Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
SCOTUS did no such thing. The SAVE program is clearly based on legislation passed years ago.
I don’t know what the “Expected PLUS loan program” is. Do you have a source for this?Did you know the SAVE program is not the Excepted PLUS loan program you tried to pass off as an allowance for Biden's illegals debt transfer?
How did the USSC get their decision so wrong?^
Since the Wharton analysis isn’t published, it’s entirely unclear whether they’re referring to the new program or the entire thing.It also noted that the most event loan forgiveness program has a 84 Billion price tag
Trust meLow income people barely pay taxes and will take far more from the government than they pay into it.
The article posted did note that 84 Billion price tag for the most recent forgiveness programSince the Wharton analysis isn’t published, it’s entirely unclear whether they’re referring to the new program or the entire thing.
Skilled tradesmen aren’t low income tax payers, which is who you had claimed were subsidizing the college loans.Trust me
Blue collar workers pay taxes
Plumbers, electricians and others are skilled tradesmen who earn enough to support themselves along with extra for the clueless college kids with useless sociology degrees
They are lower income than the pampered college gradsSkilled tradesmen aren’t low income tax payers, which is who you had claimed were subsidizing the college loans.
It kills me how you guys can act like judgmental assholes all the time and scream bloody murder when anyone gives you back that same energy.They are lower income than the pampered college grads
As for the low, LOW income college students with useless degrees they should have made better use of the money they borrowed
You are starting to get the ideaSkilled tradesmen make good money, but lower than college educated. But college educated don’t make much money because they have useless degrees.
And yet those who go to college wind up earning far more than those who don’t.You are starting to get the idea
Stop sending young people to college to study useless subjects and then gouging them with skyhigh tuition
Maybe some of them should consider a trade instead of wasting their time in college
Now you are trying to have it both waysAnd yet those who go to college wind up earning far more than those who don’t.
I have nothing against trades and think they’re valuable to society as well.
The only one devaluing anyone here is you.
They’re not being compensated by taxpayers who earn less.Now you are trying to have it both ways
Since you admit college grads earn more they dont deserve to be compensated by taxpayers who did not go to college and earn less
The Expected PLUS loan program is the reference within your post #81.I don’t know what the “Expected PLUS loan program” is. Do you have a source for this?
The SAVE program has nothing to do with the SC decision. It’s an income driven repayment plan, I showed you the legislation that enables cancellation of student loans under the program.
Helps them become deadbeats, that is.96% of the package helps those under that income level.
Nothing wrong with taking advantage of a student loan forgiveness program.Helps them become deadbeats, that is.
It’s just one type of loan not covered by the plan. others are. No big deal.The Expected PLUS loan program is the reference within your post #81.
If you forgive their student loan thats taxpayer compensationThey’re not being compensated by taxpayers who earn less.
