Call NBC to Complain

The real question is, Why is Cindy McCain not releasing her tax records from before the year 2000?

Even the IRS will only go back 7 years if they audit a person -and no further. Which is why you can throw away your copies of any tax returns and tax documents that are older than 7 years! But you think a candidate's spouse should allow a personal "audit" by the public going back even further? LOL Odds are, she doesn't even have copies of them anymore. I don't. If you do, it is a waste of space.
 
Last edited:
I saw the ad in question that O'Reilly was referring to -and what the heck do you mean O'REILLY was running scared here anyway? MANY people are outraged that NBC chose to run that ad. That ad wasn't a demand that McCain release his medical records, it wasn't about his medical records at all, wasn't about ANY relevant issue to the campaign.

It showed close-ups of McCain's face with stitches in it immediately after his surgery in 2000. While it discussed the fact the man has been treated for cancer 4 times -leaving the purposeful impression that all four times it involved a deadly form of cancer too. But without bothering to mention that all four times it involved skin cancer. Only one was for melanoma which is the dangerous form of skin cancer. The other three were for the very easily treated and most common form of skin cancer that is cured by simple removal of the lesion -nearly always right there in the doctor's office. That kind of skin cancer does not grow fast at all, poses no threat to life unless a person NEVER has it removed and even then not for many decades after a person is well aware he has a lesion that just won't ever heal up. So three of those skin cancers were NOTHING of importance at all -he had them easily and quickly removed.

Only the melanoma would have been a potential risk to his life.

But even with melanoma, if surgery did not get rid of the entire cancer, that person is likely going to be dead within 5 years. And even if not dead yet, then he will be undergoing nonstop extensive, vigorous chemo and radiation as he gets sicker and sicker. Treatment is just to buy them more time at that point because they are extremely unlikely to ever be cured at that point. Melanoma is extremely aggressive once it metastasizes and unlike the other two types of skin cancer - it metastasizes fairly early in the process. It is highly resistant to treatment once it does but is rapidly detected in the lymph nodes - so it is quickly known if surgery didn't provide a total cure. The fact McCain isn't undergoing chemo and radiation EIGHT YEARS later means something far more significant than what his face looked like after the surgery -which only tells you how extensive surgery is to make sure they get it all.

The fact McCain is alive EIGHT YEARS after that surgery, undergoing no further treatment for it whatsoever (or he couldn't be constantly on the campaign trail instead of in the hospital every few weeks for a few days while he dwindles away from the cancer) - is proof positive he was cured of it entirely. In other words, this is NOT an issue today whatsoever.

Apparently these leftwing extremist character assassination teams want people to believe that because we can all see how extensive surgery is when a melanoma is removed since it had been on his face -we shouldn't vote for the guy. Even though the fact he is alive and requires no further treatment 8 years after that surgery means he is cured. That kind of cancer doesn't have a "remission". With melanoma it is an all or nothing kind of situation -if surgery didn't get it entirely, the cancer is quickly detected elsewhere (usually in the lymph system) within a very short time. Two years after surgery for melanoma, the level of concern surgery didn't get it all -starts rapidly dropping. Five years after doctors consider the person to be entirely free of melanoma and cured by the surgery. EIGHT YEARS later, the man IS cured. If it had been on his back, no one would see how extensive surgery is to remove it because the scars would be hidden. His scars are not the issue on that kind of cancer -the number of years after surgery without any signs that surgery was too late to prevent its spread is.

The whole point of the ad was to show how extensive and ugly looking McCain's surgery had been, show his face with all those stitches in it -and hope to make people decide to cast their vote NOT on the issues -and not even the fact that this cancer is considered definitely cured by that surgery now - but on whether this guy's ugly SCARS means he is unfit for the Presidency. It was truly THE most revolting ad -like nothing I've ever seen in ANY past Presidential election. Only NBC agreed to run this ad -every other station turned it down flat and refused to air it. For a REASON.


Maybe if the Swift Boaters put a disclaimer in their ad's saying, "causion, this story is full of shit", then I'd give a damn about poor cancerous John McCain the liar.

Who is by the way ruining our country. I don't wish anyone to die, but I do wish he would go away.
 
Maybe if the Swift Boaters put a disclaimer in their ad's saying, "causion, this story is full of shit", then I'd give a damn about poor cancerous John McCain the liar.

Who is by the way ruining our country. I don't wish anyone to die, but I do wish he would go away.

talk about a coincidence........
 
Maybe if the Swift Boaters put a disclaimer in their ad's saying, "causion, this story is full of shit", then I'd give a damn about poor cancerous John McCain the liar.

Who is by the way ruining our country. I don't wish anyone to die, but I do wish he would go away.
well now, the swiftvets ads told the truth
thus showing what a moron you are yet again
 
Last edited:
As a G.E. Stock holder please watch NBC because we need all the revenue we can get after what Immelt has done to G.E. Has it occured to anyone, one of the reasons why the standards for advertising on MSNBC and NBC are lower is because both networks are huge money losers and need all the add dollars they can muster. Immelt has let the entertainment division and news division run itself into ground. Does this surprise anyone for a man that has run a company for almost 7 years and has lost money ALL seven years and still draws a salary of over 3 million a year and that does not include his bonus and stock options. So take it with a grain of salt, even though the ad itself is worhtless tripe, they need the dollars.
 
Even the IRS will only go back 7 years if they audit a person -and no further. Which is why you can throw away your copies of any tax returns and tax documents that are older than 7 years! But you think a candidate's spouse should allow a personal "audit" by the public going back even further? LOL Odds are, she doesn't even have copies of them anymore. I don't. If you do, it is a waste of space.

That's a good point. I have to throw out those records.

Cindy's mob money financed John's Senate campaigns.
 
As a G.E. Stock holder please watch NBC because we need all the revenue we can get after what Immelt has done to G.E. Has it occured to anyone, one of the reasons why the standards for advertising on MSNBC and NBC are lower is because both networks are huge money losers and need all the add dollars they can muster. Immelt has let the entertainment division and news division run itself into ground. Does this surprise anyone for a man that has run a company for almost 7 years and has lost money ALL seven years and still draws a salary of over 3 million a year and that does not include his bonus and stock options. So take it with a grain of salt, even though the ad itself is worhtless tripe, they need the dollars.
i dont watch NBC for anything but sports
and thats because their programing is crap
i dont watch any of the big networks for much the same reason
 
The real question is, Why is Cindy McCain not releasing her tax records from before the year 2000?

Where were you when Teresa Heinz Kerry, a billionaire and far richer than McCain's wife -only released her tax return for the previous year? And at first she refused to even release that one. Why do bozos like you always wallow in your own made-up double standards?

If you had no problem with Heinz-Kerry only releasing her previous year tax return, then it should have been enough for you if McCain's wife only released last year's tax returns too. But she didn't -she released as far back as the IRS would audit her -and as far back as she is even required to keep those records.

If you can't find something in any of those previous years that will let you indulge in the usual whiny hissy fit, then you aren't likely going to find it by going back even more years when each year prior means it is has less and less relevance anyway. She isn't required to keep tax records longer than 7 years -she released them for every one of those years is she required to keep them. Get over yourself.
 
It's a real shame whats happened to NBC, and the blame can be put on the shoulders of Immelt. The programming for NBC and MSNBC is a complete laughing stock and thats why I said they need the advertising dollars.
 

Forum List

Back
Top