California bill would make questioning school board members a crime

THE FUTURE Of the hate party is in the courts putting the traitors away for the rest of their lives , I see about 100 hate party member that will automatically be guilty after Trump is found guilty over any of this. If he is guilty all the people who were party of this traitorous actions will be as guilty. and we will know the simple fact that anyone who supports jan6th or Trump are traitors to this country and of course should be treated as such for the rest of their lives.
 

WHAT AN AMAZING STATE!

First ammendment violation anyone? The right for assembly?

CALI IS COMMIE.

This is just unreal. The LEFT wants to remove the right to PROTEST?

BLM IS SO DISAPPOINTED.
 
No matter which dictionary you use, that’s pure fascism by Democrats. Straight out of the Stalin handbook. Next will be thought crimes.

California is poised to codify at the state level what the feds were once requested to do — that is, turn inquisitive parents into criminals for daring to question their school board representatives.

Senate Bill 596, introduced by Democratic State Senator Anthony Portantino in February and dubbed the “School Employees: Protection” act, expands an existing law “which makes it a misdemeanor for any ‘person’ to threaten or harass a school employee during the ‘course of [their] duties,'” according to the California Globe.

This expansion adds a penalty for creating a “substantial disorder” at any meeting of a public school board, charter school board, county board of education, and the California State Board of Education.

Although “substantial disorder” is not precisely defined, the bill notes that “course of conduct” is “a pattern of conduct composed of two or more acts over a period of time, however short … evidencing a continuity of purpose.”

Gone from the definition of “harassment” is “unlawful violence” and “credible threat of violence,” and in its place is “torments, or terrorizes.”

It’s not difficult to figure out what’s happening here. A concerned parent at a school board meeting asks a board member a question and reiterates it (thereby establishing a “course of conduct”) … and if the board member feels “tormented” the parent can be arrested and charged with a fine between $500 and $1,000 and face up to a year in jail.

Irony….given you support similar anti-protest laws elsewhere.
 
Irony….given you support similar anti-protest laws elsewhere.

What similar anti-protest laws are you falsely accusing Weatherman2020 of supporting?

Webp.net-resizeimage-50.gif
 
What similar anti-protest laws are you falsely accusing Weatherman2020 of supporting?
…prosecuting people for questioning Catholic Church (using the OP’s metric).
 
…prosecuting people for questioning Catholic Church (using the OP’s metric).

So, in other words, as I expected, as is almost always the case, you're lying.

One of those things is not like the other. Not at all. Barging into a church and disrupting a religious service is not comparable to attending a public government meeting and legitimately airing one's grievances.

magnet.gif
 
So, in other words, as I expected, as is almost always the case, you're lying.

One of those things is not like the other. Not at all. Barging into a church and disrupting a religious service is not comparable to attending a public government meeting and legitimately airing one's grievances.

View attachment 816832
Are assault, death threats, and disrupting meetings to the point no one else can speak “legitimate ly airing grievances”?
 

Forum List

Back
Top