BREAKING: It's Official ----Judge Chutkan Pauses Trump DC Case Amid Dispute Over Immunity Argument

  • A federal appeals court rejected a claim by Donald Trump that he was protected by presidential immunity from a rape defamation lawsuit by the writer E. Jean Carroll.
So it will be interesting to see what the supreme court says

Completely different issues
 
Hey,

You went to court 60+ times and fucking lost.

Got it, ye lost...

Then Trump tried to steal it...

Now he wants to say he was above the law because he was President.

There is no way the SC is going to let that happen. Cause the next thing a President could do is execute everyone on the SC and claim that he above the law. He would also be above the law on calling next election. so he would be proclaiming himself Dicytator for life.
LMAO

Sure son. A stacked court, some would say a kangaroo court, stacked with Marxists who are devout Trump haters, sitting in judgment of people who disagree with them, using a Judge who is an admitted Trump hater.

I'll wait for the SCOTUS to weigh in.
 
Careful, your man Biden potentially has some very serious charges on the way. He won't be impeached no matter what because Democrats in the Senate couldn't care less about treason, selling influence or any of that, but once he leaves office, he is fair game.
Once Trump is elected Biden's arrest and conviction is virtually guaranteed.
 
Trumps case is slightly different that the J6 crowd. The crowd actually had physical engagements whereas Trump involvement was more planning, falsifying records and scheming to overturn the elections such as using fake electors, having pence change the results, accusations of fraud, etc.

He was using the office of the presidency to force a change of the election results.

Even the Trump appointed judges will have a hard time trying to appear to be fair
 
It will all be resolved before March 4th and the trial will proceed.

Court Upholds Gag Order On Trump In Washington Case But Narrows Restrictions On His Speech.

WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal appeals court in Washington largely upheld a gag order on Donald Trump in his 2020 election interference case on Friday, but narrowed the restrictions on his speech to allow the former president to criticize the special counsel who brought the case.

The three-judge panel’s ruling modifies the gag order, permitting the Republican 2024 presidential front-runner to make disparaging comments about special counsel Jack Smith, but it reimposes limits on what he can say about known or reasonably foreseeable witnesses in the case and about court staff and other lawyers.

The unanimous ruling is mostly a win for Smith’s team, with the judges agreeing with prosecutors that Trump’s often-incendiary comments about participants in the case can have a damaging practical impact and rejecting claims by defense attorneys that restrictions on the ex-president’s speech amount to an unconstitutional muzzling. It lays out fresh parameters about what Trump can and cannot say about the case as he both prepares for a March trial and campaigns to reclaim the White House.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: IM2
LMAO

Sure son. A stacked court, some would say a kangaroo court, stacked with Marxists who are devout Trump haters, sitting in judgment of people who disagree with them, using a Judge who is an admitted Trump hater.

I'll wait for the SCOTUS to weigh in.

You have your tin foil hat a little to tight. Even judges appointed by P01135809 ruled against him. Each judge based their ruling on the facts at hand, not on half baked bullshit conspiracy theories.

You people keep coming with totally improbable conspiracies to fit your delusion.
 
Last edited:
Court Upholds Gag Order On Trump In Washington Case But Narrows Restrictions On His Speech.

WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal appeals court in Washington largely upheld a gag order on Donald Trump in his 2020 election interference case on Friday, but narrowed the restrictions on his speech to allow the former president to criticize the special counsel who brought the case.

The three-judge panel’s ruling modifies the gag order, permitting the Republican 2024 presidential front-runner to make disparaging comments about special counsel Jack Smith, but it reimposes limits on what he can say about known or reasonably foreseeable witnesses in the case and about court staff and other lawyers.

The unanimous ruling is mostly a win for Smith’s team, with the judges agreeing with prosecutors that Trump’s often-incendiary comments about participants in the case can have a damaging practical impact and rejecting claims by defense attorneys that restrictions on the ex-president’s speech amount to an unconstitutional muzzling. It lays out fresh parameters about what Trump can and cannot say about the case as he both prepares for a March trial and campaigns to reclaim the White House.
Appeals court in DC part of the swamp critters call me shocked
 

Forum List

Back
Top