Bulletin To The 'No Borders' Crowd

I'm a liberal who believes that the combination of exporting jobs and importing labor is a recipe for disaster, if practiced long enough.
don't you know that liberals don't believe in no borders ...whats wrong with you.
 
Last edited:
It is a doctrine of Liberalism that having borders, and defending them, is a sign of the heartlessness of Rightwingers....mean, rotten Righties who have no compassion for the poor of the world

You can certainly tell by all the frontiers people that died at the hands of those Indian savages, the govt. just didn't care....

where were those conservatives then?



I was once told that a million monkeys typing on a million typewriters for a million years would produce Hamlet ..

.....your post... looking at it .... I'd give this seven monkeys, twelve minutes.

It took you 1 post to get to the off-topic personal insult stage. That ties your record.
And it was a progtards FIRST post in the thread after the OP that was a stupid, irrelevant comment.

No record set there, that's par for the course for you jackasses.
Oh it was relevant, where were the conservatives closing the border against raids of native Indian savages? Do you know how many lives were lost not sealing off the border?
 
It is a doctrine of Liberalism that having borders, and defending them, is a sign of the heartlessness of Rightwingers....mean, rotten Righties who have no compassion for the poor of the world

You can certainly tell by all the frontiers people that died at the hands of those Indian savages, the govt. just didn't care....

where were those conservatives then?



I was once told that a million monkeys typing on a million typewriters for a million years would produce Hamlet ..

.....your post... looking at it .... I'd give this seven monkeys, twelve minutes.

How long would it take one monkey on a message board making multiple long winded posts every day to eventually make sense?

Using rdean as empirical evidence, infinity is a distinct possibility.
 
It is a doctrine of Liberalism that having borders, and defending them, is a sign of the heartlessness of Rightwingers....mean, rotten Righties who have no compassion for the poor of the world

You can certainly tell by all the frontiers people that died at the hands of those Indian savages, the govt. just didn't care....

where were those conservatives then?



I was once told that a million monkeys typing on a million typewriters for a million years would produce Hamlet ..

.....your post... looking at it .... I'd give this seven monkeys, twelve minutes.

It took you 1 post to get to the off-topic personal insult stage. That ties your record.
And it was a progtards FIRST post in the thread after the OP that was a stupid, irrelevant comment.

No record set there, that's par for the course for you jackasses.
Oh it was relevant, where were the conservatives closing the border against raids of native Indian savages? Do you know how many lives were lost not sealing off the border?
No, it's NOT relevant. You're trying to draw a parallel between the year SIXTEEN FIFTY and TWO THOUSAND FOURTEEN. It's stupid and pointless.

Next.
 
It is a doctrine of Liberalism that having borders, and defending them, is a sign of the heartlessness of Rightwingers....mean, rotten Righties who have no compassion for the poor of the world.


But there are many reasons for borders, not the least is that having a specific geography is the definition of a nation.


1. "There is a responsibility that flows from citizenship, duties to others, basically to strangers, including a defense of their common territory and the maintenance of the law that applies within said jurisdiction."
Roger Scruton, "The West and the Rest."

a. Note the central idea: territory. There is no common territory without borders, nor is there national sovereignty.



2.Even Left-leaning Slate mag is getting the reality.

" Unfortunately, many progressives have gone beyond denouncing the obnoxious component of the Arizona statute and the bigotry of many right-wing nativists who defend it to implying that enforcement of any federal immigration law is racist. In doing so, much of the progressive commentariat has demonstrated its distance, not only from the American public as a whole, but also from most Democratic and independent voters." Open borders or high-wage welfare state - Salon.com



And this:
3. "Liberals and mainstream media writers seem offended that Americans want to take precautions--like securing the border--to prevent an Ebola outbreak at home." MSM Liberals Offended Americans Want Secure Borders to Prevent Ebola Outbreak


And this:
4. “A well-placed source informed Congressman Hunter that foreign nationals with known association to IS were apprehended along the Texas-Mexico border," said Joe Kasper, a spokesman for Hunter, R-Alpine. "Beyond that, we confirmed that every day, border officials are apprehending foreign nationals from countries of security interest, including Syria. And it should concern every American, whether in Texas or beyond, that these individuals are getting that close to the border in the first place."
Duncan Hunter Terrorists passed through Mexico into Texas UTSanDiego.com



But there is another reason to have a strong and well defended border.
Coming right up....
If these fellows with ties to ISIS were apprehended then there are people or law enforcement enforcing the border to ensure people like this do not get over here like during Booosh!
 
It is a doctrine of Liberalism that having borders, and defending them, is a sign of the heartlessness of Rightwingers....mean, rotten Righties who have no compassion for the poor of the world

You can certainly tell by all the frontiers people that died at the hands of those Indian savages, the govt. just didn't care....

where were those conservatives then?



I was once told that a million monkeys typing on a million typewriters for a million years would produce Hamlet ..

.....your post... looking at it .... I'd give this seven monkeys, twelve minutes.

How long would it take one monkey on a message board making multiple long winded posts every day to eventually make sense?

Using rdean as empirical evidence, infinity is a distinct possibility.
only because numbers have been counted past infinity.....
 
It is a doctrine of Liberalism that having borders, and defending them, is a sign of the heartlessness of Rightwingers....mean, rotten Righties who have no compassion for the poor of the world.


But there are many reasons for borders, not the least is that having a specific geography is the definition of a nation.


1. "There is a responsibility that flows from citizenship, duties to others, basically to strangers, including a defense of their common territory and the maintenance of the law that applies within said jurisdiction."
Roger Scruton, "The West and the Rest."

a. Note the central idea: territory. There is no common territory without borders, nor is there national sovereignty.



2.Even Left-leaning Slate mag is getting the reality.

" Unfortunately, many progressives have gone beyond denouncing the obnoxious component of the Arizona statute and the bigotry of many right-wing nativists who defend it to implying that enforcement of any federal immigration law is racist. In doing so, much of the progressive commentariat has demonstrated its distance, not only from the American public as a whole, but also from most Democratic and independent voters." Open borders or high-wage welfare state - Salon.com



And this:
3. "Liberals and mainstream media writers seem offended that Americans want to take precautions--like securing the border--to prevent an Ebola outbreak at home." MSM Liberals Offended Americans Want Secure Borders to Prevent Ebola Outbreak


And this:
4. “A well-placed source informed Congressman Hunter that foreign nationals with known association to IS were apprehended along the Texas-Mexico border," said Joe Kasper, a spokesman for Hunter, R-Alpine. "Beyond that, we confirmed that every day, border officials are apprehending foreign nationals from countries of security interest, including Syria. And it should concern every American, whether in Texas or beyond, that these individuals are getting that close to the border in the first place."
Duncan Hunter Terrorists passed through Mexico into Texas UTSanDiego.com



But there is another reason to have a strong and well defended border.
Coming right up....
1) I don't know of any liberals that believe in open boarders
I do... OBAMA.
and you would be wrong.... obama has made the border more secure then reagan, both bush's ... try again ...name one...
 
Last edited:
It is a doctrine of Liberalism that having borders, and defending them, is a sign of the heartlessness of Rightwingers....mean, rotten Righties who have no compassion for the poor of the world.


But there are many reasons for borders, not the least is that having a specific geography is the definition of a nation.


1. "There is a responsibility that flows from citizenship, duties to others, basically to strangers, including a defense of their common territory and the maintenance of the law that applies within said jurisdiction."
Roger Scruton, "The West and the Rest."

a. Note the central idea: territory. There is no common territory without borders, nor is there national sovereignty.

2.Even Left-leaning Slate mag is getting the reality.

" Unfortunately, many progressives have gone beyond denouncing the obnoxious component of the Arizona statute and the bigotry of many right-wing nativists who defend it to implying that enforcement of any federal immigration law is racist. In doing so, much of the progressive commentariat has demonstrated its distance, not only from the American public as a whole, but also from most Democratic and independent voters." Open borders or high-wage welfare state - Salon.com

And this:
3. "Liberals and mainstream media writers seem offended that Americans want to take precautions--like securing the border--to prevent an Ebola outbreak at home." MSM Liberals Offended Americans Want Secure Borders to Prevent Ebola Outbreak

And this:
4. “A well-placed source informed Congressman Hunter that foreign nationals with known association to IS were apprehended along the Texas-Mexico border," said Joe Kasper, a spokesman for Hunter, R-Alpine. "Beyond that, we confirmed that every day, border officials are apprehending foreign nationals from countries of security interest, including Syria. And it should concern every American, whether in Texas or beyond, that these individuals are getting that close to the border in the first place."
Duncan Hunter Terrorists passed through Mexico into Texas UTSanDiego.com


But there is another reason to have a strong and well defended border.
Coming right up....
If these fellows with ties to ISIS were apprehended then there are people or law enforcement enforcing the border to ensure people like this do not get over here like during Booosh!
Let me guess... THE BIGGER THE LIE YOU TELL, THE MORE THE DNC PAYS YOU.
 
You can certainly tell by all the frontiers people that died at the hands of those Indian savages, the govt. just didn't care....

where were those conservatives then?



I was once told that a million monkeys typing on a million typewriters for a million years would produce Hamlet ..

.....your post... looking at it .... I'd give this seven monkeys, twelve minutes.

It took you 1 post to get to the off-topic personal insult stage. That ties your record.
And it was a progtards FIRST post in the thread after the OP that was a stupid, irrelevant comment.

No record set there, that's par for the course for you jackasses.
Oh it was relevant, where were the conservatives closing the border against raids of native Indian savages? Do you know how many lives were lost not sealing off the border?
No, it's NOT relevant. You're trying to draw a parallel between the year SIXTEEN FIFTY and TWO THOUSAND FOURTEEN. It's stupid and pointless.

Next.
We were not a nation in 1650......I believe it to be four score and twenty almost years later....
 
It is a doctrine of Liberalism that having borders, and defending them, is a sign of the heartlessness of Rightwingers....mean, rotten Righties who have no compassion for the poor of the world.


But there are many reasons for borders, not the least is that having a specific geography is the definition of a nation.


1. "There is a responsibility that flows from citizenship, duties to others, basically to strangers, including a defense of their common territory and the maintenance of the law that applies within said jurisdiction."
Roger Scruton, "The West and the Rest."

a. Note the central idea: territory. There is no common territory without borders, nor is there national sovereignty.

2.Even Left-leaning Slate mag is getting the reality.

" Unfortunately, many progressives have gone beyond denouncing the obnoxious component of the Arizona statute and the bigotry of many right-wing nativists who defend it to implying that enforcement of any federal immigration law is racist. In doing so, much of the progressive commentariat has demonstrated its distance, not only from the American public as a whole, but also from most Democratic and independent voters." Open borders or high-wage welfare state - Salon.com

And this:
3. "Liberals and mainstream media writers seem offended that Americans want to take precautions--like securing the border--to prevent an Ebola outbreak at home." MSM Liberals Offended Americans Want Secure Borders to Prevent Ebola Outbreak

And this:
4. “A well-placed source informed Congressman Hunter that foreign nationals with known association to IS were apprehended along the Texas-Mexico border," said Joe Kasper, a spokesman for Hunter, R-Alpine. "Beyond that, we confirmed that every day, border officials are apprehending foreign nationals from countries of security interest, including Syria. And it should concern every American, whether in Texas or beyond, that these individuals are getting that close to the border in the first place."
Duncan Hunter Terrorists passed through Mexico into Texas UTSanDiego.com


But there is another reason to have a strong and well defended border.
Coming right up....
If these fellows with ties to ISIS were apprehended then there are people or law enforcement enforcing the border to ensure people like this do not get over here like during Booosh!
Let me guess... THE BIGGER THE LIE YOU TELL, THE MORE THE DNC PAYS YOU.
Where do I apply?
 
It is a doctrine of Liberalism that having borders, and defending them, is a sign of the heartlessness of Rightwingers....mean, rotten Righties who have no compassion for the poor of the world.


But there are many reasons for borders, not the least is that having a specific geography is the definition of a nation.


1. "There is a responsibility that flows from citizenship, duties to others, basically to strangers, including a defense of their common territory and the maintenance of the law that applies within said jurisdiction."
Roger Scruton, "The West and the Rest."

a. Note the central idea: territory. There is no common territory without borders, nor is there national sovereignty.



2.Even Left-leaning Slate mag is getting the reality.

" Unfortunately, many progressives have gone beyond denouncing the obnoxious component of the Arizona statute and the bigotry of many right-wing nativists who defend it to implying that enforcement of any federal immigration law is racist. In doing so, much of the progressive commentariat has demonstrated its distance, not only from the American public as a whole, but also from most Democratic and independent voters." Open borders or high-wage welfare state - Salon.com



And this:
3. "Liberals and mainstream media writers seem offended that Americans want to take precautions--like securing the border--to prevent an Ebola outbreak at home." MSM Liberals Offended Americans Want Secure Borders to Prevent Ebola Outbreak


And this:
4. “A well-placed source informed Congressman Hunter that foreign nationals with known association to IS were apprehended along the Texas-Mexico border," said Joe Kasper, a spokesman for Hunter, R-Alpine. "Beyond that, we confirmed that every day, border officials are apprehending foreign nationals from countries of security interest, including Syria. And it should concern every American, whether in Texas or beyond, that these individuals are getting that close to the border in the first place."
Duncan Hunter Terrorists passed through Mexico into Texas UTSanDiego.com



But there is another reason to have a strong and well defended border.
Coming right up....
1) I don't know of any liberals that believe in open boarders
I do... OBAMA.
and you would be wrong.... obama has made tha boarsder more secure then reagan, both bush's ... try again ...name one...
REALLY? Is that why BORDER PATROL was WELCOMING VIOLATORS with OPEN ARMS and ESCORTING THEM INTO AMERICA?

Get the fuck otta here, JERK MEAT. Those kinds of LIES don't hold ANY water here, ya pathetic lying moron.
 
It is a doctrine of Liberalism that having borders, and defending them, is a sign of the heartlessness of Rightwingers....mean, rotten Righties who have no compassion for the poor of the world.


But there are many reasons for borders, not the least is that having a specific geography is the definition of a nation.


1. "There is a responsibility that flows from citizenship, duties to others, basically to strangers, including a defense of their common territory and the maintenance of the law that applies within said jurisdiction."
Roger Scruton, "The West and the Rest."

a. Note the central idea: territory. There is no common territory without borders, nor is there national sovereignty.

2.Even Left-leaning Slate mag is getting the reality.

" Unfortunately, many progressives have gone beyond denouncing the obnoxious component of the Arizona statute and the bigotry of many right-wing nativists who defend it to implying that enforcement of any federal immigration law is racist. In doing so, much of the progressive commentariat has demonstrated its distance, not only from the American public as a whole, but also from most Democratic and independent voters." Open borders or high-wage welfare state - Salon.com

And this:
3. "Liberals and mainstream media writers seem offended that Americans want to take precautions--like securing the border--to prevent an Ebola outbreak at home." MSM Liberals Offended Americans Want Secure Borders to Prevent Ebola Outbreak

And this:
4. “A well-placed source informed Congressman Hunter that foreign nationals with known association to IS were apprehended along the Texas-Mexico border," said Joe Kasper, a spokesman for Hunter, R-Alpine. "Beyond that, we confirmed that every day, border officials are apprehending foreign nationals from countries of security interest, including Syria. And it should concern every American, whether in Texas or beyond, that these individuals are getting that close to the border in the first place."
Duncan Hunter Terrorists passed through Mexico into Texas UTSanDiego.com


But there is another reason to have a strong and well defended border.
Coming right up....
If these fellows with ties to ISIS were apprehended then there are people or law enforcement enforcing the border to ensure people like this do not get over here like during Booosh!
Let me guess... THE BIGGER THE LIE YOU TELL, THE MORE THE DNC PAYS YOU.
Where do I apply?
How much have you already made?
 
It is a doctrine of Liberalism that having borders, and defending them, is a sign of the heartlessness of Rightwingers....mean, rotten Righties who have no compassion for the poor of the world.


But there are many reasons for borders, not the least is that having a specific geography is the definition of a nation.


1. "There is a responsibility that flows from citizenship, duties to others, basically to strangers, including a defense of their common territory and the maintenance of the law that applies within said jurisdiction."
Roger Scruton, "The West and the Rest."

a. Note the central idea: territory. There is no common territory without borders, nor is there national sovereignty.

2.Even Left-leaning Slate mag is getting the reality.

" Unfortunately, many progressives have gone beyond denouncing the obnoxious component of the Arizona statute and the bigotry of many right-wing nativists who defend it to implying that enforcement of any federal immigration law is racist. In doing so, much of the progressive commentariat has demonstrated its distance, not only from the American public as a whole, but also from most Democratic and independent voters." Open borders or high-wage welfare state - Salon.com

And this:
3. "Liberals and mainstream media writers seem offended that Americans want to take precautions--like securing the border--to prevent an Ebola outbreak at home." MSM Liberals Offended Americans Want Secure Borders to Prevent Ebola Outbreak

And this:
4. “A well-placed source informed Congressman Hunter that foreign nationals with known association to IS were apprehended along the Texas-Mexico border," said Joe Kasper, a spokesman for Hunter, R-Alpine. "Beyond that, we confirmed that every day, border officials are apprehending foreign nationals from countries of security interest, including Syria. And it should concern every American, whether in Texas or beyond, that these individuals are getting that close to the border in the first place."
Duncan Hunter Terrorists passed through Mexico into Texas UTSanDiego.com


But there is another reason to have a strong and well defended border.
Coming right up....
If these fellows with ties to ISIS were apprehended then there are people or law enforcement enforcing the border to ensure people like this do not get over here like during Booosh!
Let me guess... THE BIGGER THE LIE YOU TELL, THE MORE THE DNC PAYS YOU.
Where do I apply?
How much have you already made?
Ask CK...
 
And yet, the first point in Obama's recent announcement of his immigration action was:

First, we’ll build on our progress at the border with additional resources for our law enforcement personnel so that they can stem the flow of illegal crossings and speed the return of those who do cross over.
 
It is a doctrine of Liberalism that having borders, and defending them, is a sign of the heartlessness of Rightwingers....mean, rotten Righties who have no compassion for the poor of the world.


But there are many reasons for borders, not the least is that having a specific geography is the definition of a nation.


1. "There is a responsibility that flows from citizenship, duties to others, basically to strangers, including a defense of their common territory and the maintenance of the law that applies within said jurisdiction."
Roger Scruton, "The West and the Rest."

a. Note the central idea: territory. There is no common territory without borders, nor is there national sovereignty.



2.Even Left-leaning Slate mag is getting the reality.

" Unfortunately, many progressives have gone beyond denouncing the obnoxious component of the Arizona statute and the bigotry of many right-wing nativists who defend it to implying that enforcement of any federal immigration law is racist. In doing so, much of the progressive commentariat has demonstrated its distance, not only from the American public as a whole, but also from most Democratic and independent voters." Open borders or high-wage welfare state - Salon.com



And this:
3. "Liberals and mainstream media writers seem offended that Americans want to take precautions--like securing the border--to prevent an Ebola outbreak at home." MSM Liberals Offended Americans Want Secure Borders to Prevent Ebola Outbreak


And this:
4. “A well-placed source informed Congressman Hunter that foreign nationals with known association to IS were apprehended along the Texas-Mexico border," said Joe Kasper, a spokesman for Hunter, R-Alpine. "Beyond that, we confirmed that every day, border officials are apprehending foreign nationals from countries of security interest, including Syria. And it should concern every American, whether in Texas or beyond, that these individuals are getting that close to the border in the first place."
Duncan Hunter Terrorists passed through Mexico into Texas UTSanDiego.com



But there is another reason to have a strong and well defended border.
Coming right up....
1) I don't know of any liberals that believe in open boarders
I do... OBAMA.
and you would be wrong.... obama has made tha boarsder more secure then reagan, both bush's ... try again ...name one...
REALLY? Is that why BORDER PATROL was WELCOMING VIOLATORS with OPEN ARMS and ESCORTING THEM INTO AMERICA?

Get the fuck otta here, JERK MEAT. Those kinds of LIES don't hold ANY water here, ya pathetic lying moron.
show us one dumb fuck ... show us one border guard that was welcoming them in... every one I saw was being arrested, that doesn't seem to me showing the welcome mat... but dumb fucks like you never get it right ... what do you expect from a dumbfuck like you .. understanding whats going on??? never happen ... but you stick with your dumb fuck buddies ... after all theres no dumb fuck union to protect you ...:badgrin:
 
There are not enough liberals in the country advocating for 'no borders' to make it a 'liberal' position.
I can't wait until we build that 25 foot high sea wall to protect our border.....

Who takes their job more seriously, ratter than look into ways to undermine it, in handling those who are found crossing their nation's borders - Mexico or the United Stares? Has it ever been discussed how Mexico treats those who are found wandering across their borders illegally? Interesting what happens when politics and the need for votes, trumps upholding a Nation's preexisting immigration laws.
 
It is a doctrine of Liberalism that having borders, and defending them, is a sign of the heartlessness of Rightwingers....mean, rotten Righties who have no compassion for the poor of the world.


But there are many reasons for borders, not the least is that having a specific geography is the definition of a nation.


1. "There is a responsibility that flows from citizenship, duties to others, basically to strangers, including a defense of their common territory and the maintenance of the law that applies within said jurisdiction."
Roger Scruton, "The West and the Rest."

a. Note the central idea: territory. There is no common territory without borders, nor is there national sovereignty.

2.Even Left-leaning Slate mag is getting the reality.

" Unfortunately, many progressives have gone beyond denouncing the obnoxious component of the Arizona statute and the bigotry of many right-wing nativists who defend it to implying that enforcement of any federal immigration law is racist. In doing so, much of the progressive commentariat has demonstrated its distance, not only from the American public as a whole, but also from most Democratic and independent voters." Open borders or high-wage welfare state - Salon.com

And this:
3. "Liberals and mainstream media writers seem offended that Americans want to take precautions--like securing the border--to prevent an Ebola outbreak at home." MSM Liberals Offended Americans Want Secure Borders to Prevent Ebola Outbreak

And this:
4. “A well-placed source informed Congressman Hunter that foreign nationals with known association to IS were apprehended along the Texas-Mexico border," said Joe Kasper, a spokesman for Hunter, R-Alpine. "Beyond that, we confirmed that every day, border officials are apprehending foreign nationals from countries of security interest, including Syria. And it should concern every American, whether in Texas or beyond, that these individuals are getting that close to the border in the first place."
Duncan Hunter Terrorists passed through Mexico into Texas UTSanDiego.com


But there is another reason to have a strong and well defended border.
Coming right up....
If these fellows with ties to ISIS were apprehended then there are people or law enforcement enforcing the border to ensure people like this do not get over here like during Booosh!
Let me guess... THE BIGGER THE LIE YOU TELL, THE MORE THE DNC PAYS YOU.
well the harder you think the less you can guess right ... keep trying dumb fuck
 
It is a doctrine of Liberalism that having borders, and defending them, is a sign of the heartlessness of Rightwingers....mean, rotten Righties who have no compassion for the poor of the world

You can certainly tell by all the frontiers people that died at the hands of those Indian savages, the govt. just didn't care....

where were those conservatives then?



I was once told that a million monkeys typing on a million typewriters for a million years would produce Hamlet ..

.....your post... looking at it .... I'd give this seven monkeys, twelve minutes.

It took you 1 post to get to the off-topic personal insult stage. That ties your record.

It took you two. Do you have a point?
 

Forum List

Back
Top