danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #241
I think the Great Walls of America would be a more necessary and more proper execution of our Commerce Clause.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The proposed fence does not include a moat or, mines or machine gun nests or alligators, sharks or Piranhas. Your attempt to paint a fence as some kind of violation of human rights is idiotic. Whose rights are violated by a fence?Well, once they get the moat in place with alligators, sharks, and piranas.. And then the mine fields and machine gun nests... And then the electric fence. That'll keep the mongol hordes out.Do you really think a wall will keep out illegals?
The property owners...Whose rights are violated by a fence?
You mean the ranchers, retirees and others who prefer to live off the grid in the vast desert near the Mexican border regularly confront the desperate and dehydrated illegal border crossers, who knock on their doors for directions and water, and lately more of the less innocent, who scurry across their land or lie low in the brush, stooped with marijuana and other drugs bundled on their backs. You mean those property owners? I don't see how that would affect their "Rights"The property owners...Whose rights are violated by a fence?
I mean the ones who would be forced to sell their land to the Feds. That's hardly a defense of Property Rights now is it?You mean the ranchers, retirees and others who prefer to live off the grid in the vast desert near the Mexican border regularly confront the desperate and dehydrated illegal border crossers, who knock on their doors for directions and water, and lately more of the less innocent, who scurry across their land or lie low in the brush, stooped with marijuana and other drugs bundled on their backs. You mean those property owners? I don't see how that would affect their "Rights"The property owners...Whose rights are violated by a fence?
The ones that may fear for their lives because of the Mexican smugglers?
Ever heard of eminent domain?The property owners...Whose rights are violated by a fence?
Yep, but that goes totally again Private Property Rights eh?Ever heard of eminent domain?The property owners...Whose rights are violated by a fence?
I always thought you were for anything that was for the greater good, or do you get to pick and choose those battles too!Yep, but that goes totally again Private Property Rights eh?Ever heard of eminent domain?The property owners...Whose rights are violated by a fence?
PMH is shedding crocodile tears over the property rights of ranchers on the border. He never gave a damn about property rights in his entire life.I always thought you were for anything that was for the greater good, or do you get to pick and choose those battles too!Yep, but that goes totally again Private Property Rights eh?Ever heard of eminent domain?The property owners...Whose rights are violated by a fence?
Yep...I always thought you were for anything that was for the greater good, or do you get to pick and choose those battles too!Yep, but that goes totally again Private Property Rights eh?Ever heard of eminent domain?The property owners...Whose rights are violated by a fence?
Entirely untrue, and you are the one who wants to take their property for a fence.He never gave a damn about property rights in his entire life.
Eminent domain is the law of the land. If we are going to use it to build damns, freeways and shopping malls, then we can damn well use it to defend our border. If there was ever a valid justification for using it, that's it.Entirely untrue, and you are the one who wants to take their property for a fence.He never gave a damn about property rights in his entire life.
Then you couldn't get your fence eh?Eminent domain is the law of the land. If we are going to use it to build damns, freeways and shopping malls, then we can damn well use it to defend our border. If there was ever a valid justification for using it, that's it.Entirely untrue, and you are the one who wants to take their property for a fence.He never gave a damn about property rights in his entire life.
That being said, if anyone ever proposes an amendment to abolish eminent domain, I'm for it.
Then you couldn't get your fence eh?Eminent domain is the law of the land. If we are going to use it to build damns, freeways and shopping malls, then we can damn well use it to defend our border. If there was ever a valid justification for using it, that's it.Entirely untrue, and you are the one who wants to take their property for a fence.He never gave a damn about property rights in his entire life.
That being said, if anyone ever proposes an amendment to abolish eminent domain, I'm for it.
Your lack of support for property rights is noted.
Entirely untrue, and you are the one who wants to take their property for a fence.He never gave a damn about property rights in his entire life.
Well shit, what good is it then? How is a mere fence going to keep the brown soulless mooching hordes out?The proposed fence does not include a moat or, mines or machine gun nests or alligators, sharks or Piranhas. Your attempt to paint a fence as some kind of violation of human rights is idiotic. Whose rights are violated by a fence?Well, once they get the moat in place with alligators, sharks, and piranas.. And then the mine fields and machine gun nests... And then the electric fence. That'll keep the mongol hordes out.Do you really think a wall will keep out illegals?
Nonsense, as always my little infant, and you're the one who wants to take the land that belongs to others.Entirely untrue, and you are the one who wants to take their property for a fence.He never gave a damn about property rights in his entire life.
It is true. You don't give a damn about private property. No liberal does.
Do you really think a wall will keep out illegals?