Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Is that like getting caught speeding?
Or double parked?
Lots of other people doing it, but you're the one that got caught.
Tell it to the judge.
Unless the police only follow his car but let the others fly by. That is a violation of his Rights and no different than targetting someone for their race or religion, in this case it is their political affiliiation and popularity. The world sees this, you must know this right? Does it help or hurt America?True but that doesn't mean he isn't guilty. The guy who gets caught speeding can say the same about the many others never caught.
Throw this case out. She admitted Judge Engoron had already found Trump guilty before the trial ever started. What Engoron did was unethical on epic levels. He should be impeached along with James who campaigned on going after Trump.
Video of Letitia James
NY Attorney General Letitia James Admits Her Guilt in Denying Trump Due Process — Says Judge Found Donald Trump Guilty “Before This Trial Even Began” (VIDEO)
COMMUNISM: NY Attorney General Letitia James Admits Her Guilt in Denying Trump Due Process — Says Judge Found Donald Trump Guilty "Before This Trial Even Began" (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
Due process and fair trials are fundamental principles of any democratic society.www.thegatewaypundit.com
The judge isn't supposed to pass judgement before any evidence is introduced.They would complain that during the penalty phase of a capital murder trial, that it's unfair, because the judge said he was guilty before the penalty phase even started.
These people are insane.
Unless the police only follow his car but let the others fly by. That is a violation of his Rights and no different than targetting someone for their race or religion, in this case it is their political affiliiation and popularity. The world sees this, you must know this right? Does it help or hurt America?
The judge isn't supposed to pass judgement before any evidence is introduced.
So yes, there would be a valid complaint that the trial was pre-judged.
It means that the accused wasn't given due-process within the law.
And folks like you seem to think a summary judgement is all that matters in this trial.
Yeah Muddy, the judge passed judgement. In Trump's case a summary judgment on the merits.The judge isn't supposed to pass judgement before any evidence is introduced.
So yes, there would be a valid complaint that the trial was pre-judged.
It means that the accused wasn't given due-process within the law.
And folks like you seem to think a summary judgement is all that matters in this trial.
Your sense of right & wrong is highly suspect.
I care about all injustices. If we are to survive as a species, we need to be honourable and have integrity. I despise abusers and cowardice. Despise it to my core.He broke the law. Prosecuting someone for that is not a violation of their rights.
Sadly many do not care that many are targeted simply over their race. Having a "wide set nose" is not illegal.
They can't really name the law he broke.He broke the law. Prosecuting someone for that is not a violation of their rights.
Sadly many do not care that many are targeted simply over their race. Having a "wide set nose" is not illegal.
Throw this case out. She admitted Judge Engoron had already found Trump guilty before the trial ever started. What Engoron did was unethical on epic levels. He should be impeached along with James who campaigned on going after Trump.
Video of Letitia James
NY Attorney General Letitia James Admits Her Guilt in Denying Trump Due Process — Says Judge Found Donald Trump Guilty “Before This Trial Even Began” (VIDEO)
COMMUNISM: NY Attorney General Letitia James Admits Her Guilt in Denying Trump Due Process — Says Judge Found Donald Trump Guilty "Before This Trial Even Began" (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
Due process and fair trials are fundamental principles of any democratic society.
Please show me proof of this, mkay?Summary Judgement was requested by both parties based on the motions, briefs, video depositions and evidence attached to the briefs.
The Judge ruled on only 1 of 7 claims, the other 6 remanded to trial.
Doing something BOTH parties requested based on briefs isn't "pre-judging", especially when most of the complaints were referred to trial.
No it doesn't.
It only matters to the one claim that was decided by summary judgement based on the request of both parties.
It's not relevant to the other 6 claims that will be determined by the trial.
WW
Unless the police only follow his car but let the others fly by. That is a violation of his Rights and no different than targetting someone for their race or religion, in this case it is their political affiliiation and popularity.
www.justsecurity.org
Umm yes. Equal justice before the law, Lady Justice is b!ind etc.. If they are going after one person rather than another, you can call yourself Russia, Korea.or Canada instead of the United States. Some wouls willingly sink.your entire nations soul in order to persecute one man and his voters. The same.voters who voted Obama in twice.
An example of the evidence, you claim wasn't introduced, was Trump reporting the value of his Trump Tower home, at over 30,000 square feet.The judge isn't supposed to pass judgement before any evidence is introduced.
And a guilty TRUMP organizationA racist prosecutor and a batshit nuts judge
Basically
And a guilty TRUMP organization
The TRUMP organization has already been found guilty of fraudBlah blah blah... keep bleating
Nobody cares
OMG.....so you're saying that the city of New York is unable to use a tape measure?An example of the evidence, you claim wasn't introduced, was Trump reporting the value of his Trump Tower home, at over 30,000 square feet.
When it was actually just over 10,000 square feet.
They need to be disbarred.This is not how you're supposed to be talking to the pubic during a trial.
Is shows clear prejudice.
It shows clear malice and is grounds for a mistrial.
I hope they get their asses handed to them for their unethical and illegal conduct before, during, and after this trial.
Malicious prosecution. Sadly, the punishment for that is not what it should be. (That is: public crucifixion.)I wasn't commenting on the summary judgement.
That's another issue.
This speech shows her malicious intent.
The entire case is built on bad feelings toward a suspect by the judge and prosecutor, and a refusal by the judge and prosecutor to look for the truth.
Not to mention the fact that there is no crime here in the first place.
Nobody was hurt.
Nobody's complaining of being ripped off, even the banks.
The banks testified that they couldn't understand the purpose of the trial to begin with.
You cannot be this stupid. It's not possible.There was a point where the investors in Bernie Madoff said the same thing. They were completely happy with the 15% return on their investment. None of them felt ripped off either, until the truth came out much later.
And the lenders have stated-repeatedly, in open court-that they had no problems with any of it. The loans are all current (some already paid back in full), absolutely nothing unusual happened here.Trump being charged with the same activities that 1000s of businessman and corporations in NY engage in every day.
