Lord Long Rod
Diamond Member
- Jan 17, 2023
- 7,706
- 8,137
- 2,138
- Banned
- #21
I studied it at your alma mater, the University of I Don’t Know Shit.But you're fluent in magaturdese.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I studied it at your alma mater, the University of I Don’t Know Shit.But you're fluent in magaturdese.
Why are you insinuating that these people are racist?!? You a fucking deranged!They’re unstable because they responded with guns to peaceful citizens passing by their house who posed no threat – typical of the racist right they incorrectly believe that Americans of color are ‘predisposed’ to violence.
You're confused. A Trump U education might do that to you.I studied it at your alma mater, the University of I Don’t Know Shit.
I also think gated communities are bad.Obviously, not when it is done in an act of self-defense against an angry mob which broke into my gated community then trespasses onto my property threateningly refusing to leave.
But then, look who I'm talking to, a total idiot.
But let me threaten your wife or family and see how many picoseconds it takes you to whip out a weapon defending them, then we can talk about who is really deranged, or would you just stand there with your dick in your hands?
St. Louis lawyer Mark McCloskey has lost another round in his effort to reclaim firearms he and his wife agreed to surrender when they pleaded guilty to misdemeanors in 2021.
These are the whack-jobs who waved guns at protestors, then plead guilty to it to avoid jail time, and were later pardoned by a republican governor they had donated a lot of money to.
They don't need guns, they are obviously unstable.
The government kept about $3000 of their property, dumbass.They can always buy more guns.
I personally think anyone who brandishes a weapon as a threat is deranged. Don't you?
If they want guns on hand, they'll have to buy new ones. They may pay more in legal fees to try and get their guns back than they're worth. How hard to understand is that?The government kept about $3000 of their property, dumbass.
Its almost like they wanted to blow each other's heads off.I have no problems with guns. I have a problem with people who handle their guns like this.
View attachment 879495
View attachment 879499
View attachment 879500
So now you think them unstable because a mob broke into their gated community, threatened them on their own property and they got their guns out to protect themselves?
Where do you live again?
The courts allow that if a person feels threatened, they are threatened. Trigger happy cops legally kill people who are 'threatening' them even when they actually aren't.they were not threatened
You apparently have a hard time understanding that government expropriated their property, which is a constitutional violation.If they want guns on hand, they'll have to buy new ones. They may pay more in legal fees to try and get their guns back than they're worth. How hard to understand is that?
they were not threatened
With all the money he blew on this case he could have bought more guns.St. Louis lawyer Mark McCloskey has lost another round in his effort to reclaim firearms he and his wife agreed to surrender when they pleaded guilty to misdemeanors in 2021.
These are the whack-jobs who waved guns at protestors, then plead guilty to it to avoid jail time, and were later pardoned by a republican governor they had donated a lot of money to.
They don't need guns, they are obviously unstable.
Since they both came outside carrying assault style rifles to meet the crowd, offhand I'd say your claim is obviously total BS. The very fact that they broke through past the gate and refused to leave are alone two forms of threatening behavior.
Them being cowardly snowflakes does not mean they were threatened. They were passing through the neighborhood, like people do all the time. These "gated" communities are not really gated at all, I used to run though this very neighborhood when I was on recruiting duty in St Louis
Somehow I doubt a couple carrying rifles prepared to use them are best termed "cowardly snowflakes."Them being cowardly snowflakes does not mean they were threatened.
Let me guess: they were on a drive for the local Mormon Church?They were passing through the neighborhood, like people do all the time.
Delivering pizzas, caddying, or driving one of the limousines?These "gated" communities are not really gated at all, I used to run though this very neighborhood when I was on recruiting duty in St Louis
Good, they obviously should not own guns without some formal training, at the very least.St. Louis lawyer Mark McCloskey has lost another round in his effort to reclaim firearms he and his wife agreed to surrender when they pleaded guilty to misdemeanors in 2021.
These are the whack-jobs who waved guns at protestors, then plead guilty to it to avoid jail time, and were later pardoned by a republican governor they had donated a lot of money to.
They don't need guns, they are obviously unstable.