refuses to tap these resources, forcing tyhe USA to remain dependent on foreign sources of energy.
 
Thats the point though Xenophon, these technologies that are supported by the "green business lobby" are no more environmentally friendly than any other existing energy technology and they all have their problems. It's all about who is marketing what to whom. So they cannot get anyone to buy their product so they are going to create a market for one where none existed. The funny thing about all this , is the big mantra in the bill about "green jobs" that has to be the biggest joke of the entire bill. the largest wind turbine company is a Spanish company and is at this moment constructing wind farms here in the United States. Lithium Ion batteries, largest producer of those? China.. Solar, panals and solar drive motors, Japan. So yes our tax money is going to create a lot of green jobs alright just not here.
 
I'm aware of the fraud going on, but to a lot of people, you say 'evirnomentaly friendly' or 'green technology' and that is all they need to hear and its full speed ahead.
 
Cap n Trade would be one of the most destructive agents against our economy in this nation's history.

And the poor will be impacted the most.

God help us if this passes...
 
It's not the final bill, lots of links:

What the frak is going on with the Cap and Trade bill? — Sunlight Foundation Blog

There is currently some wacky legislative maneuvering going on with H.R. 2454, the cap and trade energy bill, that puts a serious spotlight on the failure of Congress to make bills properly available. According to the New York Times:

House Democratic leaders late last night released a revamped, 1,201-page energy and global warming bill (pdf), clearing the way for floor debate Friday even though it remains uncertain if they will have the votes to pass it.

The House bill posted on the Rules Committee Web site has grown from the 946-page version adopted last month in the Energy and Commerce Committee. Sources on and off Capitol Hill said the bulk of the changes largely reflect requests from the eight other committees that also had jurisdiction over the bill, including the Ways and Means Committee and Science and Technology Committee.

The bill is only available online at the House Rules Committee and is reported as “text of the bill to be introduced.” Despite having a bill, H.R. 2454, that has been reported out of the Energy & Commerce Committee and discharged by eight other committees, there is now, suddenly, a new bill that is almost 300-pages longer — but it’s still being considered as H.R. 2454. Stay with me here.

Here's the timeline:

Introduced - 5/15/09

Reported with amendments out of Energy & Commerce - 6/5/09

Discharged by Education & Labor and Foreign Affairs Committees - 6/5/09

Discharged by Financial Services, Science & Technology, Transportation, Natural Resources, Agriculture, and Ways & Means Committees - 6/19/09

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 90 - 6/19/09 (This version is 946 pages)

Submitted to House Rules Committee - 6/22/09, 4:22pm (This version is 1,201 pages)

So, where along the line does the bill suddenly expand by 300 pages? According to the New York Times, the various committee chairs held behind the scenes meetings and hashed out a compromise with no allowance for public input. (What lobbyists were involved in those meetings?) And now we are expecting a Friday vote on a bill that has had no public hearing in a committee with jurisdiction over it and that is not yet available in the main engine of public disclosure, THOMAS.

This raises serious questions about how we expect Congress to disclose their activities to the public. Is a bill posted to the House Rules Committee and not THOMAS truly publicly available? While the bill may be available for 72 hours prior to consideration, the public does not have reasonable access to it. Nor does the public know how the final details were reached.

And that isn’t even the worst part. This, apparently, isn’t even the final bill. The final bill will be a manager’s amendment that will be drafted later this week! From a posting on the House Rules Committee, we know that the deadline to submit amendments is Thursday at 9:30am. And there is talk that this will be voted on on Friday. Thus, the final version of this bill will likely only be available for less than 24 hours.

Sunlight has been advocating for all bills to be posted online for 72 hours prior to consideration. It doesn’t look like that is going to happen here. If you think that Congress should read the bills they vote on, you can tell your congressman to both support the Read the Bill resolution, H. Res. 554, and to give the public enough time to read the final version of the cap and trade bill, whenever that is made available.

As Open Left’s Chris Bowers says about this process:

[Y]ou don’t get to know what is in the bill until it is too late. Further, you get no chances to improve the bill.

This is an unacceptable process and it needs to change.
 

Forum List

Back
Top