yup and they’ve mostly been all negative."Elections have consequences"
- Saint Obama
Poor pajama boy! Do you need a tissue?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
yup and they’ve mostly been all negative."Elections have consequences"
- Saint Obama
You’re so full of shit it’s coming out of wherever.Wingnuts need to be educated.
CBC News: "Clean Energy Provides More Jobs Than Oilsands, Report Says" - Clean Energy Canada
So do what Obama did. Strangle our energy supply hoping someday that a windmill will turn the lights back on, while selling our fuel to Asia to burn with impunity.
Global weather is the de facto excuse for the redistribution of our wealth. The environment has NOTHING to do with it.
Worst excuse ever for raping our beautiful wilderness.Of course libs. Give it to Putin. Because we all know that if Russia or China use it then our environment will be safe! Just like selling off our coal dirt cheap to Asian countries cleaned the environment right up!
Another knownothing that forgets Trump signed an EO giving Big Coal his tacit approval to dump their wastes in our rivers and streams..
So raping our protected wilderness is a good idea?Well I guess I was wrong about Lisa Murkowski, she's not a completely brainless Republicrat.
.... She actually is capable of coming up with a good idea once in a blue moon.
So raping our protected wilderness is a good idea?Well I guess I was wrong about Lisa Murkowski, she's not a completely brainless Republicrat.
.... She actually is capable of coming up with a good idea once in a blue moon.
Moron thinks winning is an excuse to promote the fossil fuel companies for dirtying our air, water and bastardizing our protected wilderness..yup and they’ve mostly been all negative."Elections have consequences"
- Saint Obama
Poor pajama boy! Do you need a tissue?
So raping our protected wilderness is a good idea?Well I guess I was wrong about Lisa Murkowski, she's not a completely brainless Republicrat.
.... She actually is capable of coming up with a good idea once in a blue moon.
How does one rape wilderness?
How would one go about doing that?Bullshit logic. You can still use oil without raping our protected wilderness areas.So raping our protected wilderness is a good idea?Well I guess I was wrong about Lisa Murkowski, she's not a completely brainless Republicrat.
.... She actually is capable of coming up with a good idea once in a blue moon.
If you want to characterize exploiting a highly valuable natural resource that's located in the U.S. as "raping our protected wilderness" , then sure, I got no problem with it.
Personally I'll believe you actually "care" about how all the oil you use gets to you when you actually stop using oil, until then it's just more hypocritical bullshit from a partisan drone pretending to put the environment over their own consumption.
...and obviously neither do you, unless of course you've changed your spots and sworn off fossil fuels and the plethora of other petroleum based products that exist in our oil drenched civilization in the last 5 minutes.He obviously doesn’t respect our environment by his systematic dismantling of the EPA.
Stupid question. The OP explains it. Try Hooked on Phonics..So raping our protected wilderness is a good idea?Well I guess I was wrong about Lisa Murkowski, she's not a completely brainless Republicrat.
.... She actually is capable of coming up with a good idea once in a blue moon.
How does one rape wilderness?
View attachment 159731 View attachment 159725
Once again the GOP/ Trump are pushing their anti environmental policies and won’t be happy until they let the fossil fuel companies totally dominate the EPA.
So raping our protected wilderness is a good idea?Well I guess I was wrong about Lisa Murkowski, she's not a completely brainless Republicrat.
.... She actually is capable of coming up with a good idea once in a blue moon.
How does one rape wilderness?
Methinks wilderness is much more able to rape back if one is unprepared.
No, more people voted against that. 3 million more.The American people voted they don't care about the environment. Jobs and cheap oil are more important.View attachment 159731 View attachment 159725
Once again the GOP/ Trump are pushing their anti environmental policies and won’t be happy until they let the fossil fuel companies totally dominate the EPA.
And a clean environment does not mean jobs will be hurt.
There are huge opportunities in alternative energy. Ask all the countries that are way far ahead of us in clean energy jobs..
Trump signs order at the EPA to dismantle environmental protections
DEPLORABLES: yeah cough cough Yea.
No, more people voted against that. 3 million more.The American people voted they don't care about the environment. Jobs and cheap oil are more important.View attachment 159731 View attachment 159725
Once again the GOP/ Trump are pushing their anti environmental policies and won’t be happy until they let the fossil fuel companies totally dominate the EPA.
And a clean environment does not mean jobs will be hurt.
There are huge opportunities in alternative energy. Ask all the countries that are way far ahead of us in clean energy jobs..
There are huge opportunities in alternative energy.
Yes!!
Many low productivity "clean energy" jobs are created when we shovel enough taxpayer money out the door.
Ask all the countries that are way far ahead of us in clean energy jobs..
Exactly!! Ask Spain how that's working for them. Let me know what they say.
Trump signs order at the EPA to dismantle environmental protections
DEPLORABLES: yeah cough cough Yea.
Didn't Shell already try drilling in the Arctic Ocean and fail? How will failure help off-set the tax cuts to the rich? Better idea is to open the federal waters off Florida where there is a proven amount of reserves and it's much easier to extract.