- Thread starter
- #41
This is about the author's opinions: After listening to Monday’s opening statement by prosecutors, I still think the Manhattan D.A. has made a historic mistake. Their vague allegation about “a criminal scheme to corrupt the 2016 presidential election” has me more concerned than ever about their unprecedented use of state law and their persistent avoidance of specifying an election crime or a valid theory of fraud.So, no crime. Just the covering up of an act that isn't in any way criminal.
So why try and cover up something that isn't a crime, and, more to the point, is that even possible in non retard land?
So you disagree with:
JED HANDELSMAN SHUGERMAN
Bragg's Case against Trump, a Legal Embarrassment, a Historic Mistake?
I've gone on record saying it was enough for me to see Mr. Trump brought before justice. Any specific outcome matters less to me. There are general and nuanced arguments out there from many scholars, and armchair legal experts. On social media and places like usmb, I see the average person...
www.usmessageboard.com