Barr Brings Accountability: Trump’s foes call it ‘stunning and scary.’

The Purge

Platinum Member
Aug 16, 2018
17,881
7,860
400
It’s enough to give a sane man the willies, but Barr appears up to the task.

In a senate hearing, some demonRAT female bitch axed Barr, “You don’t really mean that Trump was actually spied on”?

“Oh yes," .... (and I’m gonna get all the pricks that did it,) Barr replied.

At this point, the emergency Congressional medical team was called in to remove the body of the senator.

The rest of the demonRATs went radio silent.

They know what this means: William Barr is the modern version of Wyatt Earp......and the swamp is Dodge City!


The most inadvertently honest reaction to Attorney General William Barr’s congressional testimony this week came from former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. Mr. Barr had bluntly called out the Federal Bureau of Investigation for “spying” on the Trump campaign in 2016. Mr. Clapper said that was both “stunning and scary.” Indeed.

No doubt a lot of former Obama administration and Hillary Clinton campaign officials, opposition guns for hire, and media members are stunned and scared that the Justice Department finally has a leader willing to address the FBI’s behavior in 2016. They worked very hard to make sure such an accounting never happened. Only in that context can we understand the frantic new Democratic-media campaign to tar the attorney general.

Mr. Barr told the Senate Wednesday that one question he wants answered is why nobody at the FBI briefed the Trump campaign about concerns that low-level aides might have had inappropriate contacts with Russians. That’s “normally” what happens, Mr. Barr said, and the Trump campaign had two obvious people to brief—Rudy Giuliani and Chris Christie, both former federal prosecutors.

It wasn’t only the Trump campaign that the FBI kept in the dark. The bureau routinely briefs Congress on sensitive counterintelligence operations. Yet former Director James Comey admits he deliberately hid his work from both the House and the Senate. And the FBI kept information from yet another overseer, the judicial branch, failing to tell the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that the Clinton campaign

...snip...

Mr. Barr didn’t merely refuse to recuse; he’s made clear he plans to plumb the FBI’s actions thoroughly. That makes him Threat No. 1 to everyone who participated in these abuses, and it’s why the liberal media establishment is now disparaging his integrity. They are stunned and scared—that accountability has returned to the Justice Department.

(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...


xIMrZ8Y.jpg
 
Barr’s investigations are a joke and nobody cares. Infowars fodder.

The full Mueller report better be released.
 
They've already smeared him as a "hand-picked stooge", and that he's peddling tin foil hat conspiracy theories.....As though they weren't with the two-year RUSSIA! collusion delusion.

Further providing more evidence that the Murican left is the least self-aware and introspective bunch on the planet.
 
It’s enough to give a sane man the willies, but Barr appears up to the task.

In a senate hearing, some demonRAT female bitch axed Barr, “You don’t really mean that Trump was actually spied on”?

“Oh yes," .... (and I’m gonna get all the pricks that did it,) Barr replied.

At this point, the emergency Congressional medical team was called in to remove the body of the senator.

The rest of the demonRATs went radio silent.

They know what this means: William Barr is the modern version of Wyatt Earp......and the swamp is Dodge City!


The most inadvertently honest reaction to Attorney General William Barr’s congressional testimony this week came from former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. Mr. Barr had bluntly called out the Federal Bureau of Investigation for “spying” on the Trump campaign in 2016. Mr. Clapper said that was both “stunning and scary.” Indeed.

No doubt a lot of former Obama administration and Hillary Clinton campaign officials, opposition guns for hire, and media members are stunned and scared that the Justice Department finally has a leader willing to address the FBI’s behavior in 2016. They worked very hard to make sure such an accounting never happened. Only in that context can we understand the frantic new Democratic-media campaign to tar the attorney general.

Mr. Barr told the Senate Wednesday that one question he wants answered is why nobody at the FBI briefed the Trump campaign about concerns that low-level aides might have had inappropriate contacts with Russians. That’s “normally” what happens, Mr. Barr said, and the Trump campaign had two obvious people to brief—Rudy Giuliani and Chris Christie, both former federal prosecutors.

It wasn’t only the Trump campaign that the FBI kept in the dark. The bureau routinely briefs Congress on sensitive counterintelligence operations. Yet former Director James Comey admits he deliberately hid his work from both the House and the Senate. And the FBI kept information from yet another overseer, the judicial branch, failing to tell the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that the Clinton campaign

...snip...

Mr. Barr didn’t merely refuse to recuse; he’s made clear he plans to plumb the FBI’s actions thoroughly. That makes him Threat No. 1 to everyone who participated in these abuses, and it’s why the liberal media establishment is now disparaging his integrity. They are stunned and scared—that accountability has returned to the Justice Department.

(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...


xIMrZ8Y.jpg

As long as we can both take our blinders off. These investigations are going to by hypocrisy checks all around.

You don't have your team colors painted on your face fellow posters, do you?
 
Barr’s investigations are a joke and nobody cares. Infowars fodder.

The full Mueller report better be released.

The full unredacted report will NEVER be released. Why? Because Barr doesn't want to go by the way of where Hillary is going for breaking the law.

You people need to understand when someone testifies in front of a grand jury they are told their testimony will be kept secret. Grand Jury testimony is considered classified information. If you make public what they said you are violating their right to privacy. YOUR desire to know what the full report says does not override their right to privacy. If people think that GJ testimony can be made public at a moments notice they just won't testify anymore and the entire grand jury thing will be impotent.
 
Barr’s investigations are a joke and nobody cares. Infowars fodder.

The full Mueller report better be released.


I would disagree on this. The Mueller report undoubtably includes information which could be used to impeach the credibility of those interrogated as part of the Barr Investigation.

Keeping a lid on some of the details could reap indictments and convictions of high ranking people on obstruction charges.
 
It’s enough to give a sane man the willies, but Barr appears up to the task.

In a senate hearing, some demonRAT female bitch axed Barr, “You don’t really mean that Trump was actually spied on”?

“Oh yes," .... (and I’m gonna get all the pricks that did it,) Barr replied.

At this point, the emergency Congressional medical team was called in to remove the body of the senator.

The rest of the demonRATs went radio silent.

They know what this means: William Barr is the modern version of Wyatt Earp......and the swamp is Dodge City!


The most inadvertently honest reaction to Attorney General William Barr’s congressional testimony this week came from former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. Mr. Barr had bluntly called out the Federal Bureau of Investigation for “spying” on the Trump campaign in 2016. Mr. Clapper said that was both “stunning and scary.” Indeed.

No doubt a lot of former Obama administration and Hillary Clinton campaign officials, opposition guns for hire, and media members are stunned and scared that the Justice Department finally has a leader willing to address the FBI’s behavior in 2016. They worked very hard to make sure such an accounting never happened. Only in that context can we understand the frantic new Democratic-media campaign to tar the attorney general.

Mr. Barr told the Senate Wednesday that one question he wants answered is why nobody at the FBI briefed the Trump campaign about concerns that low-level aides might have had inappropriate contacts with Russians. That’s “normally” what happens, Mr. Barr said, and the Trump campaign had two obvious people to brief—Rudy Giuliani and Chris Christie, both former federal prosecutors.

It wasn’t only the Trump campaign that the FBI kept in the dark. The bureau routinely briefs Congress on sensitive counterintelligence operations. Yet former Director James Comey admits he deliberately hid his work from both the House and the Senate. And the FBI kept information from yet another overseer, the judicial branch, failing to tell the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that the Clinton campaign

...snip...

Mr. Barr didn’t merely refuse to recuse; he’s made clear he plans to plumb the FBI’s actions thoroughly. That makes him Threat No. 1 to everyone who participated in these abuses, and it’s why the liberal media establishment is now disparaging his integrity. They are stunned and scared—that accountability has returned to the Justice Department.

(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...


xIMrZ8Y.jpg




SpyGate-600-LI.jpg
 
Barr is doing the job he was hired to do; protect Trump.

All the more reason we need to uncouple the Justice Department from the Executive.



So what are you suggesting? That the Attorney General be elected instead of appointed?

In the past, you had ultraliberal presidents like Obama actually handpick guys like Holder and Lynch for the job. Was that acceptable in your view, having AG's being handpicked?
 
The dems have already begun their usual smear campaign against someone they see as hostile. this in itself has my radar antennae up.

why is he being smeared? because he's redacting the report, as is mandated by law. and because he has inferred that there may be investigations into the basis for this entire debacle, as there should be.

why it is even controversial that these proceedings should be looked at is beyond me.

This isn't rocket science. If all was good, and run between the lines, it will be very, very easy to prove.

If the government was running this outside the limits of the law, this is something that should concern all of us, IMO. They cannot, CANNOT, be allowed to simply ignore the law and do whatever the fuck they please.
 
Barr is doing the job he was hired to do; protect Trump.

All the more reason we need to uncouple the Justice Department from the Executive.



So what are you suggesting? That the Attorney General be elected instead of appointed?

In the past, you had ultraliberal presidents like Obama actually handpick guys like Holder and Lynch for the job. Was that acceptable in your view, having AG's being handpicked?
Holder and Lynch were both Obama's "Wingmen"
 
Barr is doing the job he was hired to do; protect Trump.

All the more reason we need to uncouple the Justice Department from the Executive.



So what are you suggesting? That the Attorney General be elected instead of appointed?

In the past, you had ultraliberal presidents like Obama actually handpick guys like Holder and Lynch for the job. Was that acceptable in your view, having AG's being handpicked?

Yep and yep. Was it acceptable to you?
 
Barr is doing the job he was hired to do; protect Trump.

All the more reason we need to uncouple the Justice Department from the Executive.



So what are you suggesting? That the Attorney General be elected instead of appointed?

In the past, you had ultraliberal presidents like Obama actually handpick guys like Holder and Lynch for the job. Was that acceptable in your view, having AG's being handpicked?
Holder and Lynch were both Obama's "Wingmen"

We’re you happy with that arrangement?
 
Barr is doing the job he was hired to do; protect Trump.

All the more reason we need to uncouple the Justice Department from the Executive.



So what are you suggesting? That the Attorney General be elected instead of appointed?

In the past, you had ultraliberal presidents like Obama actually handpick guys like Holder and Lynch for the job. Was that acceptable in your view, having AG's being handpicked?
Holder and Lynch were both Obama's "Wingmen"


Indeed. The real scandal of the B. Hussein O Regime is that in spite of scores of scandals, not a single Special Prosecutor was appointed to get to the bottom of any of them.
 
Barr is doing the job he was hired to do; protect Trump.

All the more reason we need to uncouple the Justice Department from the Executive.



So what are you suggesting? That the Attorney General be elected instead of appointed?

In the past, you had ultraliberal presidents like Obama actually handpick guys like Holder and Lynch for the job. Was that acceptable in your view, having AG's being handpicked?

Yep and yep. Was it acceptable to you?


You're unclear here, cc.

Are you in favor of an elected federal AG?

Or did you find the Hand Picked AG's of Obama to be acceptible?
 
It’s enough to give a sane man the willies, but Barr appears up to the task.

In a senate hearing, some demonRAT female bitch axed Barr, “You don’t really mean that Trump was actually spied on”?

“Oh yes," .... (and I’m gonna get all the pricks that did it,) Barr replied.

At this point, the emergency Congressional medical team was called in to remove the body of the senator.

The rest of the demonRATs went radio silent.

They know what this means: William Barr is the modern version of Wyatt Earp......and the swamp is Dodge City!


The most inadvertently honest reaction to Attorney General William Barr’s congressional testimony this week came from former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. Mr. Barr had bluntly called out the Federal Bureau of Investigation for “spying” on the Trump campaign in 2016. Mr. Clapper said that was both “stunning and scary.” Indeed.

No doubt a lot of former Obama administration and Hillary Clinton campaign officials, opposition guns for hire, and media members are stunned and scared that the Justice Department finally has a leader willing to address the FBI’s behavior in 2016. They worked very hard to make sure such an accounting never happened. Only in that context can we understand the frantic new Democratic-media campaign to tar the attorney general.

Mr. Barr told the Senate Wednesday that one question he wants answered is why nobody at the FBI briefed the Trump campaign about concerns that low-level aides might have had inappropriate contacts with Russians. That’s “normally” what happens, Mr. Barr said, and the Trump campaign had two obvious people to brief—Rudy Giuliani and Chris Christie, both former federal prosecutors.

It wasn’t only the Trump campaign that the FBI kept in the dark. The bureau routinely briefs Congress on sensitive counterintelligence operations. Yet former Director James Comey admits he deliberately hid his work from both the House and the Senate. And the FBI kept information from yet another overseer, the judicial branch, failing to tell the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that the Clinton campaign

...snip...

Mr. Barr didn’t merely refuse to recuse; he’s made clear he plans to plumb the FBI’s actions thoroughly. That makes him Threat No. 1 to everyone who participated in these abuses, and it’s why the liberal media establishment is now disparaging his integrity. They are stunned and scared—that accountability has returned to the Justice Department.

(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...


xIMrZ8Y.jpg
Not surprisingly our Democrat Socialists believe justice is something to be meted out only to conservatives.
 

Forum List

Back
Top