Calif.. always ahead of the curve...

California is a prime example of what happens when you wed the general public's desire for spending with giving the Republicans the power to control tax policy, so that none of the spending is ever paid for.

:lol::lol::lol:This post is an excellent example of the lberals complete lack of sanity. Repubs havn't had control of the purse strings in CA for decades...but don't let that screw with your dementia there ol boy.:lol:

Republicans absolutely control the purse strings in California. They have the power to veto any tax increase.
 
States with low unemployment rates, such as Texas, are drawing people from California, whose rate is above the national average.
Taxation also appears to be a factor, especially as it contributes to the business climate and, in turn, jobs.

Unfortunately, a lot of those Fornicalians bring their idiotic lolberal politics with them, as they try to make their new state more like the socialistic hell hole thy just escaped.

Colorado and New Mexico are prime examples.

It's already happened in Oregon.
 
California is a prime example of what happens when you wed the general public's desire for spending with giving the Republicans the power to control tax policy, so that none of the spending is ever paid for.

:lol::lol::lol:This post is an excellent example of the lberals complete lack of sanity. Repubs havn't had control of the purse strings in CA for decades...but don't let that screw with your dementia there ol boy.:lol:

Republicans absolutely control the purse strings in California. They have the power to veto any tax increase.






Sure buddy, sure.:lol::lol::lol: Been suffering from these delusions long?
 
Proposition 13 gives them a veto over tax policy.

No, it doesn't.

Yes, it does, because it requires a supermajority for tax increases.




Wrong again buckwheat. Prop 13 made it possible for poor old people to continue to live in their homes without having to sell them to pay the property taxes. Every time the home is sold it gets retaxed at the current rate.

What a ignorant lib you are.
 
Always the leader in Trends.. here is another area..

A finer-grained regional analysis reveals that the main current of migration out of California in the past decade has flowed eastward across the Colorado River, reversing the storied passages of the Dust Bowl era.
Southern California had about 55 percent of the state’s population in 2000 but accounted for about 65 percent of the net out-migration in the decade that followed.
More than 70 percent of the state’s net migration to Texas came from California’s south.

A third factor is state and local governments’ constant fiscal instability, which sends at least two discouraging messages to businesses and individuals.
One is that they cannot count on state and local governments to provide essential services—much less, tax breaks or other incentives.
Second, chronically out-of-balance budgets can be seen as tax hikes waiting to happen.

States with low unemployment rates, such as Texas, are drawing people from California, whose rate is above the national average.
Taxation also appears to be a factor, especially as it contributes to the business climate and, in turn, jobs.

Most of the destination states favored by Californians have lower taxes. States that have gained the most at California’s expense are rated as having better business climates.
The data suggest that many cost drivers—taxes, regulations, the high price of housing and commercial real estate, costly electricity, union power, and high labor costs—are prompting businesses to locate outside California, thus helping to drive the exodus.


Civic Report 71 | The Great California Exodus: A Closer Look


WOW... taxes too high? Move!

Sour grapes?
 
The text of the California constitution is a delusion? You should probably inform the governor.
 
No, it doesn't.

Yes, it does, because it requires a supermajority for tax increases.




Wrong again buckwheat. Prop 13 made it possible for poor old people to continue to live in their homes without having to sell them to pay the property taxes. Every time the home is sold it gets retaxed at the current rate.

What a ignorant lib you are.

Tales of old people being forced to sell their homes to pay property taxes were used to tug at the public's heart strings, but didn't have a basis in reality. Most states don't have these types of caps and there is no wave of the elderly being evicted from their homes.
 
California is a prime example of what happens when you wed the general public's desire for spending with giving the Republicans the power to control tax policy, so that none of the spending is ever paid for.

Yup. Thanks to our initiative system, we vote for crap with no way to pay for it.
 
Unfortunately, a lot of those Fornicalians bring their idiotic lolberal politics with them, as they try to make their new state more like the socialistic hell hole thy just escaped.

Colorado and New Mexico are prime examples.

True... I started this thread topic hoping some of those 7% Undecideds that may be on this board MIGHT make the very simple link that Calif. is a microcosm of the USA i.e. continued higher taxes, MORE regulations, ANTI-Capitalist attitudes is the Obama agenda!
The only problem is as it was said THE USA was the last bastion for where people could go that want freedom.. well if Obama gets re-elected that may not be true!

No one besides the right wing idiots want the whole nation to turn into a dump like mississippi.


well.. the left wing loons are turning it into a dump like mississippi....
 
Yes, it does, because it requires a supermajority for tax increases.




Wrong again buckwheat. Prop 13 made it possible for poor old people to continue to live in their homes without having to sell them to pay the property taxes. Every time the home is sold it gets retaxed at the current rate.

What a ignorant lib you are.

Tales of old people being forced to sell their homes to pay property taxes were used to tug at the public's heart strings, but didn't have a basis in reality. Most states don't have these types of caps and there is no wave of the elderly being evicted from their homes.





"I bought a new three-bedroom

house in (the Los Angeles suburb of) Agoura in 1972 for $32,000

and paid $500 a year in property taxes," said Ernie Dynda,

a political neophyte in 1978 who now heads the statewide United

Organizations of Taxpayers. "My tax bill went to $800 in 1974,

to $1,300 in 1976 and was set to jump to $2,000 in 1978. That's

when I said 'This has to stop,' and went out and worked my butt

off for Proposition 13."


Read more: PROP. 13 - THE PEOPLE'S REVOLUTION / 1978 tax rebellion turned initiatives intoa political powerhouse - SFGate
 
This shit cracks me up.

Who the fuck wants to live in Texas?



let see.... what my million+ property in SF gets me.... and what a million+ would buy me in TX..... i tell ya, it looks pretty darn good.

I could get 5X the house, a pool on at least an acre of property.....in a good area. Or no property in a gated community.

And that doesnt even go into the cost of living.
 
This shit cracks me up.

Who the fuck wants to live in Texas?



let see.... what my million+ property in SF gets me.... and what a million+ would buy me in TX..... i tell ya, it looks pretty darn good.

I could get 5X the house, a pool on at least an acre of property.....in a good area. Or no property in a gated community.

And that doesnt even go into the cost of living.

San Francisco sucks too.
 
This shit cracks me up.

Who the fuck wants to live in Texas?



let see.... what my million+ property in SF gets me.... and what a million+ would buy me in TX..... i tell ya, it looks pretty darn good.

I could get 5X the house, a pool on at least an acre of property.....in a good area. Or no property in a gated community.

And that doesnt even go into the cost of living.






Only if you're looking around Austin. If you went to the Dallas Fort Worth area you could get a LOT more. Acres of land. On a lake...with a boat dock and boat house.
 
This shit cracks me up.

Who the fuck wants to live in Texas?



let see.... what my million+ property in SF gets me.... and what a million+ would buy me in TX..... i tell ya, it looks pretty darn good.

I could get 5X the house, a pool on at least an acre of property.....in a good area. Or no property in a gated community.

And that doesnt even go into the cost of living.

San Francisco sucks too.


liberal hell....i agree...it sure does suck!
 

Forum List

Back
Top