Businessman’s Expertise Running the Country

Discussion in 'Economy' started by Star, Jun 4, 2012.

  1. Star
    Offline

    Star Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2009
    Messages:
    2,510
    Thanks Received:
    594
    Trophy Points:
    155
    Ratings:
    +1,016
    Businessmen Presidents have been the most failed Presidents in American history.



    Mitt Romney is Right, We Do Need a Businessman’s Expertise in Running the Country


    Sat Jun 02, 2012
    by tjwalker


    Powerful CEOs become wildly successful because they learn how to analyze data properly, devoid of irrational emotion, and they learn how to build strong teams by placing people in positions that match their talents.

    So how would a CEO go about selecting a President of the United States?

    First, he’d look at the productivity numbers of potential industry backgrounds of candidates. In the last 100 years, the US has had two explicitly CEO/businessman presidents: Herbert Hoover and George W. Bush. Economic growth and productivity advancements were horrific under each president. Both Presidents are on most lists of “worst Presidents of the last 100 years.”

    Next, the CEO would look for the background characteristics of presidents widely considered to have been highly successful: Reagan, Eisenhower, FDR and Clinton. The one thing they all had in common is that they had no business experience and spent their professional lives working in government (Eisenhower, FDR, Clinton) or in the communications arts/community (Hollywood) organizing field (Reagan).

    Next, the CEO would look for more immediate case studies to see if any new trends had emerged regarding political talent. The most high profile CEO businessman to reach electoral success recently at the federal and state level has been former Goldman Sachs CEO Jon Corzine. When given a position to run a whole state, Corzine was my most accounts, not very successful. In facts, the vast majority of CEOS who weighed in on the choice between Corzine and his opponent, a lifelong government worker/politician with no business experience, decided to support Chris Christy, the candidate who had studied law and was a creature of government.

    Next, the CEO might look at the particular records of the applicants for President. Mitt Romney has a clear-cut record regarding his abilities in job creation as an executive running a government entity. As governor of Massachusetts, Romney came in 47th out of 50 states, the bottom decile in terms of performance. Clearly, an "F minus_ grade on any bell curve.

    Barack Obama, as an executive, presided over an economy where unemployment went from 10% to nearly 8%, a net gain of more than 3 million jobs. More jobs were desired, but his record thus far warrants at least the grade of “C.”

    So who would a savvy CEO select to run the United States of America? What would he say to the application of Mitt Romney? He would likely say “Mr. Romney there is nothing in your background, credentials or accomplishments to suggest that you would be even minimally competent at the job of being President of the United States. Picking you for this position would be as irrational as hiring a world class figure skater to be my Chief Financial Officer or hiring an NBA MVP to be my chief research scientist—a complete miss-match. We might have a position for you as Ambassador to France—please check back with us in 6 months.”

    The CEO's next step would be to identify who had been successful at the job in the past in terms of creating huge employment and productivity gains for the country and who was still alive and healthy. This would lead the CEO to conclude that they only logical choice for the position of President would be to hire Bill Clinton, the only person in the last quarter century who presided over the country in an economically successful manner.

    When told about a constitutional technicality that would preclude Clinton from being placed in the job and that the only two finalists for the job were Mitt Romney and Barack Obama, the CEO’s response would be “this is the easiest decision I’ve made all year. Every single data point and every shred of evidence indicates Romney would be an unmitigated disaster as President; Obama possesses every characteristic for the position to suggest he could be good or even great for this position. I can’t imagine any intelligent CEO selecting Romney over Obama.”
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. EdwardBaiamonte
    Offline

    EdwardBaiamonte Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2011
    Messages:
    27,621
    Thanks Received:
    1,132
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +3,065
    right!!! BO is anti business, anti-capitalist, anti-corporation, had two communist parents, voted to the left of Bernie Sanders, and never had a real private sector job while Romney spent much of his career buying and turning around failing businesses!!


    Who knows more about ending the BO depression in the corporate business community??
    BO is like a fireman using gasoline on a fire or a pacifist using chants to win a war. Its plain stupid and yet perfectly liberal!
     
    Last edited: Jun 4, 2012
  3. Star
    Offline

    Star Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2009
    Messages:
    2,510
    Thanks Received:
    594
    Trophy Points:
    155
    Ratings:
    +1,016

    "BO is anti business, anti-capitalist, anti-corporation", yer kidding right?
    LOL - the stock market is up, corporate profits are at record levels, President Obama has never suggested corporate taxes be raised.
    Soooo -- so WTF are you talking about?


    But getting back to the subject, which former successful businessman turned POTUS are you going to cite as a successful POTUS.
     
  4. midcan5
    Offline

    midcan5 liberal / progressive

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2007
    Messages:
    10,795
    Thanks Received:
    2,367
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Philly, PA
    Ratings:
    +3,310
    LOL I'm not sure we can lump any group up so easily but in the real world there is a great divide between supporting / managing the entire nation and just supporting your friends.

    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rodifJlis2c]How Did Mitt Romney Get So Obscenely Rich? Robert Reich Explains - YouTube[/ame]
     
  5. EdwardBaiamonte
    Offline

    EdwardBaiamonte Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2011
    Messages:
    27,621
    Thanks Received:
    1,132
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +3,065
    yes 71% of BO's Solyndra's slush fund went to bundlers or large contributors who were going to provide the green jobs of the future!!
     
  6. Peach
    Offline

    Peach Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2009
    Messages:
    17,179
    Thanks Received:
    1,708
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,965
    Coolidge. Read US history CONs.
     
  7. EdwardBaiamonte
    Offline

    EdwardBaiamonte Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2011
    Messages:
    27,621
    Thanks Received:
    1,132
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +3,065
    very specifically please tell us the most substantive thing we would learn. How will you learn if you are afraid to try??

    we could tell you to read too, but this is a discussion site!! Think before you post!!!
     
  8. EdwardBaiamonte
    Offline

    EdwardBaiamonte Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2011
    Messages:
    27,621
    Thanks Received:
    1,132
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +3,065
    dear, 23 million are unemployed and we are in a depression!!!! yes dear yet another great big liberal depression!!!
     
    Last edited: Jun 5, 2012

Share This Page