Bush didn't just lie........

[Faun]

They're such idiots. The Congressmen (both Senators and Representatives) who voted for the war were doing it because they believed GW's/Cheney's lies....like most Americans....you can't blame them for voting for the war, none of us wanted Saddam to be able to build a nuclear weapon......that doesn't put them in the same category as criminals Bush and Cheney, who knew better. Shows just how smart some conservatives are when they make that comparison.

You're the idiot, nowhere did NYCarbineer show that I said that. Hint, I didn't. He's stupid. I said John Kerry voted for the war. As well as Joe Biden. And he's about to vote for another if she wins the nomination.

How stupid are you people?

John Kerry (Pres), Biden (Veep), Hillary (possible Pres) voted for the war. You people can't process that information, and you call other people idiots? Classic

No, you're the idiot. You said "what should we do with the Democrats who voted for the war" and I was explaining to you why they did.....can't you even read? There wasn't one single Democrat that was in on Bush's and Cheney's coercion of the CIA to go along with their reasoning, if there is prove it.

It's bad enough that you blame the politicians that voted for the war when they weren't in on the lies, but to continue doing it after the truth has been exposed makes you the real idiot.


While US war propagandists presented the attack on Iraq as an extension of the “war on terrorism,” it is well known that the Bush administration had drawn up plans to use military force to overthrow the regime of Saddam Hussein long before the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. September 11 was seized on as a pretext for stampeding public opinion to accept US military intervention.

The charge that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction was selected , as Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz later admitted, for “bureaucratic reasons”—i.e., it was the one allegation that the State Department, the Pentagon and the CIA all agreed could provide a serviceable cover for the real motives: seizing vast oil resources and establishing US dominance of the Middle East.

Weapons of mass destruction in Iraq Bush s big lie and the crisis of American imperialism - World Socialist Web Site

Let's see... we know Iraq had WMDs, we know this because we helped him make them, and he used them on Iran, and his own people (the Kurds). We know he continued making them, cause he admitted it bragged about it. We know he still had them cause the numbers did not add up for what was used and destroyed. We know he said he was gonna keep making them and even build nukes to bomb us and Israel, not unlike Iran claiming they are gonna do the same. We found these chemical weapons buried in the sand after the war. We have photos. The evidence of these WMDs has been widely distributed. Yet, here we are with democrats saying... he lied about WMDs Iraq didn't have any WMDs.

So why are the democrats this obtuse?

The WMD made in the late 80's/early 90's were almost all found and/or destroyed by weapons inspectors. The U.N. estimated they had taken care of about 95% of them before being pulled out by Clinton in 1998; at which point, Clinton bombed the shit out of much of the remainder in Operation Desert Fox.

So then why did Democrats lie and say they were there and authorize W to invade when they knew they weren't there?

Also, do you know how wide of access to intelligence the Senate Intelligence Committee has?

They authorized Bush to use force if necessary. Once the inspectors went back in, military force was not necessary.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Intel came from CIA. CIA was run by Bush admin not by congress. Dems were lied to. Bush admin originated the lie. Dems were gullible. Cons were criminals.

anybody who thinks the Bush family is not a bunch of lying murdering criminals is clearly a brainwashed sheep.Sr was the director of the CIA for god sakes.

 

[Faun]

No, you're the idiot. You said "what should we do with the Democrats who voted for the war" and I was explaining to you why they did.....can't you even read? There wasn't one single Democrat that was in on Bush's and Cheney's coercion of the CIA to go along with their reasoning, if there is prove it.

It's bad enough that you blame the politicians that voted for the war when they weren't in on the lies, but to continue doing it after the truth has been exposed makes you the real idiot.


While US war propagandists presented the attack on Iraq as an extension of the “war on terrorism,” it is well known that the Bush administration had drawn up plans to use military force to overthrow the regime of Saddam Hussein long before the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. September 11 was seized on as a pretext for stampeding public opinion to accept US military intervention.

The charge that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction was selected , as Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz later admitted, for “bureaucratic reasons”—i.e., it was the one allegation that the State Department, the Pentagon and the CIA all agreed could provide a serviceable cover for the real motives: seizing vast oil resources and establishing US dominance of the Middle East.

Weapons of mass destruction in Iraq Bush s big lie and the crisis of American imperialism - World Socialist Web Site

Let's see... we know Iraq had WMDs, we know this because we helped him make them, and he used them on Iran, and his own people (the Kurds). We know he continued making them, cause he admitted it bragged about it. We know he still had them cause the numbers did not add up for what was used and destroyed. We know he said he was gonna keep making them and even build nukes to bomb us and Israel, not unlike Iran claiming they are gonna do the same. We found these chemical weapons buried in the sand after the war. We have photos. The evidence of these WMDs has been widely distributed. Yet, here we are with democrats saying... he lied about WMDs Iraq didn't have any WMDs.

So why are the democrats this obtuse?

Bush admitted he didn't have any WMD's.

You are such a liar, he did not

Stop kazzing...

"Now look, part of the reason we went into Iraq was -- the main reason we went into Iraq, at the time, was we thought he had weapons of mass destruction. It turns out he didn't, but he had the capacity to make weapons of mass destruction." - George Bush, 8.21.2006 ​

Exactly, so if WMDs were your reason for supporting the war, nothing happened which should have changed that view. You know, except you being a partisan hack who doesn't care about anything else but your party winning over truth and your country. Ooooooohhhhhhhhh.......

Stop kazzing. You said Bush did not admit Hussein did not have WMD. You're a proven kazzer.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

This is a pathetic OP link/blog even from RW, oh yea we heard in the news in the early 2000s that Iraq was going to attack the US mainland, WTF?

From the same link:
And each and every time the message was the same: If we didn't wage war, Iraq was going to attack the United States homeland with its enormous arsenal of ghastly weapons

the brainwashed sheep of america speaking.

 

[Camp]

We trusted Bush 'cause after 9/11 we figured no President would take advantage of our trust after such a tragedy. We got snookered. We failed to identify the evil scum attached to the President. Dick and Donald were able to easily influence the immature little spoiled rich kid who called himself the "Decider".

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Problem is.....Bush and his staff knew that the intel was false. They fucking created the intel.

The worst part of that crime is not that the criminals, like Wolfowitz, who created that false intel were never brought it justice.

It is that dishonest politicians like Jeb Bush have rehired them for his campaign for POTUS and they will be back in the Whitehouse doing it all over again if he wins.

you nailed it.the worst part is the sheep of america dont get it that Obama is no different than Bush.there is this one brainwashed sheep poster mertex that blatantly ignores facts on this that Obama if he was any different than Bush, would have prosecuted him for his crimes but he doesnt cause he has expanded what he started and yet,this idiot wants to vote for HELLERY for president ignoring facts how Obama is no different. she is so far gone brainwashed by our corrupt schools not getting it that both parties are corrupt.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

You can easily detect lies by Rs, but Ds never lie.

Obama lies every day, but in your 'mind' that is okay because he is a D.

Ds good Rs bad.....

Like I said,the sad part is we got brainwashed sheep here in america like mertex who want HELLERY for the new president and actually believe Obama has done a great job.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

As with the Reagan administration (and with many of the same people behind the scenes), the purpose of the Bushleague was to propel America into a situation that would leave succeeding administrations, and even generations, little if any choice. The policies establish by the clique would have to be pursued.

this is the best post on this thread.Reagan is worshipped by the CIA controlled media because he was the president who got the ball rolling for the destruction of america that each president since then has continued and expanded upon.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

As with the Reagan administration (and with many of the same people behind the scenes), the purpose of the Bushleague was to propel America into a situation that would leave succeeding administrations, and even generations, little if any choice. The policies establish by the clique would have to be pursued.

this is the best post on this thread.Reagan is worshipped by the CIA controlled media because he was the president who got the ball rolling for the destruction of america that each president since then has continued and expanded upon.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

As with the Reagan administration (and with many of the same people behind the scenes), the purpose of the Bushleague was to propel America into a situation that would leave succeeding administrations, and even generations, little if any choice. The policies establish by the clique would have to be pursued.

this is the best post on this thread.Reagan is worshipped by the CIA controlled media because he was the president who got the ball rolling for the destruction of america that each president since then has continued and expanded upon.

the sheep complain about obama saying anybody but Obama ignoring that the next one will just be worse as long as we have this corrupt two party system.as i said,each one that has got in starting with reagan has been worse and more corrupt than the previous one and that is not going to change obviously.

 

[there4eyeM]

Truly, the self imposed two-party-dictatorship leaves little hope for substantive change.

 

[Dot Com]

ALL the repub candidates currently in the Adelson/Koch Primaries should have the stones to come out and say they were not only wrong in cheer leading vietraq but DEAD wrong.

 

[Dot Com]

Truly, the self imposed two-party-dictatorship leaves little hope for substantive change.

true. They both just take turns at the gov trough and shut out anyone who doesn't buy into their corrupt two party duopoly

 

[Uncensored2008]

ALL the repub candidates currently in the Adelson/Koch Primaries should have the stones to come out and say they were not only wrong in cheer leading vietraq but DEAD wrong.

Say sploogy, isn't your little tin god sending new troops Iraq as we speak?

I know, BOOOOOSSSSHHHH has a gun on him and is forcing him to..

None dare call you rational.

 

[there4eyeM]

One need not love Obama to detest Bush & Co.

 

[Mertex]

This is a pathetic OP link/blog even from RW, oh yea we heard in the news in the early 2000s that Iraq was going to attack the US mainland, WTF?

From the same link:
And each and every time the message was the same: If we didn't wage war, Iraq was going to attack the United States homeland with its enormous arsenal of ghastly weapons

the brainwashed sheep of america speaking.

I thought that was you?

 

[Mertex]

you nailed it.the worst part is the sheep of america dont get it that Obama is no different than Bush.

Yeah right....Bush was for raising minimum wage, for affordable healthcare, for women making the same for the same type of work, kids that were brought here as babies and have been here all their life to be able to become citizens, etc., etc., you're truly delusional.

 

[Mertex]

You can easily detect lies by Rs, but Ds never lie.

Obama lies every day, but in your 'mind' that is okay because he is a D.

Ds good Rs bad.....

Like I said,the sad part is we got brainwashed sheep here in america like mertex who want HELLERY for the new president and actually believe Obama has done a great job.

Damn right........Hillary's got you whiners really skirred...........and damn right Obama has done a great job.....GW Bush put the country in the toilet and thanks to Obama the economy is doing a hell of a lot better and we're not losing jobs by the bucket loads, like we were with Georgie. You need to change your beliefs.

 

[Mertex]

As with the Reagan administration (and with many of the same people behind the scenes), the purpose of the Bushleague was to propel America into a situation that would leave succeeding administrations, and even generations, little if any choice. The policies establish by the clique would have to be pursued.

this is the best post on this thread.Reagan is worshipped by the CIA controlled media because he was the president who got the ball rolling for the destruction of america that each president since then has continued and expanded upon.

Brainwashed sheeple.


10 reasons why Ronald Reagan was the worst president of our lifetime - Orlando liberal Examiner.com

 

[Mertex]

They're such idiots. The Congressmen (both Senators and Representatives) who voted for the war were doing it because they believed GW's/Cheney's lies....like most Americans....you can't blame them for voting for the war, none of us wanted Saddam to be able to build a nuclear weapon......that doesn't put them in the same category as criminals Bush and Cheney, who knew better. Shows just how smart some conservatives are when they make that comparison.

You're the idiot, nowhere did NYCarbineer show that I said that. Hint, I didn't. He's stupid. I said John Kerry voted for the war. As well as Joe Biden. And he's about to vote for another if she wins the nomination.

How stupid are you people?

John Kerry (Pres), Biden (Veep), Hillary (possible Pres) voted for the war. You people can't process that information, and you call other people idiots? Classic

No, you're the idiot. You said "what should we do with the Democrats who voted for the war" and I was explaining to you why they did.....can't you even read? There wasn't one single Democrat that was in on Bush's and Cheney's coercion of the CIA to go along with their reasoning, if there is prove it.

It's bad enough that you blame the politicians that voted for the war when they weren't in on the lies, but to continue doing it after the truth has been exposed makes you the real idiot.


While US war propagandists presented the attack on Iraq as an extension of the “war on terrorism,” it is well known that the Bush administration had drawn up plans to use military force to overthrow the regime of Saddam Hussein long before the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. September 11 was seized on as a pretext for stampeding public opinion to accept US military intervention.

The charge that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction was selected , as Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz later admitted, for “bureaucratic reasons”—i.e., it was the one allegation that the State Department, the Pentagon and the CIA all agreed could provide a serviceable cover for the real motives: seizing vast oil resources and establishing US dominance of the Middle East.

Weapons of mass destruction in Iraq Bush s big lie and the crisis of American imperialism - World Socialist Web Site

Let's see... we know Iraq had WMDs, we know this because we helped him make them, and he used them on Iran, and his own people (the Kurds). We know he continued making them, cause he admitted it bragged about it. We know he still had them cause the numbers did not add up for what was used and destroyed. We know he said he was gonna keep making them and even build nukes to bomb us and Israel, not unlike Iran claiming they are gonna do the same. We found these chemical weapons buried in the sand after the war. We have photos. The evidence of these WMDs has been widely distributed. Yet, here we are with democrats saying... he lied about WMDs Iraq didn't have any WMDs.

So why are the democrats this obtuse?

The WMD made in the late 80's/early 90's were almost all found and/or destroyed by weapons inspectors. The U.N. estimated they had taken care of about 95% of them before being pulled out by Clinton in 1998; at which point, Clinton bombed the shit out of much of the remainder in Operation Desert Fox.

So then why did Democrats lie and say they were there and authorize W to invade when they knew they weren't there?

Also, do you know how wide of access to intelligence the Senate Intelligence Committee has?

The Democrats didn't lie and say they were there.....they just believed doofus George and Cheney, like the rest of the country.

Do you even read the news?