Bush Won't Accept Iraq War Timetable

[maineman]

That is just one example = there are more

and the fake photos MM?

it was hilarious that, if there are so many examples, that you chose Haditha!


and the article clearly states that the MSM is having a hard time sorting through all the photos that come from the battlefield...there was clearly no intent to deceive.

Neil Munro writes in National Journal that media outlets struggle with how to sift through the "daily downloads of news photos"

 

[red states rule]

it was hilarious that, if there are so many examples, that you chose Haditha!


and the article clearly states that the MSM is having a hard time sorting through all the photos that come from the battlefield...there was clearly no intent to deceive.

Neil Munro writes in National Journal that media outlets struggle with how to sift through the "daily downloads of news photos"

The left leaning bias of the liberal media is there to be seen

Unless you are a liberal like you

 

[maineman]

again...as proof that the media portrays our troops going out of their way to kill innocent civilians....you pull out Haditha! too funny!

 

[red states rule]

again...as proof that the media portrays our troops going out of their way to kill innocent civilians....you pull out Haditha! too funny!

Touting a Left-Wing "Body Count" for Iraqi Civilians
Posted by Clay Waters on July 21, 2005 - 08:21.
NYT reporter Hassan Fattah touts a left-wing anti-war report on civilian casualties in Iraq, a Wednesday story topped with a headline that betrays none of the politicized controversy over the report. Instead the head lends the hodge-podge "report" (basically a collection of news clippings) a false sense of authority: "Civilian Toll in Iraq Is Placed at Nearly 25,000." As if it's the authorative word on the matter. Yet the researchers are affiliated with far-left outfits like Counterpunch and Peace UK (and, strangely, a lot of music departments all over England). Hardly a scholarly "report."

The actual 28-page "dossier" from the left-wing group iraqbodycount.net should have raised suspicion as to the ideological bent of the "researchers." It refers to terrorists who kill Iraqi civilians with car bombs as "unknown agents," innocuously defined as "those who do not attack obvious military/strategic or occupation-related targets." The report mildly notes that these "unknown agents" are planting "suicide bombs in markets and mosques."

Also: The word "terrorism" appears in the article only in quoted matter. So one person's terrorist is another person's "unknown agent"?

http://newsbusters.org/node/57

 

[maineman]

what, pray tell, does that piece of cut and paste spam have to do with the fact that, when asked to prove the media is portraying Americans as "going out of their way to kill innnocent civilians", you post a thread about Haditha where our troops did exactly that?????



do you even KNOW how much of a moron you are?????

 

[red states rule]

what, pray tell, does that piece of cut and paste spam have to do with the fact that, when asked to prove the media is portraying Americans as "going out of their way to kill innnocent civilians", you post a thread about Haditha where our troops did exactly that?????



do you even KNOW how much of a moron you are?????

a liberal would never see a liberal bias in the media

the liberal media no longer reports what happened - they report what they want to happen

 

[Superlative]

a liberal would never see a liberal bias in the media

the liberal media no longer reports what happened - they report what they want to happen

It appears that there are more and more pages filling up with you argueing nonsense, and accomplishing nothing.

 

[maineman]

a liberal would never see a liberal bias in the media

the liberal media no longer reports what happened - they report what they want to happen

I asked you if you realized how silly you are to suggest that the "liberal" media portrays american troops as going out of their way to kill civilians, and when asked to provide proof of that, you bring up Haditha, where american troops did, in fact, kill innocent civilians.

Can you address THAT point?

 

[Superlative]

a liberal would never see a liberal bias in the media

Huh, the same could and IS said about conservative media.

 

[Gunny]

Huh, the same could and IS said about conservative media.

WHAT conservative media? Allegedly the Fox News Channel, or the Washington Times.

Absolutely overwhelming, aren't they?

 

[red states rule]

I asked you if you realized how silly you are to suggest that the "liberal" media portrays american troops as going out of their way to kill civilians, and when asked to provide proof of that, you bring up Haditha, where american troops did, in fact, kill innocent civilians.

Can you address THAT point?

The head lib at CNN said US troops targeted reporters

It is part of the agenda the liberal media puts out on a daily basis

 

[maineman]

I asked you if you realized how silly you are to suggest that the "liberal" media portrays american troops as going out of their way to kill civilians, and when asked to provide proof of that, you bring up Haditha, where american troops did, in fact, kill innocent civilians.

Can you address THAT point?

please? quit running away from your own assertions.

 

[no1tovote4]

WHAT conservative media? Allegedly the Fox News Channel, or the Washington Times.

Absolutely overwhelming, aren't they?

[liberal]
Well, clearly those two simply negate the MSM in all its glory and evilly report news using words like "Illegal Immigrant" and "Imus". See BS News couldn't possibly have more lean than them, you see. Making up news is different than reporting it and saying "terrorist". That is truly evil, and biased while making up stories that we think were probably true is just really getting the story in depth!

Plus Fox has editorial shows that we can pretend are news shows and thus say that they are even more biased! Foul people spreading Conservative Opinions around as if they weren't dangerous and unamerican! It is so shocking how you can't see how evil they are. And very telling.

Sometimes they make mistakes when speaking in an editorial show about something they read on the wire, then we can say they "reported" it and laugh in all our schadenfreude glory!

Whew. Thankfully they exist because we can constantly bring up their editorial shows as evidence that there no longer is a Liberal Bias in the media.
[/liberal]