Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
HIDING payments... making the payments and disclosing them legally is just fine. HIDING them in a way that violates campaign laws is illegal like I very clearly said. How is this not getting through to you?!Wrong.
Here is the only post I saw where you wrote anything:
{...
Slade3200 said:
How do you not know the crime by now?
He hide payments made to silence Stormy Daniels via a NDA violating business filing and election laws
...}
And none of those things are illegal.
Trump violated no business filing laws, because hush money is a valid celebrity tax write off.
There are no campaign finance laws involved because while hush money may help a campaign, they are NOT at all covered by any legislation.
Which campaign laws?HIDING payments... making the payments and disclosing them legally is just fine. HIDING them in a way that violates campaign laws is illegal like I very clearly said. How is this not getting through to you?!
Here I will spell it out very simply... AGAIN
That’s not what the persecution says.Trump is being prosecuted for HIDING payments made to Stormy Daniels so she wouldn't tell her story about their affair.
Again, that’s not what the persecution claims.The way he is accused of hiding the payments violates both state and federal campaign laws.
no. It’s not. One cannot “hide” a payment made for any purpose when one pays and enters the payment in one’s records. And the purpose was to pay his lawyer’s invoice.Thats the crime.
Very simple.
If you want to get into details and statues then watch the trial and see how it all plays out.
But stop playing stupid and pretending like there is no crime.
No. You’re wrong. So what’s there to get!? That your an idiot? I already know that.What I just laid out is the crime he is being accused of. Get it?
You asking the question, soy boi, did suggest that you knew that answer since you’re the chucklehead who offered that bullshit.Thats a rather stupid statement. People ask others if they understand things all the time that the asker doesn't understand.
You didn’t write that tome, stupid.For example;
"Hey do you understand everything in Steven Hawkins Brief history of time?" If I ask that I'm certainly not implying that I understand it all.
A crime requires specific legislation to be violated, that is intended to defend individuals from violations of their inherent rights.
Since there is no victim, there not only was no crime, but no delegated authority to then use for prosecution.
Here you go... All 34 laid out with statutes and numbers and everything.... Have fun:Which specific campaign finance laws outlaw nuisance/extortion payments?....Cite them.
Put up or STFU.
so what?You misspelled simplemindedly
So no. He cannot answer.Here you go... All 34 laid out with statutes and numbers and everything.... Have fun:
Instead of Trump paying Stormy directly he had Cohen pay her and then after the election he paid Cohen back in payments disgusted as retainer payments of $35K.You misspelled simplemindedly.
That’s not what the persecution says.
Again, that’s not what the persecution claims.
no. It’s not. One cannot “hide” a payment made for any purpose when one pays and enters the payment in one’s records. And the purpose was to pay his lawyer’s invoice.
But even if they had discussed that the reason for the payment for the NDA as being to hide the fact of an NDA, that’s the whole point of an NDA. To keep private the information (or blackmail claim) the Ho was agreeing not to share.
You’re very simple. But your explanation is shallow and hollow and unprovable.
No need. I read the laws and I’ve followed this bogus trial. The question isn’t about how it turns out at the trial level. The question remains: what was the actual “other crime.” You still haven’t pointed to one.
I’m not the one being stupid. That’s you for pretending that there ever was any crime.
No. You’re wrong. So what’s there to get!? That your an idiot? I already know that.
It’s obvious you lack any shred of ability to answer the question. That’s ok. You’re dismissed.
So YOU cannot name the criminal act, nor cite the underlying law being violated....The bookkeeping jiggery-pokery is only illegal if it's covering up an actual underlying criminal act.Here you go... All 34 laid out with statutes and numbers and everything.... Have fun:
I just did answer... Laid out all the technical details since my 1st grade simplification wasn't good enough for you geniusesSo no. He cannot answer.
Well I explained the crime very simply and it wasn't good enough for you so then I post the detailed list of indictments with all the details and its still not good enough... Grow upSo YOU cannot name the criminal act, nor cite the underlying law being violated....The bookkeeping jiggery-pokery is only illegal if it's covering up an actual underlying criminal act.
You just go with "well, the prosecutor brought charges, there they are, so that's the crime".
Too fucking dumb to know you're dumb.
No you didn't....You puked up the pablum that you're being spoon fed by your media overlords.....You have NFI.Well I explained the crime very simply and it wasn't good enough for you so then I post the detailed list of indictments with all the details and its still not good enough... Grow up
Instead of Trump paying Stormy directly he had Cohen pay he
Irrelvant.r and then after the election he paid Cohen back in payments disgusted as retainer payments of $35K.
No it’s not. You (like the Bragg persecution) have failed to make a case.Thats a lot of hoops to jump through
I didn’t post anything from the media, what are you talking about?No you didn't....You puked up the pablum that you're being spoon fed by your media overlords.....You have NFI.
No. You simply failed to even have the first clue about the subject matter.I just did answer... Laid out all the technical details since my 1st grade simplification wasn't good enough for you geniuses
Irrelevant, it’s up to the trial to vet out the evidence. This thread was asking what the crime was. That’s what I explained. Now whether it happened and is proven thats for the trialBased on what the perjurer himself (all alone) claims?
You posted a link to the dreck that Bragg filed, which is the only thing the media is bothering with.I didn’t post anything from the media, what are you talking about?
You wouldn't understand it anyway.What did Trump do to warrant a jury trial that is costing New Yorkers millions at a time NY can't afford to spend it.... If people are asking today... what is the crime... and the defendant is a former US president for Gods sake....
This is going to do real harm to the democrat party....
Now if you would like to try and tell us what the CRIME is please use this thread...
