Brand new Met Office research: The modeling is wrong

[skookerasbil]

Henry Bodkin 18 September 2017 • 7:15pm

"Climate change poses less of an immediate threat to the planet than previously thought because scientists got their modelling wrong, a new study has found. New research by British scientists reveals the world is being polluted and warming up less quickly than 10-year-old forecasts predicted, giving countries more time to get a grip on their carbon output."

"They also condemned the “overreaction” to the US’s withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord, announced by Donald Trump in June, saying it is unlikely to make a significant difference.

According to the models used to draw up the agreement, the world ought now to be 1.3 degrees above the mid-19th-Century average, whereas the most recent observations suggest it is actually between 0.9 to 1 degree above."


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/09/18/immediacy-threat-climate-change-exaggerated-faulty-models/





W0W.........bad news for the climate k00ks. Oh......and a top story on DRUDGE right now!!

 

[skookerasbil]

BTW.....just more fodder that the folks who subscribe to the alarmist view hook line and stinker are born suckers.........and let me tell you, its a hoot to make fun of these hopeless OCD's

 

[skookerasbil]

"Before my life went dim" >>


Dim by dada

 

[cnm]

So, good to see you accepting reports that AGW is a thing and that amelioration may be possible if sufficient action is taken. Admitting the only mistakes in the models being a matter of 17 years, which is nothing in such a complex matter, really, is deserving of praise. Kudos, it's pretty big of you to come out with this after all your denial. Keep it up.

The discrepancy means nations could continue emitting carbon dioxide at the current rate for another 20 years before the target was breached, instead of the three to five predicted by the previous model.​

 

[skookerasbil]

So, good to see you accepting reports that AGW is a thing and that amelioration may be possible if sufficient action is taken. Admitting the only mistakes in the models being a matter of 17 years, which is nothing in such a complex matter, really, is deserving of praise. Kudos, it's pretty big of you to come out with this after all your denial. Keep it up.

The discrepancy means nations could continue emitting carbon dioxide at the current rate for another 20 years before the target was breached, instead of the three to five predicted by the previous model.​

less than 1 degree

Guess what s0n..........nobody cares

World governments certainly aren't caring........fossil fuels are going to dominate for decades!! You hysterical green fools cant connect the dots on this. Renewable energy is going to have bones thrown to them just to keep the climate obsessed all fuzzy. Indeed......in the real world, the science isn't mattering.

 

[cnm]

Guess what s0n..........nobody cares

Only 17 years out in a situation you've sworn blind didn't exist. Congratulations on posting information putting you in the warmers' camp. Because that's what you've done. Kudos. Welcome, brother.

 

[cnm]

Just quoting for posterity

Henry Bodkin 18 September 2017 • 7:15pm

"Climate change poses less of an immediate threat to the planet than previously thought because scientists got their modelling wrong, a new study has found. New research by British scientists reveals the world is being polluted and warming up less quickly than 10-year-old forecasts predicted, giving countries more time to get a grip on their carbon output."

"They also condemned the “overreaction” to the US’s withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord, announced by Donald Trump in June, saying it is unlikely to make a significant difference.

According to the models used to draw up the agreement, the world ought now to be 1.3 degrees above the mid-19th-Century average, whereas the most recent observations suggest it is actually between 0.9 to 1 degree above."


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/09/18/immediacy-threat-climate-change-exaggerated-faulty-models/





W0W.........bad news for the climate k00ks. Oh......and a top story on DRUDGE right now!!

 

[cnm]

And again,

BTW.....just more fodder that the folks who subscribe to the alarmist view hook line and stinker are born suckers.........and let me tell you, its a hoot to make fun of these hopeless OCD's

 

[Peach]

I read 1 degree in 2004. So, snooker is pleased it isn't 1.4 degrees and thinks that means something?

 

[skookerasbil]

Guess what s0n..........nobody cares

Only 17 years out in a situation you've sworn blind didn't exist. Congratulations on posting information putting you in the warmers' camp. Because that's what you've done. Kudos. Welcome, brother.

lol.........17 years........1,000 years. Who cares? It only matters who's winning in the real world. Speak to me when climate change is actually discussed in a presidential debate s0n!! Or when some climate legislation is actually even brought the floor in congress!! Or better yet...........when solar energy actually breaks providing us with 2% of our electricity! Munch

 

[skookerasbil]

Who's not winning?

Germany to Add Most Coal-Fired Plants in Two Decades, IWR Says

 

[skookerasbil]

Yuk.......yuk..........China coal production ^ of 50% by 2050!!!

https://www.nap.edu/read/11977/chapter/4#41


Oh but excuse me.........I'm the asshole here!!!

 

[skookerasbil]

What a surprise...........the alarmist contingent cant see this thread fall off the first page fast enough!!!


Who's not winning?

 

[Billy_Bob]

Who's not winning?

Germany to Add Most Coal-Fired Plants in Two Decades, IWR Says

And they are using scrubber technology that we used in the demilitarization of chemical weapons. The CMDS site (Chemical Munitions Disposal Site - Tooele Army Depot South Area) in the 1980's had an output of 99.999% water vapor as it destroyed nerve agents and persistent agents like mustard gas. And the whole world can use it... There is no reason to stop using coal or other fossil fuels.

 

[skookerasbil]

Who's not winning?

Germany to Add Most Coal-Fired Plants in Two Decades, IWR Says

And they are using scrubber technology that we used in the demilitarization of chemical weapons. The CMDS site (Chemical Munitions Disposal Site - Tooele Army Depot South Area) in the 1980's had an output of 99.999% water vapor as it destroyed nerve agents and persistent agents like mustard gas. And the whole world can use it... There is no reason to stop using coal or other fossil fuels.

No worries.............coal is going to dominate world energy for many decades to come. That's what any reputable projection says........only ones disagreeing are from green organizations................duh

 

[SSDD]

So, good to see you accepting reports that AGW is a thing and that amelioration may be possible if sufficient action is taken. Admitting the only mistakes in the models being a matter of 17 years, which is nothing in such a complex matter, really, is deserving of praise. Kudos, it's pretty big of you to come out with this after all your denial. Keep it up.

The discrepancy means nations could continue emitting carbon dioxide at the current rate for another 20 years before the target was breached, instead of the three to five predicted by the previous model.​

AGW isn't a thing...it is a fraud but you don't really expect them to step up and admit that they have been dead wrong all along do you?...like the slow incremental decrease of the climate sensitivity to CO2 figures, the admission that it has all been a big boo boo will take some time...but it will come and all you losers who have staked so much mental energy and faith into defending the crummy science will just have to apologize for being idiots.

At least the admission should put an end to the absolutely idiotic idea of the science being settled....maybe they are on the cusp of tossing out the pseudoscience and actually getting down to doing some science.