Because He Said So

[Lastamender]

In one lawsuit, Hannah found the company in contempt for failing to turn over public records and ordered the daily fine. They were fined.

The second one is ongoing; Judge Michael Kemp ordered CEO Doug Logan to appear for a deposition by Jan. 27 or risk sanctions and a civil arrest warrant. The people you are defending have violated the law.

So are you. What do you think the fake administration is but criminals?

 

[BWK]

So are you. What do you think the fake administration is but criminals?

What about ism is not an argument. It's an admission of failure against my argument. Face it, you're just a loser.

 

[Lastamender]

What about ism is not an argument. It's an admission of failure against my argument. Face it, you're just a loser.

You are the one who can't prove what he says. No audits were illegal.

 

[BWK]

You are the one who can't prove what he says. No audits were illegal.

The U.S. Department of Justice cautioned states on Wednesday that undertaking partisan election audits like the one underway in Arizona could violate federal law, sending a warning shot to states as more Republican state lawmakers move forward with their own controversial probes. You're just an ignoramus.

 

[Lastamender]

The U.S. Department of Justice cautioned states on Wednesday that undertaking partisan election audits like the one underway in Arizona could violate federal law, sending a warning shot to states as more Republican state lawmakers move forward with their own controversial probes. You're just an ignoramus.

could violate federal law,
Dumbass.

 

[BWK]

could violate federal law,
Dumbass.

Key word potato head, "undertake." Meaning, it was written as a warning if they did.

 

[Lastamender]

Key word potato head, "undertake." Meaning, it was written as a warning if they did.

You mean they were trying to intimidate people.That is what fascists do, dweeb. It didn't work.

 

[BWK]

You are the one who can't prove what he says. No audits were illegal.

I already did.

 

[hunarcy]

"Delusional" characterizes the inability to handle the vote totals certified by 50 states under both Republican and Democratic administrations, and officially recognized by Congress with the Vice President presiding: 81,268,924 for the President; 74,216,154 for the Loser.

Electoral vote	306	232

Would Obama have won by an even wider margin over Trump? Your speculation is entirely plausible.

So, you have decided that a law that received overwhelming support by Pennsylvania Republicans is a case of Democratic cheating, and is unconstitutional because Trump lost, yet the Supreme Court has not decided that it is unconstitutional?

Some cling to this pretext after the Loser lost, all his other fake claims and his goon attack on the Capitol having fizzled.

The law, Act 77, allows all Pennsylvanians to request and to return, a mail-in ballot with no excuse. Eleven of the 14 House GOP lawmakers who filed the suit voted for the law. Two were not in the General Assembly at the time. And one, state Rep. David Zimmerman, R-Lancaster, voted against it.​

Act 77 was implemented in 2019 with Republican support. But Republicans changed their views on the law after Trump lost the state, with many of them embracing the former president’s false claims that widespread fraud tied to mail-in ballots was behind his defeat... More than 2.6 million Pennsylvanians voted by mail in the election. After a campaign that saw Trump repeatedly disparage voting by mail, roughly three-quarters of ballots cast by mail selected Biden.​

​

Over two-and-a-half million Americans having their votes nullified is not about to happen, nor would it impact the outcome.

Didn't read the article? The Pennsylvania Supreme Court decided it was unconstitutional under the State Constitution.

 

[Lastamender]

I already did.

No, you did not.

 

[schmidlap]

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court decided it was unconstitutional under the State Constitution.

Mail-in voting was overwhelmingly supported by Republican legislators in Pennsylvania, and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that the proper procedure had not been followed in its adoption.

There is no suggestion that the vote was illegitimate or inaccurate and, consequently, no Republican is contesting it in any legal venue anywhere. That does not mean that the cult of Trumpery has accepted reality.

Some losers are still ineffectually whining about it.

In her ruling, Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt, a Republican, wrote: “No-excuse mail-in voting makes the exercise of the franchise more convenient and has been used four times in the history of Pennsylvania. If presented to the people, a constitutional amendment to end the Article VII, Section 1 requirement of in-person voting is likely to be adopted. But a constitutional amendment must be presented to the people and adopted into our fundamental law before legislation authorizing no-excuse mail-in voting can 'be placed upon our statute books'.”​

​

... Representatives from the Trump campaign have spouted fiery rhetoric about electoral fraud on a grand scale. But in courts of law, where proof is required and where there are penalties for lying, they haven’t provided evidence or alleged that even one vote in Pennsylvania was deliberately cast illegally. Rather, their legal efforts have been aimed at disqualifying votes that all evidence shows were legitimately cast under rules they disagree with.​

​

As Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, said in dismissing one campaign challenge last month: “Calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”​

Fact-checking false claims about Pennsylvaniaâs presidential election by Trump and his allies

President Donald Trump’s relentless and false attacks on the results in Pennsylvania as the product of widespread fraud are completely disconnected from reality.

www.inquirer.com

​

​

In Pennsylvania, the GOP’s website promotes voting by mail: "Vote Safe: By mail. From home!”​

​

 

[Lastamender]

Mail-in voting was overwhelmingly supported by Republican legislators in Pennsylvania, and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that the proper procedure had not been followed in its adoption.

There is no suggestion that the vote was illegitimate or inaccurate and, consequently, no Republican is contesting it in any legal venue anywhere. That does not mean that the cult of Trumpery has accepted reality.

Some losers are still ineffectually whining about it.

In her ruling, Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt, a Republican, wrote: “No-excuse mail-in voting makes the exercise of the franchise more convenient and has been used four times in the history of Pennsylvania. If presented to the people, a constitutional amendment to end the Article VII, Section 1 requirement of in-person voting is likely to be adopted. But a constitutional amendment must be presented to the people and adopted into our fundamental law before legislation authorizing no-excuse mail-in voting can 'be placed upon our statute books'.”​

​

... Representatives from the Trump campaign have spouted fiery rhetoric about electoral fraud on a grand scale. But in courts of law, where proof is required and where there are penalties for lying, they haven’t provided evidence or alleged that even one vote in Pennsylvania was deliberately cast illegally. Rather, their legal efforts have been aimed at disqualifying votes that all evidence shows were legitimately cast under rules they disagree with.​

​

As Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, said in dismissing one campaign challenge last month: “Calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”​

Fact-checking false claims about Pennsylvaniaâs presidential election by Trump and his allies

President Donald Trump’s relentless and false attacks on the results in Pennsylvania as the product of widespread fraud are completely disconnected from reality.

www.inquirer.com

​

​

In Pennsylvania, the GOP’s website promotes voting by mail: "Vote Safe: By mail. From home!”​

​

Same old. It convinces the weak minded, the scared shitless, and idiots like yourself.

 

[schmidlap]

Same old. It convinces the weak minded, the scared shitless, and idiots like yourself.

You appear to be utterly devoid of even remotely rational, coherent excuses for your mindless weird worship of one weird dude.

Your blind faith is impervious to the indisputable reality that not even the most virulent Trumpy, anywhere in America, is able to contrive even a feeble pretense to challenge the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election in any legal venue.

 

[Lastamender]

You appear to be utterly devoid of even remotely rational, coherent excuses for your mindless weird worship of one weird dude.

Your blind faith is impervious to the indisputable reality that not even the most virulent Trumpy, anywhere in America, is able to contrive even a feeble pretense to challenge the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election in any legal venue.

I never said one thing that hints at worship of Trump. Why do you accuse me of something I have not done? I have stated numerous times it is his policies I support. There is no need to worship him to agree with him.

The 2020 election was stolen and it will be proven. You will remain a piss poor shill repeating yourself for eternity.

 

[BWK]

You appear to be utterly devoid of even remotely rational, coherent excuses for your mindless weird worship of one weird dude.

Your blind faith is impervious to the indisputable reality that not even the most virulent Trumpy, anywhere in America, is able to contrive even a feeble pretense to challenge the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election in any legal venue.

And they aren't about to. Not one.

 

[Lastamender]

And they aren't about to. Not one.

You do not even know what you think until you are told. I would not put much stock in what you think others think.

 

[schmidlap]

The 2020 election was stolen and it will be proven...

I have stated numerous times it is his policies I support.

In the sweet by and by you will have pie in the sky when you die.

As noted, in this existence, no one, anywhere, is actually contesting the certified election, although some losers keep whining about it.

If you were enthused about the Cry Baby Loser's building his "big, beautiful wall!" and making Mexico pay for it, repealing 'ObamaCare' and replacing it with "something terrific!", resurrecting coal mining, reviving the steel industry, restoring manufacturing, and rebuilding the nation's crumbling infrastructure, you'll just have to bask in the afterglow, and take solace in his only have increased unemployment by 2%, and increased the ranks of the uninsured by only 2 million.

When the American electorate threw Trump out of office at its first opportunity, he had only raised the federal budget deficit to five times what it was when he first took office, while he managed to grow the public debt by nearly $8 trillion.

Then and now (January, 2021)

Federal Budget Deficit​

​

Then: $584 billion (FY 2016)​

​

Now: $3.3 trillion (FY 2020)​

​

Federal Public Debt​

​

Then: $19.9 trillion (Jan. 2017)​

​

Now: $27.7 trillion (Dec. 2020)​

​

Americans Without Health Insurance​

​

Then: 28.1 million (2016)​

​

Now: 26.1 million (2019)​

​

Number of Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives​

​

When Trump arrived: 241​

​

When Trump absconded: 211​

​

Number of Republicans in the U.S. Senate​

​

When Trump arrived: 52​

​

When Trump absconded: 50 (largely thanks to Trump's encouraging Republicans not to vote in Georgia)​

Even his promise to come clean with his tax returns will soon be honored since his attempts to hide them have all failed.

 

[Lastamender]

In the sweet by and by you will have pie in the sky when you die.

As noted, in this existence, no one, anywhere, is actually contesting the certified election, although some losers keep whining about it.

If you were enthused about the Cry Baby Loser's building his "big, beautiful wall!" and making Mexico pay for it, repealing 'ObamaCare' and replacing it with "something terrific!", resurrecting coal mining, reviving the steel industry, restoring manufacturing, and rebuilding the nation's crumbling infrastructure, you'll just have to bask in the afterglow, and take solace in his only have increased unemployment by 2%, and increased the ranks of the uninsured by only 2 million.

When the American electorate threw Trump out of office at its first opportunity, he had only raised the federal budget deficit to five times what it was when he first took office, while he managed to grow the public debt by nearly $8 trillion.

Then and now (January, 2021)

Federal Budget Deficit​

​

Then: $584 billion (FY 2016)​

​

Now: $3.3 trillion (FY 2020)​

​

Federal Public Debt​

​

Then: $19.9 trillion (Jan. 2017)​

​

Now: $27.7 trillion (Dec. 2020)​

​

Americans Without Health Insurance​

​

Then: 28.1 million (2016)​

​

Now: 26.1 million (2019)​

​

Number of Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives​

​

When Trump arrived: 241​

​

When Trump absconded: 211​

​

Number of Republicans in the U.S. Senate​

​

When Trump arrived: 52​

​

When Trump absconded: 50 (largely thanks to Trump's encouraging Republicans not to vote in Georgia)​

Even his promise to come clean with his tax returns will soon be honored since his attempts to hide them have all failed.

View attachment 601392​

You really think I am going to look at that bullshit? You got it bad, shill.

 

[schmidlap]

And they aren't about to. Not one.

The crazies who might have persisted in wasting the court's time seem distracted by legal jeopardy of their own.

 

[schmidlap]

You really think I am going to look at that bullshit?

Of course not. It's objective, empirical data!

​