del
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #81
Thank you for proving my point with a link. Does this mean you agree the BSA should pay their way if they want the benefits of a private organization or are you still in Liberal Land where you want them to use the city owned property for free while practicing discrimination?
Liberal land? HAHAHAHHAHAHA - No I want the city to uphold their end of the lease agreement, $1 per year as long as the BSA upholds their end and keeps the building maintained. Notice that nowhere in there is the city given the right to determine the BSA's membership rules. I would equally defend a group of homosexuals who had a signed lease if the city was trying to define their membership or kick them out.
So Equal Rights Laws are not applicable because of an older contract? Do you know how many businesses had city contracts who had to desegregate because of the ERA? The City has been trying to hold up it's end of the Lease but the BSA wants to discriminate which violates the City's law.
(Many people here defending the BSA are often bitching about "States Rights" on other issues but suddenly......the Feds are Cream Puff Gods!!!!)
no, i don't. would you please tell me how many businesses had to desegregate because of the ERA?
dope