Because He Said So

[BWK]

"Delusional" characterizes the inability to handle the vote totals certified by 50 states under both Republican and Democratic administrations, and officially recognized by Congress with the Vice President presiding: 81,268,924 for the President; 74,216,154 for the Loser.

Electoral vote	306	232

Would Obama has won by an even wider margin over Trump? Your speculation is entirely plausible.

So, you have decided that a law that received overwhelming support by Pennsylvania Republicans is a case of Democratic cheating, and is unconstitutional because Trump lost, yet the Supreme Court has not decided that it is unconstitutional?

Some cling to this pretext after the Loser lost, all his other fake claims and his goon attack on the Capitol having fizzled.

The law, Act 77, allows all Pennsylvanians to request and to return, a mail-in ballot with no excuse. Eleven of the 14 House GOP lawmakers who filed the suit voted for the law. Two were not in the General Assembly at the time. And one, state Rep. David Zimmerman, R-Lancaster, voted against it.​

Act 77 was implemented in 2019 with Republican support. But Republicans changed their views on the law after Trump lost the state, with many of them embracing the former president’s false claims that widespread fraud tied to mail-in ballots was behind his defeat... More than 2.6 million Pennsylvanians voted by mail in the election. After a campaign that saw Trump repeatedly disparage voting by mail, roughly three-quarters of ballots cast by mail selected Biden.​

​

Over two-and-a-half million Americans having their votes nullified is not about to happen, nor would it impact the outcome.

Mail-in backfired for Republicans, because it gave those who couldn't vote from the 1688 poll closings in minority areas, the chance to vote again. Which actually hijacked their own scheme to disenfranchise minority voters. Minorities were motivated once they discovered what the GOP was doing. It's all about denying their votes.

I'm not sure enough people truly understand the scope of this problem. Without a doubt, millions of minorities lost their ability to vote, when polls closed in their districts. That is why early voting, mail-in, absentee, and Sunday voting have to be a priority. It's how Biden won. And what's the Right doing? Trying to take all that away by declaring these voting tactics unconstitutional, when none of them are. They are fair tactics in a world where the GOP is trying to take the right of voting away.

 

[BWK]

You TRULY believe that Biden was so much more popular than Obama that he got that many more votes? You're delusional.

And I didn't say anything about Trump's claims. I talked about how rules were changed to benefit Democrats. For example, Pennsylvania's mail in voting rule changes were unconstitutional. Pennsylvania’s mail voting law ruled unconstitutional, but remains in place as Wolf appeals | Spotlight PA

Explain to us in detail, how mail-in is unconstitutional? With the GOP closing down 1688 polling places to keep minorities from voting, now that would be a case for something unconstitutional. Wouldn't you agree?

 

[BWK]

Enough to decertify the election in three counties.

Non answer. Try again.

 

[schmidlap]

Mail-in backfired for Republicans, because it gave those who couldn't vote from the 1688 poll closings in minority areas, the chance to vote again. Which actually hijacked their own scheme to disenfranchise minority voters. Minorities were motivated once they discovered what the GOP was doing. It's all about denying their votes.

I'm not sure enough people truly understand the scope of this problem. Without a doubt, millions of minorities lost their ability to vote, when polls closed in their districts. That is why early voting, mail-in, absentee, and Sunday voting have to be a priority. It's how Biden won. And what's the Right doing? Trying to take all that away by declaring these voting tactics unconstitutional, when none of them are. They are fair tactics in a world where the GOP is trying to take the right of voting away.

Trump (who mailed in his ballot) was raving against mail-in ballots (despite states such as Utah having long demonstrated their reliability.) How many of the Loser's lickspittles embraced his maligning the practice and failed to vote?

Trump Lost in Georgia after Depressing GOP Mail-In Vote
​

Trump may rail against mail-in ballots in public, but state and local Republicans are quietly telling Americans that’s exactly how they should vote.​

​

In Iowa, the Republican Party mailed absentee ballot applications to voters without waiting for requests. ​

In Pennsylvania, the GOP’s website promotes voting by mail: "Vote Safe: By mail. From home.”​

​

`Mail-In - Republican Party of Pennsylvania`​

And in Ohio, the Republican Party sent mailers with Trump’s photo saying

“Join President Trump and Vote by Absentee Ballot.”​

Republicans quietly push mail-in voting despite Trump claims

Even Trump’s own campaign is encouraging absentee voting, which the president claims is different.

www.politico.com

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

 

[BWK]

Trump (who mailed in his ballot) was raving against mail-in ballots (despite states such as Utah having long demonstrated their reliability.) How many of the Loser's lickspittles embraced his maligning the practice and failed to vote?

Trump Lost in Georgia after Depressing GOP Mail-In Vote
​

Trump may rail against mail-in ballots in public, but state and local Republicans are quietly telling Americans that’s exactly how they should vote.​

​

In Iowa, the Republican Party mailed absentee ballot applications to voters without waiting for requests. ​

In Pennsylvania, the GOP’s website promotes voting by mail: "Vote Safe: By mail. From home.”​

​

View attachment 598775​

`Mail-In - Republican Party of Pennsylvania`​

And in Ohio, the Republican Party sent mailers with Trump’s photo saying

​

“Join President Trump and Vote by Absentee Ballot.”​

Republicans quietly push mail-in voting despite Trump claims

Even Trump’s own campaign is encouraging absentee voting, which the president claims is different.

www.politico.com

​

​

​

View attachment 598777​

​

​

​

​

​

​

Exactly! If they weren't so obvious, they wouldn't be Republicans.

 

[schmidlap]

Exactly! If they weren't so obvious, they wouldn't be Republicans.

Making the point, via documentation, that Republicans, in Pennsylvania and elsewhere, were enthusiastically hyping mail-in voting, and even encouraging Republicans to emulate Trump by doing so, wreaks havoc with Trumpified dogmatists.

The gross inconsistency in fact vs doctrine could well induce a fugue state.

 

[Lastamender]

Non answer. Try again.

That was not a non answer. That is a factual answer. The 2020 election had no integrity.

 

[Lastamender]

Maricopa County Chain of Custody Failure
740,000 Ballots Have No Documented Chain of Custody
That is a lot of votes. There really is no choice but to decertify the election.


The violations identified are important because failure to maintain chain of custody and properly document ballot retrieval and transport makes it impossible to verify the origin of the ballots counted in an election. Arizona Law outlines specific requirements for secure ballot retrieval and chain of custody procedures for the transfer of voted ballots from drop boxes and vote centers. Maricopa County officials violated Arizona law and do not have the required chain of custody for at least 740,000 ballots.

Verity Vote: Research & Investigations

verityvote.us

 

[Lastamender]

Exhibit A
Elections Procedures Manual Requirement: “When the secure ballot container is
opened by the County Recorder or officer in charge of elections (or designee),
the number of ballots inside the container shall be counted and noted on the
retrieval form.” Without this count, there is no way to determine if the transport
staff retrieved one ballot or one thousand ballots.
1514 out of 1895 unique EVBTS forms have no ballot counts

5
Elections Procedures Manual Requirement: “For any election that includes a
partisan race, at least two designated ballot retrievers of at least two differing
party preferences shall be assigned to retrieve voted ballots from a ballot drop-
off location or drop-box.”
48 out of 1895 unique EVBTS had either one retriever signature or no
signatures.

Maricopa-Chain-of-Custody-Failure.pdf

 

[Lastamender]

We the People AZ Alliance

A Broken Oath is Treason Holding our Elected Accountable Join the fight, keep informed and take action!

wethepeopleazalliance.com

Policy Doesn't Mean a Thing​

Maricopa County elections department claims it is policy to have two people in the server room whenever someone is using the server room (KVM) keyboard video monitor. This video clearly shows that policy means nothing to anyone at the MCTEC. These videos are to show the blatant disregard for any laws, rules or statutes and is a clear indicator that there is plenty of willfully negligent and potentially unscrupulous people involved in our elections.

The link I supplied has videos of the clusterfuck. Lots of laws being broken.

 

[Lastamender]

These are election workers putting ballot envelopes into a sensitive data shred bin that should be locked. Later you see an election supervisor pulling them back out the next day. These videos are to show the blatant disregard for any laws, rules or statutes and is a clear indicator that there is plenty of willfully negligent and potentially unscrupulous people involved in our elections.

No evidence? Why aren't state officials acting on this crap?

 

[BWK]

That was not a non answer. That is a factual answer. The 2020 election had no integrity.

Right, because it's backed up by documented nothings.

 

[Lastamender]

Right, because it's backed up by documented nothings.

You did not look at the link. There is documentation that shows no ballot counts on ballots received. There are also transport forms with only one signature not the two required, So, you are stupid and lazy.

The election has 0 integrity. Period.

 

[BWK]

Maricopa County Chain of Custody Failure
740,000 Ballots Have No Documented Chain of Custody
That is a lot of votes. There really is no choice but to decertify the election.


The violations identified are important because failure to maintain chain of custody and properly document ballot retrieval and transport makes it impossible to verify the origin of the ballots counted in an election. Arizona Law outlines specific requirements for secure ballot retrieval and chain of custody procedures for the transfer of voted ballots from drop boxes and vote centers. Maricopa County officials violated Arizona law and do not have the required chain of custody for at least 740,000 ballots.

Verity Vote: Research & Investigations

verityvote.us

The officials you referred to, broke the law. They broke the law with their illegal audits, while claiming no chain of custody. They violated protocol. What you are trying to pedal is illegal. We said this from the beginning, and the Right kept on muddying the waters. They don't have any sense;
This chain of custody has now been broken in Maricopa County. The state Senate and its consultants have physical possession of nearly 2.1 million November election ballots, meaning that Arizona election officials are no longer “retaining and preserving” election ballots. After the Senate completes its work and the ballots have been handled by an untold number of individuals employed by the state Senate or its consultant, it will be impossible for anyone to confirm or refute the results.

Once the chain of custody is broken, the ballots are no longer genuine according to federal election law. Would it have been possible to conduct an audit as envisioned by the Arizona Senate and at the same time comply with federal records retention law? Yes, it is possible. Rather than breaking the official chain of custody, the Arizona election officials should have either made paper copies of the ballots or scanned the ballots for viewing electronically.

Arizona audit ignores federal law on election records

 

[BWK]

You did not look at the link. There is documentation that shows no ballot counts on ballots received. There are also transport forms with only one signature not the two required, So, you are stupid and lazy.
View attachment 598840

Are you brain dead? Do you not understand simple rules of engagement? You are showing me the result of illegal audits.

 

[Lastamender]

Are you brain dead? Do you not understand simple rules of engagement? You are showing me the result of illegal audits.

Really stamped by Maricopa County? No, this shows the election was a joke. And what audit was illegal, you fucking dumbass?

4
Exhibit A
Elections Procedures Manual Requirement: “When the secure ballot container is
opened by the County Recorder or officer in charge of elections (or designee),
the number of ballots inside the container shall be counted and noted on the
retrieval form.” Without this count, there is no way to determine if the transport
staff retrieved one ballot or one thousand ballots.
1514 out of 1895 unique EVBTS forms have no ballot counts

Busted.

 

[BWK]

Really stamped by Maricopa County? No, this shows the election was a joke. And what audit was illegal, you fucking dumbass?

Those were companies hired to do the audits. That's illegal. You are too fucking ignorant.

 

[BWK]

Really stamped by Maricopa County? No, this shows the election was a joke. And what audit was illegal, you fucking dumbass?

4
Exhibit A
Elections Procedures Manual Requirement: “When the secure ballot container is
opened by the County Recorder or officer in charge of elections (or designee),
the number of ballots inside the container shall be counted and noted on the
retrieval form.” Without this count, there is no way to determine if the transport
staff retrieved one ballot or one thousand ballots.
1514 out of 1895 unique EVBTS forms have no ballot counts

Stamped doesn't mean shit. Illegal audits do.

 

[Lastamender]

Those were companies hired to do the audits. That's illegal. You are too fucking ignorant.

What companies, that information is from Maricopa County records. Name the company you think that documentation is from.

And, again you dumbass, what is illegal about hiring anyone to do an audit? I'll wait fool.

 

[Lastamender]

Stamped doesn't mean shit. Illegal audits do.

How is an audit illegal? You cannot answer, can you?

So, certifications of the election were stamped. Does that make them illegal too? What you see is evidence the election was fraudulent because of the laws clearly broken and you cannot handle it.